Jump to content

David Carr: Vikings Made a Mistake Paying Cousins $84M


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Stafford is tied for 5th in 4th Quarter Comebacks among active QBs and everyone with more than him has at least 5 more years in the league than him. Not sure I'd call him anti-clutch.

Hes also likely to finish top 5 in yards in the history of the league.  Is he too 5?  No.  Stats can lie.  Why did he have to make comebacks.  Why does a team with a franchise elite qb never make the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

David Carr: Vikes Made Mistake PAYING Cousins -- Plus, Updated Rankings

For the Minnesota Vikings, a 5-4-1 record feels about as disappointing as ham for Thanksgiving.
 
This year's up-and-down effort comes after a 2017 campaign filled with success -- a 13-3 regular-season record, NFC North title and an NFC Championship Game appearance. All of this with Case Keenumunder center, and he was playing on a one-year, $2 million deal. This offseason, the Vikings chose to let Keenum walk (to Denver) on a two-year, $36 million contract with $25 million in guarantees, and sign Kirk Cousins to a fully guaranteed three-year, $84 million contract. When comparing Keenum's production per start in Minnesota in 2017 to Cousins' starts this season, their overall performance isn't drastically different.
 
Keenum in 2017 (14 starts): 22 of 33 pass attempts, 243.4 passing ypg, 3:1 TD-to-INT ratio, 97.6 passer rating.
Cousins in 2018 (10 starts): 29 of 41 pass attempts, 294.7 passing ypg, 2.7:1 TD-to-INT ratio, 99.3 passer rating.
 
The issue is the Vikings are paying Cousins $10 million per year more than Keenum -- and committed $59 million more in guarantees -- for a drastic difference in performance. They're paying Cousins to be exceptional, and he hasn't been.
 
That's why I believe it was a mistake for Minnesota to pay him ALL that money.


Do you think they'd want 2018 Keenum at any price?

They have cousins on a short-term deal at relatively fair market value. The Vikes won't have time to regret the deal. It's not like they gave him a Cutler deal. He was the only QB in the league that was available that could keep their Super Bowl window open. I'm sure they would have preferred Rodgers, but you can't always get what you want.

Wouldn't be shocked at all to see the Vikes use a 1rst/2nd on a QB who ends up starting when Cousins deal is up, and that may have been the fallback all along. Even if the Jets got Cousins, they were probably taking Darnold too..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Hebert19 said:

Hes also likely to finish top 5 in yards in the history of the league.  Is he too 5?  No.  Stats can lie.  Why did he have to make comebacks.  Why does a team with a franchise elite qb never make the playoffs.  

 

Stafford is a franchise QB. He is not elite. The elite QBs in the NFL are Brady, Rodgers, Brees and arguably Big Ben. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe David just look at the disgusting contract his Brother is stealing from the Raiders before he talks about other QB deals.  I bet Raiders regret Carr contract (which was a major part of why they didn't pay Mack and instead traded him) a lot more than Vikes regret Cousins contract.  Cousins at least is playing along the lines of what hes been that got him the contract.  Carr has played worse since signing his and they lost Mack.  Double whammy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Stafford is a franchise QB. He is not elite. The elite QBs in the NFL are Brady, Rodgers, Brees and arguably Big Ben. 

I'd take Goff or Mahomes over any of them if I was starting a franchise right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NoSaint said:

 

Yea, but the flip side is those that watch keenum play don’t think he can get the lead consistently enough to be able to lose the game. 

 

And while he’s incredibly highly paid, in the universe of new qb contracts is it crazy that he’s similar to Carr, Stafford and garrapolo (after like a month starting)? 30m will be the new normal as elite guys get new deals 

 

I don't know why people always get sticker shock on QB contracts when the bar is raised to a new high any time one of the top 10 guys (or beyond the top 10 in JG's case) signs a new deal.   A couple years ago people were freaking out that Brees was tanking the Saints by asking for $25M;  now that looks like a bargain.

 

By the time we get to a new Mahomes deal in a couple years he might be pushing $40M/yr.

 

 

Edited by KD in CA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, matter2003 said:

I'd take Goff or Mahomes over any of them if I was starting a franchise right now.

 

Indeed. By performance this season it is Brees and then those two. Elite status is not earned over a single year of brilliance though. Matt Ryan, Andrew Luck, Philip Rivers and Russ Wilson have had elite seasons.... the thing that elevates that band of 4 is their ability to produce year after year. That consistency an elite QB makes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Stafford is a franchise QB. He is not elite. The elite QBs in the NFL are Brady, Rodgers, Brees and arguably Big Ben. 

Nothing arguable about Roethlisberger; he’s in the club. I would also add Russell Wilson. He doesn’t put up huge numbers, but without him, that team doesn’t win 4 games a year.

Edited by mannc
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2018 at 3:32 PM, Buffalo Bills Fan said:

Cousins is good. But I put him in Rivers or Stafford, Smith category. Below to, Brees, Brady, Rodgers. For some reason those three don't make it far in playoffs.

 

I agree with a Cousins to Smith comparison; but I think Rivers and Stafford are both on another level - much closer to the Brees/Brady/Rodgers tier.

 

Rivers and Stafford have, in my opinion, been victim to poorly coached/run teams.  Their individual stats are pretty incredible.  I don't think Cousins come close to any of them and Smith is far behind Cousins.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another way to look at the question: 2 teams seemingly peaking, entering their Super Bowl competition phases.  Vikings: let's put all our eggs in the QB basket and sign the best available free agent QB, no matter what it costs.  Jags: let's double down on what got us to this point by beefing up the defense, and hope that our objectively bad QB can continue his progress toward being just good enough to take us to the next level. So far it's not working so great for the Vikings, although they're still in the hunt. So far it's working horribly for the Jags ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 9:48 PM, Warcodered said:

He did seem to be padding his stats at the end of the game with the Bills.

Thank goodness, because I had him as my fantasy QB that week

On 11/21/2018 at 7:03 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

Stafford is a franchise QB. He is not elite. The elite QBs in the NFL are Brady, Rodgers, Brees and arguably Big Ben. 

And Rivers

Edited by buffaloboyinATL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gugny said:

 

I agree with a Cousins to Smith comparison; but I think Rivers and Stafford are both on another level - much closer to the Brees/Brady/Rodgers tier.

 

Rivers and Stafford have, in my opinion, been victim to poorly coached/run teams.  Their individual stats are pretty incredible.  I don't think Cousins come close to any of them and Smith is far behind Cousins.

 

 

Totally agree.  I watched this guy play in Washington every week.  He is not a winner, not a leader.  He puts up meaningless stats but does not lift his team.  He is the opposite of a big game QB.  Skins fans were happy to see him go.  He has nowhere near the talent of either Rivers or Stafford.  Good for him that he out manuvered the Skins and cashed in, but he was never going to be worth the money. Keenum is less talented but has heart that Cousins will never have.  Minnesota screwed up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 9:39 PM, CaptnCoke11 said:

He’s playing just how he did in Washington.. Vikings got exactly who Kirk Cousins is and always will be.  That’s how free agency is though.. Yiu don’t overpay you don’t get the player.  

 

Shouldnt this frighten every single one of us because of "All the cap space the bills have"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BillsMafia13 said:

Anybody know what it would cost to bring Flacco in as a back up next year if the Ravens cut him? Idk how to read contract numbers but if the Ravens move on what roughly would it cost to bring him in?

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/baltimore-ravens/joe-flacco-4000/

Flacco won't go to any team to be a backup. He will be a starter somewhere, even if as a mentor to a rookie before hanging it up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/20/2018 at 9:41 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Agreed. Many here wanted the Bills to be in the Cousins sweepstakes.  I never thought it was a good idea. 

I for one thought he would be better than Tyrod. Not sure if I’m ever okay paying the new going rate for a QB every year tho...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2018 at 8:13 AM, Hebert19 said:

Hes also likely to finish top 5 in yards in the history of the league.  Is he too 5?  No.  Stats can lie.  Why did he have to make comebacks.  Why does a team with a franchise elite qb never make the playoffs.  

 

 

Wins are team stats.

 

Stafford and Rivers have been playing very well for a long time while surrounded by mediocrity. 

 

I wouldn't quite call either guy elite, But Rivers has been around the top six or so for a very long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 9:39 PM, MrEpsYtown said:

I think they will regret it, but I think their real mistake was giving Riley Reiff and Mike Remmers a crap ton of money, because those guys suck. They need to keep Cousins upright. 

Remmers sucked in Carolina. I live in Charlotte and every Panthers fan I knew was jumping for joy when they didn't re-sign him. He got destroyed in that Super Bowl loss.

A lot like Bengals fans with Bodine ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 10:10 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

$28M/year says the former, but he's not the kind of player that merits the hefty price tag like the upper echelon QBs around the league. 

 

Since when has that mattered?

 

Stafford, Ryan, Flacco, Cousins.  None are worth $30 mill per season.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 8:51 PM, LSHMEAB said:

 

He's very similar to Stat Padford.

 

Not a big fan of either guy. They're not terrible, but they never get it done consistently enough to be elite.

Stat Padford is one of the best nicknames coined for a player. I frickin love it (courtesy of Rob Parker)

 

He's like.. 1-15 in primetime games. Horrible record vs winning teams

Edited by PetermanThrew5Picks
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

Stat Padford is one of the best nicknames coined for a player. I frickin love it (courtesy of Rob Parker)

 

He's like.. 1-15 in primetime games. Horrible record vs winning teams

They're such anomalies(both he and second Cousins) because I'm an analytics guy but it's obvious based on the eye test that some guys just don't get it done when you need it.

 

I know there are leverage stats that tell a more complete story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...