Jump to content

TE Hollister Released


RyanC883

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BornAgainBillsFan said:

Could it be that Beane & Co are checking out the new list of available TEs, like a certain one from eastern PA (if the Eagles choose to cut him loose)? And if they don't find one better than Hollister, they'll bring him back? Seems cold hearted, but we are talking about the NFL here.

I doubt it as it damages his reputation with future free agents (and current players) if he reneges on a handshake agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BornAgainBillsFan said:

Could it be that Beane & Co are checking out the new list of available TEs, like a certain one from eastern PA (if the Eagles choose to cut him loose)? And if they don't find one better than Hollister, they'll bring him back? Seems cold hearted, but we are talking about the NFL here.

 

So there are two  situations:

1) Hollister is released because the Bills have concluded he isn't enough of an upgrade, and they're either working on a trade for a TE or scouring the cutout bins for someone plausibly better (if they don't find someone AND Hollister is still out there they could re-sign him)

2) Hollister was released as a roster move with a veteran not subject to waivers, in order to bring an injured player onto the 53 so he can return from IR later in the season.  The Bills have a "handshake agreement" to re-sign him with a little "extra" for his trouble after this.

 

Either is plausible

 

But if we promised 2) we shouldn't be doing 1)

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Color me officially confused. I figured bringing Hollister back was a foregone conclusion. Now they say they do not have that agreement. So, what's the plan?  Sweeny is hurt (seemingly always). So Knox can't be the only TE available (yes, I know they can use the FB in a pinch). 

 

So they either have their eye  on someone in a trade, or as a pickup, is the only thing I can imagine. I STILL believe they may bring back Hollister, just because I'm stubborn.🤪

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tom Donahoe, GM said:

 

Unless we're essentially eliminating the position. 

could be 4 and 5 wide all year cant say i hate it

Just now, billybob71 said:

could be 4 and 5 wide all year cant say i hate it

tho after watching Kelce kill us i wish we had that for Joshy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 11:21 AM, First Round Bust said:

4 year vets are excluded from waivers and are automatic free agents,  has played well enough in a key position to get more guaranteed money, more than the $135k he signed for, mutually beneficial...another wise move by the front office to open a slot, then IR a keeper for short-term and then bring Holister back after that happens

I think Holister looked like the best Te on the Roster so him being cut makes no sense 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, billybob71 said:

could be 4 and 5 wide all year cant say i hate it

tho after watching Kelce kill us i wish we had that for Joshy

 

I like that you responded to somebody. Then quoted that response in the same post, responding to yourself. Your life seems fun. 

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that this team isn't really built around its TEs (obviously), and it's not as if we had any problem scoring points last year with Knox and Lee freaking Smith at the position.  But man Hollister certainly looked like a serviceable, low-end starter to me during the preseason, somebody who would make for really nice depth behind Knox and maybe push him for snaps.  I don't get letting him walk.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Tom Donahoe, GM said:

 

Unless we're essentially eliminating the position. 

Maybe not deleting the position altogether -- but running a base run-n-shoot style offense may seem plausible. Which of the following receivers would you have preferred to see come off the field in favor of Hollister?

Diggs

Sanders

Cole B.

Davis

 

And that does not even take into account McKenzie and Kumerow. 

 

For all the drops issues that Knox has, we all knew he wasn't really going anywhere. That meant a competition between Sweeney and Hollister for the other spot. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is baffling.  I've watched a lot of Bills football the last couple of years and I've watched a lot of Hollister.  Hollister was the best TE in camp for the Bills period.  Hollister has a great relationship with Josh.  Hollister is a relatively cheap option from a salary cap perspective.  I honestly don't understand.  There has to be more to the story.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billybob71 said:

sorry for breaking forum etiquette not real internet savvy and yes i do have a fun life good sir


I am just busting balls. You didn’t break any etiquette. No worries. Keep doing you. 

Edited by Mango
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/09/01/zach-ertz-happiest-ive-been-in-a-long-time/

 

“This is the place I want to be, this is the place I want to retire. I’m moving on from everything that happened this offseason,” Ertz said in his first media session of the year.

For some reason it feels like he's more likely to get traded than ever now.

3 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

What happened to the gentlemen's agreement?  Multiple posters said Hollister would be back.  Please help me understand why Morris is on the PS instead of Hollister.

That's what we thought happened apparently not, he'll probably sign on to a 53 somewhere if not I don't see why we wouldn't bring him on to the PS.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said:

What happened to the gentlemen's agreement?  Multiple posters said Hollister would be back.  Please help me understand why Morris is on the PS instead of Hollister.

 

Well the "gentlemen's agreement" were nothing but fan speculation.

Next Hollister is a FA now.  He and his agent no doubt are looking to get him signed to a 53 roster somewhere.

Morris (some thought maybe Becker) was next man up for the PS.

 

There is a chance no team wants Hollister on the 53 then he will have to look for a PS team.  Maybe that could be Buffalo.

During the season the PS does have a lot of turnover.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

What happened to the gentlemen's agreement?  Multiple posters said Hollister would be back.  Please help me understand why Morris is on the PS instead of Hollister.

 

We exaggerate everything :doh:

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

One thing more about the Hollister release. It probably has something to do with or a lot to do with, Sanders, Davis, Stevenson, Kumerow. They will just run more 4-5 wide instead of three. Hollister is no inline TE. If he’s going to be split we’re better off having a WR out there. 

This.  Plus, Beasley and Sanders are very good at finding soft spots in zones.  When we do go into two TE sets Sweeney is the better blocker and has good hands (although not as athletic as Hollister).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsFanSD said:

I understand that this team isn't really built around its TEs (obviously), and it's not as if we had any problem scoring points last year with Knox and Lee freaking Smith at the position.  But man Hollister certainly looked like a serviceable, low-end starter to me during the preseason, somebody who would make for really nice depth behind Knox and maybe push him for snaps.  I don't get letting him walk.  

I don't get it either. Hopefully he can find a way on this roster. I just trust Knox about as much as I do Edmunds. Why do I get the feeling the organization has given up on TE's all together.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a move that doesn't make sense unless he's coming back. Knox has ability but will break your heart with untimely drops. Gilliam is a blocker and short yardage diversion. Hollister was one of Josh's favorite targets at Wyoming and was a contributor on a good Seattle team. If the reason was they thought Sweeney could bring more, I'd go with experience on a SB contender. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The two top abilities in football are availability and reliability. Our current TE1 is missing the latter, and our current TE2 is missing the former.

 

At the very least, Hollister had both. He was not injury prone, and he had consistent hands. I see that as an improvement over Knox and Sweeney. And his chemistry with Josh was just starting to return to their college day level.

 

There's got to be a reason for this. Did Hollister steal a girlfriend from Josh back in college??

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hollister was also not re-signed by two different teams, signed to a low contract, and hasn’t found a new home yet either. Not like he’s thought of as a stud around the league. Maybe not even worthy of any 53 although I think eventually he will sign with someone. He was undrafted. The Pats traded him for a 7th round pick. He was released by Seahawks then re-signed to PS before making roster halfway through season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Logic said:

I'm surprised that the Bills don't even seem to want him for the practice squad.

They seem to have decided that Quintin Morris is a more worthwhile practice squad stash than Hollister.

Huh.

We don't know that. He may not wanted to be here. He may be getting offers from other teams or a just wait a week or two and we will sign you notices. I know you know this, but just because a guy isn't on the PS doesnt mean A or B team didn't want him there.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...