MDH

Please take Mitchell. I want no part of a lack of effort talent.

Yeah, on tape, he’s my favorite DL prospect in this draft. His medicals leave me wanting nothing to do with him. From what I’ve read his fusion survey gives a player - on average - 3-4 years playing time before it fails. Maybe he’s the exception, I wouldn’t take the chance though, let another team make that gamble.

Pretty soon it won’t take next year’s 1st to move up…

To take a defensive player? The teams at the top of the draft are the worst teams in the league…

I wouldn’t be surprised if they trade up for Turner or Verse. Everyone would assume it’s for a WR then be pissed when it wasn’t. 😂

I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that I’d prefer, in order: 1) Trade back, grab a WR 2) Trade up to 8-10, grab a WR 3) Pick a non WR at 28 if the value dictates it. 4) Draft a WR at 28. This is all generally speaking, of course, it depends on how the board falls. Only WR that can reasonably be gotten at 28 who I’d take there is BTJ. I don’t think he’s falling that far. I like Robinson there if he’s available. And while I love Latu’s game I just can’t get behind selecting him earlier than, say, the 3-4th. Everything I’ve read says that his fusion surgery has an average shelf life of 3-4 playing years. He's a ticking time bomb and has already used up most of those years. Maybe someone gets lucky but let another team take that gamble.

Which is why if one of the top 4 or so guys at edge are there in the 1st the Bills should seriously consider taking one as one of the plethora of WRs will still be around in round 2. Taking advantage of the depth of the WR class means you don't HAVE to take one in the 1st.

The Athletic did a similar exercise a week or so ago. They didn’t share the metrics they used but the Bills came in as the 4th best team in the league based on roster construction. I think that’s a tad high and it’s somewhere in between 4 and 10.

Other. It obviously depends on how the board looks but, in general, given how bunched up the WR are after the “Big 3” I’d like to see the Bills trade back somewhere in the 35-40 range, picking up a 3rd in the process then draft a WR there. Then, use one of the 4th round picks to move up in the 2nd and grab a WR again. The Bills could conceivably end up with something like McConkey and Lagette.

With how deep this class is I don’t want them spending the assets necessary to move that far up but I’d be all for double dipping at the WR position in rounds 1 and 2.

Yeah, I mostly browse these days. Not sure what inspired me to actually reply this time. I’m usually able to ignore bad takes.

Did you see the D on Sunday? Swarming to the ball, fired up after every play. They were the definition of “high energy.” You’re confusing sloppiness - on offense, in the passing game- with low energy. Even in the run game they're shown that they can blow teams off the LoS, which doesn’t illustrate “low energy.”.

Manning wouldn’t tolerate “bad behavior” by Harrison? Harrison, unlike Diggs, had several serious bahvavioral issues and I never heard Manning say a word about any of it. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/114971-marvin-harrison-the-nfls-quiet-bad-boy-wide-receiver So don’t lecture us about Manning “holding Harrison accountable.” 🙄

They all keep saying, "Baltimore missed kicks, Lamar missed one throw, Lamar got hurt, so and so dropped a ball, Baltimore out gained the Bills" and yet I have yet to hear anybody come back and saying "Buffalo missed 2 kicks too, Gabe Davis dropped a TD pass, the wind favored a running team, many of those yards were when the Bills were up 14 points and went into a shell defense?" "Experts" keep talking about the yardage differential in both playoff games without ever mentioning the Bills had 14 point leads toward the beginning of the 4th quarter in both games. It's just bazaar how they structure their narratives to make it sound like the Bills got lucky and they do it EVERY...SINGLE...WEEK. Their definition of "lucky" and mind are very, very different.

Top shelf single malt whisky was pulled out tonight.

You may have convinced me, I do think they have a good shot at beating KC though.

Am I crazy to think the Bills match up better vs the Chiefs than the Browns? Cover 2 bend don’t break tends frustrate Mahommes and he gets impatien because he wants the big play. Browns use great ground game to have a decent pass game, Bills D is good at shutting down one thing but when teams can both pass and run they struggle. I think the O puts up points on both teams.

We've heard all week how the "Bills can't run the ball" and are "one dimensional" yet the Bills' rushing attack is better than the Ravens passing attack but nary a word is spoken about how one dimensional the Ravens are on offense. The Ravens are the most one dimensional team in the NFL.

Why? Line up in 10 personnel and throw the ball all over the place. You don’t let them dictate what we do.

I think its helped all offenses. There is a reason scoring is way up this year.

As long as they can avoid the 4 seed they should do it. Last thing they want is KC in the division round.

Henry was doing his thing before Tannehil took over as the starter and that team was nowhere near as good. The running game is key but it wasn’t enough by itself. And that was when they had a good D...

I want the Pats to win today so the Bills can be the ones to end their playoffs hopes in front of a national audience next week.

Yeah, decent chance a 10 win team misses the playoffs.