Jump to content

Rd 4, Pick 128: WR Gabriel Davis UCF


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ctk232 said:

If the argument is for a physical receiver, why not Gandy? And for that matter, why not Peoples-Jones?

 

Not saying this is a bad pick, but why not the others?

Because they had Davis rated higher.  Answer is simple

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, buffalover4life said:

Damn, and Gandy Golden Just sitting there..

 

Guessing Bills wanted someone faster that could create more separation. Size is important but our front office learned that it doesnt matter if the receiver is slow. Gabe is a bit faster than AGG. Both are beasts tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, whatdrought said:

It would appear route running is his biggest weakness, which is great cause he will be sitting behind 3 great route runners, learning from them. 


yes that is his problem. Small route tree and slow in and out of breaks because of lacking knowledge on the nuances of route running. Played in college relying on his god given ability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Did you know Jerry Rice, Andre Reed and Eric Moulds were 6'2"?

 

You folks need to get grip on this size fantasy.

 

6'2" is more than FINE.

 

?

 

I'm fine with it. Nowhere did I complain. I'm just pointing out that 6'2 is not physically imposing and in no way should be considered as having size at the WR position.

 

If he produces, who cares. Right?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

Yes. Without question.

thats why I said the only guys hating this pick are any current Bills WR NOT named Diggs,Beasley or Brown lol...this was that warning shot across the bow saying....we got this guy because we need more from the 4th WR back/down...AkA be ready to put in some work!!!!

Edited by CBennett
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RyanC883 said:

like the player, seems likes big, angry type WR w/ good hands.... but seems a bit early with the CB's and OT's still on the board.  I would have preferred him in the next round, esp. w/ our WR room so full.  

good point--they musta really liked him and didnt want to risk it

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Called this pick in the other thread...love it!!

 

As a UCF alum, I have watched him dominate for two seasons...big physical guy, and a hands-catcher with a huge catch radius.

 

This guy is exactly what the Bills WR group needed!

 

Go Beane!!!

  • Like (+1) 11
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rick 'r Mortis said:

 

?

 

I'm fine with it. Nowhere did I complain. I'm just pointing out that 6'2 is not physically imposing and in no way should be considered as having size at the WR position.

 

If he produces, who cares. Right?

It is when you watch how he plays. He is a Physical WR that knows how to shield with body and high points very well. That is physically imposing. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the pick again.

 

He has some size without compromising a ton on speed at 4.54.

 

But keeping with the theme so far with Epenesa and Moss, he has big time college production and is young.

 

Good job Bills once again.

 

I think we need a linebacker, but so far check all the boxes for me.

 

DE, #2 back with pop, and now a larger ball pointing WR with college production, not some project. 
 

NFL had him as a 4th and that’s where he went, appropriate value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


In his highlight i see catch radius.  So Diggs, Brown, Beas, Davis, Roberts? 

 

I think those top 4 are locked in unless Davis blows.  I like McKittrick better than Roberts as a PR, KR, and jet sweep specialist.  But it's clear that Roberts, McKittrick, and the Duke are fighting for the 5th and 6th spots.  RayRay and Foster are hanging on by their fingernails.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Special K said:

Called this pick in the other thread...love it!!

 

As a UCF alum, I have watched him dominate for two seasons...big physical guy, and a hands-catcher with a huge catch radius.

 

This guy is exactly what the Bills WR group needed!

 

Go Beane!!!

Finally since who...probably Polian? a guy that can draft...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:


yes that is his problem. Small route tree and slow in and out of breaks because of lacking knowledge on the nuances of route running. Played in college relying on his god given ability. 

 

I like it. That's a lot of opportunity to develop with the likes of Diggs, Beasley, and Smoke teaching him. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CBennett said:

thats why I said the only guys hating this pick are any current Bills WR NOT named Diggs,Beasley or Brown lol...this was that warning shot across the bow saying....we got this guy because we need more from the 4th WR back/down

Just from reading for the past 10 minutes I think some posters have it nailed. He has the perfect build and traits for a highly productive gunner. 

 

He seems very raw outside of that. He does have the skill set to be a WR4 and let Josh toss one up there. Better than Foster? We will

soon out. He is under team control on the cheap for 4 years so Foster should be zooming with Aaron Rodgers and Carson Wentz and the rest of the draft losers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, whatdrought said:

 

I like it. That's a lot of opportunity to develop with the likes of Diggs, Beasley, and Smoke teaching him. 

If he develops based on what I saw from him he will be a top end NO2 WR as a ceiling. I don’t think he is a true No 1 like a lot down here (UCF fans) think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ctk232 said:

If the argument is for a physical receiver, why not Gandy? And for that matter, why not Peoples-Jones?

 

Not saying this is a bad pick, but why not the others?

 

Maybe the Director Equipment Management, a good friend of Kelly Pegula, convinced Kim “no long hyphenated names”.  A solid cost cutting measure.  
 

Or, it could be because Beane wanted this guy? 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Success said:

Beane liked this guy better.  That's good enough for me.

 

Not disagreeing with you - it's clear he did, just wondering why.

 

3 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

I liked Peoples-Jones more too but not by much. Also Gandy is cheeks.

 

2 minutes ago, CommonCents said:

Beane thinks hyphenated names bust. 

 

Another reason I like Beane. 

 

2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Because they had Davis rated higher.  Answer is simple

 

Right, I get how it happened, but just curious why Davis might edge the other two. I liked Peoples-Jones and Gandy, but don't hate this pick in the least either - all for it, just wondering why we may have gone this route versus others still on the board given what info is out there. Trying to look more into Davis, but wondering what stood out about him more than others if the physical part of the game is what people are saying he's known for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...