Jump to content

Tremaine Edmunds rocked today


TroutDog

Recommended Posts

Just now, JGMcD2 said:

It's funny people wanted to move on from Tremaine following last week's game and said he'd be a liability this week.

 

Gotta love the folks that watch weekly highlights and believe they're qualified to be an NFL Head Coach.

 

 

 

Usually the anti Allen guys as well.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TroutDog said:

Even with the loss, I look for the positives. First and foremost is Edmunds: he was hammering runs and was solid in pass coverage. 

I came here to disagree with you because I thought it was a negative post. Can't agree more, this was a huge improvement from the last couple times against the Pats. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo716 said:

But everyone says he is an OLB ?

He is an OLB, but he is getting much better at MLB. It's crazy that he was an OLB in High School and the start of College, but now he is expected to stop teams in the NFL. It's probably the largest learning curve of anyone on the team. I'm a big fan of his and think that he can do it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

He really did well today. It's hard to single out anyone as everyone did their job today extremely well. 

 

Wallace has and is really starting to impress me as well. 

Wallace had an excellent game too and continues to impress. McDermott and Frazier, and Butler and Babich really know how to coach DBs. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Trogdor said:

He is an OLB, but he is getting much better at MLB. It's crazy that he was an OLB in High School and the start of College, but now he is expected to stop teams in the NFL. It's probably the largest learning curve of anyone on the team. I'm a big fan of his and think that he can do it. 

No he's an MLB.

 

Even at Tech pro scouts had him pegged as a NFL Mike while playing OLB

 

He's a football player

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said:

It's funny people wanted to move on from Tremaine following last week's game and said he'd be a liability this week.

 

Gotta love the folks that watch weekly highlights and believe they're qualified to be an NFL Head Coach.

 

 

 

I was a big critic of Edmunds last year. I think some of the criticism of him this year has been wrong and way over the top. I thought he was very good week 1 and 2, less good last week, and he did miss a couple of gaps today but for the most part I really liked his performance. 

 

I think what it might be is that his run lane discipline was really poor last year and so when he misses one this year people just presume it is the same old Tremaine. But the number of plays where he is getting things wrong is down hugely. I thought he was good again tonight. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure, it's a process (no pun intended).

 

I work with professional athletes... looking at tape or watching on TV and seeing things from a bird's eye view is vastly different than being out there and having to react to all of the moving pieces. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said:

It's funny people wanted to move on from Tremaine following last week's game and said he'd be a liability this week.

 

Gotta love the folks that watch weekly highlights and believe they're qualified to be an NFL Head Coach.

 

 

Come on. No one wanted to move on. He has not played great and people were questioning whether he would be better at OLB. He played well today. I don't think he played great. But he was better today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He definitely wasn't a liability and he was making adjustments on the D a lot.  He's learning quickly this year.  That's awesome.  He's trending in the right direction and he'll be really dangerous for a long time if he just keeps that up.

 

Great thread, OP.  Edmunds' solid work today should get its own thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

He sure did. He was great all game. The defense really did a great job of taking away three or four things the Pats like to do. I will, say, however, that not having Gordon or Edelman at 100% severely limits what they can do. They don't have the weapons they normally do. 

 

I do not think Gordon can be 100% without being stoned or Edelman without being on roids so they are severely limited.

 

Edited by Limeaid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaloRebound said:

His length and range are so damn unique for a MLB.  Brady loves those play action fakes where he draws the LB to the line of scrimmage and then lobs the ball over their head for easy completions.  Edmunds completely disrupts that with his length and range.  

Yup. Both Edmunds and Milano negated one of the Pats' strengths and the way they abuse us and other teams. We shut the short passing game to the RB down. All while stopping the run. Usually the Pats exploit teams one way or the other. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2019 at 5:42 PM, Buffalo716 said:

But everyone says he is an OLB ?

I think what some people think he is could be an absolute animal at OLb where he could rush the passer and rely on his instincts.  MLB requires a special skill to diagnosis plays which can delay your aggressiveness.  It takes more than a good athlete to be a good MLB. Zach Thomas was undersized but just could read plays and beat o linemen to the point of attack. I think TE had trouble with this as a rookie.  Glad to see him making improvements but I still think he could be a 15 sack guy on the outside. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

33 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I think what some people think he is could be an absolute animal at OLb where he could rush the passer and rely on his instincts.  MLB requires a special skill to diagnosis plays which can delay your aggressiveness.  It takes more than a good athlete to be a good MLB. Zach Thomas was undersized but just could read plays and beat o linemen to the point of attack. I think TE had trouble with this as a rookie.  Glad to see him making improvements but I still think he could be a 15 sack guy on the outside. 

The game is changing. 

 

Jordan Poyer is a SS .. not because he intimidates players over the middle but because he is a ball hawk in a passing league.. in the modern NFL coverage skills are starting to reign supreme

 

Edmunds is a freak FOOTBALL PLAYER and lots of scouts agreed he had all pro potential at every linebacker spot... He is a dangerous Blitzer but doesn't have any real pass rush moves

 

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/tremaine-edmunds?id=32194544-4d00-0000-c30c-56fb5191e34f

 

At the Mike, he gets to use his elite athleticism and be around the ball every play..  dropping a 6'5 Mike with speed on passing downs is ahead of the curve(something the Bills haven't been in a long time) disrupts passing lanes, and clogs the middle

 

Tremaine is gonna be a helluva player for us for a long time

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said:

 

 

The game is changing. 

 

Jordan Poyer is a SS .. not because he intimidates players over the middle but because he is a ball hawk in a passing league.. in the modern NFL coverage skills are starting to reign supreme

 

Edmunds is a freak FOOTBALL PLAYER and lots of scouts agreed he had all pro potential at every linebacker spot... He is a dangerous Blitzer but doesn't have any real pass rush moves

 

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/tremaine-edmunds?id=32194544-4d00-0000-c30c-56fb5191e34f

 

At the Mike, he gets to use his elite athleticism and be around the ball every play..  dropping a 6'5 Mike with speed on passing downs is ahead of the curve(something the Bills haven't been in a long time) disrupts passing lanes, and clogs the middle

 

Tremaine is gonna be a helluva player for us for a long time

 

I am with you. I know others do not agree but I have seen significant strides from him in his fundamentals and gap discipline this year. And he always had that knack for the spectacular play. I am not moving him. I am keeping him in the middle of that defense and I believe we are watching him develop into a dominant player right before our eyes. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I think what some people think he is could be an absolute animal at OLb where he could rush the passer and rely on his instincts.  MLB requires a special skill to diagnosis plays which can delay your aggressiveness.  It takes more than a good athlete to be a good MLB. Zach Thomas was undersized but just could read plays and beat o linemen to the point of attack. I think TE had trouble with this as a rookie.  Glad to see him making improvements but I still think he could be a 15 sack guy on the outside. 

Maybe tight end?

 

He is playing well, let's leave him at MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...