Seasons1992 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Discuss. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Seasons1992 said: Discuss. Here we go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 How many Safeties are we going to field? We wont be signing any of the big safety names IMO just because they will have plenty of starting opportunities elsewhere, not sure they want to come to a place where we have 2 very good safeties in place already. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said: Discuss. No, u 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Please start....discuss 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 This really doesnt seem the way we are biulding our defense McD knows how to find secondary players We appear to be going younger on the D side of the ball We have our starting safeties.....and the backups they have been finding actually play well in reserve role Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 What’s there to discuss? We are pretty set at safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, Seasons1992 said: Discuss. No and No! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WMDman Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 If it ain’t broke don’t fix it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rc2catch Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Sure let’s sign a safety on his absolute last legs to a one year deal. Sounds like a great deal to put us over the top. I highly doubt he wants to play for a super bowl contender and he surely wants to join a rebuilding team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I'm Spartacus Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Why all the hate everyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 I only discuss why to sign someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 We have Hyde and Poyer. Hell, we don't even need a 3rd Vet Safety off the bench because they signed Rafael Bush to a multi-year deal just last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 At the right price. He is pretty old but still can play. Rather have Clinton Dix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 The 2 safeties we have play their roles pretty well - hyde can even move inside and play some nickel if needed. Emergence of Wallace and Johnson last year made the CB group a lot stronger. If you think someone might be an upgrade over Rafael bush in a "big nickel" - then i'd be interested. There aren't cap ramifications if we cut Bush, and or he could play more of a reserve role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Ours are better. /thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 He’s going to a SB contender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyjj Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Pass - dude's like 34 and done. He missed Tyler Boyd on Bengals TD vs Ravens at end of 2017 that got us in playoffs - so thanks for playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston's #1 Bills Fan Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He’s going to a SB contender Yeah...US! But, seriously, hard pass. We have something good with Hyde/Poyer and Wallace. Plus, as mentioned, he's old. Edited March 6, 2019 by Houston's #1 Bills Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, freddyjj said: Pass - dude's like 34 and done. He missed Tyler Boyd on Bengals TD vs Ravens at end of 2017 that got us in playoffs - so thanks for playing He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. ... but in decline: https://www.baltimorebeatdown.com/2019/3/5/18252353/ravens-cut-s-eric-weddle-nfl-free-agency-news-safety-released-baltimore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo1105 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 He's in decline but he is still pretty good. If you can get him on a one year deal for decent money i'd take him for his leadership abilities alone and for the depth but I'm pretty sure he will either A. Go to a contender that can win a SB or B. Go somewhere where he can start. Neither of them are Buffalo unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Your Brown Eye Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Only if he shaves, the beard doesn't fit the clean cut guys needed for the Process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyjj Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. Made it on rep/name only this past year, stats are very blah Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 33 BAL FS 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 3 1.0 68 54 14 2 4 9 No picks, no forced fumbles, no recoveries, no TDs and one sack with 3 passes defended. 68 TT Poyer Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 27 BUF FS 21 16 16 4 11 0 11 6 1 0 1 0 0 2.0 100 73 27 9 3 I keep the younger dude with better stats. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seasons1992 Posted March 6, 2019 Author Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Your Brown Eye said: Only if he shaves, the beard doesn't fit the clean cut guys needed for the Process Finally, someone who gets the thread! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Just now, freddyjj said: Made it on rep/name only this past year, stats are very blah Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 33 BAL FS 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 3 1.0 68 54 14 2 4 9 No picks, no forced fumbles, no recoveries, no TDs and one sack with 3 passes defended. 68 TT Poyer Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 27 BUF FS 21 16 16 4 11 0 11 6 1 0 1 0 0 2.0 100 73 27 9 3 I keep the younger dude with better stats. I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerlyofCtown Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Because we dont need him. We have the #1 pass D in the NFL due to one of the best secondaries in the NFL. The only position we need is a hybrid S. Which he does not fit the bill for. You may see us grab another LB and use Milano in that role. 2 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. We have the number 1 pass D in the NFL. He also has other stats as well as Ints. 100 tackles, 2 sacks.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyjj Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. Poyer had 33% more tackles, 7 more TFLs and more QB hits and sacks too. Weddle was exposed in coverage last year. Father time is undefeated. Andrew Wingard is name to watch in draft at S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobills1212 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 If ur going to ask people discuss, you could at least set the table a little better and provide some context. This is just lazy fandom. Its not face book and as others have brought you up to speed, explaining why YOU think this would be a good idea would have been the only redeeming qlty. Why should someone discuss something almost seemingly to amuse you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 16 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t really disagree but you know INTs isn’t always the best way to evaluate defensive backs right? Trust me, I love our pair. But Weddle did start for the number 1 defense in the nfl. He’s really good even if he is aging. That said, not a big need and he will likely take a team friendly deal with a SB contender. It's not a need. Depth maybe, but we have no need for a starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 23 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Because we dont need him. We have the #1 pass D in the NFL due to one of the best secondaries in the NFL. The only position we need is a hybrid S. Which he does not fit the bill for. You may see us grab another LB and use Milano in that role. We have the number 1 pass D in the NFL. He also has other stats as well as Ints. 100 tackles, 2 sacks.... Oh yeah, for sure. No disagreement. I do believe our pass defense was slightly improved because a bunch of games where we got blown out and teams were just killing the clock. But agreed Weddle is not a need. I have a soft spot for him because I was huge fan of his out of college. He will have no problems catching on to a team though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Man Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) 50 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: He made the pro bowl this year. He’s really good. People judge players off Pro Bowl appearances? Wow. You do realise the Pro Bowl is simply a popularity contest? Edited March 6, 2019 by Mountain Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerlyofCtown Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Oh yeah, for sure. No disagreement. I do believe our pass defense was slightly improved because a bunch of games where we got blown out and teams were just killing the clock. But agreed Weddle is not a need. I have a soft spot for him because I was huge fan of his out of college. He will have no problems catching on to a team though. Even when they tried it was tough. The only thing I want for our D is a penetrating DT. If that was all they added to it I would be happy. I would like to somehow complete the D but I could live with just that. What I mean with complete the D is we have no hybrid S. I dont think Weddle could fill that role or I would say grab him. I do think Barr would allow Milano to play that role. Barr will get harassed a bit in the lockerroom for a bit though. I think we all know why Lol. Edited March 6, 2019 by formerlyofCtown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 The #1 pass defense, #2 overall defense vs. the 31st offense makes choices obvious. Everything gets better with a stud O Line and they have the pics and $ to do it. As someone stated pic you’re offensive toys after LT with #9. Lots of excellent TE’s. Depending on the analyst, there are 3-4 TE’s who have first round grades. The two Iowa kids, the AL guy, and the BC kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderweb Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 hours ago, Seasons1992 said: Discuss. If you wish to start a discussion, begin with yourself.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsbackto81 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 2 hours ago, freddyjj said: Made it on rep/name only this past year, stats are very blah Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 33 BAL FS 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 3 1.0 68 54 14 2 4 9 No picks, no forced fumbles, no recoveries, no TDs and one sack with 3 passes defended. 68 TT Poyer Game Game Def Def Def Def Def Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Fumb Tack Tack Tack Tack Tack Age Tm Pos No. G GS Int Yds TD Lng PD FF Fmb FR Yds TD Sk Comb Solo Ast TFL QBHits Sfty AV 27 BUF FS 21 16 16 4 11 0 11 6 1 0 1 0 0 2.0 100 73 27 9 3 I keep the younger dude with better stats. God I hate it when stats are posted like this. I feel like I'm watching The Matrix. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 No....rebuild by adding young players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 I've got your discus right here pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenryJones Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 I have a reason as to why it would make sense. To play chess with Tom Brady, by disguising coverages. Replace a great leader in Kyle with him. Assist our young secondary (Tre/Levi/Taron). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJS Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 He's still alive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts