Jump to content

Bills cuts


Chandler#81

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, whorlnut said:

Saying a guy doesn’t fit the culture based on assuming something is pretty sad. Did it ever occur to you thats just how he might be?  What?  He doesn’t fit the “culture” because he’s laid back?  Wow…carry on…

i hope I'm wrong.  Laid back isn't the description I'd use.  We'll see.  I'm a Bills fan.  i hope he's the next Freddie..  Just don't see it.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bruffalo said:

We had one of the best offenses in the league and didn't lose anyone besides Cole, who was on his way out anyways.  We invested with two rookies that seem to be solid pickups, and a savvy vet WR in Crowder in case McKenzie isn't up to snuff.

 

I'm really not worried. 

 

We lost Sanders and Bessley both of whom were past their best.... the question is have we improved at all on offense? To my mind we have three legit threats - Diggs, Davis and Knox. The rest of our offensive weapons for Josh are JAGs until proven otherwise. I like McKenzie a lot have high hopes he truly breaks out. I liked the Shakir pick a lot too... but they are both still in the gotta prove it territory. If any of our three main guys go down do we have enough people to dictate matchups? 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

Howard is a horrendous move all over. If we’re going to bring in a third TE, or just go with Knox and Morris, then just about ok though the cap hit isn’t good. If we keep Sweeney ahead of him considering his weaknesses and cap hit difference, it’s bizarre.

Chris Herndon got released by New Orleans, he's been a serviceable TE for some time. Would probably be an upgrade over Sweeney

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

The offense was the reason their season nearly got derailed last year… I know everyone here loves their playmakers but once any sort of injuries hit they lack depth just about everywhere. 

And the defense was the reason the season came to an end.  

 

Saying that the depth players aren't as good as their playmakers isn't really saying anything at all.  That's the case around the league. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

We lost Sanders and Bessley both of whom were past their best.... the question is have we improved at all on offense? To my mind we have three legit threats - Diggs, Davis and Knox. The rest of our offensive weapons for Josh are JAGs until proven otherwise. I like McKenzie a lot have high hopes he truly breaks out. I liked the Shakir pick a lot too... but they are both still in the gotta prove it territory. If any of our three main guys go down do we have enough people to dictate matchups? 

I expect we will have a significantly improved running game with the addition of Saffold and a frankly much better OL coach.  We have Allen, he dictates everything a defense has to do.  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

I think we keep only two Tight Ends: Knox and Morris.

 

Could see that happening as they also have Gillian.  Likely Sweeney will make it to PS so could bring him back if needed.  The only thing questionalbe is the talk of them running more 2 TE sets, then would think you'd want 3 on 53.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Not terribly surprised after seeing him continuously playing late in preseason games, but I don’t love any of the options currently behind Knox. Can’t believe how much they  most NFL teams struggle to identify TE talent/depth. Guess we’ll see if Morris is that guy. 

 

I fixed it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

No! Brutal was releasing Star.  This is a significant hit, but far from brutal

I disagree. Star left us with §5.2M dead cap but he played here what, 3 seasons? Howard didn't play a snap and leaves us with $3,2M dead cap. That is much worse imo.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bruffalo said:

I expect we will have a significantly improved running game with the addition of Saffold and a frankly much better OL coach.  We have Allen, he dictates everything a defense has to do.  

 

That is certainly the glass half full view. I hope you are right. If our big 3 stay healthy I am relaxed about our offense. I do worry about our ability to withstand a significant injury (say even a 5 or 6 week one) for one of those 3. I appreciate that might be the glass half empty perspective but I have to be honest about how I see it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Beane says one thing about protecting Josh and does another by going all in on defense. 
 

Time will tell and I know I repeated myself all off-season, but their playing 2nd fiddle to the offense was a disappointing approach. 

Sorry but offense was not the problem when we lost to the chiefs...    

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Agree… With Howard being cut, their only significant offensive FA added to the off-season was an aging Roger Saffold. 😅

 

Nice of you to add the "aging" in there.  Not like you have an agenda or anything. :lol:

 

Crowder is a proven vet WR, but I guess he means nothing to you.  OJ was a good swing and miss.  Quessenberry will probably start at RT.  Mancz will be a backup C.

 

Oh, and they also brought back Bates, which IS a FA transaction.

 

Keep crusading, man.

 

Edited by eball
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I am as disappointed as you. I liked the Howard pick up as a low risk, high reward offensive piece and I am really disappointed it has failed. In terms of passing targets for Josh it is really Sanders and Beasley out, Crowder (low ceiling vet), Shakir (5th round rookie) and Cook (2nd round rookie receiving back) in. Have they done enough? Only time will tell but it is a legit question to ask. 

I agree with your post, But I find It’s a strange question to ask.  Where do we stack up right now against every other team in the league?  We’re the favorites according to most.   At least point, it’s about  going to work and rolling the dice to see how the season plays out.  Outside variables other than roster construction often play major roles in how many teams’ seasons are ended.  The many rosters are good enough.  Our roster last year, was good enough.  One flip of the coin and this could’ve ended much differently.  
 

I think they’ve done enough…., I think many teams have done enough. Now it’s time to play the game.  Time to outwork our opponents.  Time to want it more than our opponents. Time for our coaches our opponents.  Time to see which unpredictable variables come into play and have positive or negative effects on our season.   The football gods will have their say.  Luck plays a role in whether or not we can say a FO had “done enough” in the offseason.  I thought they did enough last year.  Had the coin come up tails, we might still have been celebrating.  Lots of luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gordong said:

Sorry but offense was not the problem when we lost to the chiefs...    

 

No that is fair. But it was the reason the Chief game was at Arrowhead and we were not the #1 seed. Offense vs Pitt. Offense vs Jags. Win those two against two teams we are clearly better than and we are home throughout January. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:

Well I certainly don’t throw out false predictions every week like someone here…. “Hammer the over against Carolina, bills backs ups are going to wipe the floor with them”😅

 

 

Did I say that?  I honestly don't remember.  If I did, it was (a) before the Panthers announced they would play their starters, and (b) because betting the overs in preseason is almost always a good call.

 

I'll stand by my predictions over the past five years with no apologies or regrets whatsoever.  You're the one who should be hiding his face around here.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

I disagree. Star left us with §5.2M dead cap but he played here what, 3 seasons? Howard didn't play a snap and leaves us with $3,2M dead cap. That is much worse imo.

 

Well they don't let you spread the $5.2 mil over 3 seasons, so is still a $5.2 hit this year.  Thought Howard was a $2.6 mil hit.  Either way it's still less and $3 mil is not a brutal cap hit.  It might look bad as he never played, but not the first time i nthe NFL that has happened and often for larger cap hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BillsFanSD said:

I don't get the hand-wringing over Howard's cap hit.  That was a sunk cost, right?  Not a reason to keep a guy around if the coaches felt like Morris was a better option.

 

It's a bit frustrating that we spent a couple mil that could've been used anywhere else on a flyer for a guy who never even makes it out of the preseason, but it is what it is... Domino effect from the McKissic shenanigans is real..

 

McKissic dips, we give his money to Howard, draft Cook and then cut Howard.  

 

I'd rather have Cook than McKissic, by far.. but if McKissic signed, we aren't out dead cap and likely use our RD2 pick on a different position. 

 

Edited by SCBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

seems dumb as a rock.  I didn't like his response to being drafted by the Bills.  That said, he might be Adrian Peterson reincarnate.  I hope so.  Don't see him as the next Freddie

 

Yeah, hes a lot better than Freddie

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Airseven said:

Howard cut is rather brutal on several fronts

 

So too, I'm finding, are your posts.

 

It's all well and good to critique what the GM does -- we all do it -- but hyperbole is hyperbole.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...