Jump to content

Austin Ekeler asks for a trade. UPDATE: Granted permission


Alphadawg7

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Thrivefourfive said:

Ekeler is no joke. We can say that McCaffrey is an all around better back, but if you said it was Ekeler, I wouldn’t disagree. 
 

He doesn’t miss games, and he’s an excellent short yardage and goaline back. He is absolutely complete. 

hasnt he been hurt a bunch the last 2 years?

 

(edit: he has not, but felt like he lived on injury report last season)

49 minutes ago, Gunsgoodtime said:

Maybe it was Kamara, but it was one of them.  It was posted here

that was def AK

Edited by BillsShredder83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


Cook, Oliver, 2nd for Ekeler and K.Mack restructured 😄

I'll take Bosa instead:wub:

1 hour ago, Thrivefourfive said:

Ekeler is no joke. We can say that McCaffrey is an all around better back, but if you said it was Ekeler, I wouldn’t disagree. 
 

He doesn’t miss games, and he’s an excellent short yardage and goaline back. He is absolutely complete. 

You should disagree if somebody says that... McCaffrey is the most complete back not to mention the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thrivefourfive said:

Ekeler is no joke. We can say that McCaffrey is an all around better back, but if you said it was Ekeler, I wouldn’t disagree. 
 

He doesn’t miss games, and he’s an excellent short yardage and goaline back. He is absolutely complete. 


All true but he wants to be paid huge.

 

Bills aren’t in a position to pay him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rc2catch said:

I’m aware of a stat page. They don’t always tell the whole story. His value in that offense is much more than another. 

 

That's hard to imagine: "when they need a yard", Michel had a grand total of 8 1st downs last year.  Spiller is a total zero--41 yards and 2 1st downs.  What were you referring to with these 2?

 

Ekeler is  a massive part of that Offense. He is the entire running game.  He caught more TDs than any receiver on that team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

That's hard to imagine: "when they need a yard", Michel had a grand total of 8 1st downs last year.  Spiller is a total zero--41 yards and 2 1st downs.  What were you referring to with these 2?

 

Ekeler is  a massive part of that Offense. He is the entire running game.  He caught more TDs than any receiver on that team. 

Josh Kelley was the other back. Had to look it up I didn’t remember all the backs names over there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

Josh Kelley was the other back. Had to look it up I didn’t remember all the backs names over there. 

 

Another minor player.  16 1st downs on 67 carries.  

 

When they need a 1st down, Ekeler (46 of them on the ground, 36 in the air) is the go to guy.  Those 3 are bums---especially Spiller and Michel.  They do nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Another minor player.  16 1st downs on 67 carries.  

 

When they need a 1st down, Ekeler (46 of them on the ground, 36 in the air) is the go to guy.  Those 3 are bums---especially Spiller and Michel.  They do nothing.

Good to know 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicken Boo said:

 

This is a terrible take.

Maybe so. But I still stand by it. Have to see if he leaves and how his replacement does and how he does in a different system. His value is insanely high to that team. I don’t dispute that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

Maybe so. But I still stand by it. Have to see if he leaves and how his replacement does and how he does in a different system. His value is insanely high to that team. I don’t dispute that. 

 

I deleted my comment because you had acknowledged his production in another post.

 

He wouldn't be nearly as productive here because Dorsey sucks.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s official, Chargers granted permission for him to seek a trade.  That means there is a RB trade market that potentially includes Austin Ekeler, Dalvin Cook, Nick Chubb, and Derrick Henry.  That’s like the first half of a fantasy football draft lol.
 

Just goes to show how tough it is to pay a RB big money.  Teams are faced with having to decide to trade them rather than give them a big deal, or trade because they gave them a big deal.  Be interesting to see if any, or even all, of these RB's get moved and what they go for.  Given how cheap Waller just got traded for, curious to see what kind of offers teams are going to get for a RB.  
 

Some good options already in FA that won’t require draft capital.  Be interesting to see which domino falls first in both trade and free agency.  As for the Bills, given Beane has explored previous RB trades, it wouldn't surprise me if we are linked to any of these guys.  

 

 

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Alphadawg7 changed the title to Austin Ekeler asks for a trade. UPDATE: Granted permission
On 3/13/2023 at 12:31 PM, Rc2catch said:

Not sure how to value him on a contract.. Just my opinion of course but he’s not a good running back. 
He’s a check down machine but there’s been plenty of guys who just catch check downs all day. When the chargers need a yard they pull him out for Sony Michel or Spiller or another back. 


Not a good running back? What? Dude had 1600 all purpose yards and 18 TDs. Screw the stats though. Anybody who watched any Chargers games knows Ekeler would be an absolute asset to any team he joins. If catching passes out of the backfield is so easy then why have the Bills spent so many resources looking for a guy that can do exactly that ? Unfortunately, it’s just too much of a luxury at this point, but idk who wouldn’t be ecstatic to have him on their team. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

It’s official, Chargers granted permission for him to seek a trade.  That means there is a RB trade market that potentially includes Austin Ekeler, Dalvin Cook, Nick Chubb, and Derrick Henry.  That’s like the first half of a fantasy football draft lol.
 

Moral of the story, don’t pay big contracts to RBs, it rarely works out.  And by the time you figure that out, you’re gonna have to trade them for less than they are worth to get away from the big cap number.  
 

Some good options already in FA that won’t require draft capital.  Be interesting to see which domino falls first in bath trade and free agency.

 

 

 

Ekeler isn't a large cap hit issue - he just wants an extension.  He has like nothing guaranteed and his total comp for the year is only 6M.  I just cant imagine him playing under that number.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicken Boo said:

I bet he could be had for a 2nd.  

 

A back that wouldn't have to leave the field unless he's being spelled for rest.  If Dorsey doesn't suck, this is exactly the type of back the Bills need.  

I can’t imagine that the Chargers will get anything close to a second for Eckler. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

would anyone do Cook for Ekeler straight up? 

 

Keep them both.  

Just now, BarleyNY said:

I can’t imagine that the Chargers will get anything close to a second for Eckler. 

 

In the Bills case it'd be a late 2nd, but you may be right.  That would be even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

 

Ekeler isn't a large cap hit issue - he just wants an extension.  He has like nothing guaranteed and his total comp for the year is only 6M.  I just cant imagine him playing under that number.  


Yeah he has a good deal today, it’s just that he wants a bigger deal making him available despite being such a valuable piece to the Chargers.  
 

If we got him, or any of them on a reasonable deal great.  But just seems to backfire when teams pay RBs $10M+ a year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thrivefourfive said:

Ekeler would be a set it and forget it guy in ALL situations. I don’t see him as an I got paid, I’m not playing a 100% either. He’s at the top of the NFL player’s food chain. 

It won’t be him since he’s a fumbler. McD don’t play that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, nucci said:

what does that mean? He has culture?

means he seamlessly fit in on old team and matched the vibe and personality on that old team. Also means he matches vibe and personality of next team if he matches the culture wanted on new team he is going to. Usually is meant in a positive light and means he is a good person who does not put himself over team. and does not get in trouble in locker room, on field, or off field. In Bills case he needs to be down with the process and in McD case he also likes religious guys. 

 

Now saying he is a culture fit with Bills is completely different then saying he is a culture fit with for example 1980's Raiders, the Cowboys of any era, etc etc as they were down and dirty/nasty/criminal/drug users on and off field.

 

Another term appointed for these guys when coming to teams who favor religious guys is choir boys. But that is taking the characteristic description to the extreme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:

What a waste of assets this would be. 

Yeah, I love the player but unless it’s like a 4th or lower, I won’t be thrilled with it. It’s also hilarious that you would give up yet another asset for a rb (2nd, 2 3rds, the Hines trade) for a guy who wasn’t drafted.

 

it’s should not be this hard to find a rb especially with a guy like Allen. The funniest thing is the bills sucked for so long but always could find a rb. Now they are good and can’t find one! Bring back OJ!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

I just don’t ***** get it… Just a ***** ton of rumors about them interested in whichever RB is available… meanwhile their WRs suck ass outside of Diggs. 

no reason to get upset unless they acquire a RB. It's just twitter people

Edited by nucci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

I just don’t ***** get it… Just a ***** ton of rumors about them interested in whichever RB is available… meanwhile their WRs suck ass outside of Diggs. 

 

That is just it...there have been VERY FEW real rumors for the most part.  People keep reading tweets by nobody's saying he would be a good fit, or I bet the Bills would be or should be calling...and then coming onto the boards and falsely associating that as "rumors" the Bills are interested.  

 

I would say at best, like 1 out of every 10-15 rumors I have seen yesterday and today regarding the Bills interest in a player at any position have actually been from a credible source reporting Bills interest on a player.  The rest are coming from fake posts, or falsely thinking some randos comment on twitter is somehow a rumor linking the Bills to said player.  

 

Its mind blowing how many people here keep regurgitating nonsense as rumor.  A few were legitimately fooled by fake accounts posting fake info, but most see any dumb tweet as a rumor.

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we really saying Ekeler doesn’t fit? You make him fit. It’s what coaches are supposed to do — make your best players the best they can be. That’s like saying we don’t know how Allen fits. 
 

With #30, Allen can go deep all he wants, Ekeler would own everything from the line of scrimmage to the sticks. Look how great he’s been with the Chargers. He should be even better if on the Bills. The offense would be sooo good with Ekeler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...