Punching Bag Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 11 hours ago, scuba guy said: Always loved how when you watch him run the opposite team players would look like they were running in quick sand. The good old Rock pile those were the days. The standing buffalo helmet still looks cool. He made the Buffalo on the helmet look like it was standing still. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th&long Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 I’m not even sure why someone brought this piece of crap up? 1 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 12 hours ago, Ned Flanders said: As teammate Joe DeLamiellure once said, "It was like playing with Babe Ruth." Just saw Joe D flying out the other day 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon Grundy Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 5 hours ago, PatsFanNH said: He sliced and diced better than any RB in the NFL history. Lol Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.... errr Aaron Hernandez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuntieEm Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 6 hours ago, WhoTom said: Two things sealed that case for the defense: 1. The police captain who led the investigation had previously spoken publicly against interracial marriage. When asked whether the police planted evidence, he took the Fifth. That's reasonable doubt right there. 2. The glove didn't fit. As soon as Johnnie Cochran made it rhyme, there was no chance for a conviction. Honestly, I'm also 100% certain that he did it and I was pissed when the verdict came back not guilty, but I understand why and, in retrospect, if I were on the jury and heard that evidence, I'd probably have voted to acquit also. The prosecution was inept. I too lean towards he had involvement in it. But you have to prove it by our justice system. I'm more concerned that it wasn't a payoff by wealth or even a fan with pull sabotaging the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuntieEm Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 3 hours ago, Kornfed said: I wonder if the LA riots (see Rodney King) had anything to do with the acquittal. ...Duh.... The guy was my idol as a kid. Great runner. .... F--- him! It certainly was a factor. The LAPD iirc was being called racist and they didn't want more rioting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted August 18, 2023 Author Share Posted August 18, 2023 56 minutes ago, 4th&long said: I’m not even sure why someone brought this piece of crap up? Feel free to drop out. In fact, feel encouraged to. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 15 hours ago, ToGoGo said: If the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit. Vile human being. I'm talking about the man who said this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 Still so surreal to this day that not only is he the reason a kid from LA became a lifelong Bills fan. But years later at 7am I drive right past the crime scene before news even broke. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 A lot of those brilliant long runs would have been 2 or 3 yards except for the great O line we had. That's not to take anything away from OJ but go back and watch how many of those runs started with a pulling guard or Braxton creating a gap off-tackle. OJ's speed and elusiveness did the rest. Simpson always gave credit to Lou Saban for building the offense around him, after the Rauch disaster during Simpson's first couple of years. Simpson + Saban = Mahomes + Reid The game was different then (50 years ago, what else would you expect) where rushing was king and the pass game was secondary. There was a game during Simpson's years in Buffalo against the Jets where the Bills QB did not complete a single pass, and the Bills won. Joe Namath completed two passes to the Bills, and two or three to his own receivers. It's almost inconceivable today for an NFL team to win without an effective passing game. 3 hours ago, 4th&long said: I’m not even sure why someone brought this piece of crap up? Because it's fun to watch a great player in action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBear Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 Fun watch. He really was one of a kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanNH Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 9 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said: Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.... errr Aaron Hernandez OJ want anywhere near as insane as Hernandez. I mean Hernandez killed a bunch of people. (Allegedly) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gianelli Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 I seem to be missing something, did you edit out all the celebration dances and skits after his touchdowns? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregg Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 OJ obviously is a POS for what he did. But he is the reason I became a Bills fan back in the day when he was famous for all the right reasons. I should be a Jets fan TBH. Born on LI. My dad bought Jets season tickets before I was born. I think he got them in Namath's rookie year. I started going to the games in the early 70's and that is when I became a Bills fan because of OJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dopey Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 16 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: Still searching for the killers … on the golf course He should check Florida golf courses. We have killers on the courses all the time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 ill say it every time but i have enough suspicion it was his son as i do thinking it was him. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 Yep guy was incredibly fast, they had no chance of getting away. Guy's a real piece of work honestly, even if your not sure whether he did it or not, writing a book about how he would have done and trying to profit off it is a pretty ***** thing to do. I think he's done a few more things over the years basically spitting in the face of the families. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 Younger folks don't understand how preternaturally special OJ was as a player (ignoring for a moment how horrible he was as a human being). While today we talk about franchise quarterbacks, in the old days most offenses were built around running backs. RBs won more Heismans than QBs and were the #1 overall draft pick more often. In those day, the best athletes became RBs. Back then defenses were designed to stop RBs unlike the defenses of today that are schemed more for the pass. So forget nickel and dime. You needed more guys at the line of scrimmage to prevent the likes of Jim Brown and OJ from getting into the open field where they'd destroy you. And LBs back then weren't small rangy guys with good coverage skills. They were hulking, violent thumpers like Dick Butkus, Mike Singletary, and Jack Lambert who would hit you so hard that your internal organs would burst out your anus. And rules favored the defense back then. For example, hash marks were spread further apart, making sweeps and other wide plays predictable. And blockers couldn't use their hands like they can today. Rules allowed for more brutal tackling back then, too (you could lead with your helmet, etc.). In his time - at the tail end of the golden era of RBs - OJ stood head-and-shoulders above his talented peers. In 1973, OJ nearly doubled the rushing output of the next-best guy (2003 yards vs. 1144). What RB, before or since, has ever been that dominant? As a matter of fact, what QB has ever been that statistically dominant? Certainly not Brady, the consensus GOAT - he was never close to OJ's level of superiority. OJ's dominance was unmatched. Bills opponents schemed, practiced, and planned with one thing in mind: slow OJ down. They put Pro Bowl spies on him. But OJ was an unstoppable Force of Nature. 4 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 Sorry, can't get excited by anything OJ did as a Bill. He should come off the Wall. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregg Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 10 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said: Sorry, can't get excited by anything OJ did as a Bill. He should come off the Wall. That won't happen. If anything, they may not acknowledge him in the new stadium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 15 minutes ago, Gregg said: That won't happen. If anything, they may not acknowledge him in the new stadium. They should change the name to OJ Stadium. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 19 minutes ago, Gregg said: That won't happen. If anything, they may not acknowledge him in the new stadium. Yeah that's probably how it happens just silently not include him in the new stadium. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 19 minutes ago, Gregg said: That won't happen. If anything, they may not acknowledge him in the new stadium. That would work for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 3 minutes ago, Rico said: They should change the name to OJ Stadium. To end the curse you must embrace the curse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 1 hour ago, hondo in seattle said: Younger folks don't understand how preternaturally special OJ was as a player (ignoring for a moment how horrible he was as a human being). While today we talk about franchise quarterbacks, in the old days most offenses were built around running backs. RBs won more Heismans than QBs and were the #1 overall draft pick more often. In those day, the best athletes became RBs. Back then defenses were designed to stop RBs unlike the defenses of today that are schemed more for the pass. So forget nickel and dime. You needed more guys at the line of scrimmage to prevent the likes of Jim Brown and OJ from getting into the open field where they'd destroy you. And LBs back then weren't small rangy guys with good coverage skills. They were hulking, violent thumpers like Dick Butkus, Mike Singletary, and Jack Lambert who would hit you so hard that your internal organs would burst out your anus. And rules favored the defense back then. For example, hash marks were spread further apart, making sweeps and other wide plays predictable. And blockers couldn't use their hands like they can today. Rules allowed for more brutal tackling back then, too (you could lead with your helmet, etc.). In his time - at the tail end of the golden era of RBs - OJ stood head-and-shoulders above his talented peers. In 1973, OJ nearly doubled the rushing output of the next-best guy (2003 yards vs. 1144). What RB, before or since, has ever been that dominant? As a matter of fact, what QB has ever been that statistically dominant? Certainly not Brady, the consensus GOAT - he was never close to OJ's level of superiority. OJ's dominance was unmatched. Bills opponents schemed, practiced, and planned with one thing in mind: slow OJ down. They put Pro Bowl spies on him. But OJ was an unstoppable Force of Nature. I agree with all this. In particular, I think the age factor contributes to a lot of the OJ cancellation that people want to impose. He clearly committed horrible crimes and I have no respect for him as a man, but as a football player he was possibly the most dominant RB and overall player of the 70s. There is an age perspective at work here. I still watch Kevin Spacey and Woody Allen and Roman Polanski movies and shows, despite what misdeeds they may have committed. My 20-something daughter rejects any exposure to these people. We agree to disagree about this. Somehow younger people insist on pretending they're more pure because they selectively avoid works by people on their naughty list. I don't feel dirty or impure because I watch a good Spacey or Allen or Polanski movie, and it doesn't reflect badly on me that I can differentiate between the person and the person's achievements. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 47 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: To end the curse you must embrace the curse. They already tried that with the real curse, but The Ralph didn't work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 1 hour ago, hondo in seattle said: Younger folks don't understand how preternaturally special OJ was as a player (ignoring for a moment how horrible he was as a human being). While today we talk about franchise quarterbacks, in the old days most offenses were built around running backs. RBs won more Heismans than QBs and were the #1 overall draft pick more often. In those day, the best athletes became RBs. Back then defenses were designed to stop RBs unlike the defenses of today that are schemed more for the pass. So forget nickel and dime. You needed more guys at the line of scrimmage to prevent the likes of Jim Brown and OJ from getting into the open field where they'd destroy you. And LBs back then weren't small rangy guys with good coverage skills. They were hulking, violent thumpers like Dick Butkus, Mike Singletary, and Jack Lambert who would hit you so hard that your internal organs would burst out your anus. And rules favored the defense back then. For example, hash marks were spread further apart, making sweeps and other wide plays predictable. And blockers couldn't use their hands like they can today. Rules allowed for more brutal tackling back then, too (you could lead with your helmet, etc.). In his time - at the tail end of the golden era of RBs - OJ stood head-and-shoulders above his talented peers. In 1973, OJ nearly doubled the rushing output of the next-best guy (2003 yards vs. 1144). What RB, before or since, has ever been that dominant? As a matter of fact, what QB has ever been that statistically dominant? Certainly not Brady, the consensus GOAT - he was never close to OJ's level of superiority. OJ's dominance was unmatched. Bills opponents schemed, practiced, and planned with one thing in mind: slow OJ down. They put Pro Bowl spies on him. But OJ was an unstoppable Force of Nature. All true. That was the era of the Running Back and OJ was the greatest there was. In today’s NFL, he would be a wide receiver, and a great one, a faster, more devastating version of Debo Samuel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToGoGo Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 16 hours ago, Mark Vader said: Vile human being. I'm talking about the man who said this. Hey man! What did I ever do to you??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted August 18, 2023 Share Posted August 18, 2023 (edited) I've never seen a running back that could cut quite like OJ Simpson! ...In all seriousness, though, one of my favorite all-time football highlights is the play at 11:19 of the video below, against the Browns, where he has a few tacklers in hot pursuit, slides on his back/butt causing the defender to fall as well, gets up untouched, and proceeds to run away from them. Edited August 18, 2023 by Logic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeFrommStateFarm Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 (edited) Heard OJ has prostate cancer https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/nfl/article-13067017/O-J-Simpson-diagnosed-prostate-cancer-undergoing-chemotherapy-76-year-old-DENIES-reports-hospice-care-posting-video-social-media.html Edited February 10 by JakeFrommStateFarm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkyMannn Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 You need really bad luck to die of prostrate cancer. Survival after 5 years is 99+% 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo44 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 On 8/18/2023 at 1:41 PM, Utah John said: I agree with all this. In particular, I think the age factor contributes to a lot of the OJ cancellation that people want to impose. He clearly committed horrible crimes and I have no respect for him as a man, but as a football player he was possibly the most dominant RB and overall player of the 70s. There is an age perspective at work here. I still watch Kevin Spacey and Woody Allen and Roman Polanski movies and shows, despite what misdeeds they may have committed. My 20-something daughter rejects any exposure to these people. We agree to disagree about this. Somehow younger people insist on pretending they're more pure because they selectively avoid works by people on their naughty list. I don't feel dirty or impure because I watch a good Spacey or Allen or Polanski movie, and it doesn't reflect badly on me that I can differentiate between the person and the person's achievements. Well said! Great point noting those movie directors as I watch their movies too when I feel like it. I have no problem doing it. It can be a struggle for me, at times, to separate out a persons creative ability and accomplishments from their character and personal history. But I am usually able to do it. The OJ situation is an exceptional example Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggerdaddynj Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 My childhood sports hero and the reason a young boy from NJ became a Bills’ fan and has been ever since—in a few years it will be my mid-century anniversary as a Bills’ fan … true loyalty knows no bounds (for the team not the murderer—though I still have his rookie card). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay_Fixit Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Best RB in Bills history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turk71 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 I was at every home game the year he went for 2k, I was 12. My brother was an usher and would bring me with him early to the games. I would stand with him in the opening to his section and run through the hallway following the team up and down the field. What an amazing year that was, 3 200+ yd games, 6 150+ yd games in a 14 game season, he was incredible to watch. Like a million other kids, I had a big poster of him on my bedroom wall. I got to go early to the Sabres and Braves games too. Greeted the French Connection many times, got them to sign broken sticks I got from Mr Regan the penalty timekeeper and pucks I would run through the hallways to get. I was picked as the Jr Buffalo Brave ball boy for a game vs the Bucks. Sat under the basket during the game and helped Lew Alcindor (Kareem Abdul Jabbar) get rebounds at halftime. Got to see Bob Lanier, Calvin Murphy play a bunch of times as well. That was such an amazing time for me, full of memories I cherish to this day. My older brother was the greatest, he was seven years older but often took me along and let me hang out with him and his friends. I would be in the back of a station wagon full of guys handing out beers. Happy to say that even though I have been out west 42 years while he has been in Rochester, my brother and I are still best buddies. OJ didn't turn out to be such a good role model, but remembering those days reminds me of some special times in my life and how great my brother was to me. 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted February 11 Author Share Posted February 11 On 8/17/2023 at 4:28 PM, WhoTom said: The glove was evidence submitted by the prosecution. If they knew it didn't fit, regardless of shrinkage, then they shouldn't have had him try it on in court. The visual (coupled with the rhyme) is a more powerful influence on the jury than an executive's testimony. I remember experts discussing the glove thing after it happened, saying that you should never ask a question of a witness unless you already know the answer and it works in your favor. I suppose it's possible that if the prosecution hadn't mentioned the glove, then the defense would have anyway, knowing that it didn't fit. But then they'd have to admit that a bloody glove was found in his car. It wasn’t shrinkage. Simpson put on a lot of weight prior to this. I’ve read he also did things physically that swelled his hands prior, as the Defense knew this would be an attempt by the prosecution to see him put the gloves on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 He is now a murdering degenerate, but there was nothing like watching him on a football field. He was phenomenal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Low Positive Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 On 8/18/2023 at 1:41 PM, Utah John said: I agree with all this. In particular, I think the age factor contributes to a lot of the OJ cancellation that people want to impose. He clearly committed horrible crimes and I have no respect for him as a man, but as a football player he was possibly the most dominant RB and overall player of the 70s. There is an age perspective at work here. I still watch Kevin Spacey and Woody Allen and Roman Polanski movies and shows, despite what misdeeds they may have committed. My 20-something daughter rejects any exposure to these people. We agree to disagree about this. Somehow younger people insist on pretending they're more pure because they selectively avoid works by people on their naughty list. I don't feel dirty or impure because I watch a good Spacey or Allen or Polanski movie, and it doesn't reflect badly on me that I can differentiate between the person and the person's achievements. I hear you. I just watched Hannah and her Sisters the other night. But I can’t watch Manhattan anymore, and that used to be one of my favorites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubes Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 hours ago, MarkyMannn said: You need really bad luck to die of prostrate cancer. Survival after 5 years is 99+% There are different kinds of prostate cancer. Most are slow growing, and you'll die of something else before you die of that. A small percentage are very aggressive, and very nasty. I still find it hard to believe that OJ once ran for 273 yards himself in a single game on Thanksgiving against the Lions...and the Bills somehow managed to lose the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 On 8/17/2023 at 11:09 AM, corta765 said: He is also still looking for the murderer! He finds the murderer every day when he looks in the mirror. I still cringe when I have to tell friends why I'm a Bills fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.