Jump to content

Peterman will be starting Sunday


Doc

Recommended Posts

I enjoyed watching 2 dart throwers in the Falcons-Saints game, so my eyes tell me that Nate is the only guy we got that can get close to that.  Very entertaining.  I'd like to see some entertaining football from my team.  Entertaining trumps boring.  Go Bills!!!!!!!!

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, klos63 said:

you mean, less than 5 INT's in the first half?  I agree.

 

 

 

His last game, he went 6 for 15 for 50 yards, with 0 TDs and 0 INTs.

 

I would assume that's what he's comparing it to. As everyone should be at this point.

2 hours ago, Tenhigh said:

 

Of you couldnt see the different between TT's sometimes bad outings and Peterman's record setting adventure in LA, I dont know what to tell you.

 

 

 

If you're only going to look at Peterman's worst game, you ought to look only at Tyrod's worst game as well.

 

If you're more interested in making sense, you ought to look at the body of work of each. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

 

His last game, he went 6 for 15 for 50 yards, with 0 TDs and 0 INTs.

 

I would assume that's what he's comparing it to. As everyone should be at this point.

 

 

 

If you're only going to look at Peterman's worst game, you ought to look only at Tyrod's worst game as well.

 

If you're more interested in making sense, you ought to look at the body of work of each. 

Tyrod sucks. Peterman sucks more. Cant wait to hear your explanation for his 10-31 125 yard 1 td 4 int performance against the Colts. The barometric pressure perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dunkirk Don said:

We will get destroyed again.  They are just better than us

I hope Peterman does start and the line actuallly blocks for him. Taylor is barely a serviceable back up. Stop this expirement with Taylor he is terrible and will never win a playoff game against anyone. Bosa said  on micd up”they aren’t even blocking me”. Maybe the coach can convince the line to block for our QB and it ain’t Taylor . Please stop the pain bench mr Taylor who just isn’t a winning QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At home against a bad Colts team I expect him to look much better. He honestly could not ask for a better game to start after the debacle against San Diego.

2 hours ago, SlamnSam said:

I hope Peterman does start and the line actuallly blocks for him. Taylor is barely a serviceable back up. Stop this expirement with Taylor he is terrible and will never win a playoff game against anyone. Bosa said  on micd up”they aren’t even blocking me”. Maybe the coach can convince the line to block for our QB and it ain’t Taylor . Please stop the pain bench mr Taylor who just isn’t a winning QB.

 

Bosa doesnt realize that Jordan Mills just LOOKS like he isn't blocking him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BuffAlone said:

I don't believe it for a minute. McD said "normally, yes, you want the guy to get reps during the week. But with Tyrod, he has had the reps and has muscle memory/ timing down with the receivers". 

Tells me TT is starting. Not that this week wouldn't "maybe" be the right time to vindicate his Charger game decision in starting Nasty Nate, but no, Tyrod and his muscle memory will start. Hear me now, discuss next week?

Tyrod has no timing with the wr.  How many deep balls has he hit.  That is one of the biggest things I've noticed from him this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dafan said:

Tyrod has no timing with the wr.  How many deep balls has he hit.  That is one of the biggest things I've noticed from him this year.

Im guessing cause his first year hitting watkins deep so much alot of people say tyrods deep ball is one of his strengths but in reality it is terrible. I cant even think of any that he has even completed this year. Everyone is overthrown , probably cause he is scared to throw an int

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Pbomb said:

Im guessing cause his first year hitting watkins deep so much alot of people say tyrods deep ball is one of his strengths but in reality it is terrible. I cant even think of any that he has even completed this year. Everyone is overthrown , probably cause he is scared to throw an int

Probably because no one on the team is as good as Watkins. Thompson's 40 time is better than Watkins' but if someone as fast as Thompson (allegedly ran a high 4.2/low 4.3 40) was any good at WR as opposed to just being fast, they wouldn't be a journeyman. The rest of the WR corps is not know for their speed or deep ability. Hitting a deep ball takes more than QB accuracy. The WR needs to be able to track it in the air as well, which is where Watkins was >>>> anyone on this roster. Even Goodwin was a better deep tracker than this group.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JM57 said:

Probably because no one on the team is as good as Watkins. Thompson's 40 time is better than Watkins' but if someone as fast as Thompson (allegedly ran a high 4.2/low 4.3 40) was any good at WR as opposed to just being fast, they wouldn't be a journeyman. The rest of the WR corps is not know for their speed or deep ability. Hitting a deep ball takes more than QB accuracy. The WR needs to be able to track it in the air as well, which is where Watkins was >>>> anyone on this roster. Even Goodwin was a better deep tracker than this group.

Well he couldnt hit watkins last year either, hit goodwin only like once or twice. And people have been open deep this year too, he just doesnt throw it cause he is scared or overthrows them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mead107 said:

Going to be 20-30 mph winds Sunday 

 

This game will tell us a lot about Peterman.  Too bad that in today's NFL you don't get too  many chances, especially as a lower-round pick.  He is 0-1 and he won't get many more.  If he shows he can throw the ball through the elements in Buffalo, he's got a shot to stick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

 

His last game, he went 6 for 15 for 50 yards, with 0 TDs and 0 INTs.

 

I would assume that's what he's comparing it to. As everyone should be at this point.

 

 

 

If you're only going to look at Peterman's worst game, you ought to look only at Tyrod's worst game as well.

 

If you're more interested in making sense, you ought to look at the body of work of each. 

and if you ignore Peterman's worst game, ignore Taylors. It's natural to look at Petermans bad game since it's his only start. I was making a joke, but it's a valid concern. 5 Int's in 1 half doesn't happen too often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BuffAlone said:

I don't believe it for a minute. McD said "normally, yes, you want the guy to get reps during the week. But with Tyrod, he has had the reps and has muscle memory/ timing down with the receivers". 

Tells me TT is starting. Not that this week wouldn't "maybe" be the right time to vindicate his Charger game decision in starting Nasty Nate, but no, Tyrod and his muscle memory will start. Hear me now, discuss next week?

 

 

I agree with this.

 

Hate when posters cite opinions as fact.  Worst part of TSW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tenhigh said:

 

Of you couldnt see the different between TT's sometimes bad outings and Peterman's record setting adventure in LA, I dont know what to tell you.

Nearly 3 years of (maybe) just good enough to an unknown.  

 

At at this time I’ll gladly take the unknown. 

54 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

More like going out on a stump with that prediction.

A stump is sturdier than a limb.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest thing I noticed about Peterman is what can make or break his career. He is always trying to make a play and he needs to learn to take the sack sometimes and understand pocket presence. If he can figure those two things out he has shown pretty good ball placement accuracy (when not getting crushed) and the ability to throw open receivers as well as throw before their break. He's no longer at Pitt anymore and taking a sack isn't the end of the world. The part of pocket presence is knowing whether he has time to get the ball out before he's hit and not while he's being hit. 

This game if he  starts will give him the best opportunity to get more comfortable in the pocket and against a depleted secondary we have very strong matchups with our wide receivers as well. This is more of a training wheels game for him. If Tyrod starts which would make no sense to me at this point him being injured and we are currently the 8th seed which means we need to win out or have other teams fall back to have a chance. Because I'm a Bills fan I want to win and I want to see Peterman show that he isn't just the butt of all jokes in the NFL but, even if he plays great it doesn't mean much because of the inferior opponent. BTW this inferior opponent we speak of could beat us no matter who we roll out with at QB Brissett is no joke and plays hard.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that it appears Peterman is starting, I hope his confidence was not destroyed in the Chargers' game and that he shows enough talent that we (and he) can see that he has a future in this league (at least as a quality back up).

Edited by Peter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Woodman19 said:

Baring another disaster, he probably gets the Fins.

It really seems to make the most logical sense at this point imo...it’s not like Tyrod is Brett Favre and is capable of going on a tear and leading us to the playoffs...he is what he is...I think they should just play the kid and see if there is any improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple years back I was looking for a Tyrod jersey in various Albany sporting goods stores, but quickly learned that Bills apparel wasn’t really sold around there...to this day I like to think the good lord was looking down on me at that time, for only He could see the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Peter said:

Now that it appears Peterman is starting, I hope his confidence was not destroyed in the Chargers' game and that he shows enough talent that we (and he) can see that he has a future in this league (at least as a quality back up).

 

I don't think anything is going to rattle this rookie, this is the way he plays the game. He will have more 300 yard games in these last 4 games than Taylor has had in 3 years here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How nice would it be to have had a year; where playoffs were still (and tech are still) an option, and we get to see our Rookie QB play 4 meaningful games of regular season action and 3 In the division? 4 games of Peterman out the door here would be a very nice ending to the season. Let’s see what he can do. We know what the other guy can do.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

How nice would it be to have had a year; where playoffs were still (and tech are still) an option, and we get to see our Rookie QB play 4 meaningful games of regular season action and 3 In the division? 4 games of Peterman out the door here would be a very nice ending to the season. Let’s see what he can do. We know what the other guy can do.

 

....why the hell not?......drafted him for a reason, right?...ONLY downside I see is if the kid performs, there will be 876 "I Told You So" threads from SaviorPeterman and I can't afford 500 bucks for Pepto Bismol to aid my ad nauseam..............

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't myself remember a starting qb labeled as a game time decision?  wtf?  he is gonna start tyrod. we will win a boring game by a close score because our qb can't move an offense. then will get our arses handed to us by miami at home...then mcd will mcturtle and then start nate.  hoping i'm wrong.

8 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

My opinion soon to be fact

i sure hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...