Jump to content

Dolphins Promote Nick O'Leary to the 53 Man Roster


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

 

O'Leary is not very good. No one rushed to sign him when the Bills let him go. He's been on a practice squad.

 

He will never be a starting TE in this league. He's alright as a backup, but are we supposed to pout about every backup caliber player we let go?

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MJS said:

 

O'Leary is not very good. No one rushed to sign him when the Bills let him go. He's been on a practice squad.

 

He will never be a starting TE in this league. He's alright as a backup, but are we supposed to pout about every backup caliber player we let go?

 

Hes a good back up. Just sayin, dude had a knack for getting open and making plays. 

 

I’d have cut a few players before a guy who has been productive is all I’m sayin. 

 

Im not sayin the dude was a star. 

3 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said:

Just like the Bills to cut the next Tony Gonzalez

?

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

 

If O'leary is the reason you suck... Well he's not actually the reason you suck. He wasn't very good. Complaining about his loss just shows the amount of talent the offense lacked to begin with.

Edited by Ol Dirty B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprised.  Good for O'Leary.

No, O'Leary is not Tony Gonzales or Greg Olsen, but he's serviceable and actually catches balls thrown his way.  From what I've seen thus far, O'Leary is better than Croom and Lee.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard his grandpa is Jack Nicklaus. The same well connected source also told me that Fitz went to Harvard!  

 

Some of you might even remember this guy (my source)... he’s the same guy that picked up Siefert at the airport last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

 

I think we suck because we think letting Nick O’Leary go is actually a thing to make us suck. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Happy Gilmore said:

Not surprised.  Good for O'Leary.

No, O'Leary is not Tony Gonzales or Greg Olsen, but he's serviceable and actually catches balls thrown his way.  From what I've seen thus far, O'Leary is better than Croom and Lee.

I had the entire section laughing at Lambeau to get rid of 80 after his two penalty drive killer.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

Yeah that was a move I didn't understand.  The guy made plays for us on gamedays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

I absolutely couldn't agree more dude. Some of these yahoos wanted us to keep Lee who is completely worthless. Not only did Nick O'Leary get open a lot but he could have been targeted a lot more too.  Starting to really doubt the evaluation abilities of McD.

4 hours ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

If O'leary is the reason you suck... Well he's not actually the reason you suck. He wasn't very good. Complaining about his loss just shows the amount of talent the offense lacked to begin with.

....because Lee is Gronk compared to Nick.....Lee tearing it up this year with 1 reception for 5 yards and 3 penalties. Brilliant 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

Let’s be fair now. O’Leary was no superstar. He was an average player, and that’s on a good day. Yea, it was cool that he’s related to the famous golfer, but outside of that I think Croom has him beat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick O'Leary was the prototypical lunch pail Buffalo guy. Good hands and knew how to get open. May not have had the wheels one would like, but he played hard and never stopped trying. He deserved a better date with the Bills but ultimately lost out to Croom, Lee, and Thomas who are all physically superior but none have shown his heart or ability to make key plays. I miss him.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spiderweb said:

Nick O'Leary was the prototypical lunch pail Buffalo guy. Good hands and knew how to get open. May not have had the wheels one would like, but he played hard and never stopped trying. He deserved a better date with the Bills but ultimately lost out to Croom, Lee, and Thomas who are all physically superior but none have shown his heart or ability to make key plays. I miss him.

 

I'd keep him over Lee and Thomas, those guys are bums.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Happy Gilmore said:

Not surprised.  Good for O'Leary.

No, O'Leary is not Tony Gonzales or Greg Olsen, but he's serviceable and actually catches balls thrown his way.  From what I've seen thus far, O'Leary is better than Croom and Lee.

 

100% agree with this. And a million miles better than Logan freaking Thomas. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The evidence so far, is that letting O'Leary go, was a mistake, and will likely remain a mistake, until such time as Lee and Thomas learn how to get open, catch and block. Oh, and not get penalized.

 

I get keeping Croom, he's shown something, and has distinct upside, but neither Lee or Thomas has done anything positive of note.

 

They may both be physical specimens, but they aren't displaying football smarts, and O'Leary has football smarts.

 

All of this crap about 'nobody else wanted O'Leary so he must suck' is just that. This is about the Bills, and the Bills could have used him, and tbh, could still use him.

 

Imho, it's a poor decision, and as importantly, poor evaluation, of the type that said Peterman would play okay when things got real. I've seen no evidence at all, that either Lee or Thomas have done anything that could be construed as helping out a rookie QB, be it blocking or receiving, and to the contrary, Lee at least, is giving away dumb penalties.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The_Dude said:

This is why we suck. We trade a 3rd for KB and let a quality pass catcher like O’Leary go. And for as slow as he was — dude got separation on game day. Bad move to let him go. 

all he did was make plays...and a lot of them clutch.   nah we don't need that around here. besides we have khari lee....

 

my faith in this process went from optimistic trust to put up or shut up. i can't remember a year where i was looking to next year's draft before november or until we were mathematically eliminated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...