Jump to content

Joe Ferguson forever

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,966
  • Joined

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Virginia

Recent Profile Visitors

4,086 profile views

Joe Ferguson forever's Achievements

All Pro

All Pro (7/8)

2.6k

Reputation

  1. Comparing porn stars to his daughter. Stormy’s not ashamed of her manner of making a living…
  2. Never looked into this cuz I never thought it plausible. Thank you. But I don't think Blasey- Ford concocted her story. Kavanaugh is Tucker carlson on SCOTUS- an obnoxious, priviledged, arrogant preppy. Releasing the writings of anyone with mental health issues is way wrong unless they agree to release them (some authors and artists).
  3. Knives out...et tu brute? They smell blood https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4650094-kristi-noem-cuts-off-dogged-fox-business-host-enough-stuart/
  4. It wouldn't surprise me if much of the MAGA cult actually admire his bullying and domination of this 27 year old woman.
  5. He's too busy anesthetizing, intubating, ventilating, reviving and monitoring critically ill surgical patients, don't you know....
  6. No, she killed her chances by admitting to being a heartless B word...
  7. She's cooked. Even the National Review is calling her out. And the interview on CBS was just cringeworthy. She wouldn't say whether she met Kim but said she had removed the passage about him from her book. She thinks the cult is stupid and she's right. Luckily it's only 30% of the electorate. https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/noems-dog-icidal-no-apology-tour-fails-to-convince/
  8. the justices unanimously signed a document explaining the rules of ethics. There was no "slamming" of D senators in the signed letter. You and the writer of this article are mischaracterizing it at best, lying at worst. The letter in no way implies that they unanimously agree that all members are following them. The chief justice's refusal to appear before a senate subcommittee based on the premise that few other justices have appeared before congress is weak but within his rights. This is the case example I alluded to: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a272_9p6b.pdf. Others have cited other examples. Watch the hearings and find out.....
  9. The thread is about Uncle Clarence. If you can't keep up, drop out. Such language described by Orwell is called doublespeak. It is explained by William Lutz, author of the book “Doublespeak”, as language which “makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant appear attractive or at least tolerable. It is language that conceals or prevents thought.”
  10. Too bad the R operatives don't agree with the MAGA's here. She being the VP candidate would add a couple percentage points to the D ticket. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4642282-noem-scott-burgum-trump-vp/ “She’s just done, too much drama,” said one Republican senator who stays in touch with Trump.
  11. https://unherd.com/newsroom/the-strange-trajectory-of-tucker-carlsons-first-100-shows/ Genuine growth would come from working to broaden that declining base, not merely shoring it up. According to insiders, while the absence of a traditional corporate structure has granted Carlson increased autonomy, it has also eliminated a crucial layer of editorial oversight. These sources have noted a shift towards targeting a less discerning audience, emphasising sensationalism over substantive discourse in order to keep the attention of more credulous viewers — one insider notes a current “audience minus about 10-15 IQ points from the prime-time show” — interested in space aliens and Obama’s alleged gay trysts. Sounds about right.
  12. i'd like folks like you to disappear. Unfortunately that isn't going to happen. But thanks for playing...Maybe a reading comprehension class would help. You mistook opacity for transparency. It's orwellian doublespeak and you're not good at it.
  13. read the article again. He ruled for opacity that stood to benefit trump and his own wife. "Alone among the justices, Clarence Thomas said he would have granted Trump’s request to keep the documents on hold."
  14. You're as intellectually dishonest as Thomas. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-allows-jan-6-committee-to-get-trump-presidential-documents#:~:text=6 committee to get Trump presidential documents,-Politics Jan 19&text=WASHINGTON (AP) — In a,6 insurrection.
×
×
  • Create New...