Jump to content

Is Tremaine Edmunds the answer at MLB?


KOKO NFL

Recommended Posts

I've heard all the talk that our second year MLB is a physical freak with size and speed. My eyes, however, tell me he's not tough or instinctive enough to be a good MLB, let alone a great one. IMO Beane and McDermott need to take a serious look at this position in the off season and upgrade. Perhaps Edmonds is better suited for OLB? Fans can speculate but only the coaching staff can make an educated guess. So... is Tremaine Edmunds the answer at MLB?

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillsFan692 said:

Edmunds is up and down like allen, some gays he is whipping around clicking on all cylinders, other games he is missing horribly and it shows on the TV (like today).

I know losing sucks, but isn't this a little extreme? ?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edmunds was consistently bad against the run today. He flashed on one play. Outside of that, he was consistently catching blocks and  trailing plays. Teams are running right at him, and he isn't stopping anyone in their tracks. 

 

Why does he play so close to the LOS? I'd like to see them back him up a yard and allow his speed to make up for his lack of physicality.

Edited by EmotionallyUnstable
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edmunds is not a pound inside MLB.  He's an athlete, not a pounder.  He'll make plays on the ball carrier, not so much to engage blockers.  We need our tackles to tie up multiple blockers to allow him to run and chase.  That did not happen against the Eagles which have a very good O-line.

 

In time I believe he'll get better at disengaging a blocker, but he's not there yet.  This year he's better at reading plays.  Being so young, he is still learning on a pro football field.  Some of his flaws would have been worked out in college, but I'm glad he came out early and that we were the team that benefits.

 

Edited by familykwi
reply to other thread was added here inexplicably
  • Like (+1) 6
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your d line gets their ass kicked your MLB is going to be no factor....everyones. Do you think LB's disengage lineman read the play make the tackle ? They don't if O lineman are allowed to reach the second level your in trouble. Plain and simple the D line was dominated and Frazier and McD couldnt find and answer today.

 

My concern is not Edmunds its the d line with a huge financial investment being man handled all game

Secondary concern you had a 50 mph winds to help you - never said make him throw it consistently just allowed to be run over

 

your missing the problem its not the lbs

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, arcane said:

I don't even disagree with you

 

but my god you're so ***** annoying

 

This is an Edmunds thread

I totally disagree about Edmunds and Oliver.

This is the best sports league on the planet.  IT IS HARD to play NFL football.  Stop commenting as though rookies should all just come in and be dominant, hall-of-fame type talents immediately. 

 

McCaffery is playing unreal right now, but he didn't start his career that way.  Mahomes sat a year behind Alex friggin Smith. 

 

I know how hard this is, but please, for the love of God, have a little perspective.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ethan in Portland said:

The answer is we don't know.  He is still younger than many of the guys that will be drafted next year.  We will know by this time next year.  

McD screwed up in keeping Lorax and not getting a true back-MLB.  If they had a better back-up at MLB, they coudl give Edmunds a few snaps a game at OLB.  

As much as I love Lorax he is old. Players thst age play second string. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

No and Ed Oliver isn't the answer at DT either.

 

Ed Oliver is 21 years old and basically learning a new position.

Tremaine Edmunds is 21 years old and already running the defense.

 

I can't believe you're giving up on these guys already. Quitters will be quitters though.

Patriots bandwagon is still open, buddy.

  • Like (+1) 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Edmunds was consistently bad against the run today. He flashed on one play. Outside of that, he was consistently catching blocks and  trailing plays. Teams are running right at him, and he isn't stopping anyone in their tracks. 

 

Why does he play so close to the LOS? I'd like to see them back him up a yard and allow his speed to make up for his lack of physicality.

I don't know...some of it has to do with the play of the D line which was pretty bad 2 weeks in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Rigotz said:

 

Ed Oliver is 21 years old and basically learning a new position.

Tremaine Edmunds is 21 years old and already running the defense.

 

I can't believe you're giving up on these guys already. Quitters will be quitters though.

Patriots bandwagon is still open, buddy.

 

:Lol:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has more good games than bad ones and he’s still very young so I am ok w Edmunds. He can be a force, just needs to put more consistency in his game

1 minute ago, Chill said:

Tremaine is similar to Zay Jones. A ton of potential, he just has to get straight in the head. It’s the mental aspect that is struggling. 

Nothing like Jones imo

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ScottLaw said:

He's had several bad games. This wasn't the first. It's concerning. 

And he’s had several good ones.

 

You’re doing your normal thing, only showing up game day after a loss.  That’s more sad than how the Bills played today.

1 minute ago, Bangarang said:

I still think he’s probably best suited for SLB. 

His size and range sets him up to cover well.  He still needs experience reading run plays but needs to step up more there.  It would help if linemen can’t get to the second level so easily.

 

The entire front 7 was bad in run defense today.  Their O line killed our D line and vice versa.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the OP's main issue/concern is with McD's defensive scheme.  The DTs can't be handled like they did, otherwise you get what was seen today, which was the MLB being largely ineffective.  Part of that is Edmunds still not completely capable as a run stopper and another part of that is Edmunds not certain of the defensive scheme.

 

The DT's play a larger part in run stopping than the MLB in this defense.

Edited by Happy Gilmore
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...