Jump to content

Myles Garrett suspended indefinitely (minimum 2019 season), Pouncy 3 games, Ogunjobi 1 game


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Another Fan said:

Be honest, how would this board react if someone on the Bills did that to Brady.  There's a good chance he would become a legend around here 

I would hope he was cut. No place in the game for that *****. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure I'll be disappointed with the league action since I still find Gronk's hit on The White worse than Myles Garrett. Tre White wasn't even a combatent. Rudolph was running down Garrett like he wanted his *** kicked.

 

At least the Steelers defended their guy.. unlike Bills that day Tre got Gronk'ed up

Edited by BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TuelTime said:

I'm surprised that more incidents like this aren't followed up by law enforcement.

There's assault every play in football. It's a violent sport where players are doing things to each other they'd never do off the field. It should and will stay on the gridiron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P said:

There's assault every play in football. It's a violent sport where players are doing things to each other they'd never do off the field. It should and will stay on the gridiron.


Yeah but the difference is Garrett’s actions were excessive without a football action.  Slamming a helmet on another man without a helmet is not a part of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:


Yeah but the difference is Garrett’s actions were excessive without a football action.  Slamming a helmet on another man without a helmet is not a part of the game.

 

You'd think this point would be self-evident. It's kind of sad that some people need it spelled out for them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that the dust has cleared. I gotta say I don’t care much about this anymore, other than the fact it’s all pretty good news for the Bills imo. Rudolph isn’t suspended, Garrett is out, Pouncey misses some games, and who knows what will happen when these two teams meet in a couple weeks. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Another Fan said:

Be honest, how would this board react if someone on the Bills did that to Brady.  There's a good chance he would become a legend around here 

If this incident had happened more or less as it actually did, but with the Bills taking the place of either team, this board would have gone into total meltdown mode.  

 

You're probably looking at the longest thread in history!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Another Fan said:

Be honest, how would this board react if someone on the Bills did that to Brady.  There's a good chance he would become a legend around here 

Wrong. Just a totally ridiculous take.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

If this incident had happened more or less as it actually did, but with the Bills taking the place of either team, this board would have gone into total meltdown mode.  

 

You're probably looking at the longest thread in history!

 

 

Bills player does that to Brady = insta legend and headed for the wall

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No saying I can comprehend any of the rationale here. But it’s strange that it happened between the Steelers and the browns in a game where Big Ben wasn’t even playing. Like the Browns have never even seen this QB before really. Where would there be such hostility boiling over from? Not saying I’d understand but say it happened in one of those old Steelers Ravens games where the same players just beat on each other for years. This was between a backup qb that the Browns have no history with. Maybe it’s just me but I find that strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

You'd think this point would be self-evident. It's kind of sad that some people need it spelled out for them.

It happens in every sport. There's no precedent unless someone gets a career ending injury.

 

Heck even Ron Artest's part in the Malice at the Palace only resulted in a wrist slap. And that was a full blown riot.

Edited by BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

For a permanent injury, sure. Regardless I'd bet the house nothing substantial will come to Myles Garrett other than a lengthy suspension. That's all I'm saying. There's a million examples of nothing happening from these brawls in sports for every Heller / Baker suit.

 

And I'd rate the Gronk hit on Tre White to be worse than this IMO. I was calling for something to happen there but should have figured nothing would happen.

 

Maaaaybe if the NFL wants to hit hard on the CTE point. That's the only way I see anything outside a suspension happening. Would be really unlikely but who knows where the NFL is taking CTE.

Edited by BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

At least Finnegan threw the helmet and resorted to fisticuffs. 

Good scrap but the "linesman" never should have jump in like that with one player throwing punches and the other not able to do so.  Dangerous!  

35 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

No saying I can comprehend any of the rationale here. But it’s strange that it happened between the Steelers and the browns in a game where Big Ben wasn’t even playing. Like the Browns have never even seen this QB before really. Where would there be such hostility boiling over from? Not saying I’d understand but say it happened in one of those old Steelers Ravens games where the same players just beat on each other for years. This was between a backup qb that the Browns have no history with. Maybe it’s just me but I find that strange.

For what it is worth, it was a very chippy game all night long and at least 5 players left due to injury, including 3 concussions.

 

Sometimes in a game (in any sport) it's like there is a full moon in effect and the game becomes weird from the get-go.


This game had that type of vibe in it.

 

We used to get games like this fairly regularly in the NHL.  

 

Haven't seen one like that in years now, at least in the regular season.

 

 

47 minutes ago, K-9 said:

Wrong. Just a totally ridiculous take.

Yeah right.  Plenty of folks here call for injury to Tom Brady routinely.

 

I remember one thread where the poster literally called for not just an injury to Brady, but a career ending and life threatening injury!

 

Made me laugh out loud!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

Good scrap but the "linesman" never should have jump in like that with one player throwing punches and the other not able to do so.  Dangerous!  

For what it is worth, it was a very chippy game all night long and at least 5 players left due to injury, including 3 concussions.

 

Sometimes in a game (in any sport) it's like there is a full moon in effect and the game becomes weird from the get-go.


This game had that type of vibe in it.

 

We used to get games like this fairly regularly in the NHL.  

 

Haven't seen one like that in years now, at least in the regular season.

 

 

 

If you can't beat 'em - beat 'em!

 

What's different here is that the Browns were playing at home, had the game in hand and hadn't beaten the Steelers in 5 years. Usually it's the team on the losing end that does the dumbest sh!t. Should have been a great night for the Browns.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

If you can't beat 'em - beat 'em!

 

What's different here is that the Browns were playing at home, had the game in hand and hadn't beaten the Steelers in 5 years. Usually it's the team on the losing end that does the dumbest sh!t. Should have been a great night for the Browns.

 

 

This is true, but it wasn't that type of thing on Thursday night (i.e., sour grapes by the losing team sending a message at the end of the game).  It was just a chippy game throughout.  Kind of a throwback to earlier times, when rivalries among players were actually a thing!  

 

Way too much player movement now for that stuff to exist.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P said:

For a permanent injury, sure. Regardless I'd bet the house nothing substantial will come to Myles Garrett other than a lengthy suspension. That's all I'm saying. There's a million examples of nothing happening from these brawls in sports for every Heller / Baker suit.

 

And I'd rate the Gronk hit on Tre White to be worse than this IMO. I was calling for something to happen there but should have figured nothing would happen.

 

I agree with you. I don't want him charged criminally. In fact, I'd probably be defending Garrett if he were facing the repercussions the law would impose upon him in most states if he had connected cleanly in a real world setting. But it could happen if the proper parties felt so inclined.

 

The point is that being in the midst of a contact sport doesn't prevent one from being charged if the act of violence is not within the course and scope of the sport itself. Also, you can consent to a battery but not to malicious wounding* (this didn't rise to that level, but could have).

 

* Laws vary by state and I don't know exactly what the equivalent of Mal wounding is  in OH.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dubs said:

Last night went perfect for the bills. Steelers lose. Browns lose their best defensive player for the year. Steelers lose their starting center for a few game. 
 

Super Bowl!!!

Add it to the list of other favorable stuff that has made this an unusual year. 

 

Luck's retirement, Big Ben's season ending injury, New England's offensive slump, etc.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 19Bills83 said:

Garret went Norman Bates. Mason is no choir boy either instigating this fight. 

It was an alarming  expression of violence on Garret's part. A little excessive for the situation. Kind of scary...perhaps it warrants a psychological evaluation.

Edited by Rocket94
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P said:

There's assault every play in football. It's a violent sport where players are doing things to each other they'd never do off the field. It should and will stay on the gridiron.


Heard of Todd Bertuzzi? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

This is true, but it wasn't that type of thing on Thursday night (i.e., sour grapes by the losing team sending a message at the end of the game).  It was just a chippy game throughout.  Kind of a throwback to earlier times, when rivalries among players were actually a thing!  

 

 

 

That's exactly my point. In earlier times, in a chippy game when the home team had the game well in hand they'd take the foot off the gas and let the losing team do the stupid sh!t and only respond to it if necessary. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Rudolph will end up with a fine, but the decision to suspend Garrett indefinitely is the right one. 

 

Every discussion I've seen about this today has a lot of debate about who started it. IMO, Garrett has no reason to drag the guy down. Ball is gone a split second before Garrett wraps him up and then he keeps pushing to take him down. He has a reputation for hitting QBs late. Leads the league in roughing the passer penalties since he entered the league in '17. He wanted one more shot before the game ended. Dipsh*t train of thought, no foresight. Your team is gonna win their second straight game, they could've rode that momentum but instead they have to deal with this. Words were exchanged when they were on the ground and I think that's what sent Rudolph over the edge. He's played like hot garbage throwing four picks and now this dude wants to drag him down when be absolutely didn't need to. DeCastro steps in and seems to be doing well at separating them until Rudolph decides he still wants a piece. That's where he's gonna get fined. Then Garrett completely loses his marbles and swings the helmet. DeCastro flops on him and Pouncey thinks he's in Mortal Kombat. 

 

Myles Garrett could go on to break Bruce Smith's sack record and the first thing people will remember when his name is mentioned will be, "Wait, he's the lunatic who hit a guy in the head with a helmet, right?" Dirty player.

 

And 65 for Cleveland (I know his name but I don't respect him enough to go and check to make sure I spell it right, cause he's a ten pound turd in a five pound bag) is absolutely what Rudolph called him, a b*tch. Dude isn't even involved, comes up and shoves Rudolph in the back. That's 100% a b*tch move on the field or off. Real tough guy display right there, lemme hit you when you're not looking.

 

Browns and Kitchens are a joke. Browns behave like jackwagons and their attitudes suck, you know what they say, attitude reflects leadership. My cat who routinely yells at me and leads me to his already full bowl has better leadership skills than Kitchens. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

Yeah right.  Plenty of folks here call for injury to Tom Brady routinely.

 

I remember one thread where the poster literally called for not just an injury to Brady, but a career ending and life threatening injury!

 

Made me laugh out loud!

 

 

Yeah, right. Anyone who does that is a clueless moron. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

?

 

Someone in the Shoutbox suggested it should come with a matching set of cleats signed by the Pittsburgh OL

I like how the Browns DL collectively allowed Myles Garrett get his teeth kicked in by Pouncey and co. as if he deserved it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

Wonder how he would have gotten suspended if he hit him with the crown of the helmet and knocked him out??

 

 


or he rolled on the ground pretending he was hurt

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

The Gronk play was despicable, too.  And he should have been suspended.

 

But that was also a football player hitting another football player.  Yes, it was after the play was over.  And yes, Gronk is a behemoth.  But it was man on man.

 

Garrett had Rudolph's helmet in his hand and swung it.  If Garrett dropped the helmet and punched Rudolph in the face with his fist, Garrett would and should still be suspended, but probably not indefinitely.

 

Swinging a helmet at another player's head is a huge deal.

 

I'm amazed ANYONE could defend Garrett after that.

 

Don't forget that Gronk was wearing a brace made of metal on his elbow that day and that was what he used to drill into Tre's back/neck/head area. It wasn't just his bear forearm. He basically used the brace as a weapon. Luckily Tre still had his helmet on. But what if Gronk connected with Tre's neck directly, under the helmet, with that brace rather than his helmet or shoulder pads? With all of his weight (Gronk is a big dude)? He could have broken Tre's neck. 

 

The helmet swing looks and is much more shocking and Garrett deserves everything he gets for it, but the Gronk play to me was just as reckless in regards to another player's health, was just as dangerous, and also used an object as a weapon. So I'd say the plays are pretty similar, despite the Garrett play looking and feeling much worse.

 

And Rudolph was very lucky that he got hit with the underside of the helmet which had some padding on it. If Garrett had connected with the back (hard shell) of the helmet, who knows what could have happened to Rudolph.

 

As to the great debate regarding Rudolph's culpability, it was probably smart of the NFL to hold off on any possible punishment for him for the moment until they could investigate and get a better idea of the initial stages of the skirmish. I think you have to throw out the "he kicked him in the nuts" stuff. To me it is clearly Rudolph just using his leg to keep Garrett away from him, not purposefully kicking him in the groin. If you've ever been in a fight with a brother, or cousin, or friend (serious or just play fighting) and they get the upper position and you are on the ground, you stick out your leg so they can't get close enough to hurt you or pin you down. That is such a normal, instinctive reaction. And if Garrett didn't already have a grasp of Mason's helmet when the QB's leg went up, he was definitely at least reaching toward him to do so. So the so-called "kick" is a nonfactor for me. The question then becomes was Rudolph trying to rip Garrett's helmet off. At first glance it seemed obvious to me that he was. But after watching the video a bunch of times, with the hand stuck in the facemask narrative in mind, some of Rudolph's body language could be seen as that being a possibility. So, it is probably good for the NFL to get to the bottom of that before handing out fines and suspensions. If they find, no he was just mad and trying to rip off Garrett's helmet, then you go to the rulebook. Is ripping (or attempting to rip) another player's helmet off a suspendable offense? Just a penalty? An ejection with no future suspension? A fine? And then you dole out the punishment according to the rules. If his hand wasn't stuck and he was just trying to rip off Garrett's helmet, then he deserves some punishment, but it wasn't anything beyond what happens in a lot of NFL skirmishes. So, punishable by normal standards. But what Garrett did was so far beyond a scuffle, or throwing a punch, etc. that he deserves the most severe penalty they can hand out.

 

In regards to the initial tackle, I wouldn't call it a cheap shot by any means, but there is no question that he could have pulled up and not dragged Rudolph to the ground. The ball was gone before he dragged him down. He didn't body slam him or anything, it wasn't egregious, but the way Rudolph fell, he did pretty much land face first into the turf on a play that Garrett could have and probably should have held up on. It was a borderline penalty, but nothing more. Yet, I can still understand Rudolph being upset by it because it was totally unnecessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, blacklabel said:

I'm sure Rudolph will end up with a fine, but the decision to suspend Garrett indefinitely is the right one. 

 

Every discussion I've seen about this today has a lot of debate about who started it. IMO, Garrett has no reason to drag the guy down. Ball is gone a split second before Garrett wraps him up and then he keeps pushing to take him down. He has a reputation for hitting QBs late. Leads the league in roughing the passer penalties since he entered the league in '17. He wanted one more shot before the game ended. Dipsh*t train of thought, no foresight. Your team is gonna win their second straight game, they could've rode that momentum but instead they have to deal with this. Words were exchanged when they were on the ground and I think that's what sent Rudolph over the edge. He's played like hot garbage throwing four picks and now this dude wants to drag him down when be absolutely didn't need to. DeCastro steps in and seems to be doing well at separating them until Rudolph decides he still wants a piece. That's where he's gonna get fined. Then Garrett completely loses his marbles and swings the helmet. DeCastro flops on him and Pouncey thinks he's in Mortal Kombat. 

 

Myles Garrett could go on to break Bruce Smith's sack record and the first thing people will remember when his name is mentioned will be, "Wait, he's the lunatic who hit a guy in the head with a helmet, right?" Dirty player.

 

And 65 for Cleveland (I know his name but I don't respect him enough to go and check to make sure I spell it right, cause he's a ten pound turd in a five pound bag) is absolutely what Rudolph called him, a b*tch. Dude isn't even involved, comes up and shoves Rudolph in the back. That's 100% a b*tch move on the field or off. Real tough guy display right there, lemme hit you when you're not looking.

 

Browns and Kitchens are a joke. Browns behave like jackwagons and their attitudes suck, you know what they say, attitude reflects leadership. My cat who routinely yells at me and leads me to his already full bowl has better leadership skills than Kitchens. 

I wonder the lasting mark that Gregg Williams left on that defense the two years he was there.  The Browns did take out Juju an Conner last night.  Just a thought.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...