Jump to content

If the Bills Don’t Make it to the AFCCG, Should McDermott Be Fired?


Gugny

If the Bills Don’t Make it to the AFCCG, Should McDermott Be Fired?  

378 members have voted

  1. 1. If the Bills Don’t Make it to the AFCCG, Should McDermott Be Fired?



Recommended Posts

On 10/18/2023 at 4:21 AM, Kirby Jackson said:

This is where I’m at. I’m firmly in the “yes” category here. He did a nice job rebuilding the culture but that is now settled. I’m not impressed by his record. His record has not exceeded the talent imo. That’s how I judge coaching. “Is your record better than if __ was coaching here?” I don’t see it with McDermott. There are dozens of guys that could have produced the exact same results with these rosters. They need someone that can elevate them to the next level. I said it before the year and I’ll say it again, unless they take the next step it’s time for a change while you still have prime Josh Allen.

 

Someone on here once made a brilliant comparison calling Sean, Doug Collins for those early Bills teams. He had Jordan and they became contenders. Once they moved on to Phil Jackson, they became 6-time champions. That really stuck with me and feels like such a fair comparison. We need more from our coaching staff than we are currently getting.

I disagree. His first year was one of the best coaching performances I ever saw. He took a 5-11 roster, made them a 9-7 team and made the playoffs. Yes, they backed in and were lucky to get there but that team should not have been close. That's why I am impressed with his record. Despite the talent he has had the last 5 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

I disagree. His first year was one of the best coaching performances I ever saw. He took a 5-11 roster, made them a 9-7 team and made the playoffs. Yes, they backed in and were lucky to get there but that team should not have been close. That's why I am impressed with his record. Despite the talent he has had the last 5 years

He did a great job building the culture in the first year. They cleaned house in year 2 and built the roster back up in 2019.

 

I just think that a lot of people could take this roster and win 11 games and (almost) 1/2 of their playoff games. Their ceiling has been Super Bowl Champ for the last 3 years imo (4 Including this year). They have yet to appear in the game. I know that it isn’t easy but if you aren’t reaching the ceiling (like Doug Collins) get me someone that will. The Bills cannot continue to come up short during Allen’s prime. This isn’t 2017 when they are trying to break the drought. This is when they need to capitalize.
 

 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/17/2023 at 11:59 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

 

If the Bills go 4-13 like Arizona did McDermott and Beane are in trouble. But it would take that sort of disaster for Pegula to fire them after this season IMO.

That's kind of the point tho

 

A team w Allen at QB isn't going to go 4-13

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Negan said:

I'd take Harbaugh in a heartbeat if McDermott isn't the guy, considering he's trying to get back into the NFL especially after the sign stealing fiasco

 

Is he trying to get back into the NFL. I thought Michigan was his dream job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good topic question

 

im not happy with how the bills are playing 

 

BUT I am happy with a few things.

 

1 Defense has played admirable despite the adversity.  Really they have.  
 

aside from Elam in London really they played “the prince” pretty well.  He’s a threat at QB and a playoff team for sure - I feel we beat them in the USA for sure.

 

offense struggles in week 4-6

 

what?  Why do you like that?

 

they have time to fix it!  I have seen this time and time again with chmapship teams - even Mahomes and the chiefs.  Little slump then start upward and get stronger and better together.

 

now they have to change and they have to adapt.  We will see if they are championship caliber in the coming weeks but I still believe they beat the chiefs and the cowboys and the bengals in the coming weeks - even feel they beat the Eagles.  Yeah they may lose one in there somewhere those are great teams but feel they win a big majority

So I feel they make the AFCCG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said:

He did a great job building the culture in the first year. They cleaned house in year 2 and built the roster back up in 2019.

 

I just think that a lot of people could take this roster and win 11 games and (almost) 1/2 of their playoff games. Their ceiling has been Super Bowl Champ for the last 3 years imo (4 Including this year). They have yet to appear in the game. I know that it isn’t easy but if you aren’t reaching the ceiling (like Doug Collins) get me someone that will. The Bills cannot continue to come up short during Allen’s prime. This isn’t 2017 when they are trying to break the drought. This is when they need to capitalize.
 

 

I'm still skeptical that a lot of people can. I'd take McDermott over a guy like Brandon Staley right now. I feel like that guy could hold this team back. I do think coaching matters and there are worse coaches than McDermott that can take the franchise backwards 

43 minutes ago, Drew21PA said:

Good topic question

 

im not happy with how the bills are playing 

 

BUT I am happy with a few things.

 

1 Defense has played admirable despite the adversity.  Really they have.  
 

aside from Elam in London really they played “the prince” pretty well.  He’s a threat at QB and a playoff team for sure - I feel we beat them in the USA for sure.

 

offense struggles in week 4-6

 

what?  Why do you like that?

 

they have time to fix it!  I have seen this time and time again with chmapship teams - even Mahomes and the chiefs.  Little slump then start upward and get stronger and better together.

 

now they have to change and they have to adapt.  We will see if they are championship caliber in the coming weeks but I still believe they beat the chiefs and the cowboys and the bengals in the coming weeks - even feel they beat the Eagles.  Yeah they may lose one in there somewhere those are great teams but feel they win a big majority

So I feel they make the AFCCG

We didn't have any offensive struggles in week 4. Only the last 2 weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Gugny said:


So explain the playoff game. They were tired?  They were distraught?  Give me a break. 
 

Trevor Lawrence and Zack f*cking Wilson look like prime Joe Montana and our offense can’t keep up with them?

 

Let me guess. Jet lag!?

 

We’ve been making excuses for too long. 
 

As I said earlier … one common denominator. 


why did the mighty eagles lose to Zack? 
their coach ***** sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote no because I don't think Terry Pegulas has made that specific expectation clear. If he has, then sure, fire the man based on the fact that clear expectations were not met.

 

My personal expectations (as a fan with zero responsibilities to the team and nothing on the line) are simply to be entertained, which Allen does more than any other QB in the league...hell, more than any other PLAYER in the league. For my personal needs, Allen's prime years are not being wasted at all.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo03 said:

I'm still skeptical that a lot of people can. I'd take McDermott over a guy like Brandon Staley right now. I feel like that guy could hold this team back. I do think coaching matters and there are worse coaches than McDermott that can take the franchise backwards 

We didn't have any offensive struggles in week 4. Only the last 2 weeks

Let me ask it differently. What do you think the ceiling is/has been? If you think 1 championship game appearance is it, then you should be satisfied.
 

I’m not at a point where I’m worried about “it could be worse.” That’s where I was with Tyrod and that’s because the team was bad for a generation. I was of the belief that the high floor was good at that time. Now, it is not acceptable to me to get bounced in the Divisional Round. I believe that this team is/has been Super Bowl Caliber. He isn’t getting his team where they belong. You don’t get “Josh Allen’s” very often. You better take advantage of his prime.

 

Another example that I think works is Dwayne Casey. He won the Coach of the Year and was fired that offseason!! His team won the title the next year. Don’t settle for “it could be worse” while you have Josh Allen in his prime.

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Let me ask it differently. What do you think the ceiling is/has been? If you think 1 championship game appearance is it, then you should be satisfied.
 

I’m not at a point where I’m worried about “it could be worse.” That’s where I was with Tyrod and that’s because the team was bad for a generation. I was of the belief that the high floor was good at that time. Now, it is not acceptable to me to get bounced in the Divisional Round. I believe that this team is/has been Super Bowl Caliber. He isn’t getting his team where they belong. You don’t get “Josh Allen’s” very often. You better take advantage of his prime.

 

Another example that I think works is Dwayne Casey. He won the Coach of the Year and was fired that offseason!! His team won the title the next year. Don’t settle for “it could be worse” while you have Josh Allen in his prime.

 

Sean McDermott is a million times better a HC than Tyrod Taylor is a QB. Slight hyperbole but it isn't close.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo03 said:

I disagree. His first year was one of the best coaching performances I ever saw. He took a 5-11 roster, made them a 9-7 team and made the playoffs. Yes, they backed in and were lucky to get there but that team should not have been close. That's why I am impressed with his record. Despite the talent he has had the last 5 years

I love when people say something like this. The 2016 bills went seven and nine and were in the playoff hunt until week 16(ot loss to Miami and Rex resigning fired).  He took the 16th ranked offence to 29th and the defence  was pretty much the same.  Yep got some breaks and Andy Dalton got them into the playoffs.

 

Then came Allen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Sean McDermott is a million times better a HC than Tyrod Taylor is a QB. Slight hyperbole but it isn't close.

You’re missing the point if that’s what you took out of it. Tyrod was fine for a team that was perennially bad. He could get you to average. He did and broke the drought. McDermott was exceptional to take a bad team and stabilize them. That doesn’t mean that he’s the guy to take them to the promised land. If he can’t get them to their ceiling they need someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Let me ask it differently. What do you think the ceiling is/has been? If you think 1 championship game appearance is it, then you should be satisfied.
 

I’m not at a point where I’m worried about “it could be worse.” That’s where I was with Tyrod and that’s because the team was bad for a generation. I was of the belief that the high floor was good at that time. Now, it is not acceptable to me to get bounced in the Divisional Round. I believe that this team is/has been Super Bowl Caliber. He isn’t getting his team where they belong. You don’t get “Josh Allen’s” very often. You better take advantage of his prime.

 

Another example that I think works is Dwayne Casey. He won the Coach of the Year and was fired that offseason!! His team won the title the next year. Don’t settle for “it could be worse” while you have Josh Allen in his prime.

Casey is a perfect example.  Come playoffs he crumpled.  And now the Raptors too moved on from Nurse.  

Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

You’re missing the point if that’s what you took out of it. Tyrod was fine for a team that was perennially bad. He could get you to average. He did and broke the drought. McDermott was exceptional to take a bad team and stabilize them. That doesn’t mean that he’s the guy to take them to the promised land. If he can’t get them to their ceiling they need someone else.

They were an average team, not bad in 2016.  Heck outside wins/losses they were better in almost every aspect.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

You’re missing the point if that’s what you took out of it. Tyrod was fine for a team that was perennially bad. He could get you to average. He did and broke the drought. McDermott was exceptional to take a bad team and stabilize them. That doesn’t mean that he’s the guy to take them to the promised land. If he can’t get them to their ceiling they need someone else.

 

Sure. But it was a bad comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McD has 5 issues to fix and overcome this year.  If he doesn't he should be shown the door and we don't look back.

 

This is a must to do list this for the rest of this season.  Doing this equates to AFCCG and a superbowl appearance.

 

1) You have to beat Andy Reid.

2) You have to beat Zac Taylor

3) You have to beat Doug Pederson

4) You have to beat Mike McDaniel

5) You have to beat Robert Saleh

 

Any more losses to anyone of these teams is a bad omen.  We are 1-2 right now against these teams and there is a strong possibility we lose every other game against these teams too. Until we beat them when it matters you can not say that the Bills are the AFC team to beat.

 

We all know McD has never beaten Andy Reid in the playoffs when it matters,  same thing for Zac Taylor.

Doug Pederson and Mike McDaniel are going to be a problem this year for sure unless injury hits these two teams "Tua" or "Lawrence"

The Jets are learning to win, Zach Wilson is learning to win too,  and they have beaten us already.   Zack Wilson will not be the same crap QB we saw and faced in game 1.  Hell Aaron Rodgers might be back under center when we play them again.

 

Buffalo will not win the AFCE this year.  The offense has no stability and is way too inconstant.  To many swings from really good to head scratching really bad.

 

Doug Pederson has McD figured out and will be a problem in the playoffs,  Mike McDaniel will not lose our next game in Miami and could beat us in the playoffs.    None of these teams will lose to us in our remaining games against them,  with this team playing this erratic unsustainable offense as of late, even at 4-2 we have games upcoming that if we play at this mediocre level we will lose, the playoffs will be just wishful thinking.

 

We still have to beat KC, Cinci, Dallas, Philly, NYJ, Miami, and the LAC.  But McD and Dorsey do not exude any confidence going against these teams.

 

There is not one team on this list that is a pushover or a guaranteed win. This has the potential of adding up to 7 more loses to the two we have already.

 

9-8 or 8-9 is real possibility because of McD and Dorsey.

 

Until this team figures out how to play at a sustained performance level that is = to how a SB contender should play, they are more pretenders vs contenders under McD.

 

During McD's tenure the Bills have lost every important playoff game to get to the next level,  getting past the AFCCG and ultimately the Superbowl is only next step I will accept for him not to be fired.

 

It's time for him to put up or get the hell out of WNY.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Toyo321
  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Let me ask it differently. What do you think the ceiling is/has been? If you think 1 championship game appearance is it, then you should be satisfied.
 

I’m not at a point where I’m worried about “it could be worse.” That’s where I was with Tyrod and that’s because the team was bad for a generation. I was of the belief that the high floor was good at that time. Now, it is not acceptable to me to get bounced in the Divisional Round. I believe that this team is/has been Super Bowl Caliber. He isn’t getting his team where they belong. You don’t get “Josh Allen’s” very often. You better take advantage of his prime.

 

Another example that I think works is Dwayne Casey. He won the Coach of the Year and was fired that offseason!! His team won the title the next year. Don’t settle for “it could be worse” while you have Josh Allen in his prime.

I believe the ceiling is a Superbowl and I do in fact believe McDermott can get us there. I am willing to give him a little bit longer. The only way, I believe it should even be remotely discussed that he gets fired, is if he is a one and done in the playoffs. The only way he should actually be fired, is if he misses the playoffs entirely. If he is a one and done. I give him one more shot, if he fails again, then we can move on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billsfan1972 said:

I love when people say something like this. The 2016 bills went seven and nine and were in the playoff hunt until week 16(ot loss to Miami and Rex resigning fired).  He took the 16th ranked offence to 29th and the defence  was pretty much the same.  Yep got some breaks and Andy Dalton got them into the playoffs.

 

Then came Allen.  

The team was different in 2017 than any of the "almost years" prior. And if you couldn't see that, then I don't know what to tell you. The all out effort and way the team played was better under McDermott than Rex Ryan. I would have put money on Rex not making the playoffs if he stayed in 2017 and if you would have, you would have lost big time 

Edited by Buffalo03
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Big Turk said:

Get this thru your brain.

 

McDermott is NOT getting fired after this season for any reason. 

 

Him and Beane just got extensions. They are not going anywhere.

 

Words are important.  Each of them has a different meaning. For example, the original poster used the word "should".  Your post seems to be a furious reply to a different question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern with McDermott ever winning a Super Bowl, or even getting to one, is that he has a patten of making awful coaching decisions in high leverage moments.

 

13 seconds has been re-hashed to death but it was a huge coaching failure.

 

This year in our two losses there were critical coaching failures.

 

Against the Jets we had a dumb shotgun run on 2nd and 15 in OT, and then special teams fell apart on the punt. That is coaching malpractice. Maybe Dorsey called the 2nd and 15 run but ultimately those decisions fall on the head coach.

 

Against the Jags, he took Elam out of the game and his replacement Ingram missed a tackle on the game ending Etienne long TD run. What is he thinking taking a superior run stopping CB off the field in favor of a PS player off the bench, in a situation where we know the Jags are trying to run out the clock? His timeout management was also poor in the 2nd half and left us with zero margin for error at the end.

 

Against the Giants, yeah we scraped out a win, but my God the final two minutes was mismanaged to an extreme level. McDermott ran the only series of play calls that could have given the Giants a realistic chance of victory at the end, and if we're being honest his former OC's game plan was better than his own. No reason a game with such a wide talent gap should have come down to basically a coin flip at the end.

 

There are other examples of critical coaching failures in losses and barely scraped out wins that I can think of, but I won't write them all out here. Taking it all together though it paints a picture of a coach that falters in critical moments and those are the moments that win Super Bowls.

 

It's fun when we're beating teams 48-20 but that is not a path to the Super Bowl. We need to beat equally or slightly more talented teams 31-28 and I have yet to see any evidence that McDermott can do this even 50% of the time let alone in consecutive playoff games.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chaos said:

Words are important.  Each of them has a different meaning. For example, the original poster used the word "should".  Your post seems to be a furious reply to a different question. 


He has a point though.  It’s useless trying to have this debate because there’s not a remote chance of it happening.

 

It’s like starting a thread called “should the Bills trade Gabe Davis for Devante Adams?”

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2023 at 8:38 AM, boater said:

These tired and worn out "Fire McD.. wasting Allen's best years" crusades never address the next more important question: And replace him with who? I especially love the arrogant statements along the lines of "Who wouldn't want to work with Josh Allen"

 

Name the new coach and why you think:

  • he would be a step up from McD
  • he will be available
  • he'd be interested in the Bills
  • his family would be willing to move to WNY (we've lost a couple there)
  • he would work well with Beane
  • Pegs would be willing to eat the remaining 4 years of McD's contract

I caution against naming any college coaches. Most want nothing to do with the NFL. The ones who try are often wash-outs.

lol coaches literally spend their whole careers trying to find a QB like Josh Allen. It’s definitely not arrogance, it’s facts . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said:

I voted yes but only if they can get Ben Johnson… I want to see what Josh can do with an elite offensive minded head coach.

Ben would have to deal with a massive pass blocking downgrade if he came here which gives me hesitation…these ‘genius’ offensive minds always happen to have tons of talent in the trenches coincidentally lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Sure. But it was a bad comparison.

Lol, no it wasn’t. It was spot on. You just missed the point originally. Different people are acceptable, to good, in different phases of a rebuild. If you’re a championship contender, you wouldn’t want Tyrod. To this point, you wouldn’t want McDermott either. Tyrod took a perennially bad team and made them okay. McDermott took a perennially bad team and made them perennially good. He hasn’t proven to be the guy to get them to their ceiling.
 

We aren’t at a point where Divisional Round losses are acceptable. He did the dirty work. McDermott took the team from the base of the mountain to 90% of the way to the summit. He deserves a ton of credit for it. If that’s as high as he can take them than someone else needs to finish the last 10%. He’s had enough chances to finish the job. Hopefully this is the year. 

13 hours ago, Buffalo03 said:

I believe the ceiling is a Superbowl and I do in fact believe McDermott can get us there. I am willing to give him a little bit longer. The only way, I believe it should even be remotely discussed that he gets fired, is if he is a one and done in the playoffs. The only way he should actually be fired, is if he misses the playoffs entirely. If he is a one and done. I give him one more shot, if he fails again, then we can move on

I think that Houston, KC, KC, and Cincy was enough for me. I didn’t need to see this year and I certainly wouldn’t need to see it again next year. 4 times (5 including this year) they’ve been good enough to go to the Super Bowl (including a season where they were the favorites). They’ve fallen short each time. If they don’t go again this year, I don’t need to see a 6th bite at the apple. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Let me ask it differently. What do you think the ceiling is/has been? If you think 1 championship game appearance is it, then you should be satisfied.
 

I’m not at a point where I’m worried about “it could be worse.” That’s where I was with Tyrod and that’s because the team was bad for a generation. I was of the belief that the high floor was good at that time. Now, it is not acceptable to me to get bounced in the Divisional Round. I believe that this team is/has been Super Bowl Caliber. He isn’t getting his team where they belong. You don’t get “Josh Allen’s” very often. You better take advantage of his prime.

 

Another example that I think works is Dwayne Casey. He won the Coach of the Year and was fired that offseason!! His team won the title the next year. Don’t settle for “it could be worse” while you have Josh Allen in his prime.


yea, I’ll risk a step back to try to take a step forward here. I don’t care if we turn into a wild card loser instead of a divisional loser if it’s taking a swing at being a Super Bowl winner. 
 

I hope McDermott proves me wrong but that he couldn’t get it done in easier windows makes me skeptical about finishing the job with less margin of error 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2023 at 4:46 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

I haven't been in that war room but I have spoken to two separate people who have been in that building and have been in those rooms and have heard those conversations. Brandon Beane runs personnel. Of course he has input from Sean because they are basically joined at the hip. But the idea he is a puppet GM just picking who McDermott tells him to is just wrong. That is not how the building is run. 

Do you think that Beane could override McDermott on a draft day decision? If not, what you are describing is NOT equality.

 

Of course many people have input but I doubt that there is or ever has been one team in NFL history where there wasn't one person who ultimately wielded the most power in the organization. It isn't possible imo. For instance, if the 2 men disagee on a first round trade/selection and cannot come to a mutual agreement, what do you think happens? Do they toss a coin? Will they simply skip the pick?  This is not the same as buying groceries with my wife at the supermarket, and even there; she would make the decision. :) 

 

I cannot understand your reluctance to what is simply how life (and certainly business) works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NoSaint said:


yea, I’ll risk a step back to try to take a step forward here. I don’t care if we turn into a wild card loser instead of a divisional loser if it’s taking a swing at being a Super Bowl winner. 
 

I hope McDermott proves me wrong but that he couldn’t get it done in easier windows makes me skeptical about finishing the job with less margin of error 

 

Also, it's in how we lose in the playoffs.

 

Giving the game away (13 Seconds), showing up unprepared, having the #1/2 defense during the regular season but playing like a bottom tier D in the playoffs, major inconsistencies on offense, these are not indications that a coach needs a few more seasons.  

 

It was the same in the 90s, Levy held us back at that level.  If Parcells, Johnson, or Gibbs had been our coach, we'd have our Lombardi by now.  

 

SMH, I still recall the last Super Bowl, we were up 13-6 at the half.  The field reporter related the info that Johnson was in the locker room throwing chairs and swearing up a storm, and that Levy was reading Hemingway quotes.  Whatever happened, 24-0 Dallas in the second half.  

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should be fired if he doesn’t make it to the Super Bowl imo.

 

We are wasting the best QB in franchise history on a defensive minded clown who claps 24/7 and makes horrible in game decisions.

 

Also, he cost this city a Super Bowl with 13 seconds. Should’ve been fired on the tarmac.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bill from NYC said:

Do you think that Beane could override McDermott on a draft day decision? If not, what you are describing is NOT equality.

 

Of course many people have input but I doubt that there is or ever has been one team in NFL history where there wasn't one person who ultimately wielded the most power in the organization. It isn't possible imo. For instance, if the 2 men disagee on a first round trade/selection and cannot come to a mutual agreement, what do you think happens? Do they toss a coin? Will they simply skip the pick?  This is not the same as buying groceries with my wife at the supermarket, and even there; she would make the decision. :) 

 

I cannot understand your reluctance to what is simply how life (and certainly business) works. 

 

McDermott weilds the most power in the organisation. Do I believe he can ultimately put his foot down and veto a selection by Brandon Beane? Yes. But talking to people who have been in that room and have seen those conversations it doesn't happen that way. Brandon Beane runs the draft process. He takes views from the entire scouting department in the first instance. Then they get input from the coaching staff. Then when they are narrowing down to final decisions Beane takes advice from his two senior lieutenants - originally Schoen and Gaine; then Schoen and Morgan; now Gaine and Gray - and from McDermott. Then Brandon sets the board and Brandon runs the draft. This isn't opinion, this is verified information. Two sources. One still with the team, one formerly with the team. Both describe it almost identically.

 

You seem to think that because McDermott has the most power it must mean he is using it constantly and running the draft. He isn't. The picks (since 2018) are Brandon Beane's for good or ill. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, McBean said:

He should be fired if he doesn’t make it to the Super Bowl imo.

 

We are wasting the best QB in franchise history on a defensive minded clown who claps 24/7 and makes horrible in game decisions.

 

Also, he cost this city a Super Bowl with 13 seconds. Should’ve been fired on the tarmac.

 

If he takes the team into the playoffs and loses, but plays our best game, coaching included, and is simply beaten by a better team that outplayed us all things being equal otherwise, that's one thing.  Granted, it would be a first.  

 

But if we produce another stinker like the Cincy game, get out-coached, allow an inferior team to beat us because we didn't bring our best, or the team showed up unprepared, then that's another.  

 

In the case if the latter it should take care of itself.  These discussions both here and in the media would become a lot more lopsided.  

 

Right now it already appears that we were off to another fast start and have already slowed down after expending a lot of emotional capital on our first four games.  

 

Floyd for example is on pace for 18 sacks.  What fool thinks that that's really going to happen.  

 

I'm thinking that 10-7 and a wild-card spot would actually help us come playoff time, not be a detriment.  

 

Let's see how things play out and see where things stand when the music stops.  Who knows, maybe it'll be 7 a.m. and the party downtown just ended.  😎

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

McDermott weilds the most power in the organisation. Do I believe he can ultimately put his foot down and veto a selection by Brandon Beane? Yes. But talking to people who have been in that room and have seen those conversations it doesn't happen that way. Brandon Beane runs the draft process. He takes views from the entire scouting department in the first instance. Then they get input from the coaching staff. Then when they are narrowing down to final decisions Beane takes advice from his two senior lieutenants - originally Schoen and Gaine; then Schoen and Morgan; now Gaine and Gray - and from McDermott. Then Brandon sets the board and Brandon runs the draft. This isn't opinion, this is verified information. Two sources. One still with the team, one formerly with the team. Both describe it almost identically.

 

You seem to think that because McDermott has the most power it must mean he is using it constantly and running the draft. He isn't. The picks (since 2018) are Brandon Beane's for good or ill. 

 

So given all that, and keeping in mind that even those relating that info to you are going to have their biases, but that aside, how do you reconcile the enormous gap between Kincaid's obvious capabilities, and his lack of proper use, which has led to massive underachievement by him, and mid-late day-3 performance on pace for 334 yards, 0 TDS, and notable less than one 1st-down per game? 

 

If he were on Jax, Cincy, KC, Philly or perhaps a handful of other teams, how do you think he'd be doing?  ... Generally speaking contrasted with here.  

 

I'll add some more context;

 

In Davis' rookie year, he logged 35 catches, 599 yards, 7 TDs, and 20 1st-Downs, as a 4th-round selection that didn't have Kincaid's route-running ability, hands, etc.  

 

I didn't use Davis to try to bolster Davis, the opposite actually.  

 

But that is definitely an enigma of sorts. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

McDermott weilds the most power in the organisation. Do I believe he can ultimately put his foot down and veto a selection by Brandon Beane? Yes. But talking to people who have been in that room and have seen those conversations it doesn't happen that way. Brandon Beane runs the draft process. He takes views from the entire scouting department in the first instance. Then they get input from the coaching staff. Then when they are narrowing down to final decisions Beane takes advice from his two senior lieutenants - originally Schoen and Gaine; then Schoen and Morgan; now Gaine and Gray - and from McDermott. Then Brandon sets the board and Brandon runs the draft. This isn't opinion, this is verified information. Two sources. One still with the team, one formerly with the team. Both describe it almost identically.

 

You seem to think that because McDermott has the most power it must mean he is using it constantly and running the draft. He isn't. The picks (since 2018) are Brandon Beane's for good or ill. 

I agree with the top sentence 100!!! However, the last sentence woluld seem to contradict the first. Think about it GB. Are you sure that McDermott has never overridden Beane since 2018, especially given the focus on defense? 

McDermott's fingerprints would appear to be all over those defensive picks, or so it would clearly seem.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

So given all that, and keeping in mind that even those relating that info to you are going to have their biases, but that aside, how do you reconcile the enormous gap between Kincaid's obvious capabilities, and his lack of proper use, which has led to massive underachievement by him, and mid-late day-3 performance on pace for 334 yards, 0 TDS, and notable less than one 1st-down per game? 

 

If he were on Jax, Cincy, KC, Philly or perhaps a handful of other teams, how do you think he'd be doing?  ... Generally speaking contrasted with here.  

 

I'll add some more context;

 

In Davis' rookie year, he logged 35 catches, 599 yards, 7 TDs, and 20 1st-Downs, as a 4th-round selection that didn't have Kincaid's route-running ability, hands, etc.  

 

I didn't use Davis to try to bolster Davis, the opposite actually.  

 

But that is definitely an enigma of sorts. 

 

 

 

I don't need to reconcile anything. There is nothing inconsistent between saying Brandon Beane runs the draft and Kincaid hasn't yet seen significant usage by the coaches.

1 minute ago, Bill from NYC said:

I agree with the top sentence 100!!! However, the last sentence woluld seem to contradict the first. Think about it GB. Are you sure that McDermott has never overridden Beane since 2018, especially given the focus on defense? 

McDermott's fingerprints would appear to be all over those defensive picks, or so it would clearly seem.

 

There is no contradiction. Am I sure it has never happened? No I am not, I can't be. But I have spoken to people who have seen those conversations and that is not the way it operates. If it has happened then that happening is exceptional. Whereas because they have picked defensive players you are convinced McDermott is running the draft. He isn't. The process is as I set out per people who have been in those draft meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I don't need to reconcile anything. There is nothing inconsistent between saying Brandon Beane runs the draft and Kincaid hasn't yet seen significant usage by the coaches.

 

There is no contradiction. Am I sure it has never happened? No I am not, I can't be. But I have spoken to people who have seen those conversations and that is not the way it operates. If it has happened then that happening is exceptional. Whereas because they have picked defensive players you are convinced McDermott is running the draft. He isn't. The process is as I set out per people who have been in those draft meetings.

It is unlikely others in the room are privy to McDermotts and Beanes private conversations. They could be reporting 100% accurately what the see. But what they see is very unlikely the whole picture.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...