Joe Ferguson forever

y

I'd just ignore you but my back issues playing up and I'm bored sitting around. Do you think maybe someone above her in Justice might have ordered her to filed the declaration or did this middling US attorney decide to do this on her own. She prosecuted both epstein and Maxwell. One died in prison and one is rotting away there. Seems she wass pretty good at her job. SCAPEGOAT!!!! one of trump's calling cards. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/16/maurene-comey-fired-doj-00458921?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR67MlRGaK6sdkMnNr7kYdyMMZtUsCS4XQ6PP9Jg3RMMYyKDnTrQnB7G5vQmyQ_aem_3KxNPH-8jxmuASkIpIhTEA Comey, who had worked in the U.S. attorney’s office for nearly a decade, prosecuted both Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. In recent weeks, President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi have faced a firestorm of criticism over their decision not to release additional files related to Epstein, the disgraced financier who was accused of running a child sex trafficking ring. Prosecutors in the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, including Comey, charged Epstein in 2019 with sex trafficking of minors. He died by suicide in jail while awaiting trial on those charges. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in prison. She is appealing her conviction. Wh was head of Justice in 2019?

keep trying. someday you might still get into law school. There are many and I hear it's easy to get in.

We all are aware that GROK is unbiased. At least O'Connor isn't a Jewish name. Imagine grok's answer if he was named Steinberg... And you left this part of grok's answer out: However, critics argue the investigation may be politically motivated, potentially undermining its oversight status. Compliance depends on the committee's process and legal adherence. For details, see HHS HIPAA Guidance. His lawyer advised him correctly.

from CBS news O'Connor's attorneys, David Schertler and Mark MacDougall, said he declined to answer lawmakers' questions based on doctor-patient privilege and his rights under the Fifth Amendment. In a statement to the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, the attorneys said that the "totality of the circumstances surrounding this Committee's investigation leave Dr. O'Connor no choice but to decline to answer questions," while emphasizing that asserting Fifth Amendment privilege "does not imply that Dr. O'Connor has committed any crime. Schertler is correct. perhaps it has something to do with frequency https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-deposed-ny-ag-civil-probe-business-practices-rcna42355

who was in charge of intelligence then?

you try so hard. and you're very trying. Are you a hippa lawyer? It's a very complex area. Some lawyers do nothing else. If a question deals with a patients condition, I'd doubt there is a HIPAA lawyer who would counsel to answer the question except if there was a HIPAA subpoena. Perhaps they'll get one. I'd guess the testimony would not be made public in that instance. re criminal penalties and jail you are simply wrong.

read the law. we were required to attend classes on it. Criminal Penalties. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of the Privacy Rule may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase to $100,000 and up to five years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses, and to $250,000 and up to 10 years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves the intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm. The Department of Justice is responsible for criminal prosecutions under the Priv a specific HIPAA subpoena is required to give info protected by the statute and under very specific circumstances. Was there a specific HIPPA subpoena? Let's see it. A HIPAA subpoena is a legal document that compels healthcare providers to release protected health information (PHI) that they would typically be prohibited from disclosing under HIPAA privacy rules. Compliance with the subpoena requires that the request is valid and that the provider follows specific procedures to ensure patient notification and minimal disclosure of information.

ummm, he could go to jail for violating the HIPAA laws, not to mention physician ethics requirements if he gave details about a patient. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/resources/health-insurance-portability-and-accountability-act-of-1996-hipaa.html Criminal Penalties. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of the Privacy Rule may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase to $100,000 and up to five years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses, and to $250,000 and up to 10 years imprisonment if the wrongful conduct involves the intent to sell, transfer, or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm. The Department of Justice is responsible for criminal prosecutions under the Priv

Remember Alexander Acosta? The guy that let Epstein off and then got elevated by trump to his cabinet? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-s-labor-secretary-alex-acosta-resigns-after-criticism-over-n1029226

nope. trump started by being tight with Epstein for years and posing for pictures with him and the girls.

they choose to ignore the obvious contradictions: "elites" are doing very well under trump: huge tax breaks, legal protections., etc. and the maga's hate "elites" don't ya know.. They even loved musk for a while.

a pedo investigating a pedo. awesome. MAGA justice!

would you be satisfied with this? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/lauren-boebert-matt-gaetz-epstein-files-b2790074.html

Fox knew and so did the millions of idiots that watch Fox and friends. No one said that trump won because of his promise there to unveil the epstein files but his recurring chorus of taking down the "deep state" was a pivotal issue to you conspiracists. Now he's and insider rather than the outsider he claimed to be. And you're fine with that. btw, you were the first to post the interview....