Jump to content

Dak wants deal right behind Mahomes..my question is based on what??


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Oh he isn't elite, nobody would argue he is. But he is a solid top 10 QB and he wins plenty. 

He has won a bunch of games, no doubt, and likely will win a lot, he strikes me as a new generation Rivers, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RichRiderBills said:

Dak cant put the team on shoulders. I would move on. He is a stat guy. Cowboys made him fair offers. 

 

Ive been having this conversation since football is over and the sabres blow. 

 

This is kinda how I feel about Eichel. He’s great, but the Sabres need him to be Ovechkin. But that’s not him. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Rivers deserved to get paid.

Dak will as well if he can learn to carry his team, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aristocrat said:

Ask for a lot and end up in the middle. Boys will just keep tagging him 

 

Can't. You can only do it so many times before it becomes prohibitivly expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, ngbills said:

People always confuse highest paid = best player with the most recently paid player.

 

Yep. Not every player is up for a new deal every year. I use the Derek Carr example for this a lot. When he was paid he was the highest paid player in the league. 2 years later he was 10th. It is much more about the cycle of when contracts come up as it is a ranking of whose best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boxcar said:

What? The only reason the Cowboys were even remotely competitive at the start of last season is because Dak was throwing 500 yards a game. He's a very, very good QB.

 

Being said, compound fractures are no joke and I would not want to lock up a guy who's level of mobility is highly in question for that kind of money. If I were the Cowboys, I'd franchise tag him and then see how he does next year. Given the numbers he's demanding, it seems like the only outcome of that is the Cowboys ending up paying him less.

 

Everyone raves about the Cowboys talent ALWAYS...until the narrative does not fit. The Cowboys had a great running game, good pass rushers, and a scrappy defense they spent decent cash on. Now suddenly they don't have talent. Hmmm....

 

The Bills game was a microcosm of Dak's skill set. That year he could not get them in and choked. They blew easy games against bad teams down the stretch.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RichRiderBills said:

 

Everyone raves about the Cowboys talent ALWAYS...until the narrative does not fit. The Cowboys had a great running game, good pass rushers, and a scrappy defense they spent decent cash on. Now suddenly they don't have talent. Hmmm....

 

The Bills game was a microcosm of Dak's skill set. That year he could not get them in and choked. They blew easy games against bad teams down the stretch.

It always comes back to the Bills game. Lol. It’s one game.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It always shocks and surprises me when people start a negotiation by asking for a bit more than they're likely to get.

 

It also shocks and surprises me when there is disagreement on the value of a unique product or service on the open market.

 

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on leverage being the best option for the next season. To me, he is not worth signing or franchising. He's coming off  2 radical ankle surgeries and hasn't been great since his rookie year. If Jerry  signs him for Mahomes or Watson money the Boys will be mediocre for the foreseeable future. Couldn't happen to nicer folks.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aristocrat said:

Ask for a lot and end up in the middle. Boys will just keep tagging him 

 

 

2021 tag value for Dak Prescott:  $37,690,800

2022 tag value for Dak Prescott:  $54,274,752

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-dak-prescott-tops-12-franchise-tag-candidates-in-2021-plus-each-positions-projected-tag-salary/

 

And I believe the next year it goes up by 44% again.

 

There's pressure on the Boys to get a deal done. He's worth signing even if you're overpaying a bit.

 

But if I'm Dallas and I'm determined not to overpay, I draft a QB early this year, possibly with a tradeup. It would be a mistake, but if you're determined not to overpay it's the next-best alternative even if it's much much worse in its impact on your team.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

I’m no expert, but I think Dak deserves a contract similar to Russell Wilson’s.  Somewhere around 35 million AAV.   He’ll probably get more than that though.  Some team will over pay, and I don’t think it will be Dallas.

If Russ wants out of Seattle it would be interesting if Jerry would go after Russ and maybe involve Dak in the trade.  He'd have to franchise tag him first obviously and maybe throw in a first round pick.  Cowboys were on Wilson's four team wish list.

2 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

He was offered 31m per season and he should have taken it..but no.....

I wonder who leaked that.  How much as guaranteed?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, somnus00 said:

Dak isn't as good as Mahomes... But he's good enough that I wouldn't want to see the Pats sign him.

I don't know how much pull the Pats have anymore....think about it....Brady gone and happier....Gronk gone and happier.....Van Noy (who I would like to get in FA if we can't get Milano)I would be surprised if he goes back to NE....because he is a good fit there and if he doesn't go back that should say something about the moral within the Pat's organization. Nobody ever looked like they were having fun over there even when they were winning. And I don't recall any ex-pats returning after they left....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

The Cowboys could have had him at $32m per two years ago and blew it. He isn't worth the 2nd highest contract but he is a top 10 Quarterback and he has a lot of leverage because the Cowboys have ballsed this up. 

 

No, they didn't because with the seriousness of his injury, the market for his services isn't as robust as it might have been, giving the Cowboys leverage... they'll let Dak walk and not pay some ungodly $39 million plus a year or more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dbfla10 said:

Peyton Mannings rookie contract was double what rookies get today. Guys like him are just fine with what they made.... As for Dak, if im Dallas i'm moving on. What has he accomplished with them? 

 

Not exactly, Manning’s rookie deal was 6 years 48 mil w $11 mil signing bonus 

 

Joe Burrow’s rookie deal is 4 years 36 mil with $23 mil signing bonus.

 

even factoring inflation, they’re comparable contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

 

No, they didn't because with the seriousness of his injury, the market for his services isn't as robust as it might have been, giving the Cowboys leverage... they'll let Dak walk and not pay some ungodly $39 million plus a year or more...

 

He isn't hitting the market. And it he does he is getting his money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RichRiderBills said:

 

The answer to your question is yes. Then again Blake Bortles won 2 playoff games and got his team within 4 points of the SB with a good Defense. Any team with that good of a defense can be a contender. 

 

To be clear, Dak was offered a top 10 QB number...he's also made a top 5 # over the last 2 years. 

 

Dak has been given tools to win. Oline draft picks , paid RB and kept him. Proactive to get WRs and pay them. Not like they've let him flap.

 

They routinely bring in top coaches to the D and try supply talent there as well. 

 

Lets also not forget Texas is income tax free, has low property taxes, and the Dallas QB gets tons of endorsement deals.

 

Mike Nolan? Top coaches....... wow. You've started early. 

 

It's also fair to say people haven't noticed by Dallas's oline has not been very good the last two years. It's probably part of the reason their QB got hurt scrambling outside a messy pocket. After defensive back I would say offensive line is the Cowboys #1 need. It was good his first couple of years, no doubting that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

I mean i get that its not the be all end all... but bottom line if the formula isnt working, you dont think its time to move on?  it hasnt worked on the contract hes on, is the team roster going to get better or worse if they tie him up with a fat contract?  hes had plenty of years to show he can put the team on his back and win, and he hasnt

Using win lost records for a QBs is dumb. But since people like dumb things, Dan’s “record” is 42-27, which includes 2-3 this year (one game where he got hurt and didn’t finish the game) where he was on pace to set a nfl record for passing yards. 
 

Qb win- loss records are stupid without context. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Big Turk said:

This dude is dreaming if he thinks he is deserving of that type of money and the Cowboys are flat out dumb if they even are thinking about paying it.

 

Based on what does Dak think he is even in the same league as Mahomes?

 

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/report-cowboys-prescott-seeking-deal-205754257.html

Excuse me!

Didn't he stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?

Doesn't he have a name that can be in print and save space on the front page?

 

Give him the money....it helps the Bills, just another team with an overpaid QB using cap space unwisely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, he has a ton of leverage here. One more franchise tag and Dallas is forced to either give him the contract he wants, let him walk, or tag him again for $50+ million. They screwed the pooch massively here with the contracts they gave out to less important players. They're already stuck considering cutting one of the highest paid LBs in the league and trying to decide if they should split carries between one of the highest paid RBs and one of the cheapest RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Big Turk said:

This dude is dreaming if he thinks he is deserving of that type of money and the Cowboys are flat out dumb if they even are thinking about paying it.

 

Based on what does Dak think he is even in the same league as Mahomes?

 

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/report-cowboys-prescott-seeking-deal-205754257.html

So you want him to start negotiating low?  He can ask for whatever he wants, but what he agrees to tells us a lot more about what he really believes - and what the Cowboys and/or league really believes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

If I was Dallas I might consider trading for Wilson and letting Dak walk...Wilson is a better player and is under a more reasonable contract.

 

And how likely do you think it is Seattle will let Russ go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

If I was Dallas I might consider trading for Wilson and letting Dak walk...Wilson is a better player and is under a more reasonable contract.

That’s actually a pretty stellar line of thinking.  Heck, if Seattle is willing to pay Dak then the Cowboys could include him in the deal after they tag him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wppete said:

This guy is delusional. Not a top 5 QB in the league and coming of a major injury, 

 

He isn't delusional. He has all the leverage. He isn't a top 5 QB in the league but he is negotiating with a party who have backed themselves into a corner with two year's worth of bad organisational decisions on contract prioritisation and have no other realistic option. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

He isn't delusional. He has all the leverage. He isn't a top 5 QB in the league but he is negotiating with a party who have backed themselves into a corner with two year's worth of bad organisational decisions on contract prioritisation and have no other realistic option. 

 

I see you still haven't gotten your "Z" key fixed.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

And how likely do you think it is Seattle will let Russ go?

 

Based on reports coming out, as each day passes and the sides become more and more irritated with each other, it becomes increasingly likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big Turk said:

 

Based on reports coming out, as each day passes and the sides become more and more irritated with each other, it becomes increasingly likely.

 

So what do you think it would take for Seattle to let him go? I still think it highly unlikely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, wppete said:

This guy is delusional. Not a top 5 QB in the league and coming of a major injury, 

so you saying he is not a top 5 QB is your opinion of him. He was putting up MVP numbers before his injury and it was not close. 

 

Prescot in first 5 games before injury here we go.

 

Prescot----Comp. 68%  Yards 1856  9 TD 

Mahomes--Comp. 64% Yards 1705  10 TD 

Rodgers ---Comp. 76.9% Yards 1199   15 TD 

 

Prescot was in the conversation near or at top before injury for MVP.  Naming top 5 QB in this league is hard its best done in tiers.  All this info I am giving is subjective and crystal ball stuff right now.. but what Prescot did those first 5 games? crazy

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So what do you think it would take for Seattle to let him go? I still think it highly unlikely. 

 

Earlier reports said Seattle was setting the initial asking price at 3 first round picks. Not sure if they moved off that or not. Bears apparently putting together a massive offer.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

The Cowboys could have had him at $32m per two years ago and blew it. He isn't worth the 2nd highest contract but he is a top 10 Quarterback and he has a lot of leverage because the Cowboys have ballsed this up. 

I agree he is a top 10 guy and the Cowboys have worked this situation like they think he is not top 10. They can go with the Red Rifle and draft a QB or overpay Dak, neither option is good for cowboys 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...