Jump to content

NFL Week 8: Packers at Bills - post game thread


BuffaloBill

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

Normally Colin has some pretty solid takes on teams, including the Bills, hammering them about losing close games and being too Josh-centric when running the ball which he was right about.

 

However...

 

Today he is hammering the Bills about "trash talking" when we were up 24-7, "lets you back into the game" and then goes on to praise the 49ers vs. the Rams who "have been in a Super Bowl unlike the Bills".

 

1. The "trash talking" began between Alexander and Diggs IN THE TUNNEL before the game even started.

2. Douglas threw Diggs to the ground, which really set off the chippiness and yapping.

3. The 49ers beat the Rams up just like we did in LA and NEVER let the Rams "back in the game"

4. The Dolphins, Ravens and Cowboys have let teams back in the game a lot and silence...

 

It really ticks me off that he is misrepresenting the Bills and what happened last night and makes me question if he did this on purpose or not. Did he not follow the events or was he too busy sipping wine on the back patio during most of the game?!?!

 

He also talked about is immediate reaction to the Bills-Packers game on his Volume podcast thing being that we don't have a rungame, which makes you wonder if he actually watched the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

OR it could be Bills homers not being able to accept any criticisms of the team, which is the far more likely answer, especially when we're talking about this board.

Yet you are here with your infinite wisdom,  waiting for the team to fail so you can say "I told you so".  You are so enlightened🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Edited by Dablitzkrieg
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

OR it could be Bills homers not being able to accept any criticisms of the team, which is the far more likely answer, especially when we're talking about this board.

 

Here's some criticism for you buddy. Your whole dissertation has been to declare the Bills defensive strategy was a failure for allowing the Packers to run. They should have put in heavier packages and made the Packers throw.

 

But the Packers scored 0.0 points running, and they scored 14 points passing. 

 

So maybe you aren't as smart as you think you are, since you wanted the Packers to do more of what scored and less of what didn't score. 

 

  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

Yet you are here with your infinite wisdom,  waiting for the team to fail so you can say "I told you so".  You are so enlightened🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You are exhibit A, hoss.

 

I know you hate it, but I have as much right to express my opinion here as you do and if you don't like it, tough crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big Blitz said:

We were almost a mirror image of the Eagles Monday night v the Cowboys.  
 

 

I really don’t think the fans should be making much of a bad half in a game we were in total control of. 

 

The status of Poyer's elbow is the only thing to be concerned about after that game. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Here's some criticism for you buddy. Your whole dissertation has been to declare the Bills defensive strategy was a failure for allowing the Packers to run. They should have put in heavier packages and made the Packers throw.

 

But the Packers scored 0.0 points running, and they scored 14 points passing. 

 

So maybe you aren't as smart as you think you are, since you wanted the Packers to do more of what scored and less of what didn't score. 

 

It's not just this thread, had a two page conversation essentially saying the same thing and my dude's heels are so far in the mud they're sticking out in China. 

Edited by Bruffalo
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Here's some criticism for you buddy. Your whole dissertation has been to declare the Bills defensive strategy was a failure for allowing the Packers to run. They should have put in heavier packages and made the Packers throw.

 

But the Packers scored 0.0 points running, and they scored 14 points passing. 

 

So maybe you aren't as smart as you think you are, since you wanted the Packers to do more of what scored and less of what didn't score. 

 

So they scored against the Nickel passing AND ran on it too.  Maybe you aren't as smart as you think YOU are.

Edited by Billz4ever
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billz4ever said:

So they scored against the Nickel passing AND ran on it too.  Maybe you aren't as smart as you think YOU are.

 

Yeah, 17 points all game.

 

The Bills. 

 

They scored 24 points,

 

In the first half.

 

PS how many points did the Packers score on their 28 runs? 

 

ZERO POINT ZERO MR BLUTARSKI!

 

 

Edited by Motorin'
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billz4ever said:

So they scored against the Nickel passing AND ran on it too.  Maybe you aren't as smart as you think YOU are.

They didn't win though.  They didn't come close to winning.  The running only hurt them ultimately. Isn't that the most important thing?  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Yeah, 17 points all game.

 

The Bills. 

 

They scored 24 points,

 

In the first half.

 

PS how many points did the Packers score on their 28 runs? 

 

ZERO POINT ZERO MR BLUTARSKI!

 

 

And the Packers suck so what's your point MR BLUTARSKI?

 

See how stupid that looks?  🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

And the Packers suck so what's your point MR BLUTARSKI?

 

See how stupid that looks?  🤡

The logic in these posts are car crashes.  I can't help but gawk. 

 

Please call Schopp and the Bulldog right now.  I would love to listen to your conversation with them. 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said:

He's an idiot with a flamethrower.  I admit to listening to him occasionally, but you have to accept that he's going to just spout off asinine things from time to time.

CC is snap shot of info guy. For some reason Turico suggested Diggs started the stuff in the tunnel and stayed with that theme. Even suggesting with no evidence the Bills sideline said something to #7, which seemed not to be the case. Collingsworth said as much. The rant about Bills having SB tattoos already etc.. just odd.

Bills played a poor 2nd half without focus. That is all. Expect McDermy to address this week. Humbling 2nd half should fuel great prep for Jets this week. 
CC really over the top about Bills acting like they have done something. His job  is to get people to listen, doesn’t have to make sense. Because in this case he’s off base. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

Our run D in terms of yardage given away was abysmal.

Our run D in terms of points given away was pretty good.

What’s the phrase? Bend but don’t get an oil change? Bend but don’t go grocery shopping. Bend and point at the stats? I can’t remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

Our run D in terms of yardage given away was abysmal.

Our run D in terms of points given away was pretty good.

Trying to only use point scored with the run game, like some people are trying to paint this discussion as, is a very deceiving stat though.

 

If that was the case, every team the Bills play can say they gave up next to no points running.

 

The run can setup the pass, so for people simply to claim "but they didn't score points running the ball" is completely disingenuous.

 

The Bills rarely do either.

Edited by Billz4ever
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

I added him to the Ignore list. 

How can you with so much still to know?  I want to understand him. 

 

I wanna know what he has for breakfast, how he puts his pants on in the morning, how he interacts with others at the grocery store. 

 

This dude is more confident about the Bills' defensive follies than any topic I have had confidence in my entire life, and it's in the face of literally everyone telling him it's wrong.  It's impressive in a sense. 

Edited by Bruffalo
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billz4ever said:

Trying to only use point scored with the run game is a very deceiving stat though.

 

If that was the case, every team the Bills play can say they gave up next to no points running.

 

The run can setup the pass, so for people simply to claim "but they didn't score points running the ball" is completely disingenuous.

 

The Bills rarely do either.

 

At this stage I honestly think yesterday was just a bad day for missed tackles, for whatever reason. Maybe rustiness off the bye. Prior to it, our run defense has been much better this season. If we repeat that performance in quick succession then maybe it's something  to be concerned about but, for now, it was just one of those games where execution let us down - until it mattered.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

 

At this stage I honestly think yesterday was just a bad day for missed tackles, for whatever reason. Maybe rustiness off the bye. Prior to it, our run defense has been much better this season. If we repeat that performance in quick succession then maybe it's something  to be concerned about but, for now, it was just one of those games where execution let us down - until it mattered.

I thought with everyone on the D line back healthy, we'd be able to stop that.  Obviously, that wasn't the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billz4ever said:

I thought with everyone on the D line back healthy, we'd be able to stop that.  Obviously, that wasn't the case.

 

I think we were treating it as a trap. They'd keep running the ball until we switched things up to tighten our D at the line, at which point they'd go over the top. Particularly considering we were leading for the most part, it made no sense risking large chunk plays to try and stop an approach which was doing us a favour in burning the clock with very little gain on the scoreboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when KC had that terrible game against Indy this season, lost even, and how that one bad performance exposed them and led to a spiralling string of losses?

 

No?  Wait.  You mean they learned from it, and bounced right back and are still considered a top five team?

 

Imagine that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

I seen a clip of Alexander pushing Diggs helmet in the dirt and the ref pulled him away.  I dont like that Gabe lost his cool but I also get it.  Alexander had extra caricular activities that went uncalled.  Throught I read somewhere he tackled Diggs oob after the TD or something too.

 

 

I was REALLY surprised no mention and no penalty were called.  He CLEARLY tackled him hard a second time out of bonds.  That is why Diggs went after him and was being walled off by McKenzie and Davis.  It wasn't even discussed in the game as it was happening.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...