Jump to content

Update: Xavier Rhodes signed by Bills


Steel City Mafia

Recommended Posts

Xavier Rhodes is what he is a older veteran Corner who has played in Frazier system at this point in the season that’s about the best you’re going to get

2 minutes ago, DJB said:


No because Beane also forgot his wallet 

Since when has bean forgot his wallet on worthwhile players

Edited by John from Riverside
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NewEra said:

Happy to see him signed today.  Didn’t have a good feeling about it happening if he left town.  
 

what’s up with Cam Lewis? Is he strictly a S/slot now?  I figured he would’ve taken the snaps at corner over Ingram.  Or Neal?  Is he strictly slot?  Is Ingram really a better option than either of these guys who have been in the system for a few years?  Maybe we found a Diamond in the rough.  

I remember Poyer going out of his way to talk about Ingram during camp.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

I remember Poyer going out of his way to talk about Ingram during camp.

 

I don't even recall Ingram being a factor at UB all that much.  Maybe he was hurt? I don't know.  I recall Cam Lewis being very good.

 

Some of the older Vets would come to Buffalo, chasing rings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Big Turk said:

 

Right...especially if they are not IR'ing anyone.

 

Can you name one team that has better OLine depth than the Bills had with positional flexibility?  I'll wait.  

And risk losing him if another team poaches him off the PS? That is my concern at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big Turk said:

 

Uhh...he was a UFA all off season and went unsigned when a team could have literally signed him at any point.

 

 

Uhhhh ...and now that the season started, players are getting hurt.  My point is that he has no value on the PS if Bills need depth on the 53. Can we assume Dane will be coming back this week,or maybe Bills are comfortable with Lewis and/or Neal outside, across from Elam?

19 hours ago, The Wiz said:

Are you asking me or telling me?

 

I was just looking at it in terms of the "lost playing time" vs "cap hit" aspect of it.

Their cap hit still "counts" which is why Beane likes to have some cap money available for emergencies. I imagine he looked into a trade but they can apparently afford Murray and Rhodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

EJ Gaines was really really good when healthy

I was thinking more V Davis and J Norman (former pro bowlers).   You are right EJ Gaines worked out for a year but he was younger and maybe a little more hungry and an older vet who has made significant NFL dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said:

I was thinking more V Davis and J Norman (former pro bowlers).   You are right EJ Gaines worked out for a year but he was younger and maybe a little more hungry and an older vet who has made significant NFL dollars.

 

Norman was serviceable and helped win a game with a fumble recovery...he was at the very least far better than he was with Washington.

 

Vontae just didn't have it anymore physically by his own admission.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said:

I was thinking more V Davis and J Norman (former pro bowlers).   You are right EJ Gaines worked out for a year but he was younger and maybe a little more hungry and an older vet who has made significant NFL dollars.

 

Norman wasn't that bad was he?  Him and Jackson both had some starts and played when white and wallace missed time in 2020. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

When? Other than Dion & Mitch pretty much every other OL position has been a revolving door.l

I totally agree. I was never once impressed by the “depth” at oline. Dawkins and Morse are our only steady players in the entire group. Everyone else could be upgraded. 
 

It really is a shame that Beane and McD patch a line together and don’t try to make it elite for our franchise qb. I think it’s this shortsighted mistake that could cost us more this year than anything on defense. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whorlnut said:

I totally agree. I was never once impressed by the “depth” at oline. Dawkins and Morse are our only steady players in the entire group. Everyone else could be upgraded. 
 

It really is a shame that Beane and McD patch a line together and don’t try to make it elite for our franchise qb. I think it’s this shortsighted mistake that could cost us more this year than anything on defense. 

Which teams OL depth were you “impressed” with?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whorlnut said:

I totally agree. I was never once impressed by the “depth” at oline. Dawkins and Morse are our only steady players in the entire group. Everyone else could be upgraded. 
 

This is a league wide problem I think.  When I see Feliciano starting at C for the Giants, I just think OL depth is a problem everywhere.  Cinci spent a fortune trying to upgrade their OL to protect Burrow, and he's been sacked 15 times in 3 games, on pace for 85 for the year.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BearNorth said:

This is a league wide problem I think.  When I see Feliciano starting at C for the Giants, I just think OL depth is a problem everywhere.  Cinci spent a fortune trying to upgrade their OL to protect Burrow, and he's been sacked 15 times in 3 games, on pace for 85 for the year.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BearNorth said:

This is a league wide problem I think.  When I see Feliciano starting at C for the Giants, I just think OL depth is a problem everywhere.  Cinci spent a fortune trying to upgrade their OL to protect Burrow, and he's been sacked 15 times in 3 games, on pace for 85 for the year.

 

I think Cinci's problem may lie just as much with Burrow as it does the OL, re: Sacks/Pressure

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BearNorth said:

This is a league wide problem I think.  When I see Feliciano starting at C for the Giants, I just think OL depth is a problem everywhere.  Cinci spent a fortune trying to upgrade their OL to protect Burrow, and he's been sacked 15 times in 3 games, on pace for 85 for the year.


Building a good OL requires so much effort. Having a good/great OL with good depth is even harder. 
 

I think only really the Cowboys and the Eagles have lines that are better than good. They’ve also invested multiple first round picks into those projects, at the expense of team building elsewhere. 
 

I think given the circumstances the Bills have done better than okay. We have an anchor at C and a franchise LT. Spencer Brown is very promising but I’ll reserve judgment until after the season. Bates has shown above average guard play and positional flexibility. Saffold should be good between Dawkins and Morse, but again. I’ll reserve judgment because the sample size is too small atm. 

 

I think everyone complaining about our line play and depth issues isn’t watching the other games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whorlnut said:

I totally agree. I was never once impressed by the “depth” at oline. Dawkins and Morse are our only steady players in the entire group. Everyone else could be upgraded. 
 

It really is a shame that Beane and McD patch a line together and don’t try to make it elite for our franchise qb. I think it’s this shortsighted mistake that could cost us more this year than anything on defense. 

So…..which teams OL depth are you impressed with?

 

None? Interesting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, uninja said:


Building a good OL requires so much effort. Having a good/great OL with good depth is even harder. 
 

I think only really the Cowboys and the Eagles have lines that are better than good. They’ve also invested multiple first round picks into those projects, at the expense of team building elsewhere. 
 

I think given the circumstances the Bills have done better than okay. We have an anchor at C and a franchise LT. Spencer Brown is very promising but I’ll reserve judgment until after the season. Bates has shown above average guard play and positional flexibility. Saffold should be good between Dawkins and Morse, but again. I’ll reserve judgment because the sample size is too small atm. 

 

I think everyone complaining about our line play and depth issues isn’t watching the other games. 

I agree and we were mostly fine the first two games, despite Donald and Simmons pushing us around a bit.  We were horrible on Sunday, but there were obviously entenuating circumstances.  It's too much to expect to be able to go 2 (or 3) deep at every OL position without a significant dropoff.

 

Also, I'm not going to pretend that our run game has been good, but it's worth noting that the Rams and Titans were two of the better run defenses in the NFL last year, so it made sense to focus on attacking them in the passing game.  The Dolphins game just needs to be thrown out due to the injuries.

Edited by TheBrownBear
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NewEra said:

So…..which teams OL depth are you impressed with?

 

None? Interesting.  

If you think ours is ok and just want to argue, then whatever. I see a line that could use upgrades at all but two spots. If you don’t hold the same opinion then good for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, uninja said:


Building a good OL requires so much effort. Having a good/great OL with good depth is even harder. 
 

I think only really the Cowboys and the Eagles have lines that are better than good. They’ve also invested multiple first round picks into those projects, at the expense of team building elsewhere. 
 

I think given the circumstances the Bills have done better than okay. We have an anchor at C and a franchise LT. Spencer Brown is very promising but I’ll reserve judgment until after the season. Bates has shown above average guard play and positional flexibility. Saffold should be good between Dawkins and Morse, but again. I’ll reserve judgment because the sample size is too small atm. 

 

I think everyone complaining about our line play and depth issues isn’t watching the other games. 

First of all, the Cowboys line is not nearly as good as it was in years past. But, your point is still valid. The pass rushers are getting better and better and OL play is dropping across the league. This is because:

  • OL is hard to evaluate because HS and college football is all read option or single-read spread offenses. No one has to hold a pass block.
  • What kid grows up dreaming of being an OL? Everybody else on the field gets to do something fun, but OL just has to block, not hold and pray not to be noticed. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Pretty much my point...in almost every game I have watched week in and week out, when I see a backup OLine player come in they get abused almost immediately.

Yes, and that's why you always hear the play-by-play guys point out the need to roll extra help towards those backups with a RB or TE.  And that's just when a single guy is missing from the line.  You lose 4 guys and it's going to be an absolute jailbreak on every play. 

Edited by TheBrownBear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...