Why is it always, "The Bills should have played well enough the refs couldn't take it from them."? I cannot, in my many years on this Earth remember a time where it was, "[Buffalo's opponent] should have played well enough that the refs couldn't take it from them."
The Bills, despite everything, played well enough to win. Had the playing field been level, as it supposedly was, the Bills would have been in position to kick a game-winning field goal.
So yes, they could have done a million things differently, that could have gotten them the win. Also yes, the refs hosed the Bills and took a game-winning opportunity away from them. Both can be true.
I'd be more okay if the questionable calls were distributed somewhat evenly, but Buffalo is never the team that benefits from controversial calls. Never. And that doesn't sit right with me.