Jump to content

Nyhiem Hines Restructures - Takes a pay cut to stay in Buffalo.


Draconator

Recommended Posts

Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I think there is a good chance Hines is still the 3rd RB and kick/punt returner. I would like to see the Bills release McKenzie and use Hines in the old McKenzie role prior to last season.

 

I could be wrong, but I seem to recall Hines trying a few sweeps and it didn't work out.  I think McKenzie has a kind of fast-burst quickness that lends itself, while Hines has an afterburner where once he's going, he can turn it on.  Just my impression.  Same thing with Shakir - he's fast, but he's not as quick if that makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

McKenzie ran a pretty full route tree.  I'm not saying what the Bills do - it depends on who they bring in, surely - but I don't think you look at Hines and McKenzie as equivalent at all.

 

One thing is, McKenzie is owed a roster bonus of $250,000 this Fri, so if they cut him, they likely cut him this week.  My guess is that he comes into camp and competes.

 

Unless he takes a good pay cut he is gone. I hope he is gone anyway. Time to move on. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

McKenzie ran a pretty full route tree.  I'm not saying what the Bills do - it depends on who they bring in, surely - but I don't think you look at Hines and McKenzie as equivalent at all.

 

One thing is, McKenzie is owed a roster bonus of $250,000 this Fri, so if they cut him, they likely cut him this week.  My guess is that he comes into camp and competes.

For $2m I think you bring back McKenzie even if he never sees the field.  He’s good insurance in case you ever need him like the 2021 game at New England.  I actually think he might have some trade value at $2m per year also.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With this restructure we have our kick and punt returner. We also have a weapon on offense that we will hopefully utilize this season. 

 

I think with this restructure it is time to say goodbye to Isiah Mckenzie. I failed in the slot and Hines took his other role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

I could be wrong, but I seem to recall Hines trying a few sweeps and it didn't work out.  I think McKenzie has a kind of fast-burst quickness that lends itself, while Hines has an afterburner where once he's going, he can turn it on.  Just my impression.  Same thing with Shakir - he's fast, but he's not as quick if that makes sense?

The Hines package last year consisted of like 2 plays. I wouldn’t even try to evaluate whatever the Hines package was.

 

Hines is definitely similar speed and quickness to McKenzie. Probably a bit faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

The Hines package last year consisted of like 2 plays. I wouldn’t even try to evaluate whatever the Hines package was.

 

Hines is definitely similar speed and quickness to McKenzie. Probably a bit faster.

4.38 Hines vs 4.42 McKenzie 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, QCity said:

Maybe we'll actually design RB screens this year.

The thing is, both Hines and Cook can both run routes like WRs. Seems to me there is so much room to get creative with two guys like this in the backfield. Not just with screens.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Did he? I felt McKenzie was a limited route runner. A lot of crossers.

 

He certainly started on the Bills as a poor route runner

Yeah, he ran a lot of deep crossers last year, mostly as clearing routes - that was what he was asked to do on a lot of plays.

Capture.JPG

 

I hear that Gabe Davis is a poor route runner who only has 3 routes, also, I don't know.

 

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

He certainly started on the Bills as a poor route runner

Yes, he ran a lot of deep crossers last year (because that's what the Bills were asking him to do) but

 

 

Anyway, I hear people say Gabe Davis is a "limited route runner" too,

Capture.JPG

These are man beater routes……

depends game to game / what D runs against a bills

 

fake news

Edited by balln
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SWATeam said:

Glad he’s back, he was criminally underused.

 

the most head scratching aspect of the entire year regime was the major emphasis on finding multiple pass catching backs, only to never use them.

 FTFY. 
 

McBeane have keyed in on this for some time. It isn't Dorsey specific. Barkley only had about 60 more receiving yards than Singletary. 

Edited by Mango
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

The Hines package last year consisted of like 2 plays. I wouldn’t even try to evaluate whatever the Hines package was.

 

Hines is definitely similar speed and quickness to McKenzie. Probably a bit faster.

 

He was on the field for 66 plays.  I could be wrong, but don't think he was running the same 2 plays on all 66 snaps.

He's definitely faster than McKenzie once he gets going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do we have a backup OC ready for in-season.  If Dorsey starts the year like he ended it by wasting our ability to attack Ds in multiple ways, we need an OC who is not learning on the job during a SB window.  Perhaps Dorsey as Assist OC in that situation.  

19 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

For $2m I think you bring back McKenzie even if he never sees the field.  He’s good insurance in case you ever need him like the 2021 game at New England.  I actually think he might have some trade value at $2m per year also.  

 

I agree, trade but not cut.  I think it depends on the draft.  If you get the WR from BC or UNC, you don't need McKenzie with Shakir and the rookie.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

 

He was on the field for 66 plays.  I could be wrong, but don't think he was running the same 2 plays on all 66 snaps.

He's definitely faster than McKenzie once he gets going.

I honestly felt like they ran the same thing every time Hines came on. Probably not but that’s what it felt like.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

 

He was on the field for 66 plays.  I could be wrong, but don't think he was running the same 2 plays on all 66 snaps.

He's definitely faster than McKenzie once he gets going.

 

It really was extremely limited. I'd even argue that saying 2 plays is stretching it.

 

Seemed like the same thing every time. Or at least every time he got the ball. So it became super predictable for us, and the defense. That same busted sweep every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

do we have a backup OC ready for in-season.  If Dorsey starts the year like he ended it by wasting our ability to attack Ds in multiple ways, we need an OC who is not learning on the job during a SB window.  Perhaps Dorsey as Assist OC in that situation.  

 

I agree, trade but not cut.  I think it depends on the draft.  If you get the WR from BC or UNC, you don't need McKenzie with Shakir and the rookie.  

 

It would be Joe Brady

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Doesn't sound like much of a pay cut and incentives can take him OVER his $4.9M?

 

WTF Beane? :doh:

 

Hines is clearly going to be RB3.........that shouldn't cost anything in excess of $2M total.........and not $2M with future dead money.

 

Hines should have been cut and allowed to test the market..........the kind of pay cut he should have required are the kind that don't work out unless the player is allowed to test his true worth on the market.    

 

Pay cuts in general are bad business.   Every time Beane asks for one the player effort/buy-in shifts into double low.   See Vernon Butler and opt-out year Star Lotulelei as the prior examples.

 

The player needs to be able to see his value to appreciate their position..........case in point Beasley refusing a pay cut down from $7M and then being grateful to be accepted back onto the practice squad 6 months later.    It's human nature for workers to check out when you cut their pay.

 

Sign Jamaal Williams next for $4M-$5M and they can have a $10M backfield without even having a star RB in it. 😂

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

do we have a backup OC ready for in-season.  If Dorsey starts the year like he ended it by wasting our ability to attack Ds in multiple ways, we need an OC who is not learning on the job during a SB window.  Perhaps Dorsey as Assist OC in that situation.  

Our offense was almost identical to 2021 with Daboll. They got hot in the playoffs. Only difference. Worst game of Allen’s career imo was home vs Atlanta late 2021 season.

 

Point is people are being way to harsh on Dorsey. Expectations were sky high. He did improve redzone as the year went on. I think he’ll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

Doesn't sound like much of a pay cut and incentives can take him OVER his $4.9M?

 

WTF Beane? :doh:

 

Hines is clearly going to be RB3.........that shouldn't cost anything in excess of $2M total.........and not $2M with future dead money.

 

Hines should have been cut and allowed to test the market..........the kind of pay cut he should have required are the kind that don't work out unless the player is allowed to test his true worth on the market.    

 

Pay cuts in general are bad business.   Every time Beane asks for one the player effort/buy-in shifts into double low.   See Vernon Butler and opt-out year Star Lotulelei as the prior examples.

 

The player needs to be able to see his value to appreciate their position..........case in point Beasley refusing a pay cut down from $7M and then being grateful to be accepted back onto the practice squad 6 months later.    It's human nature for workers to check out when you cut their pay.

 

Sign Jamaal Williams next for $4M-$5M and they can have a $10M backfield without even having a star RB in it. 😂

 

Agreed. Let's wait and see final numbers but this is confusing to me. Hines was basically a FA with no dead money on his contract. Beane had all the leverage. Either keep him for max. $2M (or maybe $2.5) or let him go. Restructuring his deal to create void years doesn't make any sense to me.

3 minutes ago, Draconator said:

In other Bills news...

 

 

I really hope this is for vet min only.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CapeBreton said:

I'd love to see these incentives. Given his lack of opportunities, I'm surprised he wants to be back in Buffalo.

Really? He makes millions of dollars to do very little, and his body will still work when he is fifty five years old, what’s not to like, it’s a cake gig, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Would argue our best special teams returner since a young Eric Moulds in addition to being a pretty darn good third down back 

Would argue that Terrance McGee is our best returner ever. Statistically, I have no idea if that’s true…..but I just really loved watching his return kicks. He was electric 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

It really was extremely limited. I'd even argue that saying 2 plays is stretching it.

 

Seemed like the same thing every time. Or at least every time he got the ball. So it became super predictable for us, and the defense. That same busted sweep every time.

 

I think this is a case where perception is not reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ngbills said:

Hate the Hines signing. Hope he proves me wrong. Think he is a luxury on this team. We could have replaced him with a rookie deal and used these resources where needed more. 

You hate the signing….but do you know the price tag?  He’s a top flight return man (a position we’ve had trouble with the last handful of years), has jets on his feet and can catch.  I think he’s the perfect RB3/Return man.  
 

if the cap hit is over 4M, I agree.   I don’t like it.  If it’s 2-3M,  I can dig it. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

I think this is a case where perception is not reality.

 

Well no duh. 😜  I dont think anyone is actually arguing that it was TECHNICALLY 2 plays. But there's also a case that stats dont tell the whole story, or tell a bigger story than there actually was. Was he in on other plays? Sure. Was their any significance to them? Didnt seem so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

I don’t understand their RB stance. Completely ***** ass backwards…. Same goes for their over emphasis of special teams and the Hines contract makes perfect sense.

I don’t think Hines is seen, first and foremost as a RB.  He’s a return man 1st, RB3 2nd.  Jmo.  
 

yes, I agree…..their overemphasis on ST is sickening.  That said, I love him as a return man/RB3.  Eager to see how much of a pay cut is and if the incentives are even possible to attain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Go lower. Like onto the field.

 

Josh was dumping off to Singletary and Cook the first 4-5 games, as designed, and they were starting to light it up. Our offense was clicking. Then he just stopped. Folks can blame it on the elbow injury, and that may be the case. But we did start the season throwing to the RBs, and they were still there and wide open underneath the rest of the season. We just stopped throwing it to them and instead bombed it out for low percentage throws.

 

I blame the Miami game. They ran a ball control offense and had the ball for 40+ minutes, but flukily lost. They stopped after getting fatigued during that game, but no other game had 130° temperatures on the field. Changing what was working backfired on them. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...