Jump to content

Rd 2, Pick 63 (31): RB James Cook, Georgia


Hapless Bills Fan

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

That take couldn't make less sense in this context.

 

This type of draft is the exact opposite of that philosophy.

 

It was a draft to address immediate needs that you think will help you in the very short term.

 

The way you maintain a team with a $250M QB on it is to keep infusing cheap talent into the expensive premium positions of your systems..........because it's THOSE players you can't afford to keep after contract 1 or replace in free agency with a $250M QB.

 

Any team can afford a Levi Wallace or JD McKissic or a slot receiver,  punter etc............even one's with $250M QB.

 

Just a note that whether he develops as a press CB2, remains to be determined, but it is highly doubtful whether the Bills drafted Kaiir Elam to be a "Levi Wallace".

From https://www.nfl.com/prospects/kaiir-elam/3200454c-4155-0002-a198-92eda6859fa9

Strengths

Desired size, length and strength for press man.

Well-balanced with ability to crowd and stuff the release.

Patient feet rarely fall for release fakes.

Able to swivel hips and pursue with fluidity.

Mirrors shifting routes with basketball agility.

Rarely bites on the cheese against double moves.

Allows receiver to close the cushion for him in Cover 3 and quarters coverage.

Squeezes deep sideline routes with physicality.

Contested catches are typically tilted in his favor.

Solid transition quickness to plant and drive on the throw.

Some improvement in his tackling on 2021 tape.

 

Richard Sherman (FWIW) commented that the physical traits are there and the gaps in his game are (in Sherman's opinion of course) eminently correctable with coaching.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Awwufelloff said:

Singletary will be our 1st and 2nd down RB. Cook is a weapon that can literally be used anywhere. Excited to see what plays they design for him.

literally anywhere? Sometimes people don't know how to use the word literally

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Do you realize that he trains in the offseason with Motor?  

Did not. Makes me feel better

10 hours ago, PrimeTime101 said:

Im going to shed some light on this whole thing. His father died less then 2 years ago. He was his personal trainer.. his life... they had a very close relationship. At the presser he wore a picture of his father. This is a dude that does not like to show true emotions. I am sure his father had his favorite teams and he had his favorite teams. 

 

Also at the presser he talked about "it not hitting him yet"

 

The dude is going through a wide range of emotions.  Jim Kelly did not want to play for the Bills at all... Maybe this kid wanted to play/live where its warmer? who knowns. 1 week in buffalo with teamates will be all it takes.. 

Thanks brother

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ya Digg? said:

So we all see a video of a guy who isn’t doing backflips after getting drafted, but why does everyone have to have that reaction? Have you watched other interviews from him where he shows tons of emotion that would make you think this way? Maybe he’s just a calm guy by nature, maybe he didn’t feel the need to ham it up for the camera…to me your thinking is the 20 years of drought thinking. The Bills are a destination now, players want to play in Buffalo

wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning. Just observing what I saw. Go Bills!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

1) No........right off the bat you've somehow misunderstood my philosophy.

 

A team is never "set" at premium positions.

You read all my posts.........how many times have I told the Aaron Donald story? 100?

Thinking that you are "set" in the rapidly changing NFL is the first step onto the slippery slope of needy drafting.

 

 

So let me get this straight.  The positions I mentioned the Bills as being "set" at were QB and WR1 and LT.

Should one conclude you believe we should have drafted a LT or a QB at the bottom of the 1st, while we have Josh Allen signed for $258M through 2028 and Dawkins signed for 3 more years with $12M dead cap, simply because those are the positions which get resigned easy-peasy for >$20M?

 

C'mon man.

 

I'm pretty sure that if a pass rusher or WR the Bills liked with a 1st round grade had fallen to them, they would have pulled the trigger, but we were at the spot in the first round where the guy drafted ahead of us projects as an inside LB, and the next DE has "underdeveloped pass rush" as a tag, then folks were drafting IOL and safety.

Question: what exactly do you believe the Bills should have done with Pick 25 in the 1st round of the 2022 NFL draft?

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Simon said:

 

And sometimes people are incapable of seeing things which clearly exist.

When you make a statement and then will not supply an example, doesn't that speak a little bit to the credibility of the statement? I would like to see who chased him down from behind and what was the situation on that play. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, nucci said:

literally anywhere? Sometimes people don't know how to use the word literally

and by anywhere he means at his natural position of RB or lined up on the line of scrimmage as a receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Looks like one of those reads that scouts will want to forget they wrote in a couple of years.   Often times players going into the league is all about the fit and how they are used in the league.   Word is he has blitz pickup chops.....he has pedigree.....and his strengths are obvious on tape.   Why in the world would we take a bellcow back that takes the ball OUT of Josh Allen's hands?   We are a passing team.   And I also dont buy that he cant carry the ball.   He fit into a nitch with his college team and they had someone else run the ball between the tackles.  As an outside zone runner?  I think he fits it perfectly.

You are making things up.  He is not a 4.8 guy.....Where in the F do you get that from.

Those holes that Singletary goes thru, Cook will go through faster. We have had two of the slowest RB's in the league and now we have a guy that can make some huge plays.....i believe if he is used to his strengths this will be an incredible player for us.  Singletary still has value but this guy is dynamite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

When you make a statement and then will not supply an example, doesn't that speak a little bit to the credibility of the statement? I would like to see who chased him down from behind and what was the situation on that play. 

 

Since we're on a football message board and not in a court of law, I'll suggest that it's OK to offer an opinion without committing a bunch of my life to providing video evidence to those who won't do their own homework.

You're free to regard that opinion as credible or not.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

So let me get this straight.  The positions I mentioned the Bills as being "set" at were QB and WR1 and LT.

Should one conclude you believe we should have drafted a LT or a QB at the bottom of the 1st, while we have Josh Allen signed for $258M through 2028 and Dawkins signed for 3 more years with $12M dead cap, simply because those are the positions which get resigned easy-peasy for >$20M?

 

C'mon man.

 

I'm pretty sure that if a pass rusher or WR the Bills liked with a 1st round grade had fallen to them, they would have pulled the trigger, but we were at the spot in the first round where the guy drafted ahead of us projects as an inside LB, and the next DE has "underdeveloped pass rush" as a tag, then folks were drafting IOL and safety.

Question: what exactly do you believe the Bills should have done with Pick 25 in the 1st round of the 2022 NFL draft?

 

 

 

First off.........I would have expected the GM to be on the phone and feeling out the trade up market.    Which was far cheaper than normal.   If trading the second round pick was off the table then that was a mistake.   You need to know your limitations........the second round has been a black hole for Beane.   IMO, you either believe there are reasons for your behavior and their results.........or you aren't self aware and do not.  

 

Yes, I would have taken a LT if the right player was there or reachable.   I had Penning rated very high.    Dawkins can be moved or the player can be moved inside to develop into a LT.   I'm of the opinion that if you get 7 years out of a bad bodied LT like Dawkins you've gotten every bit of what you could have expected.   And that 7th year is right around the corner.   I know @GunnerBill agrees with me about LT not being "set".

 

But why are you going there when 13 WR's went in the first 2 rounds?    And I wouldn't have been averse to taking an edge rusher either.    Why not?   They are carrying 9 or 10 DL and Shaq is a scrub and Epenesa is a disappointment with no production and Basham is an unknown with questionable upside going into his age 25 season.

 

I would have come out of this draft with Jameson Williams.    Perhaps I wouldn't have James Cook or Bernard but I would have had a potential $30M receiver.

 

But let's say the teams in front of me refused to take my superior offer for whatever reason.

 

I take Christian Watson.    And if he were gone I take Jermaine Johnson.    And if he were gone,  Boye Mafe.

 

Because in the Bills system those are premium positions......islands where they are earning their pay without being covered up by position or scheme..........and if they pan out the team would feel compelled to extend them.

 

I'm not sure that's the case with Elam.

 

If they were a press man team,  maybe that's different.   But they play zone.   He will be shielded by the system.

 

He could play well but they could easily decide that they could just plug in a Dane Jackson or Levi Wallace level type of player and be just fine rather than pick up his 5th year option or extend him.     Because they have LITERALLY done that for the past 4 seasons.  

Edited by BADOLBILZ
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

In a vacuum, well, maybe he's not the best player available at 63.

But picks aren't made in a vacuum. They're made to (1) fill an immediate need, other than what you can fill for more money in free agency or a trade; and (2) build depth for the future when the current contributors become too expensive in free agency.

I see this as mostly (1) - filling an immediate need. We had basically no speed out of the backfield last year. Recognizing that, Daboll started using (ultimately over-using) McKenzie as a substitute, engineering ways to get him outside. But he's not in any way a running back; not even a CJ Spiller type speed back, so that was no plan for improvement in 2022. So they could've traded for a Gio Bernard (a guy without much left in the tank), could've signed a Philip Lindsey type (not the worst idea), or, as they did, tried to fill the roster need by using the 63rd pick overall. There isn't much room elsewhere to crack the roster since McD is unlikely (other than Elam, and I guess Araiza) to depend on non blue-chip rookies to fill a critical position given the fact that this team has Super Bowl aspirations and a Super Bowl-worthy roster already. If Daboll's Giants had used the 63rd overall pick on Cook, well, they would've been idiots. Thankfully we're not in that position anymore.

I still see White as the better player overall and would fill the same need, also drafted later.  I think this was a reach and Beane knew it or he wouldn’t have traded down twice before doing it.  Based on their track record, they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt on RB evaluation.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading The Draft Network’s scouting report on James Cook to see why he was ranked so low.

 

They only scouted 3 games but noted that 2021 vs Clemson was his “worst game” … so I watched highlights of that game and came away… impressed!

 

He broke a huge run, made some great pass block reads, made something out of nothing on several well-fitted runs. See the video below — I walked away from this very encouraged, given the scouts hated this game. Maybe we stole one with Cooks because he was unfairly labeled a change of pace back?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DCofNC said:

I still see White as the better player overall and would fill the same need, also drafted later.  I think this was a reach and Beane knew it or he wouldn’t have traded down twice before doing it.  Based on their track record, they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt on RB evaluation.

I've seen a lot of both White and Cook as I am a huge UGA fan and live just outside Athens. You're just not correct in your analysis. White is certainly a good back. I think he has a chance to do well with the Raiders. High character player who is a power runner. Cook is a different kind of back, very versatile, quick, shifty, and dangerous. They are not identical skills sets, so I am not sure how you think they could fill the same need. Yes, Cook is probably a third round value, but end of the second is pretty close, Beane accumulated two picks, and did not risk losing a playmaker for the offense.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Few teams got worse play on passing downs out of their running backs than the Bills. Enter second-round pick James Cook. I believe the NFL overthought the evaluation of Dalvin's brother. Yes, James is smaller. Yes, he moves differently than almost any NFL running back, with the exception of ... three-time Pro Bowler Dalvin Cook. The lateral quickness, vision, hands and route-running will translate. Taken No. 63 overall, don't be shocked if James Cook winds up catching more than 63 passes as a rookie.”

 

https://www.nfl.com/news/2022-nfl-draft-debrief-a-j-brown-trade-fallout-draft-winners-and-losers-rookie-w

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

I've seen a lot of both White and Cook as I am a huge UGA fan and live just outside Athens. You're just not correct in your analysis. White is certainly a good back. I think he has a chance to do well with the Raiders. High character player who is a power runner. Cook is a different kind of back, very versatile, quick, shifty, and dangerous. They are not identical skills sets, so I am not sure how you think they could fill the same need. Yes, Cook is probably a third round value, but end of the second is pretty close, Beane accumulated two picks, and did not risk losing a playmaker for the offense.

This.  As a Dawgs fan cook is the better fit as we are a passing team but his running is underrated due to lack of touches.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

First off.........I would have expected the GM to be on the phone and feeling out the trade up market.    Which was far cheaper than normal.   If trading the second round pick was off the table then that was a mistake.   You need to know your limitations........the second round has been a black hole for Beane.   IMO, you either believe there are reasons for your behavior and their results.........or you aren't self aware and do not.  

 

Yes, I would have taken a LT if the right player was there or reachable.   I had Penning rated very high.    Dawkins can be moved or the player can be moved inside to develop into a LT.   I'm of the opinion that if you get 7 years out of a bad bodied LT like Dawkins you've gotten every bit of what you could have expected.   And that 7th year is right around the corner.   I know @GunnerBill agrees with me about LT not being "set".

 

But why are you going there when 13 WR's went in the first 2 rounds?    And I wouldn't have been averse to taking an edge rusher either.    Why not?   They are carrying 9 or 10 DL and Shaq is a scrub and Epenesa is a disappointment with no production and Basham is an unknown with questionable upside going into his age 25 season.

 

I would have come out of this draft with Jameson Williams.    Perhaps I wouldn't have James Cook or Bernard but I would have had a potential $30M receiver.

 

But let's say the teams in front of me refused to take my superior offer for whatever reason.

 

I take Christian Watson.    And if he were gone I take Jermaine Johnson.    And if he were gone,  Boye Mafe.

 

Because in the Bills system those are premium positions......islands where they are earning their pay without being covered up by position or scheme..........and if they pan out the team would feel compelled to extend them.

 

I'm not sure that's the case with Elam.

 

If they were a press man team,  maybe that's different.   But they play zone.   He will be shielded by the system.

 

He could play well but they could easily decide that they could just plug in a Dane Jackson or Levi Wallace level type of player and be just fine rather than pick up his 5th year option or extend him.     Because they have LITERALLY done that for the past 4 seasons.  

 

You would have traded the Bills first 3 picks to move up to take a guy whose rookie season will be a wash and who if (IF) he becomes productive in years 2 and 3, will probably ask for $30M/year right after, like Deebo is?  Gotta say, that's bold!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

You would have traded the Bills first 3 picks to move up to take a guy whose rookie season will be a wash and who if (IF) he becomes productive in years 2 and 3, will probably ask for $30M/year right after, like Deebo is?  Gotta say, that's bold!

 

Like Deebo?

 

Deebo Samuel is a first team all pro........he put up 1400 yards receiving on 18 yards per reception and also produced 365 yards on the ground and totaled 14 TD's.........basically dragging a sluggish 49ers team to the NFC championship game.

 

The ignorance around the Deebo Samuel situation is crazy..........that would have been easily the best offensive season by a Buffalo Bills receiver in their history.

 

He was basically 1998 Eric Moulds in the air but with 400 more yards of production and 4 more TD's.

 

Yeah........I'd want that kind of impact from a first round pick.    Sign me up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

First off.........I would have expected the GM to be on the phone and feeling out the trade up market.    Which was far cheaper than normal.   If trading the second round pick was off the table then that was a mistake.   You need to know your limitations........the second round has been a black hole for Beane.   IMO, you either believe there are reasons for your behavior and their results.........or you aren't self aware and do not.  

 

Yes, I would have taken a LT if the right player was there or reachable.   I had Penning rated very high.    Dawkins can be moved or the player can be moved inside to develop into a LT.   I'm of the opinion that if you get 7 years out of a bad bodied LT like Dawkins you've gotten every bit of what you could have expected.   And that 7th year is right around the corner.   I know @GunnerBill agrees with me about LT not being "set".

 

But why are you going there when 13 WR's went in the first 2 rounds?    And I wouldn't have been averse to taking an edge rusher either.    Why not?   They are carrying 9 or 10 DL and Shaq is a scrub and Epenesa is a disappointment with no production and Basham is an unknown with questionable upside going into his age 25 season.

 

I would have come out of this draft with Jameson Williams.    Perhaps I wouldn't have James Cook or Bernard but I would have had a potential $30M receiver.

 

But let's say the teams in front of me refused to take my superior offer for whatever reason.

 

I take Christian Watson.    And if he were gone I take Jermaine Johnson.    And if he were gone,  Boye Mafe.

 

Because in the Bills system those are premium positions......islands where they are earning their pay without being covered up by position or scheme..........and if they pan out the team would feel compelled to extend them.

 

I'm not sure that's the case with Elam.

 

If they were a press man team,  maybe that's different.   But they play zone.   He will be shielded by the system.

 

He could play well but they could easily decide that they could just plug in a Dane Jackson or Levi Wallace level type of player and be just fine rather than pick up his 5th year option or extend him.     Because they have LITERALLY done that for the past 4 seasons.  

You are incorrect in alot of this, just my opinion.

 

There are two ways to improve the roster, FA and draft.  If you disagree that we should have targeted a CB in FA, fine name him.  But we had a HUGE hole at corner.  As you said, "if we were a press man" team, well now we have thr ability to run more multiple looks on defense, ie: man, press man, press zone.  Not to mention that big/long WRs killed Levi.  Who cares about scheme, Devante Parker owned Levi as did Claypool in game 1 against Steelers...cost us big.  Elam fixes that problem and gives us much needed skill at that position group.

 

You don't overload talent at a single position, and leave a gaping hole elsewhere.  That's like building a pool, while your basement is flooded.  Not a good investment, and "balance" while improving the team with quality players is key.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Simon said:

 

I don't remember specifically against who or what particular plays.

I just saw him beating people with that initial burst but then maxing out his top end speed and being run down from behind.

 

Well, if Cook gets run down from behind after gaining 7 yac instead of the abysmal leage-cellar 4.2 yac we had this past season or even the 6 yac Singletary managed on 50 targets, I'll be OK with him being run down from behind.  Bonus if he drops less than 10% of his targets.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DCofNC said:

I still see White as the better player overall and would fill the same need, also drafted later.  I think this was a reach and Beane knew it or he wouldn’t have traded down twice before doing it.  Based on their track record, they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt on RB evaluation.

………

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

You are incorrect in alot of this, just my opinion.

 

There are two ways to improve the roster, FA and draft.  If you disagree that we should have targeted a CB in FA, fine name him.  But we had a HUGE hole at corner.  As you said, "if we were a press man" team, well now we have thr ability to run more multiple looks on defense, ie: man, press man, press zone.  Not to mention that big/long WRs killed Levi.  Who cares about scheme, Devante Parker owned Levi as did Claypool in game 1 against Steelers...cost us big.  Elam fixes that problem and gives us much needed skill at that position group.

 

You don't overload talent at a single position, and leave a gaping hole elsewhere.  That's like building a pool, while your basement is flooded.  Not a good investment, and "balance" while improving the team with quality players is key.

 

 

They didn't have a HUGE hole at CB.........White, Johnson and Jackson are 3 good starters.

 

They have a lack of proven, high quality depth.

 

Which is also the case at WR.......LT.......DE........Safety......Guard......a lot of positions........they aren't just overloaded everywhere. 

 

And some of those positions have proven A LOT harder to fill/address than the relatively easy-to-fill CB position in Buffalo.

 

You are just assuming that Tre White won't make it back and that now the rookie Elam will be ready to step right in for him and excel if he doesn't.

 

Two assumptions and there is plenty of reason to believe that neither may be right.

 

I am tired of arguing against the HUGE HOLE theory.......... the same way I was rolling my eyes in dismissal at you when you thought the Bills season was over after Tre White got injured.

 

And I was proven right..........they then proceeded to play their best football the next two months with a 6th rounder and UDFA starting at CB.

 

Sure they had a couple bad games defensively because of a lack of pass rush.........but Tre White probably played the worst game of his career at KC in the AFCCG  so assuming that he or a rookie CB would make ANY difference whatsoever in those exact situations is just rosterbation.

 

It's not consistent with what we've seen from this team/defense under McDermott. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DCofNC said:

I still see White as the better player overall and would fill the same need, also drafted later.  I think this was a reach and Beane knew it or he wouldn’t have traded down twice before doing it.  Based on their track record, they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt on RB evaluation.

I think that being knew that there was value in those six round pics and gamble that Cook would be available a few spots down cook fits perfectly

37 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

They didn't have a HUGE hole at CB.........White, Johnson and Jackson are 3 good starters.

 

They have a lack of proven, high quality depth.

 

Which is also the case at WR.......LT.......DE........Safety......Guard......a lot of positions........they aren't just overloaded everywhere. 

 

And some of those positions have proven A LOT harder to fill/address than the relatively easy-to-fill CB position in Buffalo.

 

You are just assuming that Tre White won't make it back and that now the rookie Elam will be ready to step right in for him and excel if he doesn't.

 

Two assumptions and there is plenty of reason to believe that neither may be right.

 

I am tired of arguing against the HUGE HOLE theory.......... the same way I was rolling my eyes in dismissal at you when you thought the Bills season was over after Tre White got injured.

 

And I was proven right..........they then proceeded to play their best football the next two months with a 6th rounder and UDFA starting at CB.

 

Sure they had a couple bad games defensively because of a lack of pass rush.........but Tre White probably played the worst game of his career at KC in the AFCCG  so assuming that he or a rookie CB would make ANY difference whatsoever in those exact situations is just rosterbation.

 

It's not consistent with what we've seen from this team/defense under McDermott. 

 

What is rosturbation

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

They didn't have a HUGE hole at CB.........White, Johnson and Jackson are 3 good starters.

 

They have a lack of proven, high quality depth.

 

Which is also the case at WR.......LT.......DE........Safety......Guard......a lot of positions........they aren't just overloaded everywhere. 

 

And some of those positions have proven A LOT harder to fill/address than the relatively easy-to-fill CB position in Buffalo.

 

You are just assuming that Tre White won't make it back and that now the rookie Elam will be ready to step right in for him and excel if he doesn't.

 

Two assumptions and there is plenty of reason to believe that neither may be right.

 

I am tired of arguing against the HUGE HOLE theory.......... the same way I was rolling my eyes in dismissal at you when you thought the Bills season was over after Tre White got injured.

 

And I was proven right..........they then proceeded to play their best football the next two months with a 6th rounder and UDFA starting at CB.

 

Sure they had a couple bad games defensively because of a lack of pass rush.........but Tre White probably played the worst game of his career at KC in the AFCCG  so assuming that he or a rookie CB would make ANY difference whatsoever in those exact situations is just rosterbation.

 

It's not consistent with what we've seen from this team/defense under McDermott. 

 

Glad you aren't making any decisions.  Even the GM admitted it was a position of great need, along with anyone who has watched the team over the last year.  We lost one of our starters and the other is injured.  Yea lets just roll into the season like that.  Dane Jackson isn't horrible and still has room to get better but he definitely isnt good enough to go into the season as the only starting option.  CB was definitely a huge hole compared to the other positions, and I think a lot of people overthought it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bahamasbills said:

Glad you aren't making any decisions.  Even the GM admitted it was a position of great need, along with anyone who has watched the team over the last year.  We lost one of our starters and the other is injured.  Yea lets just roll into the season like that.  Dane Jackson isn't horrible and still has room to get better but he definitely isnt good enough to go into the season as the only starting option.  CB was definitely a huge hole compared to the other positions, and I think a lot of people overthought it.

 

 

I get it, you have no faith in Tre White being able to meet the relatively standard 9 month return plan.

 

Either way, they have plenty of depth now.........they have like 8-10 CB's and plenty of guys with excellent measurables/traits even if they weren't high pedigree draft prospects.........which means little because Levi Wallace and Dane Jackson aren't either.

 

Talent-wise and taking scheme into account it's maybe the deepest they've ever been at CB in their history.  

 

The OL is thin and sketchy and Jake Kumerow is the top backup to Stefon Diggs and Gabe Davis........but it's a defense driven league, amirite?

 

The hand wringing at CB sorta' reminds me of the justification for the Cody Ford pick..........not because Elam won't be better than Ford,  he's much more talented and drafted earlier........but rather just because Beane thinks he needs something doesn't mean he will make the best choice or that the opportunity cost won't be significant.  

 

With Ford they passed on big time WR's to take him and then when he failed to impress at RT they moved him to G........which forced a roster move at G that turned out to be Wyatt Teller getting traded.

 

Not saying Beane just cost himself TWO All Pros again or anything but don't tell me I am wrong because that GM said he needed something.

 

Job #1 is protecting the QB.........Beane also said that right after the season........acknowledging their struggles in that regard in 2021.    125 combined pressures and sacks is ghastly.   Where are the re-inforcements there?   Saffold for Williams mainly just made them older and less versatile and more prone to losing time to injury.    

Edited by BADOLBILZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

They didn't have a HUGE hole at CB.........White, Johnson and Jackson are 3 good starters.

 

They have a lack of proven, high quality depth.

 

Which is also the case at WR.......LT.......DE........Safety......Guard......a lot of positions........they aren't just overloaded everywhere. 

 

And some of those positions have proven A LOT harder to fill/address than the relatively easy-to-fill CB position in Buffalo.

 

You are just assuming that Tre White won't make it back and that now the rookie Elam will be ready to step right in for him and excel if he doesn't.

 

Two assumptions and there is plenty of reason to believe that neither may be right.

 

I am tired of arguing against the HUGE HOLE theory.......... the same way I was rolling my eyes in dismissal at you when you thought the Bills season was over after Tre White got injured.

 

And I was proven right..........they then proceeded to play their best football the next two months with a 6th rounder and UDFA starting at CB.

 

Sure they had a couple bad games defensively because of a lack of pass rush.........but Tre White probably played the worst game of his career at KC in the AFCCG  so assuming that he or a rookie CB would make ANY difference whatsoever in those exact situations is just rosterbation.

 

It's not consistent with what we've seen from this team/defense under McDermott. 

 

Im hoping Tre is back week 1, as that is what Beane said this week.  And I never said the season was over last year without Tre, not sure where you pulled that comment from.  You just are making up things now.

 

You list WR, LT, DE, S, and G.  That's all i need to know about your misguided opinion.  You say round 1 should be used on high-price FA types, then jnclude S and G?

 

Newsflash, we just drafted two DEs last year, let them develop, not to mention signing Von Miller.

 

I could go the list of positions that you listed and do the exact same thing.  G, I would give you, but again I'm picking CB over G all day, unless thr player value doesn't align.  There were 0 Gs left worth taking at that point, Beane even stated Elam was their last 1st round graded player remaining on the board (hence the trade up).

 

You picked a strange hill to die on, with these arguments with everyone.  Let's see how things play out.  Unlike your poor memory accusing me of what I said (didnot) about Tre, I will remember to carry on this conversation once season starts.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

So let me get this straight.  The positions I mentioned the Bills as being "set" at were QB and WR1 and LT.

Should one conclude you believe we should have drafted a LT or a QB at the bottom of the 1st, while we have Josh Allen signed for $258M through 2028 and Dawkins signed for 3 more years with $12M dead cap, simply because those are the positions which get resigned easy-peasy for >$20M?

 

C'mon man.

 

I'm pretty sure that if a pass rusher or WR the Bills liked with a 1st round grade had fallen to them, they would have pulled the trigger, but we were at the spot in the first round where the guy drafted ahead of us projects as an inside LB, and the next DE has "underdeveloped pass rush" as a tag, then folks were drafting IOL and safety.

Question: what exactly do you believe the Bills should have done with Pick 25 in the 1st round of the 2022 NFL draft?

 

 

Elam is a potential cb 1 in 3-4 years, as Tre White hits his 30's. And cb is most certainly a premium position. 

 

He can make that argument about the 2nd and 3rd picks, but doesn't hold water just bc cb was a position of need. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not based on 'value' or 'need', but simply based on the fact it's been so long since the Bills Drafted, developed, and used a RB that produced terrific results, I LOVE this pick for the Bills. To get a RB of Cook's caliber AND be able to pick Elam in the 1st so that the team can build deeper CB play, was incredible IMHO. 

 

Cook will be a very important part of the Offense in the years to come, in my mind. I don't think he's 'the one' out of the gate, but I think they utilize him in specific situations with the intent to increase his role as the season goes on...love this guy!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the question will be who sticks at RB on the roster? After Cook, Singletary is a lock. He's not going anywhere. Taiwan Jones was resigned for ST purposes. I don't see them cutting him, though it could possibly happen depending on how the ST group shakes out. I think both Moss and Johnson are on the roster bubble at this point. We usually only have 2 active RB's on game day because of how they use Taiwan. The 3rd guy is really going to have to stand out and I believe Johnson will show more value than Moss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, H2o said:

Now the question will be who sticks at RB on the roster? After Cook, Singletary is a lock. He's not going anywhere. Taiwan Jones was resigned for ST purposes. I don't see them cutting him, though it could possibly happen depending on how the ST group shakes out. I think both Moss and Johnson are on the roster bubble at this point. We usually only have 2 active RB's on game day because of how they use Taiwan. The 3rd guy is really going to have to stand out and I believe Johnson will show more value than Moss. 

 

Yes I see Moss getting cut.  Duke is just the better player.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Actually this report makes me happy, he is a reciever put of the backfield. If they can coach up his blocking he could be an effective weapon. I am not a fan of having one premier running back on a team but would prefer a 1a and 1b type situation and going with the hot hand. 

 

Singletary started performing much better once he became the #1 guy, who got the overwhelming majority of touches out of the backfield. He never seemed to get into a groove when he and Moss were 1A and 1B. Not saying it can't be done with Cook, but I'm not holding out hope that Singletary will perform like he did the back half of the year if he's in a near-equal timeshare with Cook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, junior said:

 

Singletary started performing much better once he became the #1 guy, who got the overwhelming majority of touches out of the backfield. He never seemed to get into a groove when he and Moss were 1A and 1B. Not saying it can't be done with Cook, but I'm not holding out hope that Singletary will perform like he did the back half of the year if he's in a near-equal timeshare with Cook.

I don't necessarily mean they split carries each week but more of the idea they go with best back for the situation. A large part of my comment is based on the fact that teams that rely on one back seem to not do well in the playoffs in general. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2022 at 10:17 AM, Luka said:

 

Well bud you're gonna have a rough go of it from here on out. This is how you maintain a team with a $250 million QB on it. Beane doesn't have the luxury of going out and making big splashes in free agency anymore. It's going to be need over "value" every year. And seriously, these grades placed on players only ever matter when trying make hindsight arguments after a player plays for a year or two. The only grade that matters is the one Beane has placed on the player. He doesn't look at Todd McShay's mock draft and go "oh, if Todd thinks this of that player, I better move him on my big board."

 

Concerning Cook, he was argued to be the best receiving back in this draft. We were not looking for a thumper or a guy that can carry the ball 30+ times a game. Josh needs a reliable outlet out of the backfield at the very least, something Moss and Singletary have proven they can not be. But more than that, just like we're seeing with the tight end room this year, the Bills are looking for guys that can also be split out. I think we're going to see more uptempo. Josh and Dorsey need guys that can catch the football and make plays downfield and in open space and they have to be able to do it from various positions on the field. Howard and Knox are good blockers but have the athleticism to stand up and create mismatches with linebackers and safeties. Cook is great on the outside and has the speed to turn the corner or hit holes in zone runs but he's also an excellent receiver and has the speed to turn quick crosses and wheel routes in to big plays.   

 

 

except for Von Miller...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DCofNC said:

The only thing he shares with Dalvin is a name.  

Watching his video, that's what I think, too.  But someone said if you watch Dalvin in college, he looks a lot like James.   So, we'll see.   If the Bills just drafted Dalvin Cook in the second round (after trading down twice!), Beane is the GM of the decade.  

 

I think the Bills just got a really good #2 back who could possibly become a #1.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...