Jump to content

Joe Marino says all-22 Review shows Josh deserves a lot of blame for Pats Loss


Thurman#1

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

Well if you're looking for reasons to be pessimistic just consider how the Bills coaching/management brain trust may be well on their way to ruining Allen. 

 

Instead of a forceful personality like DaBoll, who was willing to get in the trenches and argue with McD about what the O should be, we have a compliant OC who is faithfully executing the McD vision of how an offense should compliment his defense.  So the guy that benched Tyrod Taylor to give Peterman a shot in 2017 and then decided that Allen wasn't ready to start in 2018 but Peterman was is now setting the strategic mission for Allen and the offense.  I've got a bad feeling that this will not end well for the Bills.

 

One last observation.  Remember in the 2nd quarter of the 2021 KC playoff game when the Bills got the ball after a punt at midfield and they ran it three straight times and didn't get the 1st down?  That always bothered me and I suspect that what happened there was that McD yelled at DaBoll for not doing enough (running the ball) to protect his D from Mahomes while DaBoll was arguing that his responsibility is to score.  I will go to my grave believing those play calls by DaBoll were a big F you to McD in that game.

 

 

 

 

So now there is a conspiracy by the OC against the HC in the middle of a playoff game?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Mahomes has more...33 on the year, he is running more than ever. Allen had 124 rushes last year to Mahomes 66, almost double. Now Mahomes has more than Allen. That isn't maximizing anything, especially when a bunch of Allen's "runs" have come on QB sneaks and the final failed lateral attempt last game counted as a run.   


That’s why I said ‘about’. Mahomes is 33 and Allen is 29 in week 7. There’s a lot of games left. At this pace they’ll both be in the 60s-70s by year’s end. Having him doubled Mahomes’ attempts last year is not sustainable for a qb. That’s what the coaching staff is try to do…sustain him for the long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oldmanfan said:

So now there is a conspiracy by the OC against the HC in the middle of a playoff game?  

No but I've always thought that sequence was weird, very weird.  If you can go back and re-watch it. And people are people.  If McD got on the head phones and yelled at DaBoll to run the ball I could see this exact reaction - even in the middle of the game.  I know that's a lot of "ifs" but I've never forgotten that series and thought it stood out in comparison to how DaBoll called the rest of the game.

 

Both coaches were very professional during their years together and we didn't see the likely bad blood between the two. But we saw it after that Sunday night game.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:


he’s not Mahomes. Let’s stop comparing him to Mahomes. If he could read the field consistently like  Mahomes he would have shown us that by years six already.

 

Allen has other tools in his tool bag. Might as well let him use those as well.


I think in the rushing attempts context he is like Mahomes. Able to scramble and pick up chunks of yards. Just don’t hurdle and truck people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 90sBills said:


That’s why I said ‘about’. Mahomes is 33 and Allen is 29 in week 7. There’s a lot of games left. At this pace they’ll both be in the 60s-70s by year’s end. Having him doubled Mahomes’ attempts last year is not sustainable for a qb. That’s what the coaching staff is try to do…sustain him for the long term. 

 

Oh really?  How is that working out for Jackson and Hurts who were 50-60+ more than Allen last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh did not do a good job reading the defense and was very indecisive vs the pats. Don't need to watch the all 22 to see that. He had a very rough game. 

 

There were guys getting open at the snap for quick passes that should have helped negate the pats pass rush. Josh didn't go to them.

 

Yes our o line was bad sunday. But Josh made them look worse by dancing around instead of hitting quick reads. 

 

Was Daboll's system a better fit and make things easier for Josh? Does he need to put more work in? I don't know, but hopefully he gets things figured out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Oh really?  How is that working out for Jackson and Hurts who were 50-60+ more than Allen last year?


So you think Allen is closer to Jackson and Hurts than he is to Mahomes? Because I don’t…so those two are not on my radar for Allen’s comps. Allen’s comps should be Mahomes and Burrow if he’s who we think he is. Comparing him to two ‘running’ qb’s like Jackson and Hurts is a disservice imo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Success said:

There are actually fans here suggesting that we trade Allen.

 

That is simply incomprehensible to me.  Does anyone remember the time between Kelly and Allen?  Does anyone remember Orton, Edwards, Losman, Lewis, Tuel?

 

It can take a LONG time to find a franchise QB.  And Allen is very likely to be the best QB in this franchise's history..

 

 


Where are you seeing ‘fans’ suggesting we trade him? There was one guy that said it sarcastically like he had in other Allen threads but no one else from what I’ve seen. But I’m only on page 8 lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mango said:


Not to be pedantic, but at least for me I when I talk about Allen I don’t think he stinks, and I don’t think he’s lazy. I do think he could be better in a few areas that would help him and the team level up. 
 

Fitz sucked at some things like accuracy. But Allen can be better. Not sure if that makes sense. 


I feel like, when the chips are down, Josh has historically (and figuratively) curled up into a fetal position, stick his thumb in his mouth and rocked himself to sleep. 
 

I feel like he made an improvement in that area a couple years ago, but something set him back at the 1/4 mark of last season and it’s clearly carried over into this season. 
 

My “lazy” comment was in reference to the reports that he’s not a diligent film watcher. 
 

And to Gunner’s earlier point, he seems to have regressed with regard to reading defenses. 
 

I have been a Josh fan since the second we drafted him and I still am. 
 

But something is amiss. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Was over the summer. Wanna say it was on McAfee but others will remember better than I.

 

I actually kinda dismissed it as offseason chatter at the time. But others have raised since and.... welll it makes you wonder...


This is incredibly disappointing to me. 

I'm not sure how this wasn't a bigger deal at the time. 

Your QB stating that they are not big into film... unacceptable.

 

And unacceptable on the coaches for allowing it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gugny said:


I feel like, when the chips are down, Josh has historically (and figuratively) curled up into a fetal position, stick his thumb in his mouth and rocked himself to sleep. 
 

I feel like he made an improvement in that area a couple years ago, but something set him back at the 1/4 mark of last season and it’s clearly carried over into this season. 
 

My “lazy” comment was in reference to the reports that he’s not a diligent film watcher. 
 

And to Gunner’s earlier point, he seems to have regressed with regard to reading defenses. 
 

I have been a Josh fan since the second we drafted him and I still am. 
 

But something is amiss. 


I’m not sure he’s regressed at reading defenses as much as he’s being asked to focus on areas of his game that amplify that weakness. 
 

I keep reading that taking away Josh’s ability to run is taking away his best ability, hampering his game, etc. The other side of that coin is that he isn’t able to read and react with his arm super efficiently. 


This is the same thing we heard about Lamar and Cam. 
 

It sort of is what it is. He will have to evolve. A new OC can help work around that for sure. But if we keep working around it and he doesn’t evolve the bill will come due. 

 

2 minutes ago, Einstein said:


This is incredibly disappointing to me. 

I'm not sure how this wasn't a bigger deal at the time. 

Your QB stating that they are not big into film... unacceptable.

 

And unacceptable on the coaches for allowing it too.


I am out of pocket; trying to pull it up. But it’s a bear. 
 

I am going to try and paraphrase as best possible. It was along the lines of “Of course I watch film. But I try not to get too wrapped up in it because teams tend to play us a lot differently than what we see on film. I prefer to trust my eyes, read, react. I like to play fast and loose.”
 

I think it might have been @Beck Water who has the quote. But we disagree on interpretation. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Josh wasn't his best, but when he left the field the Bills were winning by 3. Josh didn't let the Patsies march down for a TD.

Adam Schein makes some great points on this game, though he has a lot of issues with our head coach, and thinks he is holding the team back.

 

I am not going to say much about Joe Marino, I have seen him say this stuff before. No idea if he is a "Josh hater" or not, but I feel like there is some gaslighting going on here. Go ahead and talk about his reads, missed throws, WHATEVER, he got the team the lead with less than 2 minutes left, and we lost. For me, that is all I need to know. I don't care how sluggish the start is(I mean, I care a little) or how long it takes to get things going, I care about the end result. Against a sad Patriots team, I think 25 points should have been more than enough. MHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

He has so many options here against the blitz, but he holds the ball waiting for Knox to complete his route. Just horrible by Josh here.

 

The Mike is coming free and outside of waiting for Knox, there are zero options that result in a TD on that play.

He does a nice job avoiding the sack and buying extra time with his eyes downfield, but nobody comes open on that side of the field.

He was smart not to force it on 2nd down, take the incompletion and give themselves another shot at it.

Anybody second-guessing that is being an armchair QB after the fact.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mango said:


I am out of pocket; trying to pull it up. But it’s a bear. 
 

I am going to try and paraphrase as best possible. It was along the lines of “Of course I watch film. But I try not to get too wrapped up in it because teams tend to play us a lot differently than what we see on film. I prefer to trust my eyes, read, react. I like to play fast and loose.”
 

I think it might have been @Beck Water who has the quote. But we disagree on interpretation. 


Thank you sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if McD is causing issues on offense especially in the 1st half by trying to force Allen/Dorsey to "dial it down" and help the D by staying on the field and playing more ball control but then when it doesn't work and they have to play catch up in the 2nd half, he takes the limiters off and they go back to looking like normal?

 

I am starting to get a sneaking suspicion McD is causing issues he doesn't need to be causing. McD preaching "complimentary football" but what if that means it works far better by letting the offense get into a track meet and forcing teams to play catch up all night?

Edited by Big Turk
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dopey said:

Dan Orlovski showed at least three clips where the hot read was open on a blitz and Josh ignored them. There’s a lot of people that are not going to like this thread.  Hard for many to accept it. He needs to play better. 

I rarely ever remember Josh going to a hot read this season or last. And with Daboll it was always about going downfield. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Aimee75 said:

Adam Schein makes some great points on this game, though he has a lot of issues with our head coach, and thinks he is holding the team back.

 

I am not going to say much about Joe Marino, I have seen him say this stuff before. No idea if he is a "Josh hater" or not, but I feel like there is some gaslighting going on here. Go ahead and talk about his reads, missed throws, WHATEVER, he got the team the lead with less than 2 minutes left, and we lost. For me, that is all I need to know. I don't care how sluggish the start is(I mean, I care a little) or how long it takes to get things going, I care about the end result. Against a sad Patriots team, I think 25 points should have been more than enough. MHO.

 

Joe Marino is no Josh hater but he calls things as he sees them. And I think his takes are better than most because he at least gives a reason for his takes, unlike most drunk callers to the 'GR postgame.

 

The thing with Josh seems to be a combination of things: 1) McDermott limiting his natural instincts  2) having played a Giants team that knew Josh's tendencies and 3) giving that plan to Bill Belichick.

 

Again, Josh had some bad throws. But his teammates all shared the goat horns this week. Drops, penalties, wrong patterns, then the defense getting led by the nose by Noodle-arm MacCorkle. Do you realize the Pats ran the exact same play at the goal line to win the game? They saw they beat Taron Johnson on that throw the first time. Only a bad pass prevented a TD. So they ran that play again with Gesicki. How do you let that happen?

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

He has so many options here against the blitz, but he holds the ball waiting for Knox to complete his route. Just horrible by Josh here.

I don’t even think Shakir is the hot read. It is a risky pass flinging it to the sideline with the DB there.

 

I think setting the protections got screwed up. RB should be blocking the blitzer. Not sure if that is on Allen or Dorsey. I think the pass should have gone to the RB, but I think this was 3rd down right? He may have thought the RB wouldn’t have made it to the sticks or endzone.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dopey said:

Dan Orlovski showed at least three clips where the hot read was open on a blitz and Josh ignored them. There’s a lot of people that are not going to like this thread.  Hard for many to accept it. He needs to play better. 

He does need to play better, no doubt. He led the offense to 25 points though Vs a team with a terrible offense. They also missed a fairly routine 42 yard FG on another drive. Do I want to see more from Josh Allen ? Absolutely yes. It’s what we’ve come to expect. I cannot get past allowing Mac Jones to look like a decent QB running a decent NFL offense. That’s an inexcusable defensive performance to me, regardless of injury. The Bills HC is a defensive specialist : figure it out. It shouldn’t take 30+ to defeat this version of the Pats. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DapperCam said:

I don’t even think Shakir is the hot read. It is a risky pass flinging it to the sideline with the DB there.

 

I think setting the protections got screwed up. RB should be blocking the blitzer. Not sure if that is on Allen or Dorsey. I think the pass should have gone to the RB, but I think this was 3rd down right? He may have thought the RB wouldn’t have made it to the sticks or endzone.

 

It was 2nd down and I think that is Diggs in the backfield, who is not going to be picking up any linebackers.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FrenchConnection said:

He has so many options here against the blitz, but he holds the ball waiting for Knox to complete his route. Just horrible by Josh here.

Check out the Bills receiver in the back right corner of the end zone…NO ONE covers him at all…he’s WIDE OPEN.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:

Check out the Bills receiver in the back right corner of the end zone…NO ONE covers him at all…he’s WIDE OPEN.

 

It's Knox, and that is where Allen was going until the free Mike blew it up.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Beast said:

It’s totally up to him but we may have seen the best of Josh Allen.

 

There is a chance we have.  He definitely has lost a step or two which is to be expected as he grows older and the hits taken over the years take their toll.  If he doesn't improve his game from within the pocket with decision making I'm afraid you are right sir.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Simon said:

 

The Mike is coming free and outside of waiting for Knox, there are zero options that result in a TD on that play.

He does a nice job avoiding the sack and buying extra time with his eyes downfield, but nobody comes open on that side of the field.

He was smart not to force it on 2nd down, take the incompletion and give themselves another shot at it.

Anybody second-guessing that is being an armchair QB after the fact.

 

Also that play is how Allen always handles free rushers. He never hits a hot route in those situations, especially one that is short of the sticks. People forgot how he plays QB I guess? He usually evades the free rusher and then runs for a big gain or tries to complete a pass in a scramble drill. In this case he hit Diggs at the goal line but Diggs didn't make the tough catch.

 

These broken plays often become explosive gains or TDs which is why defenses historically have not blitzed him much, they've learned that he burns them more times than not. Here the blitzer did a good job taking away his escape route angle to the right, but Allen rolling out of the pocket even to the left is a really dangerous situation for a defense to put themselves into. They're lucky Diggs didn't corral that one in, like he has a dozen times before.

 

I don't know, a lot of analysis I'm seeing today is people evaluating Allen as a traditional QB in a traditional offense and that just isn't how it's ever going to be. Instead of complaining about it or trying to take away what makes him special, we should be hoping the team leans into it and surrounds him with weapons that fit his skill set.

 

Edited by HappyDays
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

 

He didn't like a lot of things (says Morse played much worse than usual, that Torrance was bad, Spencer Brown allowed two big pressures and Gabe Davis also, that James Cook was "a disaster in pass protection,") etc. He had plenty more criticism of others, as well. So he certainly did not blame it all on Josh by any means. But ...

 

"As I watched this offensive tape, it became very clear to me that Josh Allen really struggled in this game. And I know that nobody ever wants to hear that Josh Allen played poorly, and I'm sure that lots of you are going to yell at me for saying that Josh played poorly, but he did.

 

"Could things have been better around him? Absolutely. Could Ken Dorsey have been a little better in this game? Absolutely.

 

"But I thought the top reason for how the offense performed against New England was the play of Josh Allen. 

 

"Let me give you some themes from what I observed, and I think that as more people study the tape, you're going to see a lot of what I'm sharing here being echoed throughout those who watch film. I thought his processing and decision-making was really off in this game. He had some very frustrating turndowns, especially under pressure. And I thought his whole mental approach was very poor with protections and how he set protections, working away from where the protections were set, not necessarily feeling or sensing or seeing or reacting to pressure schemes correctly based on what New England was giving him.

 

"I thought his tempo was poor. He didn't get through progressions with enough urgency, especially when New England either had pressure or had very obvious route combinations leveraged and his eyes needed to be in different places. He was late to process pressure, I mean they're sending extra guys and it's not affecting the way that he's attacking the play. I thought his trigger was incredibly slow. Once again his average time to throw over 3.15 seconds. That's going to put a lot of stress on your offensive line. And I have plenty of criticism for those guys, but I mean Mac Jones got the ball out in 2.2 seconds, literally a full second quicker. The amount of stress that puts on the offensive line compared to what Josh did is really different.

 

"He absolutely had some accuracy lapses, right? The two misfires to Stefon Diggs, the deep shot, then the outbreaking pattern, missed them. Josh has to get back to taking profits and playing smart football. His average depth of target against New England was 10.6.

 

"There were issues with Josh Allen not getting the team out of bad run looks. Another situation where they're trying to run the ball to a side of the formation where there's four Patriots players for two Bills offensive linemen to block; you can't run the play.

 

"Not making correct decisions on run-pass options. I mean, honestly minus the quantity of turnovers, I felt a lot of things about Josh Allen that I did in that Jets game in Week One. Thought he was chasing some plays and just not doing the smart correct thing with any level of consistency that's needed to win a football game.

 

"And I'm not talking about Josh Allen not being Josh Allen. that's not what I'm saying. But within the context of a football game, there are certain times where you just need to take the profit, you need to go to the smart place with the football. And Josh Allen didn't do that.

 

"Now, I'm confident this analysis is going to be met with some resistance, some anger at me for daring to say that Josh Allen played poorly, and not pointing enough fingers at Ken Dorsey or enough fingers at being able to trust the offensive line, or weapons or whatever you want to point at.

 

"I watched that game, I studied it in depth, the biggest problem on the offense was 17. ... Josh Allen is not perfect, he has bad games and this was absolutely one of them. Missed so many opportunities. And he did some good, there's no doubt. I enjoyed the three touchdown drives in the second half. I did a lot of what he did to get the team in scoring position in the first half.

 

"But I'm left thinking a whole lot more about the plays he didn't make, about the plays that were left on the field, about the times he could have done the smart correct thing with the football and just mentally was not sharp in this game: decision-making issues, protection issues, just issues galore.

 

"You need more out of Josh Allen. And I know that's hard to say based on what he's given you.

 

"But when you look at this game, and that's what I'm talking about, this game, this loss to the Patriots, I thought the biggest problem with the offense was the quarterback."

 

...

 

"He refused to throw hot on several occasions during obvious pressure looks. He didn't have the team sliding in the right direction, just too many miscues. He has to manage that better, both the pre-snap and the post-snap part of pressure, and Josh just played poorly."

 

 

Joe had plenty to say about the defense too. As usual, he gets into a ton of detail.

 

 

Gotta take the good with the bad.  Without Josh, we're nothing!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DapperCam said:

I don’t even think Shakir is the hot read. It is a risky pass flinging it to the sideline with the DB there.

 

Nobody has any clue who the hot read is, or if there even was one on this play. Nobody knows the reads or the progressions or the built in checks or the protection scheme on any given play, let alone how any of that can change based on what happens pre- or post-snap. It's just people creating takes out of thin air. After a game where Allen scored 3 TDs and left the field with the lead there are people saying he's lazy, he doesn't care any more, he's lost his fire, he's gone Hollywood, etc. It's nuts. Did Allen go Hollywood immediately after putting up 48 on the Dolphins? He lost his fire in week 1, regained it for 3 weeks, then lost it again? That's the only narrative you can believe to reconcile some of these ridiculous takes.

 

I don't know if it's the Mahomes effect or what but expectations for Allen have gotten WAY WAY WAY out of control. If he isn't the best version of himself in every game then he's the main reason that we lost. Obviously Allen missed some throws and the interception was just plain awful, but other than that a lot of the analysis out there is based on guesswork or straight up misevaluation.

 

Edited by HappyDays
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Nobody has any clue who the hot read is, or if there even was one on this play. Nobody knows the reads or the progressions or the built in checks or the protection scheme on any given play, let alone how any of that can change based on what happens pre- or post-snap. It's just people creating takes out of thin air. After a game where Allen scored 3 TDs and left the field with the lead there are people saying he's lazy, he doesn't care any more, he's lost his fire, he's gone Hollywood, etc. It's nuts. Did Allen go Hollywood immediately after putting up 48 on the Dolphins? He lost his fire in week 1, regained it for 3 weeks, then lost it again? That's the only way to reconcile some of these ridiculous takes.

 

I don't know if it's the Mahomes effect or what what expectations for Allen have gotten WAY WAY WAY out of control. If he isn't the best version of himself in every game then he's the main reason that we lost. Obviously Allen missed some throws and the interception was just plain awful, but other than that a lot of the analysis out there is based on guesswork or straight up misevaluation.

Allen has completely warped people’s

expectations of what is good/bad QB play. If he is only playing well, but not HOF level then people say he is playing “very bad”. It’s like people missed the entire drought and became Bills fans in the last 5 years.

 

Allen has outperformed or been on par Mahomes this year, and Mahomes has a way better offensive line, running game and play caller. It’s ridiculous.

  • Disagree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Nobody has any clue who the hot read is, or if there even was one on this play. Nobody knows the reads or the progressions or the built in checks or the protection scheme on any given play, let alone how any of that can change based on what happens pre- or post-snap. It's just people creating takes out of thin air. After a game where Allen scored 3 TDs and left the field with the lead there are people saying he's lazy, he doesn't care any more, he's lost his fire, he's gone Hollywood, etc. It's nuts. Did Allen go Hollywood immediately after putting up 48 on the Dolphins? He lost his fire in week 1, regained it for 3 weeks, then lost it again? That's the only way to reconcile some of these ridiculous takes.

 

I don't know if it's the Mahomes effect or what what expectations for Allen have gotten WAY WAY WAY out of control. If he isn't the best version of himself in every game then he's the main reason that we lost. Obviously Allen missed some throws and the interception was just plain awful, but other than that a lot of the analysis out there is based on guesswork or straight up misevaluation.

Greg Cosell's quote about the Bills and Allen is worth repeating again and again:

 

"If your QB has to be elite in every game then you have a problem and it's not the QB".

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:


What I’ve been saying.  He is not winning pre-snap.  He’s trying to pick the lock after the ball is snapped and is struggling to figure it out on the fly.  To me that SCREAMS a lack of film study and preparation.

 

I love Josh Allen.

 

Josh Allen is dogging this season.


I don’t know what the deal is, or what’s happening behind closed doors.  What I know is he looks like crap for basically every game outside of Miami this year.  I know Diggs came into camp HOT over something going on w Josh and the Coaches.  Regardless of what they spin it to be, I think evidence points to Diggs feeling JA isn’t playing to his ability and the coaches are holding him accountable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Why not? I am pretty sure that Josh is clearly superior to Jalen Hurts.


Check our spotrac. His cap hit is still $6M. That’s still rookie numbers. It’s 2 more seasons before he breaks $20M. And 3 before he breaks $30M. 
 

I am actually not as high on Hurts as everybody else. I actually think Allen is a better passer but JH has 3 more years to evolve on the cheap with high priced skill players. 
 

Beane could have done better the last few years given Allen’s cap number and he didn’t. That’s 100% on him. But now we’re in a space where Allen is going to be costing $40M+ from here on out. We will have to draft well and get rookies going much much quicker. 
 

It’s unfortunate, but Allen will have to make do without big WR money outside Diggs. KC has a slight advantage that their best guy makes low TE money. For reference Diggs will cost $12M more than Kelce next year. That is a good chunk of change to be spread elsewhere on the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

 

I don't know if it's the Mahomes effect or what but expectations for Allen have gotten WAY WAY WAY out of control. If he isn't the best version of himself in every game then he's the main reason that we lost. Obviously Allen missed some throws and the interception was just plain awful, but other than that a lot of the analysis out there is based on guesswork or straight up misevaluation.

 

WORD.

 

We want Greatness every week. We expect he to be great every single week. The hopes and dreams of a fan base hang in the balance. But he is a human FCOL

 

The importance of all  of this is not life and death. But it would be nice to have some answers. I think as someone else stated It is time for we fans to Buckle Up and enjoy the ride every week.  You'll go batty with conjecture. or maybe that's just me. I have faith in Josh Allen. period. Gotta have faith.

 

GO BILLS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

Also that play is how Allen always handles free rushers. He never hits a hot route in those situations, especially one that is short of the sticks. People forgot how he plays QB I guess? He usually evades the free rusher and then runs for a big gain or tries to complete a pass in a scramble drill. In this case he hit Diggs at the goal line but Diggs didn't make the tough catch.

 

These broken plays often become explosive gains or TDs which is why defenses historically have not blitzed him much, they've learned that he burns them more times than not. Here the blitzer did a good job taking away his escape route angle to the right, but Allen rolling out of the pocket even to the left is a really dangerous situation for a defense to put themselves into. They're lucky Diggs didn't corral that one in, like he has a dozen times before.

 

I don't know, a lot of analysis I'm seeing today is people evaluating Allen as a traditional QB in a traditional offense and that just isn't how it's ever going to be. Instead of complaining about it or trying to take away what makes him special, we should be hoping the team leans into it and surrounds him with weapons that fit his skill set.

 


I just want him to be better prepared before the ball is snapped.  That’s all I’m asking.  I prepare very hard for my job even though I am pretty good on the fly.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...