Jump to content

Colts grant Jonathan Taylor’s request to seek trade


Big Blitz

Recommended Posts

This will be interesting because he wants to get paid, so not only do they need to compensate the Colts, but they will need to pay him and I am guessing he is going to expect $10M+ even though he is coming off injury and won't be playing behind that great OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alphadawg7 said:

This will be interesting because he wants to get paid, so not only do they need to compensate the Colts, but they will need to pay him and I am guessing he is going to expect $10M+ even though he is coming off injury and won't be playing behind that great OL.

Teams with QBs on rookie deals for 3+ years make sense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Teams with QBs on rookie deals for 3+ years make sense.

 

Yeah I agree, that makes the most sense.  But thinking about it, how many of those scenarios are out there who also have the need for a RB?  Off the top of my head, the only team I think it could make some sense for is Bears, but they they just drafted Roschon and have a couple good vets there too that they like.  They didn't show any interest in Dalvin Cook who could have just been signed for cheaper and not cost any draft capital...so doubt they are going to be players for Taylor.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious if this could happen.... NOT even talking about here, but was a spit-balling take from Cover2.  Say no teams were willing to trade and give a new contract, is it possible a team could offer to put in writing that they would NOT franchise tag him... just as the next best incentive for him as opposed to a new contract.  Just, we want your services for the year, we cant afford you, but to keep you happy/motivated, you'll get a chance to chase $$ as an Unrestricted next year?

 

Would just be interesting to see that precedent set, because anytime we see this situation most of the top dawg teams are immediately ruled out because of cap concerns.

 

Basically, can a team even offer a 'no franchise tag' clause? Has that happened before?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great player but which teams around the league need running backs so bad they are willing to part with draft capital and commit to a big contract?

 

He seems like a player that would do well in Baltimore and Washington but I can't imagine they are interested with dobbins as robinson already set as starters.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillMafia716ix said:

Colts playing dirty. They know no teams gonna trade for him right now. Teams don’t have cap space right now to give him the deal he wants. 

Meh, while it does restrict somewhat, whats stopping a team from giving the Watson type contract, $1m this year, then pump up the next 2-4 years of contract + GUARANTEED $$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone on Twitter said that RBs are gonna have to start negotiating differently. When their rookie contracts are up, they will have to start negotiating shorter term, higher paid deals. Something like 2 years $30 million and then go from there. That way teams aren't locked into almost 30 year old RBs on 5 year deals. The RBs won't like it. But it may be the best way for them to go

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said:

Good grief! Here we go, how many pages will this run? 

It doesn’t deserve one page, but the redundancy machine will rev up and go out of control, 😂

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

 

And the anonymous source tweets begin...more will certainly come.

 

So a team with a bad OL who wasn't willing to pay another talented RB in Dalvin is now going to both pay him even more money and give up draft assets (that they will need as their cap balloons soon) for a guy who is coming off am injury and a down year?  

 

Color me skeptical.  They could have just signed Dalvin cheaper and not had to trade any assets.  And Dalvin was making it clear he wanted to play there too.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

Someone on Twitter said that RBs are gonna have to start negotiating differently. When their rookie contracts are up, they will have to start negotiating shorter term, higher paid deals. Something like 2 years $30 million and then go from there. That way teams aren't locked into almost 30 year old RBs on 5 year deals. The RBs won't like it. But it may be the best way for them to go

AAV of 15M is top 3 at the position.

 

Most of the RB woes aren’t dealing with contract #2, but contract #3. They are trying to negotiate contract #2 to compensate, and that’s where they are losing the battle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

And the anonymous source tweets begin...more will certainly come.

 

So a team with a bad OL who wasn't willing to pay another talented RB in Dalvin is now going to both pay him even more money and give up draft assets (that they will need as their cap balloons soon) for a guy who is coming off a down injury filled year who had one exceptional year when he was playing behind the best OL in the NFL?  

 

Color me skeptical.  They could have just signed Dalvin cheaper and not had to trade any assets.  And Dalvin was making it clear he wanted to play there too.  

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but to pretend like Dalvin Cook and Jonathan Taylor are apples:apples is laughable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

And the anonymous source tweets begin...more will certainly come.

 

So a team with a bad OL who wasn't willing to pay another talented RB in Dalvin is now going to both pay him even more money and give up draft assets (that they will need as their cap balloons soon) for a guy who is coming off a down injury filled year who had one exceptional year when he was playing behind the best OL in the NFL?  

 

Color me skeptical.  They could have just signed Dalvin cheaper and not had to trade any assets.  And Dalvin was making it clear he wanted to play there too.  

Dolphins also are way over the cap in 2024. Obviously they can make lots of moves but they are hardly the pinnacle of overpaying for an RB in the nfl

1 minute ago, JoPoy88 said:


Funny because even those all these teams refuse to pay these guys, the Colts will now turn around and demand an arm and a leg in trade compensation.

Allowing Taylor to seek a trade is like allowing Lamar to seek a trade. They want him to see his market, then come crawling back.

  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, I'm Spartacus said:

This is awesome! Dump the new Jets guy and sign Taylor! The more running backs the merrier.

Taylor isn't a free agent so they can't just "sign" him. Bills will have to give up something of value and then probably do a new deal.  He is still on PUP ,anyways, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, glazeduck said:

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but to pretend like Dalvin Cook and Jonathan Taylor are apples:apples is laughable...

 

I respectfully disagree there is some huge gap between these two RB's...Taylor had one great year behind one of the best OL's in football as the main focal point of the offense.  The other 2 seasons Taylors production isnt any better than Cooks and Cook didn't have the benefit of being on a run first team behind an elite OL.  

 

So I am gonna have to say this feels like a stretch to act like there is a vast difference in the quality of these two players.  Plus, you can make a case that Cook is a better fit given he comes from a pass first team where Taylor wants to be paid top dollar and the focal point of the offense.  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Dolphins also are way over the cap in 2024. Obviously they can make lots of moves but they are hardly the pinnacle of overpaying for an RB in the nfl

Allowing Taylor to seek a trade is like allowing Lamar to seek a trade. They want him to see his market, then come crawling back.

 

This.  Dolphins weren't willing to pay Cook enough to come there, I seriously doubt they are looking to spend more on Taylor with their upcoming cap.  Not to mention having to send Indy valuable draft capital they will need with their cap ballooning soon to help keep the roster up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wppete said:

We don’t have money to pay him. 

More like...we don't have a line to support him. I am terrified to see us force the run this year and never get more than 2-3 yards each time. Dorsey is the most important person on this team (besides Allen) as he will have to get Kincaid, Knox and Cook heavily involved in the passing game (in addition to the usual suspects). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, FireChans said:

AAV of 15M is top 3 at the position.

 

Most of the RB woes aren’t dealing with contract #2, but contract #3. They are trying to negotiate contract #2 to compensate, and that’s where they are losing the battle. 

Which brings it back to my point. They will need to take a shorter term higher paid deal and then go from there. Teams aren't gonna lock long term contracts on RBs anymore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...