Jump to content

Cam Newton to Pats.


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

B33816AC-E551-4E17-9063-90F22B3114BA.jpegHe is scheduled to make less money than Matt Barkley!!!

 

Cam has $120+ million in career earnings, not including endorsements.

 

This is a pretty clear sign, I think, of how serious Newton is about winning and playing for Belichick.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicken Boo said:

 

Cam has $120+ million in career earnings, not including endorsements.

 

This is a pretty clear sign, I think, of how serious Newton is about winning and playing for Belichick.

I don’t think he had any other options if he wants to start 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

Cam has $120+ million in career earnings, not including endorsements.

 

This is a pretty clear sign, I think, of how serious Newton is about winning and playing for Belichick.

Oh for sure.  If Cam plays well for the Pats and shows he’s healthy, he’s going to get paid.  It’s a non lose situation for both parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, KGun12TD said:

Gotta love all “the Sky is falling” fans on here. ???

 

generally, this is correct.  But not winning a playoff game since 1995, the "sky is falling" fans have been more correct than not.  

 

Further, the Pats** won the division last year with a version of Brady who is worse that current Cam.  The Pats just got better than they were last year.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

I feel like BB has signed a number of big name WRs over the years who just didn't "get it."  I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Cam didn't "get it," especially with the limited learning curve.  Boy I hope that is the case. We will see. 

 

It takes time to get a doctorate in cheating and he does not have the maskers to hide chemicals like T*m Br*dy has.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He lowered his asking price. Had to check his ego and now is added to a long list of NFL talent whose skills are in the decline that choose to go to NE with the hopes of obtaining the coveted SB Ring. Unfortunately for Cam, Marcia left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

 

generally, this is correct.  But not winning a playoff game since 1995, the "sky is falling" fans have been more correct than not.  

 

Further, the Pats** won the division last year with a version of Brady who is worse that current Cam.  The Pats just got better than they were last year.  

 

Although this is all correct, I do feel like there has to come a point when we're not projecting the past on this team. I would have to humbly disagree that Cam is better than Brady...in fact, if ever! So, we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1ManRaid said:

And which one was an incredibly raw prospect coming out of college, is still on the rise, and just got handed Diggs and Moss?  Ok got it.  Thanks.

 

Allen hasn't really shown anything as a passer that he will take the next steps 

 

he is still a mediocre passer in the NFL. overall decent QB because of his running ability but in terms of being a pure passer he is bottom 10 in the league. we will see how he takes advantage 

Edited by Penfield45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s telling that of the 31 remaining teams that could have given him a deal, only 1 late in the dance gave him an option-at league minimum.  Maybe they know something that us fans just don’t.  

 

He is a shell of himself and from what I see, doesn’t have the mental fortitude to handle it-especially if he doesn’t make it as the starter.  Now wouldn’t that be fun to watch here in NE!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Bills offense was worse than the Pats "dogschitt" offense. 

But our offense is gonna be much better now with the addition of Diggs. Plus Singletary is getting a second year in the same system and this will be Josh’s 3 rd year under the same system as well. Our offense on paper is 20 million times better than the dog ***** that the pats have. Besides an injured often Edelman, Newton has literally no one to throw to besides him. They’re passing game will struggle mightily. They don’t even have a running game either. If they start Cam and he can’t run they’re in trouble 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Behindenemylines said:

It’s telling that of the 31 remaining teams that could have given him a deal, only 1 late in the dance gave him an option-at league minimum.  Maybe they know something that us fans just don’t.  

 

He is a shell of himself and from what I see, doesn’t have the mental fortitude to handle it-especially if he doesn’t make it as the starter.  Now wouldn’t that be fun to watch here in NE!

 

 

True, but he rocks a babushka.  ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

 

generally, this is correct.  But not winning a playoff game since 1995, the "sky is falling" fans have been more correct than not.  

 

Further, the Pats** won the division last year with a version of Brady who is worse that current Cam.  The Pats just got better than they were last year.  

Statistically, Brady put up better numbers last year than Cam has put up since 2015.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS is the guy Bills fans are all up in arms over the Pats signing?? LOL **clicking his heels** There's no place like New England, There's no place like New England"

The real reason behind Cam Newton’s foot injury...



EFXDg8_WsAAl7U6?format=jpg&name=small

another thought I have is Mr red shoes newton wont be performing so well ON HiS BACK after the Bills D-line crushes him. Guy is toast.

Edited by Muppy
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really find it so weird that people are so positive about this for the Pats. The Pats are unquestionably better today than they were Saturday. There’s been a lot of talk about Brady but he wasn’t going to be there this year anyways. The comparison isn’t Brady vs. Cam; it is Stidham vs. Cam. I don’t think that the Pats are great but they are much better now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

I really find it so weird that people are so positive about this for the Pats. The Pats are unquestionably better today than they were Saturday. There’s been a lot of talk about Brady but he wasn’t going to be there this year anyways. The comparison isn’t Brady vs. Cam; it is Stidham vs. Cam. I don’t think that the Pats are great but they are much better now.

this is where i'm at with it.  it makes the pats better, (even if it's just a little bit) and that's not a good thing.  that being said, if the bills can't beat the pats with cam, that's on the bills.  they've had their time to develop into who they've wanted to be under mcd and beane.  time to make it work.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RyanC883 said:

 

generally, this is correct.  But not winning a playoff game since 1995, the "sky is falling" fans have been more correct than not.  

 

Further, the Pats** won the division last year with a version of Brady who is worse that current Cam.  The Pats just got better than they were last year.  

How intact is their team  from last year as far as coaches and players. I know they lost some, notably the ST coordinator and OL coach plus van noy, Jamie Collins, Elandon Roberts and Danny Shelton. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense is so good that even if Cam works he'll have issues vs. us.

 

I didn't think this would happen due to fit with Pats/McDaniels. Presumably they'll change their offense and try to use more PA?? Or maybe they don't and secretly hope Stidham wins the job. It would be the most NFL thing ever to have Josh and Cam playing each other in spread the whole time trying to play read the defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, VW82 said:

Our defense is so good that even if Cam works he'll have issues vs. us.

 

I didn't think this would happen due to fit with Pats/McDaniels. Presumably they'll change their offense and try to use more PA?? Or maybe they don't and secretly hope Stidham wins the job. It would be the most NFL thing ever to have Josh and Cam playing each other in spread the whole time trying to play read the defense.  

McDaniels did fine with Tebow. Cam is much better than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScottLaw said:

Bills offense was worse than the Pats "dogschitt" offense. 

 

Pay attention, junior, we're talking about THIS season.  The Bills added Diggs and two more WRs, and added Moss while subtracting Gore.  The Pats*** lost the GOAT, Gronk, and their HOF OL coach.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I really find it so weird that people are so positive about this for the Pats. The Pats are unquestionably better today than they were Saturday. There’s been a lot of talk about Brady but he wasn’t going to be there this year anyways. The comparison isn’t Brady vs. Cam; it is Stidham vs. Cam. I don’t think that the Pats are great but they are much better now.

Yeah, you pretty much have to ask, would I rather face Stidham/Hoyer or Cam twice next year?

 

Easy answers IMO.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I really find it so weird that people are so positive about this for the Pats. The Pats are unquestionably better today than they were Saturday. There’s been a lot of talk about Brady but he wasn’t going to be there this year anyways. The comparison isn’t Brady vs. Cam; it is Stidham vs. Cam. I don’t think that the Pats are great but they are much better now.

Maybe, but bringing in a high profile vet QB seems to never end up being low risk.  Any other position, sure.  But if Cam comes out and gets hurt or craps the bed, and the QBs behind him are now unprepared and unconfident, things might get ugly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I really find it so weird that people are so positive about this for the Pats. The Pats are unquestionably better today than they were Saturday. There’s been a lot of talk about Brady but he wasn’t going to be there this year anyways. The comparison isn’t Brady vs. Cam; it is Stidham vs. Cam. I don’t think that the Pats are great but they are much better now.


I mean, yea Cam makes the Pats better but they literally had the worst QB room in the NFL, so that wasn’t hard to do. How much better they are depends on what version of Cam they are getting.
 

I’m still not seeing how Cams personality and way he works, fits with BB. It’ll interesting to say the least. Maybe it works, I guess we will find out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure Cam will work out. Nevertheless, this is a steal for the Patriots. Nothing to lose. I have a hard time thinking Cam will be a good Bellicheat student. However, Cam is always Nice if he is winning. The Pats know how to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chuck Schick said:

Maybe, but bringing in a high profile vet QB seems to never end up being low risk.  Any other position, sure.  But if Cam comes out and gets hurt or craps the bed, and the QBs behind him are now unprepared and unconfident, things might get ugly.  

 

5 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said:


I mean, yea Cam makes the Pats better but they literally had the worst QB room in the NFL, so that wasn’t hard to do. How much better they are depends on what version of Cam they are getting.
 

I’m still not seeing how Cams personality and way he works, fits with BB. It’ll interesting to say the least. Maybe it works, I guess we will find out.

I guess my point is that they are DEFINITELY better. I don’t know how much better but there’s no doubt in my mind that they have taken a step forward. If the Pats improve, even incrementally, it’s not a positive for the Bills. It may not matter but there’s no way that we can view this as a good thing.  

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

 

I guess my point is that they are DEFINITELY better. I don’t know how much better but there’s no doubt in my mind that they have taken a step forward. If the Pats improve, even incrementally, it’s not a positive for the Bills. It may not matter but there’s no way that we can view this as a good thing.  


Oh I’m not doubting they are better now, they are. I’m just not sure how much better and therefore not sure how much it really effects this Bills team.

 

Here’s an interesting thought experiment, which FA QB do you think would have had the most success with the Pats:  Dalton, Winston or Newton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

 

I guess my point is that they are DEFINITELY better. I don’t know how much better but there’s no doubt in my mind that they have taken a step forward. If the Pats improve, even incrementally, it’s not a positive for the Bills. It may not matter but there’s no way that we can view this as a good thing.  

The thought of the Pats going down in flames with Stidham just isn’t as funny as it is with Cam. Stidham isn’t even meh.

1 hour ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

Honestly I'd be more scared of Tyrod Taylor than Cam as QB for the Pats. 

I wouldn’t go that far. Fitzy on the Pats, yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...