Jump to content

Deshaun Watson officially requests trade from Houston


Process

Recommended Posts

I think Houston is an incredibly stupid organization, but Watson looks like a complete loser in this deal. 

 

If I were Houston I wouldnt take anything less than 4 first round picks for the guy or two 1sts and an established veteran QB.   Dolphins fans who think Tua factors into this at all are out of their mind, you have the guy for a year and dont want him, but think that another team that's never had him in their building thinks the kid is worthy of being in a trade for one the best quarterbacks in the league?   No chance.  And not for nothing, its going to cost the Texans 20 Million dollars just to trade him. 

 

Watson wants to be in New York thats obvious, but again if I am in Houston, I do not trade him in the AFC. 

 

That said there are only two teams I consider if I am the Texans and thats the Lions or the 49ers.

 

I'd ask the Lions to give me Stafford and two first round picks or the 49ers to give me Jimmy G and two 1sts.

 

Thats it, otherwise I tell Watson to go pound salt.

 

 

Edited by thenorthremembers
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

I would add the Lions to the list and possibly Atlanta if they really want to shake things up...

 

Atlanta is too cap restricted to make it work I think. And I am not sure he would go to Detroit but sure they could be interested. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

IMO, Houston shouldn't trade him. Tell him to play...or sit out.


that’s where I am at.
 

There is no chance I would move him. You just bank on Culley figuring out a way to repair the relationship. 
 

Also, Watson strikes me as a good guy. I think if the Texans should some degree of competence with the new GM and coach, he will come around. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

IMO, Houston shouldn't trade him. Tell him to play...or sit out.


There is no great answer here. Forcing a malcontent to play won’t yield good locker room. If he sits out, maybe just postponing the inevitable. If you don’t try to trade for assets, which he could garner a windfall than you’ve squandered that opportunity too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

Houston's dysfunctional ownership continues to screw up the league, and it disproportionately affects Buffalo.  To recap:

 

1)  Trades 2 #1st to Miami for Tunsil, giving the Dolphins a top-five pick; Tunsil wasn't extended in advance, giving players in a similar position additional negotiating leverage.

 

2) Trades Hopkins for peanuts; Hopkins single-handedly beats Buffalo in 2020

 

3) Hires David Culley instead of Leslie Frazier, giving extra draft capital to the best GM in football

 

4) Likely trades a top-five QB in his prime to the AFC East

And the playoff game last year.

Hope they follow Hopkins trade model and send to NFC team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO SF is the best place for Watson if he wants to win now. Shanahan is one of the best offensive minds in the league and he'd be falling into a bunch of weapons with Kittle, Samuel, and Aiyuk. They also have a solid RB stable. Then you can throw in the top 5 defense they will have again when everyone comes back healthy. 

Edited by H2o
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can ask for as many trades as he'd like. If I'm Caserio I tell him to play out his contract or play out his contract. The hiring of Culley, who I don't think is expected to be some sort of long-term savior, would indicate to me that the Texans are about to start a re-build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillMafia716ix said:

Miami just makes too much sense. Tua or Deshaun Watson? Looks like will be seeing Watson twice a year 

 

Miami would be tough if they get Watson.  

 

I'm not too worried about the Jets with him... He'd basically be going to a team worse than where he came from, and depending on what they have to give up, it may not get better very soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I get that but the Texans have very little on that roster. If I get #2 or #3 I am picking one of those 3 QBs that are not Lawrence and then maximising my capital to try and put stuff around him. So basically I want picks instead of Tua or Darnold. If my QB gets hurt? Well I will just be like most NFL franchises when their QB goes down.

Re QBs going down, check out this quote from Ron Jaworski's book:

 

'As we watched, we were surprised to see Manning taking virtually all the reps in the session.  Jon [Gruden] asked Tom [Moore, the Colts offensive coordinator,] why he wasn’t giving some snaps to Peyton’s backups…He looked at us both in the eye, paused for a moment, then said in that gravelly voice of his, “Fellas, if ‘18’ goes down, we’re f*cked.  And we don’t practice f*cked.”'

  • Haha (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ndirish1978 said:

He can ask for as many trades as he'd like. If I'm Caserio I tell him to play out his contract or play out his contract. The hiring of Culley, who I don't think is expected to be some sort of long-term savior, would indicate to me that the Texans are about to start a re-build.

This is exactly it.  The NFL cannot allow their league to become what the NBA has become.   The league is a complete joke.

 

Sorry buddy, you can either play the contract you signed or you can go sit at home and not get paid.  Otherwise I am sending your butt to Detroit, and if you choose not to go there once you've been traded, you can once again go home and sit on your butt.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, H2o said:

IMO SF is the best place for Watson if he wants to win now. Shanahan is one of the best offensive minds in the league and he'd be falling into a bunch of weapons with Kittles, Samuel, and Aiyuk. They also have a solid RB stable. Then you can throw in the top 5 defense they will have again when everyone comes back healthy. 

SF doesn't have enough: 12th, 44th, and 112th picks. They have no third rounder. I guess it depends on who you prefer Jimmy G, Darnold, or Tua. The problem with Garapolo is his big contract. The Texans have a bad cap situation. The other two are on rookie contracts, and personally I think Darnold has a fair bit more upside than Tua.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Atlanta is too cap restricted to make it work I think. And I am not sure he would go to Detroit but sure they could be interested. 

Atl totally is cap screwed, their time to tear it apart a bit is coming up though. Was simply just considering it would be a fun move and would be cool to see a QB swap like that

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thenorthremembers said:

This is exactly it.  The NFL cannot allow their league to become what the NBA has become.   The league is a complete joke.

 

Sorry buddy, you can either play the contract you signed or you can go sit at home and not get paid.  Otherwise I am sending your butt to Detroit, and if you choose not to go there once you've been traded, you can once again go home and sit on your butt.

He can void a deal to Detroit because of his no-trade clause. I don't know why people get upset about this stuff. He's gone, and it's in the best interest for everyone if he's traded. The Texans need a new start, and they can get a boatload for him. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


There is no great answer here. Forcing a malcontent to play won’t yield good locker room. If he sits out, maybe just postponing the inevitable. If you don’t try to trade for assets, which he could garner a windfall than you’ve squandered that opportunity too. 

Exactly. 

2 minutes ago, FireChans said:

????

 

Garropolo has a $2M cap hit next year if traded. I think Tua’s traded hit is probably higher.

Good to know. Didn't realize that. Thanks. That said, wouldn't the signing bonus accelerate from $24 million to $48 million on SF's balance sheet this year?

Edited by dave mcbride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

He can void a deal to Detroit because of his no-trade clause. I don't know why people get upset about this stuff. He's gone, and it's in the best interest for everyone if he's traded. The Texans need a new start, and they can get a boatload for him. 

 

Except he's not really gone is he. He has a contract and no way out of it other than to whine and complain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Why take a QB? If you are getting #2 or #3 you don't need to. Pick your own rather than taking a reclamation project that is gonna be almost impossible to sell to your already furious fanbase. 

 

For me 3 #1 picks plus either two #3s or a #2 and a #4 is about where I'd pitch the price. 

 

Should say if I am trading with the 9ers or Panthers I do want their QB as part of the deal because I am probably out of position to draft one.

 

If I am trading a 2nd or 3rd overall pick I am most certainly not giving them 2 other first rounders.  Why would the Texans think those teams are going to agree to that when other teams are offering them a mid or late first round pick this year? Do they think they are stupid to not realize that a 2nd/3rd pick is hugely more valuable than a 10th or 15th or 20th overall pick?? 

 

 If I'm either of those teams it is limited to the #2/#3 overall pick and a QB swap with maybe some lower round picks in there.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

You are excluding Colts because they are in division? What about Bears, Patriots, Giants?

 

Yea I see Stafford to the Colts as all but a done deal. Giants maybe, Bears..... Pace and Nagy are on the hotseat not sure Watson would want to go somewhere where there may be more dysfunction upcoming. Patriots is just not attractive to a Quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

And he is a Georgia kid isn't he Deshaun?

 

Yes, a big reason why I mentioned them too. He's local and would probably like to come back if the Falcons can make it work.

 

I wonder if they could send Matt Ryan as part of the deal, but I'm sure he has a NTC as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

If I am trading a 2nd or 3rd overall pick I am most certainly not giving them 2 other first rounders.  Why would the Texans think those teams are going to agree to that when other teams are offering them a mid or late first round pick this year? Do they think they are stupid to not realize that a 2nd/3rd pick is hugely more valuable than a 10th or 15th or 20th overall pick?? 

 

 If I'm either of those teams it is limited to the #2/#3 overall pick and a QB swap with maybe some lower round picks in there.

 

In which case can't see that being attractive to the Texans. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea I see Stafford to the Colts as all but a done deal. Giants maybe, Bears..... Pace and Nagy are on the hotseat not sure Watson would want to go somewhere where there may be more dysfunction upcoming. Patriots is just not attractive to a Quarterback.

 

Nothing on the Stafford to Washington talk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Exactly. 

Good to know. Didn't realize that. Thanks. That said, wouldn't the signing bonus accelerate from $24 million to $48 million on SF's balance sheet this year?

No. 
 

Jimmy G’s contract was a classic case of everyone getting ahead of themselves that he was being overpaid and overrated. They locked him up for 3 seasons with an easy out.

 

The 49ers can cut him this offseason and save $23M in space.

Just now, GunnerBill said:

 

Ah okay. My mistake. 

Gainesville, Georgia! 

 

you had it right.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

He can void a deal to Detroit because of his no-trade clause. I don't know why people get upset about this stuff. He's gone, and it's in the best interest for everyone if he's traded. The Texans need a new start, and they can get a boatload for him. 

I didnt realize he had a no trade clause, that was another stupid move by the Texans.   People get upset about this stuff, because petulance shouldnt be rewarded.   Then again, I am in the shrinking number of people that dont believe you give people whatever they want just because they want it. 

 

It sets a bad precedence for the rest of the league, and what you end up with is employees who think they run the show.   Pretty soon the league will be unwatchable and insufferable because employees, on teams that sunk a ton of time and money into players will be forcing their ways off of said teams to play with their buddies in other cities.  Why dont we just do away with the draft altogether and ask College kids where they want to play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems almost likely at this point that he ends up in the division.

 

The difference between the AFC and NFC at the QB position is becoming lopsided. I wish he'd end up in the NFC, if only for a little bit of balance.  The AFC is looking brutal in the years ahead w/ the # of good & great young QB's.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

That's not going to happen. He's gone, and he has the ability to force the trade. He has a ton of value, and the Texans can get a ton for him. Cutting off your nose to spite your face isn't a great strategy, especially in a not-for-long league with a new coach/GM who will be given a grace period because it's a new start. 

 

I get it, believe me. I am well aware that Houston has created most of their own problems. However, Watson isn't completely blameless in this entire fisco. You don't think he was well aware of all of the issues with this franchise before he signed a new contract? And, honestly, his behavior hasn't been much more professional than theirs.

 

I think the value for him is limited because the would reach new levels of ineptness in trading a franchise QB within the division or conference - and that is where the teams are that can offer the most. Nothing could be worse for that team than to have to face him any future playoff scenarios within the conference. So, if they go out of conference, as they should, they are not going to get nearly as much for him.

 

I hate when I see situations like this where, as professionals, they should be able to reach some agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...