Jump to content

Clowney Trending for some reason.


MAJBobby

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

If you only look at the way Mario went out, you're going to have a warped idea of what he actually did with the Bills. It wasn't a home run signing, but it certainly wasn't a bust. He played a crucial role for what I consider to be our best defense in the last 30 years(2014). 

 

Clowney is a 26 year old with an incredible amount of upside. He's got all the talent in the world and has increased his productivity each and every year. EVERY signing is a risk. Look at Morse. Yes, this would be higher dollars, but you gotta roll the dice sometimes.

I wish!

Williams was superb and his play honored his contract. Rex Ryan? The guy was an aberration and a traveling road show. In 2014, you could feel a sense of momentum that Schwartz was building...then boooom!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rocket94 said:

Williams was superb and his play honored his contract. Rex Ryan? The guy was an aberration and a traveling road show. In 2014, you could feel a sense of momentum that Schwartz was building...then boooom!

I was furious. The argument against hiring Schwartz was that he had failed in his stint in Detroit. Meh. It's the Lions organization. Who HAS succeeded there? And then there was the fact that the guy we hired had some early success and completely fell on his face in his last couple years in NY. Did not compute.

 

I'm surprised Schwartz hasn't gotten so much as an interview. I think he's viewed around the league as a DC and not HC material. You'd think someone would give him a shot to dispel that with all the retreads who've gotten second chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, njbuff said:

Why hasn’t this thread died yet?

 

The Bills aren’t going to give the Texans valuable draft capital AND pay Clowney over 20 mill a year. 

 

Ain’t happening.

Hope. this is what teams do when you have a qb on a rookie deal you load up talent you spend in free agency you stack the roster for a multi year run .and if its a 3rd you dont find many players like clowney in round 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheJauronClap said:

Hope. this is what teams do when you have a qb on a rookie deal you load up talent you spend in free agency you stack the roster for a multi year run .and if its a 3rd you dont find many players like clowney in round 3

 

A third rounder would be fine.

 

Ain’t giving anything more when you have to pay the man......... RICHLY.

Edited by njbuff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, njbuff said:

 

A third rounder would be fine.

 

Ain’t giving anything more when you have to pay the man......... RICHLY.

 

Does that logic apply to Khalil Mack? I'm fine having the conversation about what Clown boy is worth, but the argument of it being a bad trade if you have to give up compensation and pay the guy just doesn't work in the modern NFL. Teams are realizing that they have to leverage value on young stars that they aren't going to pay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

I was furious. The argument against hiring Schwartz was that he had failed in his stint in Detroit. Meh. It's the Lions organization. Who HAS succeeded there? And then there was the fact that the guy we hired had some early success and completely fell on his face in his last couple years in NY. Did not compute.

 

I'm surprised Schwartz hasn't gotten so much as an interview. I think he's viewed around the league as a DC and not HC material. You'd think someone would give him a shot to dispel that with all the retreads who've gotten second chances.

Your right. Schwartz was already labled as a defensive guru through out the NFL, even so, promoting Schwartz seemed like the logical next step, but I think for the Bills it was also timing. The Pegulas bought in to the Ryan myth and it just took off. Do you remember the Bills players carrying Schwartz off the field after the Detroit game? How often do we see that! Some redemption anyway.

Edited by Rocket94
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lombardi is reporting he will be traded within the next 24 to 48 hrs.  Houston wanted oline help, but since that is unlikely, they are looking for a WR they can pair with Hopkins as Fuller is coming off an ACL injury.   There are two teams currently negotiating with Clowney to see if they can agree to an extension. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkeerie said:

Lombardi is reporting he will be traded within the next 24 to 48 hrs.  Houston wanted oline help, but since that is unlikely, they are looking for a WR they can pair with Hopkins as Fuller is coming off an ACL injury.   There are two teams currently negotiating with Clowney to see if they can agree to an extension. 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Happy Gilmore said:

This has the makings of Mario Williams 2.0.  Instead of a $100M invisible man, it will be the $135M invisible man.

I want the DE position to be upgraded, but I don't think Clowney is the answer.

? if I ever commit a crime I hope you're the witness.  You saw over 30 sacks Mario's first three years in Buffalo and call him invisible...??

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

If a good starting receiver is required to make the trade, count us out. I wonder if the Chiefs rumors were correct...

Maybe Sammy would finally come close to realizing his potential if he learned how to be a pro from DeAndre Hopkins... the Clemson connection couldn't hurt.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Leonhart2017 said:

I never thought of Mario Williams being a bad signing. It is weird I keep seeing people say that. If Wrex didn’t take over in 2015 we would have likely made the playoffs with him on defense that year.

Doubt it Mario lost the love of the game before Wrex took over. His career was over no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Boca BIlls said:

Not false, totally true which is why when he left the Bills he was still garbage 

Played great before Rex

Play diminished during and after Rex.

 

Do you actually feel the above is proof that he lost his passion before Rex arrived?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice, but I don’t see it happening. 

 

I’d make any of our RB’s available, any of our Wr’s (minus brown and Beasley) and give up a 2nd rounder or below.   But I can’t see that being enough.  

 

And yes, we’d need to have a new contract in place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1ZAYDAY1 said:

We all know they would ask the world of the Bills....

 

If they want a WR, Zay is the only WR I think they’d accept.

Shaq would probably have to be part of that deal and a draft pick, rd 2 would be my guess.

You can only ask the world if you are in control and the Texans are definitely not. They will make a deal that makes them look bad b.c they have no choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Bill O’Brien: Ball’s in Jadeveon Clowney’s court until he signs tender

Posted by Charean Williams on August 25, 2019, 12:23 AM EDT
 

Linebacker Jadeveon Clowney isn’t under contract, so the Texans can’t trade him. But John McClain of the Houston Chronicle expects the Texans to trade Clowney for an offensive tackle as soon as Clowney signs his franchise tender, with a deal already agreed to with another team.

 

Texans coach Bill O’Brien, the de facto General Manager, was asked about Clowney on Saturday night after his team’s 34-0 loss to the Cowboys.

 

“Until he comes in and signs the tender, really the ball’s in his court relative to playing for the Texans and all those things, just like it’s been since the beginning of training camp,” O’Brien said. “He’s a franchise player, and so, until he comes and signs the tender, really there’s nothing else to talk about.”

 

O’Brien said he has no indication when Clowney might sign the tender.

 

“I think I spoke to him a few times since the end of our season,” O’Brien said. “All the conversations have been good conversations. Very professional conversations, but I don’t have any idea of any specific date of when he will decide he wants to be here.”

It sounds as if the Texans have decided they don’t want Clowney, leaving his future up in the air until he signs his franchise tender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Boca BIlls said:

You can only ask the world if you are in control and the Texans are definitely not. They will make a deal that makes them look bad b.c they have no choice.

I honestly think there is multiple teams that will be in talks. 

 

And i think if the Bills want him, our 2020 1st round would have to be involved. Just look a Mack’s deal with the Bears. Wouldn’t be as much, but a 1st for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1ZAYDAY1 said:

I honestly think there is multiple teams that will be in talks. 

 

And i think if the Bills want him, our 2020 1st round would have to be involved. Just look a Mack’s deal with the Bears. Wouldn’t be as much, but a 1st for sure.

I don't see how they could ask for a 1. Mack is a generational player, Clowney is just a good player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

Linebacker Jadeveon Clowney isn’t under contract, so the Texans can’t trade him. But John McClain of the Houston Chronicle expects the Texans to trade Clowney for an offensive tackle as soon as Clowney signs his franchise tender, with a deal already agreed to with another team.

 

Color me confused 

 

Isn’t under contract 

Can’t be traded 

 

 

expects the Texans to trade Clowney for an offensive tackle as soon as Clowney signs his franchise tender

 

what am I miss reading?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once he signs franchise tender w Houston, a trade can then be made.  So essentially once they have a deal worked out and he likes new team, he signs and trade goes through.  It’s a roundabout built in no trade clause as he can refuse to sign if he doesn’t like where he’s going. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that realistically, at this point, the Bills would be looking at something like Shaq, Shady & a 2nd. Im not sure that’s enough but that would be my offer. Shaq and Shady will help the Texans this year and they can make a decision in the offseason on them. I wouldn’t be surprised if they offered Shaq a contract sooner. The Bills would be finishing off their defense which SHOULD remain near the top of the league. 

 

The only way that this happens though is if Clowney’s agent and the Bills have the framework of a deal in place for the offseason. Seeing as Gaine should know EXACTLY what Clowney wants I’d be comfortable with it.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

Color me confused 

 

Isn’t under contract 

Can’t be traded 

 

 

expects the Texans to trade Clowney for an offensive tackle as soon as Clowney signs his franchise tender

 

what am I miss reading?

 

He has to sign his tender, then he can be dealt. That’s why he has some power here- he can simply say “nope, I don’t want  to go that team- I won’t sign.” 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...