Jump to content

Buffalo was in on Patrick Peterson


BillsMafi$

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

We really do need a Cb before the draft you don’t ever want to go into a draft with a glaring need. Else teams already know where you’re going with the first couple picks and will jump your pick to get a guy cause they know you’re targeting them. 

We were in on Peterson so I think Beene will add a veteran - have a feeling it’ll be Nelson, though I can dream about Gilmore 

Edited by Turbo44
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't surprise me. Probably wanted to get him on a bargain as evidenced by him staying in Minnesota for a year. This is the type of signing I'd expect. A vet with starting experience who can provide a little more coverage for a few games when Tre's out and provide depth and leadership behind our 1st or 2nd round, at a cap friendly price for a season. Big time signings or trades like Stephon Gilmore or James Bradberry is unrealistic. I'd be looking at Joe Haden or Steven Nelson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

We were in on Peterson so I think Beene will add a veteran - have a feeling it’ll be Nelson, though I can dream about Gilmore 

But why would you do that: 1) for a team that willingly moved on from him, and 2) that plays a zone scheme he is less ideally suited for, and 3) that asks its corners to actually tackle?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hondo in seattle said:

I have a lot of faith in the FO but that doesn't mean every move they make is a good one.  The best GMs make mistakes.  And right now Beane has me worried about the CB position.  

 

But the offseason is far from over.  

 

I've not seen anyone make the assertion they don't make mistakes, but given the track record.. defaulting to "they made a huge blunder" doesn't make sense. In fact, I continually make the claim that beane is good because he limits the impact of his risks and moves on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Dane Jackson as a #4 or #5 CB, but I suspect much of the game planning and play calling was to give him help or mitigate his liability. That takes away from what the defense as a whole can do. I know our D was OK against weak offenses, but we still had issues. It wasn't all on Jackson either. Still, he's a significant weak spot in our D.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

To continue in the great tradition of Vontae Davis and Josh Norman.

 

...and it IS an even year!!

 

Don't forget Phillip Gaines, EJ Gaines, and Kevin Johnson. OBD has been veteran CB retread central for some time.

 

1 hour ago, GreggTX said:

I like Dane Jackson as a #4 or #5 CB, but I suspect much of the game planning and play calling was to give him help or mitigate his liability. That takes away from what the defense as a whole can do. I know our D was OK against weak offenses, but we still had issues. It wasn't all on Jackson either. Still, he's a significant weak spot in our D.

 

So in your estimation Dane Jackson is not good enough to be our 3rd CB.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

He got way more money than I think Beane was offering.  

Didn't seem like a lot of money to me - $4M is Levi Wallace money.  Could be the market is drying up.  Or maybe relative to Rhodes/Nelson/or Haden it was too much, or they just prefer one of the other remaining CBs.

 

Getting a little tight though - kind of like when the market for the big pass rushers was thinning out.  Beane has come through before.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Utah John said:

Wallace didn't sign for a huge amount in Pittsburgh.  I think the Bills, who have watched him closely for years, figured he just wasn't ever going to be good enough, and that someone with equivalent skills to his would be available.  I'm sure this wasn't a careless decision on the part of Beane. 

Agree. Beane doesn't make careless decisions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Utah John said:

Wallace didn't sign for a huge amount in Pittsburgh.  I think the Bills, who have watched him closely for years, figured he just wasn't ever going to be good enough, and that someone with equivalent skills to his would be available.  I'm sure this wasn't a careless decision on the part of Beane. 

He literally got Siran Neal money to put it in perspective. Possibly the Bills thought Wallace would get more on the open market but I think if they wanted Wallace back they would’ve beat the low number the Steelers gave him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

Don't forget Phillip Gaines, EJ Gaines, and Kevin Johnson. OBD has been veteran CB retread central for some time.

 

 

So in your estimation Dane Jackson is not good enough to be our 3rd CB.

3rd corner meaning the nickel or 3rd corner meaning the 3rd outside corner?  He’s best as the 3rd outside corner…like he was last season. Thing is, he might be better than Haden and Nelson at this point. Meaning we’ll have 2 backup corners starting for the first 1/3-1/2 of the the year.

 

of we sign a vet, we should still be drafting a corner in the 1st 3rds, preferably 1-2 imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Warcodered said:

and why would we let Levi Wallace go if we didn't have confidence in Dane?

Because he was roasted all season long against good QB’s.  Mahomes made Levi his b@$&? The last 3 time we played them.  We need to beat KC to get to the SB, hence, see ya Levi.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Because he was roasted all season long against good QB’s.  Mahomes made Levi his b@$&? The last 3 time we played them.  We need to beat KC to get to the SB, hence, see ya Levi.  

I just think Beane has a price point and this year a team was willing to pay it so they wished him well.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Einstein's Dog said:

Didn't seem like a lot of money to me - $4M is Levi Wallace money.  Could be the market is drying up.  Or maybe relative to Rhodes/Nelson/or Haden it was too much, or they just prefer one of the other remaining CBs.

 

Getting a little tight though - kind of like when the market for the big pass rushers was thinning out.  Beane has come through before.  

 

Oh I thought someone here said he got a 1 year $10M or $11M deal...maybe I misread something.  Yeah, if it was $4M then that would have likely been in our ball park at least.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Oh I thought someone here said he got a 1 year $10M or $11M deal...maybe I misread something.  Yeah, if it was $4M then that would have likely been in our ball park at least.  

Looking back I can see how there can be confusion.  I think you need to disregard the ramblings of this billybrew and instead reference the page 2 tweet from Mike Garafolo - looks like a $4M + $1M incentive deal.

 

If the FO can get a Rhodes or Nelson or Bradberry for around $4-5M, I think we would be looking at another GM of the year award for Beane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Would have loved the talent but probably too expensive unless we think Dane Jackson is not ready to start yet.

 

Ummm. Best case scenario is Tre starts week one, but takes a few weeks to ramp back up. Worst case scenario, Tre misses a few weeks then takes time to get back to form. Either way, Dane Jackson is not ready to start in that scenario. Is that even being debated at this point? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mango said:

 

Ummm. Best case scenario is Tre starts week one, but takes a few weeks to ramp back up. Worst case scenario, Tre misses a few weeks then takes time to get back to form. Either way, Dane Jackson is not ready to start in that scenario. Is that even being debated at this point? 

I mean Dane Jackson is not ready to be our CB2- Tre will have to be out CB1 when healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Because he was roasted all season long against good QB’s.  Mahomes made Levi his b@$&? The last 3 time we played them.  We need to beat KC to get to the SB, hence, see ya Levi.  

I’ve watched the Tyreek Hill TD in the playoffs more than I would like to admit. Wallace is literally lined up to take away any route  inside and still gets beat inside on a dig route. I think that was the moment they knew they had to move on.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

So next on my list is Joe Haden or Bradberry

 

Both good options. Would rather send a pick or two sent to the Giants for Bradberry, than spend picks and players to move up in the draft (per recent rumors).

 

The window is open and the Autumn wind is blowing in. It smells like a herd of stampeding Buffalo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Not sure why Dane would not be ready to be CB2 he did pretty well in that role last year.   He def is not ready to be CB1 and I am not sure if he ever will be.

I don't think he is ready to get a CB1 right now but why do you think he can't be? He think did well in every game he played in and he went against some good recievers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I don't think he is ready to get a CB1 right now but why do you think he can't be? He think did well in every game he played in and he went against some good recievers.

He lacks the speed that I want in CB one.   I love him as a run stuffer and he has good instincts.   I championed him all last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...