Jump to content

Why is the punter the holder?


NakedSquid

Recommended Posts

Can't have your backup QB practicing holding the ball for the kicker all through practice while the offense is practicing, and have him never get to throw or run plays.  Much more valuable to have your backup QB up to speed on the offense, than to be able to run a gadget play once a year with them.  Makes the most sense time-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably because during practice the punter is the one other guy besides the kicker and the long snapper with nothing else to do, so have him hold.  Agreed using backup QB would give more options but for the couple times a year in may come into play, probably teams don't feel it's worth it.

 

For years wasn't Frank Reich the holder?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, buffalobillswin said:

Nope it's the punter for all teams in real life. 

 

You are thinking of Madden where the holder is the backup QB

 

not at all, I've watched games recently where it's the backup QB out there, as stated by the announcers

 

(beware of 100% dogmatic always/has to be statements in life)

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the day, Frank Reich was the holder. I remember this as a discussion point during the comeback game, as Houston had their punter as the holder, and when he bobbled the snap, he spazzed and Houston lost a FG opportunity. The announcer commented that Frank Reich, as Bills holder, had better hands, and also better ability to react to a busted play. Normally, the punter makes sense, as he and the kicker have more practice time together. However, with our unprecedented turnover at punter this year (4!!!), maybe having the stability of a backup QB would be better....uh based on how we've handled the backup QB position this year, never mind.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they just keeping all the odd balls in one place so they can keep an eye on them?   ?

 

 

I get the backup QB gives options, but the point was made they need to be more with the offense. The punter is used to catching long snaps, he’s just doing it with different hand placement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Augie said:

Are they just keeping all the odd balls in one place so they can keep an eye on them?   ?

 

 

I get the backup QB gives options, but the point was made they need to be more with the offense. The punter is used to catching long snaps, he’s just doing it with different hand placement. 

?This is always what crosses my mind, FG units are like the Island of Misfit Toys

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

Probably because during practice the punter is the one other guy besides the kicker and the long snapper with nothing else to do, so have him hold.  Agreed using backup QB would give more options but for the couple times a year in may come into play, probably teams don't feel it's worth it.

 

For years wasn't Frank Reich the holder?

yes, he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, NakedSquid said:

Serious question, why is the punter the holder?  I thought it should always be the back up QB or a gadget player. That would provide more options for a fake or bad snap. 

 

Our best gadget player on FGs was our punter Moorman; he was a hurdler and made a number of good plays on fakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of the reasons is the team has had too much instability at the backup QB position.  Maybe if Barkley signs a multi-year contract and they can count on him as being the clear #2 QB, then we can have the backup QB holding.  However, if Bojorquez is the punter next year, he'll probably hold as long as he understands the difference between a FG and a fake.  . 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kicking Teams / specialists practice together most often, so if the punter is capable - he does the holding.  That said, for fakes it would be best if a QB held or someone who could throw and run . . . Logan Thomas?  Micah Hyde?  Interesting question.

Edited by Never NEVER Give-up
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way back when, Bobby Chandler (WR) was a holder.  You want/need someone that has practice catching a fast snap.  Used to be, as I recall, more often than not, it would be the backup QB.  However, I suspect, w/ the increasing complexity of the game, requiring more study & practice, and now coupled w/ practice restrictions due to the CBA, in most cases, it just makes more sense to have the more practiced punter do it.

One other thing - as punters have improved considerably over the last 10 yrs or so, I suspect so has their general athleticism.  As such, less reason not to have them doing it. Additionally, punters don't usually get hurt, QBs do thereby allowing for more continuity.

Edited by eSJayDee
Another thought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buffalobillswin said:

Nope it's the punter for all teams in real life. 

 

You are thinking of Madden where the holder is the backup QB

 

3 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

 

  Makes more sense to have a QB do it.  Keeps the threat of a fake FG, or if you run a fake, you have a QB throwing the ball.  If practice is an issue, could we train Logan Thomas to be the holder?  Consistency and a (former college) QB. 

 

Edited by RyanC883
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this a pretty self explanatory question ? I think it's because "He himself is a kicker" & & they want to have that one person that is taking up that roster spot to do more than one thing !

 

The real question is why don't they hire one guy to do both place kicking & punting ?

 

Of course then they would have to use a back up QB to be the holder & if the Place kicker/punter got injured they would be screwed unless the back up QB learned not only to be the back up QB but the place kicker & the punter to then he would have 3 jobs which would save the team on roster spots also ... 

 

But then the Long snapper would have to be the holder for the back up QB/Place kicker/Punter but then why couldn't the Long snapper be the holder for the place kicker/punter ? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams changed it up after Romo dropped it during the playoff game against Seattle.

 

Seriously though...good question.  The rate at which we change punters you would think they would have someone "more permanent" do it. 

12 minutes ago, dneveu said:

I would think you could use any mostly dedicated teams player/returner.  Logan thomas already helped execute a fake punt - he's athletic enough to run around and buy time, and has a good arm.  I guess it would take away some reps though?

Logan Thomas is inactive a lot....

Edited by Azucho98
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NakedSquid said:

Serious question, why is the punter the holder?  I thought it should always be the back up QB or a gadget player. That would provide more options for a fake or bad snap. 

 

 

It used to to always be the back-up QB and before that it was whoever you had that had the best hands - very little training and practice time was spent on kicking.

 

As the kicking game and special teams in general has become more specialized - the change gradually occurred to move away from other players/back-up QBs to the punter because the kicker, punter, and the long snapper can all get together and practice the snaps and holds while the rest of the team is practicing.

 

It allows for the three of them to practice the snap hundreds of times throughout the week without pulling guys away from the team practice.

 

Do not be fooled though because the back-up QB (or other designated player) will also do a small amount of holding in practicing- just in case the punter is injured (see the Tony Romo incident).  You also have practice where the punter (or other back-up kicker) will attempt a few kicks and the kicker will attempt some punts - just to make sure everyone is aware in case of injury, but that number of snaps is very limited.  The teams will usually have a dedicated segment on various days just to practice this stuff along with coverage and other potential issues - like fakes and the such.

 

I am not aware of any current NFL team that routinely uses anyone other than the punter as the holder for FGs and XPs.  I have seen a QB here or there, but it is almost always associated with an injury.

 

I do not know what to make of Crossman - he has never been a great coach as far as what I can see (although he has had a few top units).  The last couple of years the penalties and mistakes just seen to keep growing.  I can’t tell if it is the amount of change and different personnel or him just being a bad coach or a combination of the two.  I unfortunately agree that it is probably time to move on and see if we can get something better out of that role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Azucho98 said:

Teams changed it up after Romo dropped it during the playoff game against Seattle.

 

Seriously though...good question.  The rate at which we change punters you would think they would have someone "more permanent" do it. 

Logan Thomas is inactive a lot....

 

Good point - the likelihood of injury for all non-punters is like 1000% higher.  And QBs get hurt pretty frequently too.  

11 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

 

 

It used to to always be the back-up QB and before that it was whoever you had that had the best hands - very little training and practice time was spent on kicking.

 

As the kicking game and special teams in general has become more specialized - the change gradually occurred to move away from other players/back-up QBs to the punter because the kicker, punter, and the long snapper can all get together and practice the snaps and holds while the rest of the team is practicing.

 

It allows for the three of them to practice the snap hundreds of times throughout the week without pulling guys away from the team practice.

 

Do not be fooled though because the back-up QB (or other designated player) will also do a small amount of holding in practicing- just in case the punter is injured (see the Tony Romo incident).  You also have practice where the punter (or other back-up kicker) will attempt a few kicks and the kicker will attempt some punts - just to make sure everyone is aware in case of injury, but that number of snaps is very limited.  The teams will usually have a dedicated segment on various days just to practice this stuff along with coverage and other potential issues - like fakes and the such.

 

I am not aware of any current NFL team that routinely uses anyone other than the punter as the holder for FGs and XPs.  I have seen a QB here or there, but it is almost always associated with an injury.

 

I do not know what to make of Crossman - he has never been a great coach as far as what I can see (although he has had a few top units).  The last couple of years the penalties and mistakes just seen to keep growing.  I can’t tell if it is the amount of change and different personnel or him just being a bad coach or a combination of the two.  I unfortunately agree that it is probably time to move on and see if we can get something better out of that role.

 

Blocking in the back is like... so common its stunning.  If we literally did nothing except fair catch everything, we'd probably have a better punt return unit than we have had over the last few years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zow2 said:

Love ya Scottie but why couldn't Christie be the one kicking that 47 yd FG on that fateful Jan. 1991 night in Tampa when i was sitting at the 50 yard line?!?!?!?

 

Ok, sorry,,, that pic took me back.

Or have a different holder. Morten Anderson blamed Reich on that kick, saying he had the laces pointing (wide) right, which caused the kick to sail right. You had to bring this up , didn't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Tony Romo as the starting QB was the holder for the Cowboys.

 

Image result for Tony Romo holder gif

 

He started that season as the backup QB, though. After he took over as starter, they figured that continuity was important.

 

In retrospect ... Oops!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dneveu said:

 

Good point - the likelihood of injury for all non-punters is like 1000% higher.  And QBs get hurt pretty frequently too.  

 

Blocking in the back is like... so common its stunning.  If we literally did nothing except fair catch everything, we'd probably have a better punt return unit than we have had over the last few years.  

 

Yes and I do not think it would be that close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first I can remember is Brian Moorman.  He always held for field goals and extra points.  Prior to that I only remember backup quarterbacks doing this job.

 

Not sure why this changed.  Maybe because it is more likely to have a backup qb injured than your punter.  I don't know, just a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...