Jump to content

Rodgers Traded to Jets Officially


Dablitzkrieg

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

You make a lot of valid and not untrue statements here but I feel like there is another train of thought that proves differently.

 

We have seen teams like the Jets and Dolphins for YEARS throw rosters together with elite free agents. Seems like every big name FA is linked to or signs with one of them. They have elite players...but are not elite as a team. It's a bunch of great players that don't compliment each other with a huge revolving door both at the player level and coaching level. There is a lack of on field leadership and team chemistry which leads to being mediocre. We saw the same thing here in Buffalo under Whaley. Added good players be it a fit or not.

 

The Bills on the other hand have a lot of good players that form to make a great team. Hyde and Poyer are an excellent example of this. On their own I don't know if either reaches the heights they have together. It's that way in a lot of the position rooms. Yes, the team has holes and needs upgrades. But they guys they do have are close and their skillset compliments each other well. That bring them up some levels in my opinion. The pieces put in place here for the most part fit what we do and that makes the machine run smoother so to speak.

Good post. Yes the way the pieces fit together is very important. My original post was that I felt with the addition of a legitimate quarterback the Jets my be favorite in our division. Didn't mean that as a put down of the Bills at all. Miami and the Jets have made themselves legitimate contenders. Frankly I, at this moment in time, think the Jets have a better defense than ours. With the addition of Rogers unless he has lost more of his game than I think they'll be tough this year. I also stand by my statement that we're a good to very good team but not an elite team as the poster claimed.

Edited by Radar
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the Jets win the division with Rodgers at QB mostly because who is calling the plays? Nathaniel Hackett?

 

Look what happened in Denver with Hackster as HC, it was a joke. The Jet's defense will be good and the offense not so much.

 

Both Tua and Rodgers contemplated retirement this offseason and what is the saying?..."if you are thinking about retirement you've already retired". 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TBBills Fan said:

 

agree 100%

 

 

just as much as one can have their own ego get in the way of the goal.

 

And my preference is they are hungry and are either counted out or in a under dog role.

 

Is that easier for you to understand?

No because your premise is incorrect. 

 

The underdog role can motivate athletes. I think it's much less of a factor with professional athletes. So I hear what you are saying.

 

However, being a favorite is not a negative nor does undermine motovation, ego, and the hunger to win. That's nonsense. 

 

It's really that simple but I can see your ego has dug in and you won't bulge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

I doubt the Jets win the division with Rodgers at QB mostly because who is calling the plays? Nathaniel Hackett?

 

Look what happened in Denver with Hackster as HC, it was a joke. The Jet's defense will be good and the offense not so much.

 

Both Tua and Rodgers contemplated retirement this offseason and what is the saying?..."if you are thinking about retirement you've already retired". 

Hackett just has to call plays now, not manage the whole game. Much easier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

No because your premise is incorrect. 

 

The underdog role can motivate athletes. I think it's much less of a factor with professional athletes. So I hear what you are saying.

 

However, being a favorite is not a negative nor does undermine motovation, ego, and the hunger to win. That's nonsense. 

 

It's really that simple but I can see your ego has dug in and you won't bulge. 

 

no, I just think we dont agree.  thats okay.  

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billl said:

What do you mean it was my argument?  I was responding to your statement that the Jets and Dolphins haven't proven that they could win a division against a team with an elite QB by saying that the same was true of the Bills.

 

It mattered enough for you to make the statement about NY and Miami, but you suddenly found it irrelevant as soon as the same logic was applied to Buffalo.

 

No, I said I wasn't worried about the opposition because at this point Allen is in a different tier than the other QB's in the AFC East.   Your argument is that Allen hasn't proven he can win a division with an equally elite QB in it and that Rodgers is the same quality of player he was in his MVP years.   I disagree because I saw a very different Rodgers than you last season.

 

You also made some other dubious statements about personnel.  Jermaine Johnson is the Jets 5th best draft pick under Douglas and your initial assessment was that he was better than Rousseau? :lol: 

 

Did you even watch the rest of the NFL last year?   Did you pay any attention when the Chiefs struggled against the AFC's two worst teams?  You seem to think that the bridge has been gapped in the AFC East because the Dolphins and Jets won a couple of VERY close games........but that the Chiefs close division games don't represent anything.   By your rationale the Texans and Colts are better than the Chiefs if they added Rodgers.......because the 2022 Chiefs couldn't beat either of those teams in regulation despite their pathetic QB's. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, papazoid said:

the bills are built to play on a fast track.......it was sloppy vs playoff cincy

 

half the defense was out or playing injured vs that cincy game....von, daquan, hyde, poyer, white

 

some players like saffold were mentally fatigued after all the demar hamlin worries

 

the bills in the regular season beat themselves in all 3 losses.

 

the bills are a legit Top 5 team in league and will win the division.....yea the jets got better....but not enough to overtake buf

 

i say they put it all together this season...... 13-4 and to the super bowl

Ground hog day...

2 hours ago, papazoid said:

the bills are built to play on a fast track.......it was sloppy vs playoff cincy

 

half the defense was out or playing injured vs that cincy game....von, daquan, hyde, poyer, white

 

some players like saffold were mentally fatigued after all the demar hamlin worries

 

the bills in the regular season beat themselves in all 3 losses.

 

the bills are a legit Top 5 team in league and will win the division.....yea the jets got better....but not enough to overtake buf

 

i say they put it all together this season...... 13-4 and to the super bowl

Care to add anymore excuses? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Radar said:

Good post. Yes the way the pieces fit together is very important. My original post was that I felt with the addition of a legitimate quarterback the Jets my be favorite in our division. Didn't mean that as a put down of the Bills at all. Miami and the Jets have made themselves legitimate contenders. Frankly I, at this moment in time, think the Jets have a better defense than ours. With the addition of Rogers unless he has lost more of his game than I think they'll be tough this year. I also stand by my statement that we're a good to very good team but not an elite team as the poster claimed.

This likely isn't the correct thread for this,  but it does echo what you are saying.  

 

I heard this from someone on WGR last night who used to be at PFF. When it comes to this draft and other drafts, we have to realize that we will always be in contention with McD, Beane and Allen. The draft should be about grabbing elite talent and traits almost regardless of position and perceived roster holes or strengths. Our view when drafting should be to be able to win 2 to 3 superbowls in a 5 year period, what gets you there is getting the best players you can, even at a perceived strength on the team. If CB this year at 27 is by far the best player available, you draft him, edge etc.

 

You can always move existing players on your roster once and if they are beat out. If one goes down like tre, you aren't dangerously thin at CB all of a sudden. If you need to move on from Morse, you have that ability if we took bpa at 27 and it was a C. You don't pigeon hole yourself by forcing wr. All stuff most everyone on here knows, but I found the viewpoint to win 2 to 3 in 5 years as opposed to just load up for the season, to be a much different view on acquiring the highest level talent you can get. As you said, there are not many elite players on this team....

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't think this is going to go well for either party, for several reasons:

 

His off the field comments are going to be constant fodder for the New York media.  This is not the Green Bay Press-Gazette or Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel he is dealing with.  It's going to be a distraction to the team at some level and I suspect it will be a constant source of drama during the season between the Rodgers and the coaching staff.

 

Rodgers spent his entire career in one organization, one with a history of winning and a fanbase that's got a ton of patience.  Neither of those apply to the New York Jets.  Change at the age of 40 is a lot harder than it is at, say, 26 or 27 when many players hit free agency for the first time.  He's clearly thin skinned and I suspect he's gonna play the blame game if/when things go south, just like he did in his last year in Green Bay.

 

Finally, Rodgers just wasn't very good last year.  He was in an average division in the easier conference and they still missed the playoffs.  They had a win-and-in game against Detroit, a team he usually defeats with ease... and they lost.  He doesn't strike me as the Tom Brady type of player that will be successful well into his 40s.  His primary motivation this year appears to be to spite the Packers rather than a true desire to play - the guy nearly retired a few months ago.  Spite only gets you so far.

 

This move just wreaks of desperation to me.  It's something the Bills would have done during the drought - and they did do it with Bledsoe.  That got them a 9-7 season and a bunch of mediocrity.  The reaction to this trade feels a lot like the Russell Wilson trade - that the AFC West was gonna be this super competitive division and that the Chiefs better watch out.  Call me a homer, but I'm just not convinced this is gonna work for the Jets.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

No, I said I wasn't worried about the opposition because at this point Allen is in a different tier than the other QB's in the AFC East.   Your argument is that Allen hasn't proven he can win a division with an equally elite QB in it and that Rodgers is the same quality of player he was in his MVP years.   I disagree because I saw a very different Rodgers than you last season.

 

You also made some other dubious statements about personnel.  Jermaine Johnson is the Jets 5th best draft pick under Douglas and your initial assessment was that he was better than Rousseau? :lol: 

 

Did you even watch the rest of the NFL last year?   Did you pay any attention when the Chiefs struggled against the AFC's two worst teams?  You seem to think that the bridge has been gapped in the AFC East because the Dolphins and Jets won a couple of VERY close games........but that the Chiefs close division games don't represent anything.   By your rationale the Texans and Colts are better than the Chiefs if they added Rodgers.......because the 2022 Chiefs couldn't beat either of those teams in regulation despite their pathetic QB's. 

This is your quote:
“So why can't you understand the perspective that a logical fan will believe that the Jets or Dolphins will unseat the Bills when they ACTUALLY prove they can outperform an elite QB'd team over 17 games?”

 

YOU brought up the idea that a team needs to prove that they can win a division against an elite QB.  My response was that the Bills have also never outperformed an elite QB over the course of a season.  It’s either important (in which case Allen has something to prove) or it isn’t (and the Dolphins/Jets have nothing to prove in this regard).  You’ve got to pick a lane, though.

 

Now show me where I said Johnson was better than Rousseau.  (You can’t because it didn’t happen). What I did do was compare several picks that were similar in terms of when they were made, where they were taken in the draft, and their respective positions. The Jets have recently taken Sauce Gardner in the first.  The Bills took Elam.  Jets took Breece Hall.  Bills took James Cook.  Jets took Quinnen Williams.  Bills took Ed Oliver.  Jets took Jermaine Johnson.  Bills took Rousseau (and Basham and Epenesa).  The Jets took Garret Wilson.  The Bills took Davis and Shakir (who aren’t really comps in terms of where they were drafted).  The Jets didn’t get the better player every single time, but in totality they’ve massively outperformed Buffalo in the draft in recent years…and they just added Rodgers while Buffalo just lost one of their best young players as a cap casualty.  Your take-away from that has been to say that Rousseau is better than Johnson and then spike the football.  

 

Now I’m not sure why you keep trying to inject the Chiefs into the conversation, but they lost one game to a bad team in week 3.  Nobody is claiming that the Chiefs were the best team in football in the first half of the season.  The Bills already hung that banner.  The Chiefs were expected to take a step back.  They had 8 rookies and 6 second year players play meaningful snaps this season.  It took a while for them to gel, but it turned out pretty well in the end.  What they were in week 3 has no bearing on the future, as those players have improved and will continue to improve.  
 

Meanwhile, the Bills fielded a team of veterans who were a finished product week 1.  The problem is that they started to show their age as the season progressed.  Guys like Miller, White, Hyde, and Poyer were useless by the end of the year and they won’t be younger nor have less wear and tear on them next season.  So I guess it makes sense that you’d prefer to talk about week 3 of the regular season than the postseason, but I think we both know what presents a clearer picture of where each team is going forward.  That brings us back to my point in this thread.  The Jets have a solid roster loaded with young talent.  Adding an elite, HOF QB to the mix absolutely makes them serious contenders for the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billl said:

This is your quote:
“So why can't you understand the perspective that a logical fan will believe that the Jets or Dolphins will unseat the Bills when they ACTUALLY prove they can outperform an elite QB'd team over 17 games?”

 

YOU brought up the idea that a team needs to prove that they can win a division against an elite QB.  My response was that the Bills have also never outperformed an elite QB over the course of a season.  It’s either important (in which case Allen has something to prove) or it isn’t (and the Dolphins/Jets have nothing to prove in this regard).  You’ve got to pick a lane, though.

 

Now show me where I said Johnson was better than Rousseau.  (You can’t because it didn’t happen). What I did do was compare several picks that were similar in terms of when they were made, where they were taken in the draft, and their respective positions. The Jets have recently taken Sauce Gardner in the first.  The Bills took Elam.  Jets took Breece Hall.  Bills took James Cook.  Jets took Quinnen Williams.  Bills took Ed Oliver.  Jets took Jermaine Johnson.  Bills took Rousseau (and Basham and Epenesa).  The Jets took Garret Wilson.  The Bills took Davis and Shakir (who aren’t really comps in terms of where they were drafted).  The Jets didn’t get the better player every single time, but in totality they’ve massively outperformed Buffalo in the draft in recent years…and they just added Rodgers while Buffalo just lost one of their best young players as a cap casualty.  Your take-away from that has been to say that Rousseau is better than Johnson and then spike the football.  

 

Now I’m not sure why you keep trying to inject the Chiefs into the conversation, but they lost one game to a bad team in week 3.  Nobody is claiming that the Chiefs were the best team in football in the first half of the season.  The Bills already hung that banner.  The Chiefs were expected to take a step back.  They had 8 rookies and 6 second year players play meaningful snaps this season.  It took a while for them to gel, but it turned out pretty well in the end.  What they were in week 3 has no bearing on the future, as those players have improved and will continue to improve.  
 

Meanwhile, the Bills fielded a team of veterans who were a finished product week 1.  The problem is that they started to show their age as the season progressed.  Guys like Miller, White, Hyde, and Poyer were useless by the end of the year and they won’t be younger nor have less wear and tear on them next season.  So I guess it makes sense that you’d prefer to talk about week 3 of the regular season than the postseason, but I think we both know what presents a clearer picture of where each team is going forward.  That brings us back to my point in this thread.  The Jets have a solid roster loaded with young talent.  Adding an elite, HOF QB to the mix absolutely makes them serious contenders for the division.

It helps that the Jets have had multiple first rounders and are always picking near the top of the draft. We'll see how it turns out. I'm not sold on 39 year old Rodgers. If he plays well, the Jets are dangerous. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billl said:

This is your quote:
“So why can't you understand the perspective that a logical fan will believe that the Jets or Dolphins will unseat the Bills when they ACTUALLY prove they can outperform an elite QB'd team over 17 games?”

 

YOU brought up the idea that a team needs to prove that they can win a division against an elite QB.  My response was that the Bills have also never outperformed an elite QB over the course of a season.  It’s either important (in which case Allen has something to prove) or it isn’t (and the Dolphins/Jets have nothing to prove in this regard).  You’ve got to pick a lane, though.

 

Now show me where I said Johnson was better than Rousseau.  (You can’t because it didn’t happen). What I did do was compare several picks that were similar in terms of when they were made, where they were taken in the draft, and their respective positions. The Jets have recently taken Sauce Gardner in the first.  The Bills took Elam.  Jets took Breece Hall.  Bills took James Cook.  Jets took Quinnen Williams.  Bills took Ed Oliver.  Jets took Jermaine Johnson.  Bills took Rousseau (and Basham and Epenesa).  The Jets took Garret Wilson.  The Bills took Davis and Shakir (who aren’t really comps in terms of where they were drafted).  The Jets didn’t get the better player every single time, but in totality they’ve massively outperformed Buffalo in the draft in recent years…and they just added Rodgers while Buffalo just lost one of their best young players as a cap casualty.  Your take-away from that has been to say that Rousseau is better than Johnson and then spike the football.  

 

Now I’m not sure why you keep trying to inject the Chiefs into the conversation, but they lost one game to a bad team in week 3.  Nobody is claiming that the Chiefs were the best team in football in the first half of the season.  The Bills already hung that banner.  The Chiefs were expected to take a step back.  They had 8 rookies and 6 second year players play meaningful snaps this season.  It took a while for them to gel, but it turned out pretty well in the end.  What they were in week 3 has no bearing on the future, as those players have improved and will continue to improve.  
 

Meanwhile, the Bills fielded a team of veterans who were a finished product week 1.  The problem is that they started to show their age as the season progressed.  Guys like Miller, White, Hyde, and Poyer were useless by the end of the year and they won’t be younger nor have less wear and tear on them next season.  So I guess it makes sense that you’d prefer to talk about week 3 of the regular season than the postseason, but I think we both know what presents a clearer picture of where each team is going forward.  That brings us back to my point in this thread.  The Jets have a solid roster loaded with young talent.  Adding an elite, HOF QB to the mix absolutely makes them serious contenders for the division.

 

 

Right.......that is the end of a response to your claims that the Bills division winning results are fraudulent because they haven't had to play elite QB's in their division.  

 

Which neglects the fact that the Chiefs have had a cake walk schedule of non-elite QB'd teams in their division since before Mahomes entered the league 6 years ago.   

 

I know you and @Zerovoltz come here because your Chiefs sites are full of garbage illogical posts from idiots who don't get the nuance of the game.   But you're not making much sense here either.  

 

You've determined that to your casual fans eye that the Bills are circling the drain and old.   So rather than realizing that the facts are that the Bills have beaten the Chiefs in Arrowhead two straight seasons and have had the highest point differential in the NFL in that time period you are making a broad assumption that they have cycled out simply because they didn't beat your team in the playoffs.

 

The reality is that they are still rightfully one of the strongest SB favorites.  Just like the Chiefs still were even though they blew a 24 point lead the AFCCG and got rid of Tyreek and Mathieu while there was a general perception that the AFC West had CLEARLY improved themselves across the board.......just like the Dolphins and Jets have!  

 

If you aren't worried about the Jets as a Chiefs fan then there certainly isn't any reason for the Bills to be. :lol: 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Right.......that is the end of a response to your claims that the Bills division winning results are fraudulent because they haven't had to play elite QB's in their division.  

 

Which neglects the fact that the Chiefs have had a cake walk schedule of non-elite QB'd teams in their division since before Mahomes entered the league 6 years ago.   

 

I know you and @Zerovoltz come here because your Chiefs sites are full of garbage illogical posts from idiots who don't get the nuance of the game.   But you're not making much sense here either.  

 

You've determined that to your casual fans eye that the Bills are circling the drain and old.   So rather than realizing that the facts are that the Bills have beaten the Chiefs in Arrowhead two straight seasons and have had the highest point differential in the NFL in that time period you are making a broad assumption that they have cycled out simply because they didn't beat your team in the playoffs.

 

The reality is that they are still rightfully one of the strongest SB favorites.  Just like the Chiefs still were even though they blew a 24 point lead the AFCCG and got rid of Tyreek and Mathieu while there was a general perception that the AFC West had CLEARLY improved themselves across the board.......just like the Dolphins and Jets have!  

 

If you aren't worried about the Jets as a Chiefs fan then there certainly isn't any reason for the Bills to be. :lol: 

 

For the record....I think the Jets are overrated...both before and after the Rodgers trade.  MAYBE if Rodgers has something left the jets grab the 6 or 7 seed....but that is the same situation many AFC teams are in.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

It helps that the Jets have had multiple first rounders and are always picking near the top of the draft. We'll see how it turns out. I'm not sold on 39 year old Rodgers. If he plays well, the Jets are dangerous. 

Lots of Packers fans pissed off from his press conference I’ll bet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Right.......that is the end of a response to your claims that the Bills division winning results are fraudulent because they haven't had to play elite QB's in their division.  

 

Which neglects the fact that the Chiefs have had a cake walk schedule of non-elite QB'd teams in their division since before Mahomes entered the league 6 years ago.   

 

I know you and @Zerovoltz come here because your Chiefs sites are full of garbage illogical posts from idiots who don't get the nuance of the game.   But you're not making much sense here either.  

 

You've determined that to your casual fans eye that the Bills are circling the drain and old.   So rather than realizing that the facts are that the Bills have beaten the Chiefs in Arrowhead two straight seasons and have had the highest point differential in the NFL in that time period you are making a broad assumption that they have cycled out simply because they didn't beat your team in the playoffs.

 

The reality is that they are still rightfully one of the strongest SB favorites.  Just like the Chiefs still were even though they blew a 24 point lead the AFCCG and got rid of Tyreek and Mathieu while there was a general perception that the AFC West had CLEARLY improved themselves across the board.......just like the Dolphins and Jets have!  

 

If you aren't worried about the Jets as a Chiefs fan then there certainly isn't any reason for the Bills to be. :lol: 

 

It’s simply not true that you were responding to me making a comment about the quality of the QBs the Bills have faced.  You brought that up out of thin air that people won’t respect the Jets or Dolphins until they win a division against an elite QB.  My response was that the Bills haven’t won a division with a good opposing QB.  I was responding to you, not the other way around.

 

Congrats on the regular season wins and point differential championships, though.  I’ve got to admit I’m a little confused as to why the Chiefs should be more concerned about the Jets than the Bills.  I mean, the Bills play the Jets twice a year.  The Chiefs do play them in NY this season, and that’s a very loseable game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billl said:

It’s simply not true that you were responding to me making a comment about the quality of the QBs the Bills have faced.  You brought that up out of thin air that people won’t respect the Jets or Dolphins until they win a division against an elite QB.  My response was that the Bills haven’t won a division with a good opposing QB.  I was responding to you, not the other way around.

 

Congrats on the regular season wins and point differential championships, though.  I’ve got to admit I’m a little confused as to why the Chiefs should be more concerned about the Jets than the Bills.  I mean, the Bills play the Jets twice a year.  The Chiefs do play them in NY this season, and that’s a very loseable game.

It's rhetorical judo, not karate.

Nice snide underhanded compliment to begin the second paragraph. Not sure who is ahead on points, but if it's a knife fight I'm going with BADOLBILZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Billl said:

It’s simply not true that you were responding to me making a comment about the quality of the QBs the Bills have faced.  You brought that up out of thin air that people won’t respect the Jets or Dolphins until they win a division against an elite QB.  My response was that the Bills haven’t won a division with a good opposing QB.  I was responding to you, not the other way around.

 

Congrats on the regular season wins and point differential championships, though.  I’ve got to admit I’m a little confused as to why the Chiefs should be more concerned about the Jets than the Bills.  I mean, the Bills play the Jets twice a year.  The Chiefs do play them in NY this season, and that’s a very loseable game.

I like how you have previously said that the Bills are a team you root for after the Chiefs, but then spew the vitriol starting the 2nd paragraph. You seem like nothing but a troll. I don't post a ton here, but it seems clear that if there is a classy Chiefs supporter on the board it is Zerovoltz and not you

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nucci said:

Hackett just has to call plays now, not manage the whole game. Much easier

He didn't call the offensive plays in Green Bay as HC Matt LaFleur called them.

 

I do believe his last stint as OC who called the offensive plays was with Jacksonville...where his ole bud St Doug fired him. 

 

EDIT: Oh, BTW Hackett called the offensive plays in Denver. Then after going 3-6, he had Klint Kubiak (the passing game coordinator) call the offensive plays. Meanwhile, it was noted that at some point during last season, QB Russell Wilson was calling plays from the Seattle playbook.

 

This season should be interesting. 

Edited by Nihilarian
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blowhard Rex Ryan thinks the Jets have the better QB. Here is the quote.

 

 

Wearing a Jets jacket and his dads superbowl III ring

Ryan threw the word “we” around a lot in his excitement on ESPN’s “Get Up”:

“This happens to be Super Bowl III, my dad’s Super Bowl ring right there. And why am I wearing it? Because the Jets are going. Watch out, everybody. Here come the Jets! Here come the Jets! Right now, we haven’t had this type of quarterback maybe ever, since [Joe] Nameth or whatever, or maybe ever. This is it. This is the missing piece for the New York Jets right here. Guess what all you fans in the AFC East: it ain’t no fun when the rabbit’s got the gun. Because we’ve got the gun right now, and it is on. Our defense is better than yours, our quarterback is better than yours. It is on ... Here we come Jets.”
 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going to need someone to explain how the Jets are dealing with a $107M cap hit next year.  
 

I’ll assume void years, as the most positive Jets fan likely hopes Rodgers plays this year and next.  
 

Pay him 50M next year and then take on 25M in dead cap for ‘24 and ‘25?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stevewin said:

All I know is a few days in and I've already had my limit of Rodgers/Jets media coverage :sick:

 

Wait until the season starts. It will be 24-7-365 singing the praises of the Jets from all of the media "experts". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Billl said:

Meanwhile, the Bills fielded a team of veterans who were a finished product week 1.  The problem is that they started to show their age as the season progressed.  Guys like Miller, White, Hyde, and Poyer were useless by the end of the year and they won’t be younger nor have less wear and tear on them next season.  So I guess it makes sense that you’d prefer to talk about week 3 of the regular season than the postseason, but I think we both know what presents a clearer picture of where each team is going forward.  That brings us back to my point in this thread.  The Jets have a solid roster loaded with young talent.  Adding an elite, HOF QB to the mix absolutely makes them serious contenders for the division.

Miller & Hyde suffered season ending injury's.  It happens to veteran players and young players alike - you know just like the Jets rookie RB. And White was coming back from a serious knee injury.  Let's see how effective right from the get go the Jets rookie RB is coming off his knee injury.

 

You are correct about the Bills fielding a veteran team at the start of last season and then sticking with them through the season.  This is a legitimate criticism of McD who is reluctant to give rookies/young players meaningful playing time. But I'm confident given his comments this off season and the example of the Chiefs using rookies all over the field that McD is going to change and play the young guys sooner and more often.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevewin said:

All I know is a few days in and I've already had my limit of Rodgers/Jets media coverage :sick:

It will only get worse and more obnoxious. But in the end I believe that it will go more along the lines of Denver & Wilson:  a lot of sound & fury swirling around the hype followed by a dismal under performing of bloated expectations.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Zerovoltz said:

For the record....I think the Jets are overrated...both before and after the Rodgers trade.  MAYBE if Rodgers has something left the jets grab the 6 or 7 seed....but that is the same situation many AFC teams are in.  

I agree.  Over the years I have seen plenty of teams with the talent to make deep playoff runs held back by bad QB play.  But those teams still would win 10 or 11 games while making early exits as a wildcard from the playoffs.  But the Jets went 7 - 10 with a miracle win over Cleveland.  If they were truly loaded with talent and had great coaching even with poor QB play they would have done better then that.

 

And like you I also think that with Rogers the Jets are at best a 9 to 10 win team that might sneak into the playoffs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CincyBillsFan said:

It will only get worse and more obnoxious. But in the end I believe that it will go more along the lines of Denver & Wilson:  a lot of sound & fury swirling around the hype followed by a dismal under performing of bloated expectations.

 

 

I don't think it will be as big a tire fire, but to me there's a real wildcard if things go a little sideways with Aaron starting to pout and the NYC media honeymoon ending adding more fuel to the fire.  Add in Hackett - it could really go downhill fast.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Locomark said:

Did anyone see the Rodgers cap hit got pushed to ‘24 and per CBSSporstline it’s ONE HUNDRED SEVEN MILLION for that year!!! Wow, they will be forced into eating $ on him for years. 

Yeah thats a huge deal for both them and GB, assuming that was part of the holdup in trade too.  GB now doesn't have to "eat" any money....and Jets take on the full portion of his contract.

 

Jets certainly restructure next year, but that cap burden is likely 2-3 years away from really hitting them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...