Jump to content

Do the Kansas City Chiefs deserve a bye week ?


HOUSE

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Nephilim17 said:

Buffalo essentially had a bye week by not playing over 3 and a half quarters of football.

 

Yes, we had a devastating injury but you're kidding yourself if you think other serious injuries couldn't have occurred with the time remaining.

 

How would you feel if in the third quarter of that game Morse gets concussed again? Or Diggs gets a high ankle sprain? Or Milano gets hurt? It could have happened.

 

Accept it and be glad we don't go to Arrowhead this post season. Life isn't fair. Move on.

A bye week in which they lost their starting free safety for the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

A bye week in which they lost their starting free safety for the season. 

Sorry, but your logic does not preclude any other Bills from getting injured for over 3 and a half quarters of football if they were to have played the rest of the game.

 

The fact is the Bills didn't play over 3 and a half quarters of football. So not exactly a bye but they missed the vast majority of the game. The truth is they didn't play anywhere near to a full football game against Cinci.

Is this the ideal outcome? No. but I think it's reasonable and choose to move on. Others can continue to feel victimized by it if that helps them process their emotions or get through the week.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nephilim17 said:

Sorry, but your logic does not preclude any other Bills from getting injured for over 3 and a half quarters of football if they were to have played the rest of the game.

 

The fact is the Bills didn't play over 3 and a half quarters of football. So not exactly a bye but they missed the vast majority of the game. The truth is they didn't play anywhere near to a full football game against Cinci.

Is this the ideal outcome? No. but I think it's reasonable and choose to move on. Others can continue to feel victimized by it if that helps them process their emotions or get through the week.

 

I get that, but please don't use "bye" when they lose a starting safety and see a major piece (Taron Johnson) get put in concussion protocol. I realize it could have been worse on the injury front.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Irv said:

They backed in to the #1 seed over two teams that kicked their ass.  

I predict they will be one-and-done and this neutral-site nonsense will never go down.

 

Can’t wait for the Rat’s next epic meltdown in it’s final game, 3rd time in 3 straight years will be funny af.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, HOUSE said:

The fair solution was no bye week in the AFC. 

 

The only way it is fair is if no bye week in NFC as well and no way is that voted in.

Remember any change needs to be voted by supermajority of owners or representatives.

38 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

I get that, but please don't use "bye" when they lose a starting safety and see a major piece (Taron Johnson) get put in concussion protocol. I realize it could have been worse on the injury front.

 

Josh also had his leg deliberately rolled on.

 

Funny (but not funny ha ha) how Bills and Bengals were friends after injury but not before.

 

Bills and Bengals will likely meet in playoffs and should talk about a scrimmage combined with social events before and after it.  This will decrease tensions in playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

I get that, but please don't use "bye" when they lose a starting safety and see a major piece (Taron Johnson) get put in concussion protocol. I realize it could have been worse on the injury front.

Fair enough. 

I get people are upset and need to express it (this is a message board); I'm just suggesting we accept what is and what we can control and look forward.

Let's destroy the fish, rest our starters with a big lead, and escape that game with no injuries. Go Bills!!!! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL had to do something, and apparently making-up the Buffalo-Cincinnati game wasn't a viable option for the league.

 

Considering the Chiefs ended up as the only AFC team with 14 wins, you really can't argue with them getting some of the #1 seed benefits.  But since the Bills also could have easily gotten the #1 seed (had the game not been cancelled), they really can't argue with losing homefield over us.  This was an OK compromise.  

 

There are basically three advantages of the #1 seed.

1. The first-round bye

2. Homefield advantage 

3. Lower seeded opponents

 

My problem is the Chiefs getting 2/3 of these benefits, and still having the nerve to complain about getting screwed.  And it's not even like they totally lost homefield and have to play in Buffalo.  They get a neutral field that puts both teams on equal footing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We made out. We get to play Miami instead of the Chargers, which we would have had to play, most likely, if we got the #1 seed. Yea, we have to play Cincy in the divisionals probably, but would have had to play them in Week 17 anyway in order to have the bye. So it's a push. We can't avoid them. We got our bye last week. Plus, if we had lost to Cincy in Week 17, we would have had to go there again in the divisionals, then to KC. 

Edited by chongli
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the solution created by the NFL and then discussed, vetted, and ratified by the ownership yes, in fact, the Chiefs deserved the bye.  That does not mean I agree with it, but last I checked the NFL and the owners did not ask me; nor anyone on this board.

 

This is why I like this board so much, we get to present and entertain many views both normative to our own beliefs and others so far out of reach it is intriguing to wonder how someone comes up with such "curious" questions.

 

Go Bills!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Joe Ferguson said:

Chiefs deserved it. It wouldn't be an issue if Allen didn't fumble at the goal line against the Vikings


i don’t know. I wondered about that a couple of weeks ago. If we won the Vikings game, would it have changed the sense of urgency at the end of the Lions game, for instance, when we couldn’t afford to lose another game in large part due to the Vikings game and the urgency to win the game at the end of the 4th quarter so that there would be no chance of going to OT? (to avoid another potential outcome LIKE the Vikings game?)
 

It might sound silly on the surface but as Von and many other players have pointed out “you learn more from the losses than the wins” and all I know is we have not lost a “close game” since that Vikings game. 
 

All I am saying is that, if we won that Vikings game, it doesn’t automatically mean we still would have won every game after that

Edited by BobBelcher
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unpopular opinion I'm sure but here goes.

 

Ignoring the losses we took because that doesn't matter.

 

The league rule says divert back to winning % which gives KC home field and the bye. 

 

They had to give up home field on a technicality, if they pushed they could have got both. 

 

Buffalo had a tragedy and they done the right thing by getting off the field and being with their teammate. 

 

That doesn't mean other people have to accommodate them though. It's a good life lesson, doing the right thing doesn't bring a parade, just shows your character. Actually it usually makes things harder, just as it has here.

 

I know KC was a beneficiary of someone else's tragedy, but it's not their fault. 

 

Persevere and prevail to be the victor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the league did a pretty good job of "splitting the baby in half", given the circumstances. As a Bills fan, I feel the Bills came out of the situation pretty well.  If anything, the Bengals have might feel they got the short end of the stick. Up to the moment it became apparent how serious Hamlin's injury was, I was preoccupied with how Burrow was carving up the Bills defense and the prospect of the Bills falling to the 3 seed.

 

If the Bengals end up coming to Buffalo for the divisional round and lose in a close game they're likely to feel that they would have won if the game had been played in Cincinnati -- that they were screwed by circumstances beyond their control.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, HOUSE said:

The fair solution was no bye week in the AFC. 

Then KC fans would’ve complained that they didn’t have the opportunity to earn the 1 seed themselves. It’s a lose-lose situation for everybody. Obviously only thing that would’ve worked was a rematch, but doesn’t matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BananaB said:

I’m not sure if I truly wanted a bye. We always win after a bye but then we kind of slow down. Can’t have that in playoffs. 

 

I think the solution was about as fair as gets but wanted to comment on this.

 

Its not just about the bye.  Would you rather play Miami, Bengals, Chiefs to get the SB or Chargers and one of Bengals/Chiefs?  One is far far easier than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

I think the solution was about as fair as gets but wanted to comment on this.

 

It’s not just about the bye.  Would you rather play Miami, Bengals, Chiefs to get the SB or Chargers and one of Bengals/Chiefs?  One is far far easier than the other.

Yeah there is an easier route but if you come out of a bye not playing your best football you’re gonna get eliminated anyway.  We can beat anyone, they have proved that. Now it’s time to put it all together and go do it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s going to be a cloud, but to say they didn’t deserve it is a bit unfair. They went 14-3 so it’s hard to say they didn’t earn it. That being said they are a flawed 14-3 and they will definitely have a game on their hands if they have to play Jacksonville (I don’t believe the Chargers are a very good team) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

 (I don’t believe the Chargers are a very good team) 

IMO, the Chargers are a very talented team with a below-average coach. On the bright side for Bills fans, the Herbert Chargers have always played the Chiefs close, e.g. losing by three in both games this year and splitting with them last year. I think it's quite possible that if the Chargers played the Chiefs in the division round, the AFC championship game could end up in Buffalo after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, HOUSE said:

The #1 seed is not determined by win percentage 

 

It's also not determined by h2h tiebreakers when you don't finish tied.

 

11 hours ago, PetermansRedemption said:

If the NFL wanted to proceed this way, the Chiefs should have randomly had one of their games excluded. Draw a number 1-16, that week doesn’t count for the Chiefs. 

 

one of those games could have been the Bills game.  Then you lose the tiebreaker.  This place would melt down.

 

one of those games could have been the Bengals game.....talk about completely screwing the Bengals..KC would get the 1 outright....Cincy would get an L and thus lose any shot they had at better seeding period.  THey'd also have lost the division title.  

 

This was not a good solution and rightly was not considered.

 

Also, lets say the game that doesn't count for KC is Seattle.  That game off the board for Seahawks would have meant Packers and Lions instantly eliminated before week 18.  

 

That whole idea was bad.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, HOUSE said:

I will take it to my grave, the Chiefs should be playing this weekend same as the Bills.

The Chiefs won the #1 seed while Buffalo had no chance

Free bye week on a technicality 

 

I think the Chiefs deserve a week of hard labor. I suggest looking for your wallet. Only if they find it do they get a bye! 

 

No trips to Cancun for you, KC! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, special-teams said:

NO!  Makes little sense both the Bengals and Bills beat them in regular season play.  BUT - - Mahomes is the NFL poster boy for the AFC and it's not going to change.

But…..winning% matters.  Obv.  We are where we are.  Enjoy the ride

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ABSOLUTLEY NOT!!!

 

The Chiefs were handed the #1 seed that they did NOT earn.

 

They LOST to both Bengals AND the Bills. They LOST to the two teams, that not by anything they did, nor their lack of performance on the field, have been screwed over.

 

The Chiefs cannot be called the best team AFC. They lucked out on the back of Damar Hamlin’s tragedy.

 

If they end up winning the Super Bowl it will be forever cheapened by this.

 

The Bills have to show their resiliency and win the Super Bowl this year, despite all the obstacles and challenges of both the team and the community.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but a complete freak thing happened and no one was going to be happy. I think the Bengals have the biggest beef personally. 
 

but if we really are a SB team, there is zero reason to not be able to win our first 2 games to get to a neutral field (which I think helps us in a weird way).

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2023 at 7:42 AM, HOUSE said:

I will take it to my grave, the Chiefs should be playing this weekend same as the Bills.

The Chiefs won the #1 seed while Buffalo had no chance

Free bye week on a technicality 

Complaint with no alternative solution ….atta boy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...