Jump to content

Bills sign Mack Hollins


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

NOT A GABE REPLACEMENT

 

 

The Bills don't need a Gabe replacement.   They need a better player than Gabe and that's what the draft should provide.   But I think Mack Hollins is very Gabe-like in many regards.   Including being a bit of a weirdo. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

The Bills don't need a Gabe replacement.   They need a better player than Gabe and that's what the draft should provide.   But I think Mack Hollins is very Gabe-like in many regards.   Including being a bit of a weirdo. 


Yeah. He seems like discount Gabe Davis, but without the lure of being "young and improving" and thus enticing the coaches to try to make him a viable WR2.

Hopefully he's nothing more than a gunner and never sees the field for meaningful offensive snaps other than as a blocker on obvious run plays.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mack Hollins looked okay on the Raiders, but he's a bottom of the roster type guy, WR4/5 with some special teams upside. 

 

This shouldn't change anything in regards to the WR room needs, but eh...

 

After Sherfield and Harty I'm not going to get excited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I don’t know if he can play football, but he’s right about cats.    😋

 

 

These are the types of signings I expect. Fill holes inexpensively before the draft. 


I like cats. Mack Hollins is not welcome at my house. We also eat with utensils here, so that’s another thing he wouldn’t like.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

He may well make the roster as a gunner/STer 5th or 6th WR - why would you have a problem with that?  He's shown he can produce more with a good QB throwing to him than most #5 or 6 WR do.

He's a roster lock

 

People that are upset with this signing don't understand how rosters work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

The Bills don't need a Gabe replacement.   They need a better player than Gabe and that's what the draft should provide.   But I think Mack Hollins is very Gabe-like in many regards.   Including being a bit of a weirdo. 

Gabe replacement comes at #28 or earlier with a trade up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez... not every signing is a big splash.  You need these type of veteran guys to fill out a roster and/or if nothing else, push the rookies in training camp.  We're limited with cash and unfortunately need to hit the scrap heap.  It's just the way it is this year.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

This is an upgrade to Sherfield 

 

Man i sure hope so maybe he can make 2 good plays instead of 1 for the season ... Given all the hype last year for Sherfield and what they got out of him it sure wasn't worth the money !! 

Edited by T master
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Diggs

?

Shakir

?

Hollins

Shorter vs Isabella vs Hamler

 

 

 

The ? will be coming from the draft. This is supposed to be a very good draft for WR's.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

The dude literally didn't play for like 3 straight seasons because of injuries and suspensions. I can't see any team putting that number on him. They would be dumb

 

I guess we'll see who's right.

 

In my observation, when a guy is a former OPOY with multiple pro-bowl and all-pro appearances, he'll have multiple suitors.  And multiple suitors drives up the price.

 

OBJ was coming off injury and hadn't put up numbers for years - since 2019.  He got vet minimum salary in his deal, true - but he also got $14M signing bonus paid up front, and carries a modest $4-$5M cap hit.  For which he put up modest numbers of 35 receptions for 560 yds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

Gabe replacement comes at #28 or earlier with a trade up

He's basically a Gabe replacement, in terms of talent and measurables.  Put Mack on the Bills as a rookie with Allen and he probably does a lot better in production.

He can block all game and have 0 receptions on 0 targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

This is a Trent Sherfield level signing. I really hope this isn't the end of our WR free agent shopping.


We were never going to spend on WR in free agency outside this type of signing.  Anyone thinking otherwise was just getting their hopes up.  This is richest and deepest draft at WR in a long time, maybe ever and we have a tight cap with more than half our roster turning over.  
 

That being said, this is a solid signing considering what our budget is for FA.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s almost like they’re pissing on us and not even having the courtesy of calling it rain. 
 

I can’t believe anyone is even remotely pleased with this pickup. Could have got whatever production he provides at half the cost from an undrafted rookie. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gregg said:

 

The ? will be coming from the draft. This is supposed to be a very good draft for WR's.

Keep hearing that. and then see moves like this and it makes me think they draft 1 guy in rd 3 or 4 and call it a day. Sad but I fear may be true 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

I guess we'll see who's right.

 

In my observation, when a guy is a former OPOY with multiple pro-bowl and all-pro appearances, he'll have multiple suitors.  And multiple suitors drives up the price.

 

OBJ was coming off injury and hadn't put up numbers for years - since 2019.  He got vet minimum salary in his deal, true - but he also got $14M signing bonus paid up front, and carries a modest $4-$5M cap hit.  For which he put up modest numbers of 35 receptions for 560 yds.

OBJ was severely overpaid and shouldn't have been. I actually think with Michael Thomas's injury history that a small 1 year prove it deal may be worth it to show he can at least stay healthy for a season and then cash in next season

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


We were never going to spend on WR in free agency outside this type of signing.  Anyone thinking otherwise was just getting their hopes up.  This is richest and deepest draft at WR in a long time, maybe ever and we have a tight cap with more than half our roster turning over.  
 

That being said, this is a solid signing considering what our budget is for FA.  

And we are picking in a really crappy place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...