Jump to content

Not expecting to see Edmunds or Milano this week


Rubes

Recommended Posts

Our defense was clearly weakened by the losses of Edmunds and Milano. Those two are essential and we don't have backups that can do what they do. We had no answer to Fitz (Fitz!) and the Dolphins attack, although at least part of that was probably due to heat and exhaustion. Nevertheless, we need those two back badly.

 

Not this week, though. I don't expect to see either of them on the field against the Rams. It's possible Edmunds dresses, but I don't expect to see him play unless needed. Why?

 

- Non-conference game, doesn't mean much (despite old prior threads)

- Still in first place even if we lose

- Still undefeated in the division and conference even if we lose

- Brutal stretch of 5 consecutive AFC games coming up after (Raiders, Titans, Chiefs, Jets, Patriots)

- Need them as healthy as possible for those five games, the AFC is at stake

 

Unless they're both near 100%, give them time to rest and heal up. We're gonna need them much more in a couple of weeks.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, arcane said:

This is a useless opinion simply because you have no idea what is even specifically wrong with each player, other than the body part the injury entails, much less how close they are to being healthy.

 

Awesome take, thanks.

 

I know one has a shoulder injury that can impact tackling, and the other has a hamstring injury which tends to linger if it doesn't heal fully. So yeah, you do you.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HOUSE said:

In Salt Lake City, Milano & Edmunds are not playing, in Buffalo they are...

 

Fair point! We'll see. As I said, maybe they'll be healthy enough to play. I hope so...

3 minutes ago, mannc said:

I actually think they could have played last week and were held out because it was the Dolphins, so I expect to see one or both of them this week.

 

Why hold them out because it's the Dolphins, but not the Rams? Dolphins game is far more important (divisional game and AFC game).

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rubes said:

 

 

Why hold them out because it's the Dolphins, but not the Rams? Dolphins game is far more important (divisional game and AFC game).

McDermott would never say it, but they probably felt they could beat Miami without them, so erred on the side of caution.  I could be totally wrong, of course...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be surprised if Milano plays this week. He wasn't even out there when they practiced at all last week. Edmunds did have a couple of days doing individuals and then they decided it wasn't right and sat him down again at the end of the week. I'd expect the same pattern, ie. Edmunds in a red non-contact jersey doing positional drills only Wednesday and Thursday and then a decision Friday either to incorporate him in team drills - which would trend towards him playing; or to sit him down which would trend towards him missing out again.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rubes said:

 

Awesome take, thanks.

 

I know one has a shoulder injury that can impact tackling, and the other has a hamstring injury which tends to linger if it doesn't heal fully. So yeah, you do you.

 

Like I said, you know only the body part injured, not what the injury is. As such, you have no idea what the timeline for each injury is, nor where they are in their recovery. So the opinion is useless, which is all I said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mannc said:

McDermott would never say it, but they probably felt they could beat Miami without them, so erred on the side of caution.  I could be totally wrong, of course...

 

You could be wrong, but I hope you are right!  While mathematically (for division and conference standings and playoff tie-breakers), a game vs. an NFC opponent doesn't carry as much weight as an AFC game or a divisional game, with only 16 games, every game counts.  If one or both of them are healthy enough to play, they will likely play.

Edited by msw2112
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's dumb. Every game is absolutely crucial. They'll play if they are healthy, if not they won't. Simple as that.

 

My guess is Edmunds will play and Milano won't. They don't like to rush guys back from hamstring injuries.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, arcane said:

Like I said, you know only the body part injured, not what the injury is. As such, you have no idea what the timeline for each injury is, nor where they are in their recovery. So the opinion is useless, which is all I said. 

 

Yeah, basically all opinions outside the organization on any issue are useless. So, hot take.

 

Just giving you my opinion, not what I'd do if I was the coach. I know these guys play whenever they possibly can, and nobody is 100% once the season starts. But if there is any question about their health I'd say the prudent thing would be to hold them out this week, even though we'd all like to see them play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rubes said:

Our defense was clearly weakened by the losses of Edmunds and Milano. Those two are essential and we don't have backups that can do what they do. We had no answer to Fitz (Fitz!) and the Dolphins attack, although at least part of that was probably due to heat and exhaustion. Nevertheless, we need those two back badly.

 

Not this week, though. I don't expect to see either of them on the field against the Rams. It's possible Edmunds dresses, but I don't expect to see him play unless needed. Why?

 

- Non-conference game, doesn't mean much (despite old prior threads)

- Still in first place even if we lose

- Still undefeated in the division and conference even if we lose

- Brutal stretch of 5 consecutive AFC games coming up after (Raiders, Titans, Chiefs, Jets, Patriots)

- Need them as healthy as possible for those five games, the AFC is at stake

 

Unless they're both near 100%, give them time to rest and heal up. We're gonna need them much more in a couple of weeks.

 

I agree with all of this. Its just I don't think NFL teams think this way.  

 

That said, Edmunds is fine (somewhat obviously in my opinion).  Milano is really the only guy that might sit. 

Just now, Gene1973 said:

I feel that Edmunds will play, Milano is a nope.

 

Milano is more likely to sit than Edmunds. That said, if Milano was really that bad, they would have placed him on IR. The fact that they haven't speaks volumes. So too does the fact that they have no looked at any other LB options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rubes said:

 

Yeah, basically all opinions outside the organization on any issue are useless. So, hot take.

 

Just giving you my opinion, not what I'd do if I was the coach. I know these guys play whenever they possibly can, and nobody is 100% once the season starts. But if there is any question about their health I'd say the prudent thing would be to hold them out this week, even though we'd all like to see them play.

Right, but since you don't know anything, you could have just posted this (completely reasonable) take in another thread, and not dressed it up with a headline that might suggest to users there has been a report stating as much,which is likely why I was not the only disgruntled reaction to your topic.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rubes said:

Our defense was clearly weakened by the losses of Edmunds and Milano. Those two are essential and we don't have backups that can do what they do. We had no answer to Fitz (Fitz!) and the Dolphins attack, although at least part of that was probably due to heat and exhaustion. Nevertheless, we need those two back badly.

 

Not this week, though. I don't expect to see either of them on the field against the Rams. It's possible Edmunds dresses, but I don't expect to see him play unless needed. Why?

 

- Non-conference game, doesn't mean much (despite old prior threads)

- Still in first place even if we lose

- Still undefeated in the division and conference even if we lose

- Brutal stretch of 5 consecutive AFC games coming up after (Raiders, Titans, Chiefs, Jets, Patriots)

- Need them as healthy as possible for those five games, the AFC is at stake

 

Unless they're both near 100%, give them time to rest and heal up. We're gonna need them much more in a couple of weeks.

Very logical and I agree.  But I don't think McD is wired that way. Particularly the way Chan and Fitz abused the middle of the field.

Edited by CodeMonkey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said:

You need to stack wins in any way, shape or form.  If they're healthy enough to play, they'll play.

Agreed. This is McDermott's style. Remember last year in the ensuing week after Josh was knocked out against the Pats? Some of us thought they would hold him out a week. Others thought he would play as soon as he cleared protocol. He cleared and he played. If Edmunds and Milano can get in some practice work, and McDermott likes what he sees, then you can bet your **s they will be on the field this Sunday. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do generally agree that the Bills should be more cautious in brining back Edumonds and Milano due to it being a non-conference game. However I am not so sure that these injuries are that serious. Considering the 3 week IR minimum, why not just IR Edumonds and Milano if the injury is a 3 week recovery? I think there is a 50/50 chance that each of them play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, we are forgetting that we have an Offense (or at least seem to).

 

Week 1 we ran Josh.

Week 2, big change, we slung it deep.

 

Week 3... Another big change. Establish the run with our RBs. Let our badass OL get to mauling. Control that clock and limit Rams possessions. Put the onus on the Offense again and let our LBs heal completely.

 

???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MJS said:

I think that's dumb. Every game is absolutely crucial. They'll play if they are healthy, if not they won't. Simple as that.

 

My guess is Edmunds will play and Milano won't. They don't like to rush guys back from hamstring injuries.

Yeah, I don't think coaches really think about the other stuff.  If they're healthy, they will play - every game matters.  This isn't baseball.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, MJS said:

I think that's dumb. Every game is absolutely crucial. They'll play if they are healthy, if not they won't. Simple as that.

 

My guess is Edmunds will play and Milano won't. They don't like to rush guys back from hamstring injuries.

Every game is crucial!!! End thread 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Edmunds can go without risk of further injury then he plays like any other player.  Same is true for Milano but the bills are super conservative with hamstrings.  I don’t think the opponent has much influence either way.  It is true non conference games mean the least for tie breakers but winning any game is always important.   You might need this game to just be in a tie breaker. 

Edited by mattynh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Don't you know beating NFC teams hurts you for the playoffs?

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

It definitely does but not as much as in the past.  The division is in play and divisional tie breakers hit common opponents rather than AFC/NFC,. The Pats will also play the Rams so a win helps us in a divisional tie breaker.  It would hurt in a wild card tiebreaker but there is an extra wild card team this year.  It is very early in the season but my guess is W/L is a break even scenario in a tie breaker or that a win might even be better.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

 

 

Milano is more likely to sit than Edmunds. That said, if Milano was really that bad, they would have placed him on IR. The fact that they haven't speaks volumes. So too does the fact that they have no looked at any other LB options. 

I think this is how I am leaning...with the shortened window for IR even more so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wins are needed.  If they can play, they need to play.  A.J. Klein is god awful.  He basically just dances around in small circles every play.  This is clearly one of the only areas that we couldn't afford this to happen to.  We'll get through it, but man, there has to be better options out there than Klein.

Edited by Lv-Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...