Jump to content

Maiorana's Report: Realism or Pessimism?


Tolstoy

Recommended Posts

Sal makes some good points here, but I can't help but be struck by the negativity regarding players and coaches all over the field. Is Sal giving us a needed wake-up call, or is he unreasonably pessimistic? Here it is: https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/football/nfl/bills/2019/09/23/tremaine-edmunds-buffalo-bills-linebacker-struggles-in-win-over-cincinnati-bengals/2418753001/

Edited by Tolstoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's right about Edmunds.  

19 minutes ago, Tolstoy said:

Sal makes some good points here, but I can't help but be struck by the negativity regarding players and coaches all over the field. Is Sal giving us a needed wake-up call, or is he unreasonably pessimistic? Here it is: https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/football/nfl/bills/2019/09/23/tremaine-edmunds-buffalo-bills-linebacker-struggles-in-win-over-cincinnati-bengals/2418753001/

Sal usually gives Sully a run for his money but this was a decent breakdown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

He could have balanced the piece out with more good points, but I can't argue with any of the criticisms.   It was a pretty sloppy performance all things considered.

True but one way to look at it. All things considered, the Bengals scored 17 points, had only 306 yards, the Bills got three turnovers (officially four), the Bills ran and passed decently, and won the game. If that is sloppy we go 11-5 or so with that performance.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We all expected big strides from the 21-year-old in his second NFL season, but in these first three games, Edmunds has been a ghost. He has 19 tackles, only one for lost yardage, and two pass breakups."

 

That's a ghost? 5 tackles a game, pass breakups, and a tackle for loss?

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

True but one way to look at it. All things considered, the Bengals scored 17 points, had only 306 yards, the Bills got three turnovers (officially four), the Bills ran and passed decently, and won the game. If that is sloppy we go 11-5 or so with that performance.

 

Yup.  On D it’s mostly nitpicking, though he made a good point about the pass rush (Brady will destroy them if they aren’t more creative).

 

On O, the turnovers, drops, and play calling will cost them games soon if not cleaned up.

 

But yes, we should be thrilled to have 3 wins with a team that is still a work in progress.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Reader said:

Interesting to read this and consider that our defense has allowed by my count 8, 14, and 14 points respectively. Clearly someone on the D is playing exceptionally.

Secondary in run support has been exceptional to my eyes...granted I didn’t really go back and look at Bengals game yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to be fair as sloppy as it was the D held what was the 2nd best passing team in the NFL to almost nothing in the first half before giving up some plays and yards in the second once the Bengals went max protect for much of the time...still Dalton didnt even get to 250 yards and the Bengals barely got over 300 for the game...

 

More importantly they still only allowed 17 points and that was the high water mark through 3 games. Can't complain much about that.

Edited by matter2003
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Realism. He’s not wrong that Edmunds had a rough go but I’m not concerned. His previous two games were stellar imo

 

This Bills team are still a bit of a mystery to me but a lot will be learned over the next 3 weeks. 

 

Those bye weeks are educationalAF. Heyyoooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Tolstoy said:

Sal makes some good points here, but I can't help but be struck by the negativity regarding players and coaches all over the field. Is Sal giving us a needed wake-up call, or is he unreasonably pessimistic? Here it is: https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/football/nfl/bills/2019/09/23/tremaine-edmunds-buffalo-bills-linebacker-struggles-in-win-over-cincinnati-bengals/2418753001/

I thought the beginning part about Edmonds was fair and well analyzed. You have to wonder about a guy who then proceeds to do nothing but point out anything he could to be negative. I mean the team won and is 3-0....how can there not be anything positive? When you reach that point its time to go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NickelCity said:

 

In crayon, if you don't mind. 

 

For my money, that Titans game is going to tell us a lot. Going to be tough sledding imo. 

I know there isn't a ton to be read into results this early on but I am totally confused by that week1 Titans/Browns game...such a weird one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest K-GunJimKelly12

In the context of the defense Edmunds is doing a good job imo.  He can cover and his ability to go sideline really prevents backs from getting to the edge.  This defense is all about every man playing their role.  I think there are a lot of defenses that you could drop Edmunds into and his stats would increase significantly.  He is doing exactly what he needs to in this defense.  Can anyone argue with the results?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MJS said:

"We all expected big strides from the 21-year-old in his second NFL season, but in these first three games, Edmunds has been a ghost. He has 19 tackles, only one for lost yardage, and two pass breakups."

 

That's a ghost? 5 tackles a game, pass breakups, and a tackle for loss?

 

 

 

Yes, he’s nowhere to be seen during commercial breaks! :flirt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

Edmunds strikes me as a better OLB.  He is good in coverage, but still struggling with MLB responsibilities.

I think people forget he just turned 21 years old in May...he is still young and learning things...the Bills defensive vets to a man believe he is a hall of fame caliber player so either we can believe their opinions or the opinions of some fat sportwswriter who probably never even played ? past pop warner or high school...

 

I think Edmunds has everything you want in an MLB in this scheme and its only a matter of time before he becomes a force to be reckoned with.

Edited by matter2003
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tolstoy said:

Sal makes some good points here, but I can't help but be struck by the negativity regarding players and coaches all over the field. Is Sal giving us a needed wake-up call, or is he unreasonably pessimistic? Here it is: https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/football/nfl/bills/2019/09/23/tremaine-edmunds-buffalo-bills-linebacker-struggles-in-win-over-cincinnati-bengals/2418753001/

 

People have been saying Edmonds has struggled.  

 

Yet the 19 now 20 year old is still leading the defense.  

 

A legitimate top 5 defense lead by a kid.  

 

Sit it back and enjoy the WINS

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Tolstoy said:

Sal makes some good points here, but I can't help but be struck by the negativity regarding players and coaches all over the field. Is Sal giving us a needed wake-up call, or is he unreasonably pessimistic? Here it is: https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/football/nfl/bills/2019/09/23/tremaine-edmunds-buffalo-bills-linebacker-struggles-in-win-over-cincinnati-bengals/2418753001/

 

What a hack.  He needs to up his anti-depressant dose.  This article is a negative, mean spirited piece of crap.

 

Living in another NFL city makes me appreciate how absurd this kind of garbage about a 3 - 0 team is.  Damn, the Bengals are 0 - 3 and you would be hard pressed to find a writer this negative.  The role of the local media IMO is to be a booster of the local team.  That doesn't mean ignoring realty or looking at EVERYTHING through rose colored glasses but this guy and to many other Bills "reporters" look at everything through a dark cloud.

 

We all get that the 3 - 0 start could be mirage and the bubble could burst.  We're Bills fans after all.  But how about we wait until it happens before sticking a pin into the balloon!  This guy needs to let us enjoy the moment.  Sure, he can gently point out some potential trouble spots but this article reads like we're 0 - 3.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

I always thought Edmunds would be better suited in a pass rushing capacity rather than MLB....he just doesn’t seem to have the natural instincts imo....

 

This coming game is going to confirm or deny this and many other concepts.  Because if Edmunds' instincts are truly not there, Belichick will expose that all day.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Reader said:

Interesting to read this and consider that our defense has allowed by my count 8, 14, and 14 points respectively. Clearly someone on the D is playing exceptionally.

 

Great film breakdown Sal with your caveat that you do  not know the players assignments anyway.  A Sullyesque piece indeed.  

 

Headlines: 3-0 team with 6th ranked defense has a 21 year old middle linebacker that is not playing well.  

 

Edmunds is holding his own and if Bellichek/Brady exposes him he won’t be the first.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Limeaid said:

 

He is depressed because Bucky and Sucky are gone (Yes Sucky writes for Niagara Gazette but he pays to write there).

 

Living down here in Cincy I suspect I'm better off for not knowing who "Bucky" & "Sucky" are.  But if they were side kicks of Sal's then they must be tools!

 

 

11 minutes ago, BuffaloBill said:

The criticisms are well founded.  The Bills should have won this game easily and yet they were very close to losing it.  I will take w’s all the time but against a stronger team they  would have lost. 

 

But that's NOT what he was critical of.  He targeted specific players and overly exaggerated what he claimed was their poor play. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stony said:

He's right about Edmunds.  

Sal usually gives Sully a run for his money but this was a decent breakdown. 

 

Not going to disagree with him and no surprises.

 

A few of us have been saying Edmunds has struggled, especially needs work learning to shed blocks. We have to remember he is really young, but he needs to pick up his game and improve his ability to diagnose plays, so he can anticipate better and be in the right position to stop them.

 

Same with Ford in pass-pro, he struggles against speed rushers. I am pretty sure we have beat the Star L. deal to death here as well?

 

The coaching staff and this team have things to work on.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maiorana sounds as objective as he can be, and he seems more concerned about the Bills than pessimistic. Perhaps it is a wake up call and Maiorana is making valid points  about a few issues that need to be addressed. The same things that opposing coaches will be analyzing on film.

Edited by Rocket94
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I look at this is, they had three games against weaker opponents and have had time to get problems identified and work on solutions.  They have definitely not been hitting on all cylinders and yet they're still 3-0.  They have an opportunity to get a whole lot better if they keep on working, and from what I can see this team is not made up of men who are willing to let each other down.  

 

So yeah, it's kind of good news that some parts of the D haven't been playing well.  Wait until they put it all together.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...