Jump to content

Brandon Beane Set To Double Down on 2022’s Big Disappointments


JohnNord

Recommended Posts

Beane is just making use of a psychological phenomenon known as the "Pygmalion Effect."  In layman's terms, the Pygmalion Effect says that if you treat people like winners, they tend to become winners.  If you treat them like losers, they tend to become losers.  The Pygmalion Effect has shown to be true in the classroom, in business, and in the military.  I don't know if it's been studied in sports but I assume it holds there.  If Beane doesn't specifically know about the term, "Pygmalion Effect," I'm sure he knows the concept through experience.  A lot of coaches grasp this intuitively and use it to their advantage.  

 

No matter the truth of the matter, I personally wouldn't want Beane to come out and say: "Brown, Oliver and Davis were all huge disappointments for us.  We tried to replace them during free agency but unfortunately nothing worked out.  So this year we're just going to do our best to work around their crappy play again."  Public negativity doesn't build up the team or the individual.  It tears them down.  

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsVet said:

 

Players get older, slower, don't heal from injuries as quickly, and generally are degrading every year.  It's the NFL.  Contracts are closer to expiring and new players must be integrated to replace those older players on the decline.  

 

Which means what worked last year is not a guarantee to succeed this coming season.   People don't like change, but if you're not improving you are regressing.  Status quo doesn't get it done in this world. 

That is far from completely true.  Most of the players are improving from year to year, not degrading.   They are getting the best diets and training in the world.   They are working at improving pretty much all year long, practicing new skills and improving old ones.   They don't reach their physical prime until 27 or 28.   

 

If you're running your team in an intelligent manner, you're expecting most of the players you have to improve.    The Bills have reasonable expectations, for example, that Brown, Bates, Dawkins, Davis, Shakir, Cook, Allen, and Hines will improve.   They have reasonable expectations that Oliver, Epenesa, Rousseau, Basham, Bernard, Elam, Benford will improve.   They expect all of those guys to play better in 2023 than in 22.   In addition, you have other guys who are true vets, and although they might continue to improve, they might begin to decline physically.  Still, you're happy to have them.   Hyde and Poyer and White and Morse are in that category.  You don't ignore the fact that you're going to have replace them, and you make plans, but their positions are not positions of need until they show that's true.  

 

I'll repeat something I heard J.J. Redick say.  When he was a junior in college, he didn't expect to be drafted into the NBA.  Then he got drafted and he made the NBA.  As a rookie, he asked a vet what he needed to do in the off-season, and the guy said "learn how to do something you can't do now."  Redick said that every year for the ten or so years he was in the NBA, every off-season he developed a new part of his game.  Shooting, with the off-hand, changes of direction, dribbling skills, whatever.  He said that if you don't keep improving your game, you're on your way out of the league.   

 

It's true in the NFL.   A couple of years ago, Diggs was working on developing his stopping muscles.   He said everyone works on speed out of the cut, but his trainers had explained that being able to stop in advance of the cut was equally important, so his off-season training regimen was working on those muscles. 

 

I have no doubt that guys like Gabriel Davis and Spencer Brown had very clear off-season programs that were designed to improve particular skills.   Neither one of those guys is yet facing is physical decline; on the contrary, both should be physically a little stronger, and also mentally stronger, in 2023.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Players get older, slower, don't heal from injuries as quickly, and generally are degrading every year.  It's the NFL.  Contracts are closer to expiring and new players must be integrated to replace those older players on the decline.  

 

Which means what worked last year is not a guarantee to succeed this coming season.   People don't like change, but if you're not improving you are regressing.  Status quo doesn't get it done in this world. 

Excellent points, but it’s not one way or the other. You definitely have to factor in the age of the roster. Since most players career’s are no more than five years, your returning roster’s status relies on where the majority of your starters are within that very narrow window. The Bills feel to be right around the league average. When considered as a whole they’re neither super young or aging out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Players get older, slower, don't heal from injuries as quickly, and generally are degrading every year.  It's the NFL.  Contracts are closer to expiring and new players must be integrated to replace those older players on the decline.  

 

Which means what worked last year is not a guarantee to succeed this coming season.   People don't like change, but if you're not improving you are regressing.  Status quo doesn't get it done in this world. 

It’s not even about change. It’s about roster talent.
 

Last year’s roster talent was good enough to get to 13 and three

 

Now we have to find players that are better than last year’s players not an easy task especially given the amount of money we had to spend

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Excellent points, but it’s not one way or the other. You definitely have to factor in the age of the roster. Since most players career’s are no more than five years, your returning roster’s status relies on where the majority of your starters are within that very narrow window. The Bills feel to be right around the league average. When considered as a whole they’re neither super young or aging out. 

 

I didn't make any observation about their roster's average age.  My point is, people expect the team to at least remain as good or perhaps improve from one season to the next.  It's not within the worldview that they could regress.  E.G.: They were 13-3 last season, not much changed...ergo, they'll be about that next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like all 3 of those guys. I'm surprised some want to move on from Brown, after what happened w/ Teller. He gets one more season where he hopefully isn't dealing w/ an injury situation.

 

Gabe Davis also had his own injury issues - and he has stepped up in both the 2021 and 2022 playoffs (his drop against Cincy notwithstanding). I'm also surprised how eager some fans are to move on from him.  He's got the talent, and I'm going to bet when Allen has better protection, he'll excel.

 

Oliver is the only player there that I'd be ready to move on from.  But again - he has the talent, and in a contract year, I think it's a good gamble to keep him on the team and starting.  He could have an Edmunds type of breakout year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

That is far from completely true.  Most of the players are improving from year to year, not degrading.   They are getting the best diets and training in the world.   They are working at improving pretty much all year long, practicing new skills and improving old ones.   They don't reach their physical prime until 27 or 28.   

 

If you're running your team in an intelligent manner, you're expecting most of the players you have to improve.    The Bills have reasonable expectations, for example, that Brown, Bates, Dawkins, Davis, Shakir, Cook, Allen, and Hines will improve.   They have reasonable expectations that Oliver, Epenesa, Rousseau, Basham, Bernard, Elam, Benford will improve.   They expect all of those guys to play better in 2023 than in 22.   In addition, you have other guys who are true vets, and although they might continue to improve, they might begin to decline physically.  Still, you're happy to have them.   Hyde and Poyer and White and Morse are in that category.  You don't ignore the fact that you're going to have replace them, and you make plans, but their positions are not positions of need until they show that's true.  

 

I'll repeat something I heard J.J. Redick say.  When he was a junior in college, he didn't expect to be drafted into the NBA.  Then he got drafted and he made the NBA.  As a rookie, he asked a vet what he needed to do in the off-season, and the guy said "learn how to do something you can't do now."  Redick said that every year for the ten or so years he was in the NBA, every off-season he developed a new part of his game.  Shooting, with the off-hand, changes of direction, dribbling skills, whatever.  He said that if you don't keep improving your game, you're on your way out of the league.   

 

It's true in the NFL.   A couple of years ago, Diggs was working on developing his stopping muscles.   He said everyone works on speed out of the cut, but his trainers had explained that being able to stop in advance of the cut was equally important, so his off-season training regimen was working on those muscles. 

 

I have no doubt that guys like Gabriel Davis and Spencer Brown had very clear off-season programs that were designed to improve particular skills.   Neither one of those guys is yet facing is physical decline; on the contrary, both should be physically a little stronger, and also mentally stronger, in 2023.  

 

I'm not as concerned about the technical aspects or training...it's a team game headlined by the QB.  The end result, i.e. the W-L record, is all that matters, not the new drills a player is running.  That's small picture stuff, which is often off-season puff piece stuff that fills the void fans have.  

 

The discussion centers around building a roster that can compete with now 2 teams in the AFC that own them in the post-season.  And, how to overcome their failures in those games.  Because if the wheel gets spun on draft day and it magically ends up taking another defensive player or two highly...you're not helping the QB and it's Ted Thompson v2.0 happening all over again.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsVet said:

The only doubling-down on disappointment would be using another premium asset for McD's defense.  

 

Coming off the Cincinnati loss going defense again is like a business revising an aging product line despite their opponents innovating and gaining market share.  

 

If Beane concludes from the Cincinnati and Kansas City losses the last 2 years that they need more defense the result is they'll continue losing track meets against top-end NFL offenses.   

 

There's stubborn and then there's stupid.  McBeane are trending away from the former and pointing more toward the latter if they go defense in RD1.  

 

 

 

That metaphor makes zero sense.

 

The Bills D was crippled with injuries, absolutely a different defense than what they'd have been if even ordinarily healthy. 

 

And yet the defense held Cincy to their average scoring total for the year. Both sides were bad, but the problem in that game was the offense. The offense was absolutely awful, though unlike the defense they were healthy. The offense scored ten freaking points and yet nobody on here seems willing to blame anyone but the defense. 

 

Spending more premium assets on the D just makes sense. As does spending them on the offense. Comparing this D to an aging product line is ridiculous. 

 

We need help - premium help - on both sides. If you're going to ignore all of the rest of the year and go from the Cincy game, the offense was the one that played far far below the level that could have been reasonably expected of them.

 

And it wasn't that Cincy beat up the offense because they were just not as good. The offense had an absolutely horrible day. These things happen, and unfortunately they did.

 

This team needs to use premium assets on both sides of the LOS.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shaw66 said:

I think a lot of fans tend to panic about this stuff.  First, as I've said a thousand times, this league is less about talent and more about coaching than people understand.   When you get to the right tackle, you're talking about guys who are not among the 20 best tackles in the league, because they're all left tackles.  When you get down below the top 20, you're talking about guys whose talent looks pretty much like the talent of the guys around him.   It's an ordinary bell curve distribution, and the difference between the 30th and the 40th best tackle in the league is not very great.   Same as the difference between the 30th and 40th best receiver.   Davis caught a lot of passes for a lot of yards last season, and many fans fail to recognize that his production puts him solidly in that 30th-40th best receiver category.   That's a good #2 to have.  

 

Second, fans rarely really understand how good or bad a player is.  We simply don't have the information or experience to evaluate guys the way the coaches do.   When I hear Beane on Brown, what I hear him saying is that they know his development, they've watched his development, and they think he's going to be better.   I have to trust that judgment, because I really don't know the first thing about what the Bills expect of their right tackle and how close he is. 

 

Third, fans in these conversations fail to recognize that players really do improve.   A guy like Brown, especially, with no quality high school experience and third-tier college experience and coaching, coming into a position where even the best college players are unprepared for what the NFL expects, simply is not going to be the player you want when he first steps on the field.  If he's a McDermott type, he's working and studying daily, and we haven't seen his full development yet.  

 

Fourth, when Beane says our starting middle linebacker is on the roster, he's saying something that's literally true today.   He's not saying that guy WILL be the starter; he's saying that if they had to name the roster today, the only guys they have to choose from are the guys who are on the roster.   Beane ALWAYS says he's looking to improve the roster at every position, and every player (except Allen) knows that he's always at risk of being replaced.   Dion Dawkins knows the Bills could go OT in the first round, and the guy they draft could challenge not only Brown but Dawkins, as well.  Davis, too, knows that the Bills could take a receiver in the first, and that receiver could be the eventual replacement for Diggs.   If that's who he is, he also could be the immediate replacement at #2.  The real point of what Beane says is that although he might take a linebacker or a receiver at #1, they've determined that they don't have a true need at those positions.   That's what allows the Bills to go BPA.  

 

I don't think what Beane has said to date should be understood that any position on the roster is safe. 

 

That said, we've seen and heard him enough not to expect that he won't go pure BPA in the first round.   I think they have to be looking for a tackle or a linebacker, and they will move to get one.  Possibly a receiver.   And, given their history, I won't be surprised to see them take a defensive lineman.

 

Strongly agree with this post.  I'll add that Beane and McDermott are both pretty straight shooters - it's very rare to catch either in a lie, and Beane especially is more forthcoming on the draft process than a lot of GMs.  But all that means is, "The words Beane says are true," not "Beane is giving us the whole truth."  We heard some similar rhetoric about MLB prior to the Allen/Edmunds draft.  Reading between the lines, I thought it was pretty clear that once they got their QB, whatever top resources they had left would go towards MLB (the QB of the defense).

 

I'm less confident this time around, because there's a chance that someone like Baylon Spector has been a massive surprise in offseason workouts, and they're willing to roll the dice with him.  But I think it's likely that they're targeting an Edmunds replacement early in the draft.  My best guess would be that they go offense in round 1, and then target MLB in round 2.  Quite possibly by trading up - that would be very on brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we don’t draft a tackle in the first 3 rounds I’m going to lose it.  There will some solid prospects.  Dawkins contract has 2 years left and his play vs the bengals was atrocious.  
 

They say that Josh needs to run less, slide more and not play as reckless.  Well…. They can certainly thank Spencer Brown for Josh running more and putting his body at risk. This will be 3 years in a row we’re trusting a bum (and other bums) to protect our franchise QB.  

 

We have Josh Allen-  protect him and extend his career rather than shortening it.
 

If Brown works out as Beane would hope, we can move one to LT or trade one.   Everyone wants good OTs.  
 

If Brown is the guy we’ve seen in his 1st 2 years, we’ll still have a chance to win the Super Bowl with a rookie RT

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shaw66 said:

That is far from completely true.  Most of the players are improving from year to year, not degrading.   They are getting the best diets and training in the world.   They are working at improving pretty much all year long, practicing new skills and improving old ones.   They don't reach their physical prime until 27 or 28.   

 

If you're running your team in an intelligent manner, you're expecting most of the players you have to improve.    The Bills have reasonable expectations, for example, that Brown, Bates, Dawkins, Davis, Shakir, Cook, Allen, and Hines will improve.   They have reasonable expectations that Oliver, Epenesa, Rousseau, Basham, Bernard, Elam, Benford will improve.   They expect all of those guys to play better in 2023 than in 22.   In addition, you have other guys who are true vets, and although they might continue to improve, they might begin to decline physically.  Still, you're happy to have them.   Hyde and Poyer and White and Morse are in that category.  You don't ignore the fact that you're going to have replace them, and you make plans, but their positions are not positions of need until they show that's true.  

 

I'll repeat something I heard J.J. Redick say.  When he was a junior in college, he didn't expect to be drafted into the NBA.  Then he got drafted and he made the NBA.  As a rookie, he asked a vet what he needed to do in the off-season, and the guy said "learn how to do something you can't do now."  Redick said that every year for the ten or so years he was in the NBA, every off-season he developed a new part of his game.  Shooting, with the off-hand, changes of direction, dribbling skills, whatever.  He said that if you don't keep improving your game, you're on your way out of the league.   

 

It's true in the NFL.   A couple of years ago, Diggs was working on developing his stopping muscles.   He said everyone works on speed out of the cut, but his trainers had explained that being able to stop in advance of the cut was equally important, so his off-season training regimen was working on those muscles. 

 

I have no doubt that guys like Gabriel Davis and Spencer Brown had very clear off-season programs that were designed to improve particular skills.   Neither one of those guys is yet facing is physical decline; on the contrary, both should be physically a little stronger, and also mentally stronger, in 2023.  

 

 

 

Nice.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

32 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

I still think there is a chance that we go defensive tackle at 27
 

Oliver in his last year

 

We have no defense of tackles that are signed pasted this year

 

 

Me too. Not that we definitely will, but that we might. 

 

I'm becoming a Mazi fan. 

 

Seems like the obvious areas of need, such as MLB and WR, and maybe some areas of the OL, stand a decent chance of having lost the best players and/or not having good value around 27. If theBills don't trade back, DL seems one of the best alternatives to me, though certainly not the only alternative.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cash said:

 

Reading between the lines, I thought it was pretty clear that once they got their QB, whatever top resources they had left would go towards MLB (the QB of the defense).

 

I think it's likely that they're targeting an Edmunds replacement early in the draft.  My best guess would be that they go offense in round 1, and then target MLB in round 2.  Quite possibly by trading up - that would be very on brand.

On brand is right.

 

One minor point on the Edmunds history:  Beane said that in preparing for that draft, he considered all kinds of trade up scenarios, both for the QB and for other positions, but he had not considered a scenario where he traded up to get Allen and still had a shot at Edmunds.  That is, he assumed Edmunds would not be available to him with the resources he had left after trading up for Allen.  He did exactly what you said, except that he was surprised to find he had enough resources to get Edmunds.  

 

I think we have to remember that the Bills put a lot of stock, more than most teams, in what they learn about these guys in interviews.  They certainly will have the mlb prospects ranked by their strict physical abilities, but Sanders and Campbell (and probably Simpson) likely meet all the minimum physical requirements they're looking for.   If Beane moves on one of these guys, it will be because they are convinced his head is on straight in the ways that McDermott wants - team player, growth mindset, intense competitive desire, etc.  For better or worse, it's the bias they've built into their evaluation of players.   

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JohnNord said:

I took another listen to the Brandon Beane interviews after the season and at the combine.  What stuck out to me was his defense of players than were much maligned by the fan base.  
 

In my opinion, the three of his former draft picks who didn’t “take the next step” in 2022, are being counted on to “take the next step” in 2023.  
 

This season will prove to see if The Bills faith in these players will be rewarded. 
 

Spencer Brown

Brown was the Bills worst lineman at times in 2022 which is notable considering how poorly Roger Saffold played.  
 

Still, Beane was effusive in his praise and defense of Brown.  He point blank said he had confidence in him and listed some reason for his poor performance in 2022.
 


These comments make me think that the Bills won’t invest a high draft pick at tackle and will again roll the dice that Brown greatly improves.  


Gabe Davis

Like Brown, Beane was quick to defend Gabe citing “unrealistic expectations” from his amazing playoff performance and a numbers of injuries. 

 

Losing faith in Davis as a true WR2, many fans wanted the Bills to make a big move.  Some foolish fans convinced themselves to believe the lying huckster on Twitter “ErieCountyBills” who said they were trading for DeAndre Hopkins.  All false hope.

 

It’s doubtful the Bills make a huge move at WR like OBJ or Hopkins given the context,    Because Davis is a FA in 2024 I can see a scenario where they draft a WR in the first 3 rounds.  But again, when it comes to WR2 in 2023, the Bills are putting their faith in Davis to improve yet again.  
 

Ed Oliver

Same story with Ed Oliver.   Nice player.  Not a difference maker unless he plays against a BAD offensive line…or on Thanksgiving.  

 

Beane again defended Oliver mentioning how the things he does go unnoticed and that he fought through injuries.  He did mention that he left “more meat on the bone.”  But Beane could have said this during any of Oliver’s seasons in Buffalo.  
 

Because of his guaranteed 5th year option, The Bills likely didn’t have a choice but to have faith in Oliver.  But I can definitely see the Bills use a higher draft selection on a DT given the contract situation.  
 

The concern for me, is that we’ve seen the Bills make similar excuses for players in the past and it hasn’t worked out (Star, Cody Ford, Zach Moss, AJ Epinesa, Boogie Basham).  IMO a big part of next season will be whether the faith the Bills placed in these former draft picks will pay off…

There's a saying that says: “If you listen to the fans, you’ll find yourself sitting with them”. He has a job to do, and it's not taking input by fans on roster moves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

That metaphor makes zero sense.

 

The Bills D was crippled with injuries, absolutely a different defense than what they'd have been if even ordinarily healthy. 

 

And yet the defense held Cincy to their average scoring total for the year. Both sides were bad, but the problem in that game was the offense. The offense was absolutely awful, though unlike the defense they were healthy. The offense scored ten freaking points and yet nobody on here seems willing to blame anyone but the defense. 

 

Spending more premium assets on the D just makes sense. As does spending them on the offense. Comparing this D to an aging product line is ridiculous. 

 

We need help - premium help - on both sides. If you're going to ignore all of the rest of the year and go from the Cincy game, the offense was the one that played far far below the level that could have been reasonably expected of them.

 

And it wasn't that Cincy beat up the offense because they were just not as good. The offense had an absolutely horrible day. These things happen, and unfortunately they did.

 

This team needs to use premium assets on both sides of the LOS.

 

Cincinnati's OL was crippled with injuries so it was something of a draw there injury-wise.  Somehow, Bills fans always forget that.  :lol:  The other excuse, predictably, was citing their lack of cap room for not improving the offense as much this off-season.  It's hilarious the grand canyon level reach people are making to defend them.  Or, that McBeane didn't create that problem themselves. :lol:

 

Most of you rubber-stamping the McD vision of NFL football just throw up mental roadblocks and go full automaton whenever someone asks about the value of taking defense at this point in McBeane's football management lifecycle.        

 

Besides, how does Cincinnati manage to go to the SB and then back to an AFC Championship?  I guess it was because they had JaMarr Chase as Beane said in January. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Cincinnati's OL was crippled with injuries so it was something of a draw there injury-wise.  Somehow, Bills fans always forget that.  :lol:  The other excuse, predictably, was citing their lack of cap room for not improving the offense as much this off-season.  It's hilarious the grand canyon level reach people are making to defend them.  Or, that McBeane didn't create that problem themselves. :lol:

 

Most of you rubber-stamping the McD vision of NFL football just throw up mental roadblocks and go full automaton whenever someone asks about the value of taking defense at this point in McBeane's football management lifecycle.        

 

Besides, how does Cincinnati manage to go to the SB and then back to an AFC Championship?  I guess it was because they had JaMarr Chase as Beane said in January. :thumbsup:

 

 

Nonsense. The injuries were NOT just DL for the Bills, though we did miss probably three of our four best defenders in Von Miller, Hyde and Da'Quan. Did the Cincy offense miss three of their best players? Two? One?

 

In fact, the Bills were in much worse condition. Poyer played but he was a shell of himself. White wasn't close to his best. And Jordan Phillips was playing with one arm. We had to give significant snaps to Jaquan Johnson, Dean Marlowe and Cam Lewis. Even Siran Neal played a few downs on D.

 

If you think they were in as bad a shape as we were, you are absolutely kidding yourself.

 

And speaking of kidding yourself, ignoring cap problems as a limiting factor is more of the same. 

 

 

 

 

As for the remainder of your post, it's not really relevant to my post which you answered, or even very understandable in paragraph 3 . But whatever. Guess I'm glad you're amusing yourself.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JohnNord said:

I took another listen to the Brandon Beane interviews after the season and at the combine.  What stuck out to me was his defense of players than were much maligned by the fan base.  
 

In my opinion, the three of his former draft picks who didn’t “take the next step” in 2022, are being counted on to “take the next step” in 2023.  
 

This season will prove to see if The Bills faith in these players will be rewarded. 
 

Spencer Brown

Brown was the Bills worst lineman at times in 2022 which is notable considering how poorly Roger Saffold played.  
 

Still, Beane was effusive in his praise and defense of Brown.  He point blank said he had confidence in him and listed some reason for his poor performance in 2022.
 


These comments make me think that the Bills won’t invest a high draft pick at tackle and will again roll the dice that Brown greatly improves.  


Gabe Davis

Like Brown, Beane was quick to defend Gabe citing “unrealistic expectations” from his amazing playoff performance and a numbers of injuries. 

 

Losing faith in Davis as a true WR2, many fans wanted the Bills to make a big move.  Some foolish fans convinced themselves to believe the lying huckster on Twitter “ErieCountyBills” who said they were trading for DeAndre Hopkins.  All false hope.

 

It’s doubtful the Bills make a huge move at WR like OBJ or Hopkins given the context,    Because Davis is a FA in 2024 I can see a scenario where they draft a WR in the first 3 rounds.  But again, when it comes to WR2 in 2023, the Bills are putting their faith in Davis to improve yet again.  
 

Ed Oliver

Same story with Ed Oliver.   Nice player.  Not a difference maker unless he plays against a BAD offensive line…or on Thanksgiving.  

 

Beane again defended Oliver mentioning how the things he does go unnoticed and that he fought through injuries.  He did mention that he left “more meat on the bone.”  But Beane could have said this during any of Oliver’s seasons in Buffalo.  
 

Because of his guaranteed 5th year option, The Bills likely didn’t have a choice but to have faith in Oliver.  But I can definitely see the Bills use a higher draft selection on a DT given the contract situation.  
 

The concern for me, is that we’ve seen the Bills make similar excuses for players in the past and it hasn’t worked out (Star, Cody Ford, Zach Moss, AJ Epinesa, Boogie Basham).  IMO a big part of next season will be whether the faith the Bills placed in these former draft picks will pay off…

Maybe these coaches have more information and more insight on their trajectory than fans, doesn’t mean they’ll ultimately be correct in their beliefs bout can explain why they’re being given more opportunity for success.

 

 Much like Allen in year one and two, Brown’s overall performance leaves much to be desired but also like Allen, SB has flashes of athleticism and dominant reps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Cincinnati's OL was crippled with injuries so it was something of a draw there injury-wise.  Somehow, Bills fans always forget that.  :lol:  The other excuse, predictably, was citing their lack of cap room for not improving the offense as much this off-season.  It's hilarious the grand canyon level reach people are making to defend them.  Or, that McBeane didn't create that problem themselves. :lol:

 

Most of you rubber-stamping the McD vision of NFL football just throw up mental roadblocks and go full automaton whenever someone asks about the value of taking defense at this point in McBeane's football management lifecycle.        

 

Besides, how does Cincinnati manage to go to the SB and then back to an AFC Championship?  I guess it was because they had JaMarr Chase as Beane said in January. :thumbsup:

So, we had two teams with serious injury issues play and they won. Get over it. You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. It's hard to improve on the 2nd highest scoring offense in the entire league. Rubber-stamping, mental roadblocks?! I guess no one can disagree with you. OK. I like McBeane's football ,management lifecycle. No rubber stamping or mental roadblocks here. If you all are mad we didn't win a SB, news flash: NEITHER DID CINCY. So you're comparing us to a non-super bowl winner. What good does that do, if winning it all is the end all? Cincy fans, along with you, should be questioning their GM too. Philly too?!? Quit acting like NE fans in their heydays. You are not entitled to squat. Enjoy the ride or don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

A hopeful comparison for Brown would be Josh Allen and Dawson Knox's ascension in year three.  Extremely athletic prospects coming into the NFL relatively raw.  Brown fits that mold but can you bank on that leap?  Given his injury history I wouldn't hesitate to draft an OT in the first round if the right one falls to us.  If not then I think Beane takes that leap of faith.

Agreed and your comments about athletic freaks is very spot on for Beane.

 

Looks at the freakishly athletic, large and young (and the most overused expression of all time "raw"), all these guys fall into that category imo:  Josh Allen, Spencer Brown, Greg Rouseau, Tremaine Edmunds, Knox, Kaiir Elam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

If we don’t draft a tackle in the first 3 rounds I’m going to lose it.  There will some solid prospects.  Dawkins contract has 2 years left and his play vs the bengals was atrocious.  
 

They say that Josh needs to run less, slide more and not play as reckless.  Well…. They can certainly thank Spencer Brown for Josh running more and putting his body at risk. This will be 3 years in a row we’re trusting a bum (and other bums) to protect our franchise QB.  

 

We have Josh Allen-  protect him and extend his career rather than shortening it.
 

If Brown works out as Beane would hope, we can move one to LT or trade one.   Everyone wants good OTs.  
 

If Brown is the guy we’ve seen in his 1st 2 years, we’ll still have a chance to win the Super Bowl with a rookie RT

 

Couldn't agree more with you.  The only thing I'll add is they need to do it now as next year a Center will be needed to be drafted most likely.

Josh deserves a solid center.  I have no problem with Bates as backup, but I'd much rather see a full-time college center taking over from

Morse.  There's a lot that goes on between the ears at that position and I don't want any hopeful quick fixes.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well some players have bad seasons i would be willing to bet that if you ask any of them they would say that hell the Bills went to 4 SB's & didn't win 1 so i guess that team was filled with a bunch of losers . 

 

Brown had a back injury that requires surgery if i remember correctly & he didn't get any reps in OTA's or the pre season so that very well could have had something to do with it & the fact that he had a different O line coach with different blocking schemes to learn with out reps didn't help either .

 

Gabe was injured for a time too sure he wasn't his normal catch anything thrown his way i'll give you that but Beane is referencing how he is as a team guy & his work ethic & has the confidence in him unlike some that he will work his ass off to not have the same thing happen & if it continues then i'd say he probably will find another to do better & take his place .

 

But because he had some drops & his consistency wasn't up to par for 1 season i wouldn't just get rid of him because Josh has developed a bit of chemistry with him & hopefully he will get better this year also there was a new OC last year that may be part of it different scheme with different plays . 

 

Oliver well now as a first round draft draft pick i was hoping that they could trade him & get something for him because he has shown although making flash plays from time to time his consistency is not first round at all .

 

But you can't just throw them all out because of a bad season as Beane does you need to have faith that they will work hard to turn their play around & help them to a SB ...

Edited by T master
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

No, it's not typical coach speak. It just isn't. 

 

Typical coach speak is as vague and unspecific as possible. "He gives it 100% all the time. Tough kid. Gives it his all. We like him. The whole defense has been very very ...." That's coach speak. 

 

On the other hand, when Beane is specific and long-winded with his praise on a guy, he means it.

 

And again, Beane is perfectly comfortable NOT supporting his guys 100% when they have a problem. Remember his thing a couple of years ago about how nobody was game-planning to stop our TE room? He's got zero problem expressing dissatisfaction. No, he's not going to say somebody is as lazy as the guard dog at a slaughterhouse, or that someone's dumb or that someone just doesn't have talent. 

 

But he's perfectly capable of expressing dis-satisfaction or that a guy still needs to improve. Does it reasonably often.

 

 

That’s what some people don’t seem to understand.  It wasn’t that he defended them…it’s how strongly he worded his defense and then how he seemingly backed up those words but not bringing in competition for those spots.  
 

Of course, he could draft players at these positions but it would be a big upset to see any of these players unseated by a rookie in 2023.  
 

He is once again, electing to put his faith in his players.  It didn’t work out last season.  Time will tell what happens this year.  

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

Exactly.  Wish I could like this x10

Hey Hapless Bills Fan, why are you ignoring my DM’s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JohnNord said:

I took another listen to the Brandon Beane interviews after the season and at the combine.  What stuck out to me was his defense of players than were much maligned by the fan base.  
 

In my opinion, the three of his former draft picks who didn’t “take the next step” in 2022, are being counted on to “take the next step” in 2023.  
 

This season will prove to see if The Bills faith in these players will be rewarded. 
 

Spencer Brown

Brown was the Bills worst lineman at times in 2022 which is notable considering how poorly Roger Saffold played.  
 

Still, Beane was effusive in his praise and defense of Brown.  He point blank said he had confidence in him and listed some reason for his poor performance in 2022.
 


These comments make me think that the Bills won’t invest a high draft pick at tackle and will again roll the dice that Brown greatly improves.  


Gabe Davis

Like Brown, Beane was quick to defend Gabe citing “unrealistic expectations” from his amazing playoff performance and a numbers of injuries. 

 

Losing faith in Davis as a true WR2, many fans wanted the Bills to make a big move.  Some foolish fans convinced themselves to believe the lying huckster on Twitter “ErieCountyBills” who said they were trading for DeAndre Hopkins.  All false hope.

 

It’s doubtful the Bills make a huge move at WR like OBJ or Hopkins given the context,    Because Davis is a FA in 2024 I can see a scenario where they draft a WR in the first 3 rounds.  But again, when it comes to WR2 in 2023, the Bills are putting their faith in Davis to improve yet again.  
 

Ed Oliver

Same story with Ed Oliver.   Nice player.  Not a difference maker unless he plays against a BAD offensive line…or on Thanksgiving.  

 

Beane again defended Oliver mentioning how the things he does go unnoticed and that he fought through injuries.  He did mention that he left “more meat on the bone.”  But Beane could have said this during any of Oliver’s seasons in Buffalo.  
 

Because of his guaranteed 5th year option, The Bills likely didn’t have a choice but to have faith in Oliver.  But I can definitely see the Bills use a higher draft selection on a DT given the contract situation.  
 

The concern for me, is that we’ve seen the Bills make similar excuses for players in the past and it hasn’t worked out (Star, Cody Ford, Zach Moss, AJ Epinesa, Boogie Basham).  IMO a big part of next season will be whether the faith the Bills placed in these former draft picks will pay off…

Other players and coaches know which players are playing through injuries, and what they are actually capable of when they get healthy.

 

 We can not pretend to know what everyone around the team, sees them go through in practice, fighting through the pain. I trust Beane’s assessments, and therefore, whomever he chooses to bet on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Couldn't agree more with you.  The only thing I'll add is they need to do it now as next year a Center will be needed to be drafted most likely.

Josh deserves a solid center.  I have no problem with Bates as backup, but I'd much rather see a full-time college center taking over from

Morse.  There's a lot that goes on between the ears at that position and I don't want any hopeful quick fixes.


I agree but I really get the impression that the Bills don’t see OL as much of a need as many of use fans do.  The comments about Brown really seem to reinforce that.  I feel that they are good with him at RT. 

9 minutes ago, T master said:

Well some players have bad seasons i would be willing to bet that if you ask any of them they would say that hell the Bills went to 4 SB's & didn't win 1 so i guess that team was filled with a bunch of losers . 

 

Brown had a back injury that requires surgery if i remember correctly & he didn't get any reps in OTA's or the pre season so that very well could have had something to do with it & the fact that he had a different O line coach with different blocking schemes to learn with out reps didn't help either .

 

Gabe was injured for a time too sure he wasn't his normal catch anything thrown his way i'll give you that but Beane is referencing how he is as a team guy & his work ethic & has the confidence in him unlike some that he will work his ass off to not have the same thing happen & if it continues then i'd say he probably will find another to do better & take his place .

 

But because he had some drops & his consistency wasn't up to par for 1 season i wouldn't just get rid of him because Josh has developed a bit of chemistry with him & hopefully he will get better this year also there was a new OC last year that may be part of it different scheme with different plays . 

 

Oliver well now as a first round draft draft pick i was hoping that they could trade him & get something for him because he has shown although making flash plays from time to time his consistency is not first round at all .

 

But you can't just throw them all out because of a bad season as Beane does you need to have faith that they will work hard to turn their play around & help them to a SB ...


You are missing the point of this thread.  I’m not suggesting to get rid of these players.  I am questioning whether more should have been done to add competition to their spots.  

Instead he is once again showing a lot of faith in these positions. 

 

As far as player progress, it’s not always an upward trajectory.  Sometimes players have a down year(s), before breaking out.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, HurlyBurly51 said:

Even worse imo is their statements that Edmunds replacement is already on the roster🤦

I'm still waiting for a link to that exact quote ...what I have  read is that the likebackers currently on the roster will COMPETE for the starting MLB,but I didn't see that Beane actually said the new MLB is already on the roster.

Why would he say that before the draft and the end of free agency? He wouldn't limit his options by ruling out an addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JohnNord said:

I took another listen to the Brandon Beane interviews after the season and at the combine.  What stuck out to me was his defense of players than were much maligned by the fan base.  
 

In my opinion, the three of his former draft picks who didn’t “take the next step” in 2022, are being counted on to “take the next step” in 2023.  
 

This season will prove to see if The Bills faith in these players will be rewarded. 
 

Spencer Brown

Brown was the Bills worst lineman at times in 2022 which is notable considering how poorly Roger Saffold played.  
 

Still, Beane was effusive in his praise and defense of Brown.  He point blank said he had confidence in him and listed some reason for his poor performance in 2022.
 


These comments make me think that the Bills won’t invest a high draft pick at tackle and will again roll the dice that Brown greatly improves.  


Gabe Davis

Like Brown, Beane was quick to defend Gabe citing “unrealistic expectations” from his amazing playoff performance and a numbers of injuries. 

 

Losing faith in Davis as a true WR2, many fans wanted the Bills to make a big move.  Some foolish fans convinced themselves to believe the lying huckster on Twitter “ErieCountyBills” who said they were trading for DeAndre Hopkins.  All false hope.

 

It’s doubtful the Bills make a huge move at WR like OBJ or Hopkins given the context,    Because Davis is a FA in 2024 I can see a scenario where they draft a WR in the first 3 rounds.  But again, when it comes to WR2 in 2023, the Bills are putting their faith in Davis to improve yet again.  
 

Ed Oliver

Same story with Ed Oliver.   Nice player.  Not a difference maker unless he plays against a BAD offensive line…or on Thanksgiving.  

 

Beane again defended Oliver mentioning how the things he does go unnoticed and that he fought through injuries.  He did mention that he left “more meat on the bone.”  But Beane could have said this during any of Oliver’s seasons in Buffalo.  
 

Because of his guaranteed 5th year option, The Bills likely didn’t have a choice but to have faith in Oliver.  But I can definitely see the Bills use a higher draft selection on a DT given the contract situation.  
 

The concern for me, is that we’ve seen the Bills make similar excuses for players in the past and it hasn’t worked out (Star, Cody Ford, Zach Moss, AJ Epinesa, Boogie Basham).  IMO a big part of next season will be whether the faith the Bills placed in these former draft picks will pay off…

Great post, one that needs to be discussed at great lengths. When I think of the position(s) that we’re addressed heavily (DL) and/or dealt with with poor results (OL & RB) one comes to the conclusion that Beane and/or McDermott failed and failed greatly imo. Outside of Von Miller one can’t be too thrilled with the results along that DL and the OL, outside of paying huge money (hopefully all of the restructures made it more plausible), for an above average Center the OL is nothing special, actually it’s one of the weak positions on this roster. As far as RBs go, I don’t think that I have to even say anything about this position. The only thing that may become redeemable for Beane on this position is that it’s way too early to get a bead on Cook, time will reveal his actually worth. If he was overwhelmingly the answer than there wouldn’t be any kind of discussion on the Bills drafting a RB potentially in the first round.

 

Thanks for posting this, it was well written and truly a topic that is worthy of being discussed much more than it already has been.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

That’s where experience, repetition, and coaching come into play. Your same sentiments could apply to a host of NFL players who played in lesser conferences in college. The one thing I see in Brown is a natural aggressiveness. He doesn’t appear to be lazy, especially in run blocking. I’m hoping he can be taught better technique to use his length in pass protection. We shall see. (By the way my biggest concern on the O Line is in the middle. I’m fed up with watching our Guards totally whiff in pass protection only to have Josh run for his life…or watch our RB get swallowed up right after taking a handoff. Pathetic.)


I also think Morse is overrated.  He frequently gets bullrushed right into Josh’s face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BobbyC81 said:


I also think Morse is overrated.  He frequently gets bullrushed right into Josh’s face.

I’m a bit hot and cold on Morse. I sometimes give the Center a pass since he’s got one hand on the ball, calls out signals, and has a defender right in his face on every play. Given all of that I don’t doubt that I’d get ‘bull rushed’ from time to time as well. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...