Jump to content

Antonio Brown Tells Raiders without his helmet no football


Recommended Posts

Like I said back in the spring...

Ā 

Coaches/teams are almost always willing to give multiple chances to guys who with off-field issues - getting arrested for DUIs or drugs, beating-up their girlfriends/kids, etc.Ā  If the NFL doesn't issue aĀ suspension, they have no problem putting these kinds of players on the field indefinitely.Ā  They know that regardless of how bad these offenses are, they will have little to no impact on the team's success.

Ā 

But once guys start doing stuff like this, you can forget it.Ā  Teams (at least the smart ones) know they can't succeed with these kind of distractions.Ā  They bring down morale and divide locker rooms.Ā  Pittsburgh had absolutely no problem dumping Antonio Brown, and you can tell that Oakland is already starting to regretĀ picking him up.Ā Ā 

Ā 

Just something to consider when you see (for example) Brandon Beane trading away Marcel Dareus for scraps.Ā 

Ā 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Sometimes it is the trade/transaction that is not made

Ā 

Could you imagine giving up a huge portion of our new found salary cap to AB and this happen if he was with us?

Talk about dodging a bullet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

Ā 

Who was it here that CASTIGATED Beane for not landing Brown?

Ā 

I wanna take a victory lap.

Ā 

Beane is a wizard, a futurist, a soothsayer and a great GM.Ā  Love that man!

3 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Talk about dodging a bullet.

Dodging a nuclear warhead...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mort with the two word kill-shot

Ā 
Ā 
Oh boy
Ā 
Quote Tweet
Ā 
Adam Schefter
Ā 
@AdamSchefter
Ā· 8m
And now this: Raidersā€™ WR Antonio Brown has told team officials that, unless he gets to wear his old helmet, he will not play football again, per league sources. And more....
Edited by JoeF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

Ā 

Who was it here that CASTIGATED Beane for not landing Brown?

Ā 

I wanna take a victory lap.

Ā 

I mean I guess the idea was that with a good enough locker room/culture you could absorb a crazy player but I don't think a good enough one exists for this much crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fwiw -and itā€™s totally nothing, Iā€™m sad to see the helmet look of the past now be banned. I liked seeing Rodgers wearing that helmet as it had the look of Favre and Starr before him. These new ones just donā€™t have the same appeal.

Ā 

but Iā€™m old..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mjt328 said:

Like I said back in the spring...

Ā 

Coaches/teams are almost always willing to give multiple chances to guys who with off-field issues - getting arrested for DUIs or drugs, beating-up their girlfriends/kids, etc.Ā  If the NFL doesn't issue aĀ suspension, they have no problem putting these kinds of players on the field indefinitely.Ā  They know that regardless of how bad these offenses are, they will have little to no impact on the team's success.

Ā 

But once guys start doing stuff like this, you can forget it.Ā  Teams (at least the smart ones) know they can't succeed with these kind of distractions.Ā  They bring down morale and divide locker rooms.Ā  Pittsburgh had absolutely no problem dumping Antonio Brown, and you can tell that Oakland is already starting to regretĀ picking him up.Ā Ā 

Ā 

Just something to consider when you see (for example) Brandon Beane trading away Marcel Dareus for scraps.Ā 

Ā 

But the guys on WGR55, lead by Schopp and White argue that culture, accountability, maturity and other qualitative measures are meaningless. Essentially, these guys believe there is zero negative impacts when players of this ilk act as they do. The issue with these dorks is they believe in binary quantitative evidence. In other words, they look at yards and catches and that, and only that, is a measure of the value of a player. They can be self-destructive off the field, destroy the lockerroom, and undermine the coach but none of that will impact the team or their own play because.... numbers.Ā 

Ā 

I am continually fascinated by the WGR55 people when I get a chance to listen. They seems to always focus on data and numbers, incorrectly in most cases, yet fail miserably in understanding that in all professions, and hockey and football are not immune, back co-workers can often have a deleterious impact on the organization. For some reason, they believe sports are immune. As soon as someone comes up with an analytical measure that quantifies the impact of these losers on a team, then maybe they'll believe in it.Ā 

Ā 

Let's maybe add some context here. You can't tell me that in cases where someone has to make a tough block or play to support a catch and run by Brown that less effort might be put into it because he's not someone a millionaire is going to stick his neck out for. That would impact, for example, yards after a catch in this on instance. That is a direct impact on the game due to bad behavior and I bet my next paycheck on it that it happens. The reason is, guys say they work harder for guys they love, who are committed to the team. So the inverse is true.

Ā 

In the end, I railed against these kinds of players before and am a major supported of McD and Beane and the way they are shaping this team. Emotional maturity, team-first, football IQ, hard working, and smart. You can teach and coach up the emotionally intelligent and smart players, you can't with the Browns and Dareuses of the world... the perpetually late, inattentive, divas who put themselves above the team.

Ā 

So I will thoroughly enjoy his lackluster season (he gave up on a much better QB) as much as I'll enjoy watching the Cowboys suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zonabb said:

But the guys on WGR55, lead by Schopp and White argue that culture, accountability, maturity and other qualitative measures are meaningless. Essentially, these guys believe there is zero negative impacts when players of this ilk act as they do. The issue with these dorks is they believe in binary quantitative evidence. In other words, they look at yards and catches and that, and only that, is a measure of the value of a player. They can be self-destructive off the field, destroy the lockerroom, and undermine the coach but none of that will impact the team or their own play because.... numbers.Ā 

Ā 

I am continually fascinated by the WGR55 people when I get a chance to listen. They seems to always focus on data and numbers, incorrectly in most cases, yet fail miserably in understanding that in all professions, and hockey and football are not immune, back co-workers can often have a deleterious impact on the organization. For some reason, they believe sports are immune. As soon as someone comes up with an analytical measure that quantifies the impact of these losers on a team, then maybe they'll believe in it.Ā 

Ā 

Let's maybe add some context here. You can't tell me that in cases where someone has to make a tough block or play to support a catch and run by Brown that less effort might be put into it because he's not someone a millionaire is going to stick his neck out for. That would impact, for example, yards after a catch in this on instance. That is a direct impact on the game due to bad behavior and I bet my next paycheck on it that it happens. The reason is, guys say they work harder for guys they love, who are committed to the team. So the inverse is true.

Ā 

In the end, I railed against these kinds of players before and am a major supported of McD and Beane and the way they are shaping this team. Emotional maturity, team-first, football IQ, hard working, and smart. You can teach and coach up the emotionally intelligent and smart players, you can't with the Browns and Dareuses of the world... the perpetually late, inattentive, divas who put themselves above the team.

Ā 

So I will thoroughly enjoy his lackluster season (he gave up on a much better QB) as much as I'll enjoy watching the Cowboys suck.

That is not even close to what they argue. What they argue is culture with out talent and strategy is not going to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, plenzmd1 said:

That is not even close to what they argue. What they argue is culture with out talent and strategy is not going to win.

Exactly this. Talent and winning can also create a culture. The U had a culture that is the complete opposite of Bama/Patriots yet both were dynasties. Talent > culture all day

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

Is this guy really a piece of crap? Ā I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt because that Pittsburgh team seemed so toxic the past few seasons, but heā€™s REALLYĀ starting to act more and more like a prima donna.

He came to training camp in a hot air balloon pretty sure he didn't have any trouble providing the hot air.

Edited by Warcodered
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Holy *****Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

And they wonder why teams want to pay signing bonuses at intervals.Ā  He will likely burn all the money, hold out and when the Raiders try to get the money back he will say he is broke with debiters getting first claim on any money.

Ā 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude literally wants to do whatever he wants and basically have the team thank him for it. I'm pretty sure he'd love to skip every practice and meeting and just show up for games on Sundays. Complaining about the helmet is real amateur hour stuff. He has to know he comes off looking like a jackass, but whatever, in his mind he can do anything he wants.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...