Jump to content

Cousins to Denver?


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, davspo said:

That would mean that Cleveland, the Jets and the Cardinals are the only teams that are definite to select a qb before the Bills.  The Giants may or may not.  Bills could move up to the 10 to 14 range without leveraging the future.  

 

Don't rule out teams like Miami, Chargers and Bengals though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamie Muellers Ghost said:

Early birds get the worms, McBeane still recovering from Eric Wood fiasco.

 

 

Or he really meant it when he said we're building through the draft so don't expect any big FA signings.

1 hour ago, Jamie Muellers Ghost said:

Early birds get the worms, McBeane still recovering from Eric Wood fiasco.

 

 

Or he really meant it when he said we're building through the draft so don't expect any big FA signings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:

 

I think it's possible that Cousins' agent was given permission to talk to other teams, and that he has the framework of a deal with Denver in place.  I also think it's possible that Denver and Washington--knowing that--agreed upon compensation.

 

Likely?  Meh, not sure.

 

 

Nope.  The transition tag only mandates the level of compensation if a player signs an offer sheet with a new team.  Once Cousins signs the transition tender, he is under contract and can be traded for any agreed-upon compensation.

  So from Washington's standpoint what is the reason to do this now versus seeing if anybody offers better?  Cousins is in stasis until March unless he sign's with a Euro league or the XFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn. 

 

Our QB upgrade options are quickly disappearing. Smith, Cousins, McCarren... 

 

I am starting to be more and more on board with a trade up for Rosen, Mayfield, Darnold. I am not seeing many options left for an upgrade at QB. But I really don't know that Beane will be willing to give up how draft to move way up for a QB, especially sitting at #21.

 

It is starting to look like a lot of people (including myself) may be disappointed at what the Bills roll out at QB next season. Unfortunately, this may not be a problem that the Bills can solve this year. But there is still a lot of time, so I'm not giving up hope yet by any means. 

 

We are just going to have to draft our long term solution. Buffalo is not a destination and probably never will be (unless we somehow turn into a true perennial super bowl contender) 

Edited by BillsFan4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RochesterRob said:

  So from Washington's standpoint what is the reason to do this now versus seeing if anybody offers better?  Cousins is in stasis until March unless he sign's with a Euro league or the XFL

 

Not sure...could be a number of things...

 

Maybe Cousins' agent shopped around and--of the teams he'd be happy to go to--Denver offered the most in compensation.

Maybe the feedback from Cousins' agent is that teams would rather take their chances that they can sign him on the open market, and Washington decided they'd rather get something for him before he walks.

 

Again, this is all speculation.  All I was speaking to is that the mechanics of a trade are fairly straightforward: give agent permission, agent gets deal framework, GMs speak and agree to compensation, Cousins gets the transition tag prior to March 14, Cousins signs the tag, teams submit paperwork for trade, Cousins officially signs extension once traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if all this is true then I guess we can stop with all the Cousins and Alex Smith talk on here. 

Bring on Bradford talk, it'll be great watching him play in 5 games before he gets hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as it "happening already" - that's not quite possible/above board.

 

As far as agents and teams talking in principle about a signing, that would not shock me.  And the charade can go on 'til March...

 

Only way a trade could happen is if the Redskins do a tag again - which would allow other teams to sign him, but they'd lose picks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Cousins and Denver agree to a long-term deal.  Washington and Denver agree to trade compensation. Washington signs him to the deal he worked out with Denver and trades him to Denver. 

 

The question is why does Cousins agree to a long-term deal? This stifles his ability to test the water with others and drive up his price. Washington lost leverage when the news broke that they have a trade in place for Alex Smith, so I dunno why he would agree to this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheTruthHurts said:

 

I am not sure I believe this.  The league does not allow trades until the new year starts and Kirk Cousins at that point woul not be under contract.

 

Alex Smith can happen because he still had a year left on his contract, but there are rules for guys that have been franchised.

 

Unless there is a window that Washington could sign him before the start of the new year and then trade him afterwards - this seems phony.

 

Even then there would be potential salary cap implications unless the contract is written specifically to prevent that with the trade - such as base pay to start the year - signing bonus after the trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MDFan said:

I think I will ignore this rumor until someone more credible than Cowherd is reporting it.  Does not make sense from many perspectives.  

Schefter was on his weekly spot on local station today and while he didn’t report this, he did say he believed Washington was likely open to his agent talking to other teams for awhile now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheFunPolice said:

Super Bowl 52 week headlines!

 

ALEX SMITH TRADED!

COUSINS TO DENVER!

it's also super bowl 52 week...

I can't remember a SB with less juice than this one.  Maybe SF-SD, but at least that had Young storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

I am not sure I believe this.  The league does not allow trades until the new year starts and Kirk Cousins at that point woul not be under contract.

 

Alex Smith can happen because he still had a year left on his contract, but there are rules for guys that have been franchised.

 

Unless there is a window that Washington could sign him before the start of the new year and then trade him afterwards - this seems phony.

 

Even then there would be potential salary cap implications unless the contract is written specifically to prevent that with the trade - such as base pay to start the year - signing bonus after the trade.

 

....only possible thing I can think of is that all 2017 player agreements do not expire until March 14.......so even though Cousins is a UFA, technically his 2017 tag deal does not expire until March 14  (I think).....I'm guessing the Smith tariff was too tall for Beane as well as extension duration so Cousins is out who gets more money and probably 5 years.....Beane and McD are committed to building through the draft so their bridge vet is probably a 2 year scenario to groom the new 1st round QB and Peterman.....guys like McCown and Stanton are probably on their radar for openers.....also guessing that Rudolph is their pick at 21/22, preserving draft capital versus moving up....

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, boco357 said:

I can't remember a SB with less juice than this one.  Maybe SF-SD, but at least that had Young storyline.

PHIL takes 20-3 lead. NE wins 21-20 because of poor clock mgmt and PI call vs PHIL.

PHIL receiver catches the ball at the three stumbles into end zone and loses the ball after getting hit in the EZ.Ball rolls out of bounds.

1st and 10 NE at their 20.

Edited by Tcali
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok here is the difference in the 2 pending QB transactions.

 

1. Any teams are ok to talk trades even though they can't be finalized until the new league year. In Alex Smiths case this is what has transpired. And if KC wants to grant permission for Washington to negotiate what deal will be signed when the trade is finalized...that is Kansas City's choice as far as I know. Again, deal can't be made or contract signed until new league year.

 

2. In the case of Cousins, he is still under contract and set to be a free agent when the new league year hits. If Washington can work out the trade parameters they are still withing their rights to tag him and negotiate a deal with Denver. They can also give permission to work on a deal to be signed upon trade completion.

 

In both cases, nothing is official. Either deal could conceivably fall apart until completed. In any event there really isn't a case for tampering as both players likely have permission from the team that owns their rights to negotiate. Very similar to when Colin Kapernick was allowed to visit Denver's facility and try to work a deal a couple of off-seasons ago.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yav said:

Well, if all this is true then I guess we can stop with all the Cousins and Alex Smith talk on here. 

Bring on Bradford talk, it'll be great watching him play in 5 games before he gets hurt.

 

 

10 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

 You think he will go that long?  Or were you including preseason?

 

Lasted one game this season and attempted to come back which lasted 2 quarters. I see 3 quarters next season as his goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

But the trade deadline for the current season was back in November. 

So they can't trade him in this season, and unless they franchise him, he's a FA as soon as the new league year (and trades) are allowed March 14th.

I was wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I may not want to admit it, Denver makes much more sense than Buffalo for Cousins.

 

Yes, they were worse than us this season, but they are barely 2 years removed from winning the Super Bowl. They have a veteran team, a lot of good, skilled playmakers on offense and a good QB could really put them over the top again (assuming their defense rebounds). 

 

The head coach may be a question mark at the moment, but other than that they have a whole lot going for them.

 

I feel that Buffalo is a team on the rise and should be looked at more favorably by free agents. But we just this year broke a 17yr playoff drought. I'm guessing that the Bills have a lot more proving to do to the rest of the league before we are really taken seriously by free agents looking to win (especially if they're not just looking to win, but win a championship). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So OBD again asleep at the wheel, no Smith, no Cousins, does this mean no high draft pick used on a QB either? 

 

So sick of OBD going all in on QB purgatory, will Tyrod return or some other teams backup again? Same fail different staff. They never try for one so we will never have one. 

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Schefter was on his weekly spot on local station today and while he didn’t report this, he did say he believed Washington was likely open to his agent talking to other teams for awhile now

That part is believable.  Personally, I hope the rumour to Denver is true.  I don't want this guy on the Bills, while I realize this probably puts me in the minority opinion.  I would rather see another QB spot open in front of the Bills in the draft.

Edited by MDFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...