Jump to content

The London Chargers? In the AFC East? It could happen


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

If there is so much interest in football in London, why don't they have their own league?

 

As I recall, the London Monarchs were one of the first teams in the WAFL to fold.

 

The WAFL? The West Australia Football League?

 

I think you mean WLAF, and later NFL Europe. The Monarchs lasted all 8 seasons and was probably the most successful franchise along with the Frankfurt Galaxy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

I am all for a team in London. The Chargers and Jags both make sense.

 

They do - for slightly different reasons. The Chargers currently have no roots and there is no funding to take them back to San Diego so they are basically homeless with no existing stadium tie that they can't get out of. The Jags because Jacksonville has always felt like a bit of a meh NFL city and they have already done a lot of work in building the brand and fanbase over here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnnyGold said:

 

Four divisions, each with 8 teams.

 

The Pacific Division

Seahawks, Raiders, 49ers, Rams, Cardinals, Broncos, Chiefs,  Bengals (not a great fit)

 

The Gulf Bay Division

Cowboys, Texans, Dolphins, Jaguars, Buccaneers, Saints, Falcons, Titans (not a great fit)

 

The Great Lakes Division

Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions, Bills, Steelers, Browns, Colts (not a great fit)

 

The Atlantic Division

Patriots, Jets, Giants, Ravens, Redskins, Eagles, London, Panthers

 

Scheduling:

All scheduling based on the previous years standings: you play half of your division twice (top four finishers play a home and away vs each other, bottom four finishers play a home and away vs each other) for 6 games; you play the other half of your division 1 time (bottom finisher plays top 4 teams once) for 4 games; interdivisionally, all first and second place finishers play one another, all 3rd and 4th place finishers play one another, all 5th and 6th place finishers play one another, all 7th and 8th place finishers play one another--for an additional 6 games.

 

Playoffs:
No separation of conferences, as there are no conferences. 12 teams make the playoffs. Each division winner gets a bye. 8 wild card teams are seeded based on record, then re-seeded for the second round. Reseeding again for the 3rd round of the playoffs, and the Super Bowl should then theoretically feature the two best teams.

 

 

Your dreaming, they are never getting rid of the conferences.  Plus the way you have it schedule, too much of a schedule imbalance, top 4 teams play each other twice & bottom 4 play each other twice, I mean come on that is not fair.  Penalizing a team like that because they are good.  I will chalk this one up as another boneheaded idea.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Should the Chargers pursue the move, the NFL could help build the team’s bridge to London by transferring the $650 million relocation fee it still must pay for the L.A. move to a London relocation. The Chargers also could switch divisions with the Houston Texans — the Chargers to the AFC South and the Texans to the AFC West — or perhaps the league could move the Chargers to the AFC East, Miami Dolphins to the AFC South and Texans to the AFC West.

 

Well, Miami IS in the South.   Maybe they can toss the Patriots out too.  LOL 

 

North - Keep the same ?          * Baltimore is more east than north / central. 

East - Buff, Jets, Putz*** and  Chargers?  

South - Miami, Jax, Tenny and Houston

Mid West / Mountain - Colts, Denver, KC and Raiders 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Simplest solution would to move us to AFC North, Texans to AFC West, and the Ravens to AFC South.

East:  Pats, Fins, Jets, Chargers

West: Chiefs, Texans, Raiders, Broncos

South: Colts, Titans, Ravens, Jaguars

North:  Bills, Steelers, Browns, Bengals

This ^^^ except switch Fins and Ravens.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this brave new world, I'd move the Bills to the AFC North.  The geographic location of Buffalo in regards to Cleveland and Pittsburg could create a fantastic regional rivalry.

 

If the NFL is going to screw around with a permanent team in England, then why not try new things?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cripple Creek said:

How does Shocker Khan feel about this?

 

The Chargers get 8 games Jax gets 8 games.  

 

When in the states these teams share the Jax stadium

 

the London team will have to have a schedule of 4 Home, 4 Away rinse repeat. 

weekly back and forth won't cut it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoTier said:

 

 

Agreed.  LA couldn't support 2 teams the first time around, so I'm not sure why the NFL suits thought it would work again except that stadium boosters/developers sold owners a bill of goods.  I don't think that the cities you mentioned are viable options because they aren't big enough metros, population wise, to support an NFL franchise in this era.  I think that San Diego and St Louis are both viable, and probably Oakland as well.  Those cities didn't lose their franchises because the fans didn't support their teams but because the owners couldn't strong arm the local governments into building them new stadiums.

Agree with this except Portland is probably large enough (25th largest Metro area in the US)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL needs to sit the owners of the Jags, Titans and Chargers and figure something out or buy out two of these franchises and dissolve them.  I think a big assumption on the part of the NFL and its owners is that greener pastures remain for the NFL. What if there aren't any?  

 

I don't think the NFL is willing to subsidize a full time NFL franchise in London. Any owner who jumps into the deep end of that unknown will want financial subsidies and guarantees that will equal or exceed just buying out the franchise and dissolving it.  

 

Mexico and Mexico City have a very unsettled security situation.  St. Louis has failed twice with NFL franchises.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Anyone ask Shad Khan what he thinks of this brilliant idea?

Make the teams visiting London have a ‘bye’ week immediately after; send them back to the States on a chartered ocean liner.  (on Khan’s dime.). NFL can run those cruises like they do with celebrities.  ?

*
“Look, George, we’re at Jermaine Whitehead’s table!  Ask him how he had such a bad game!”

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to give up on this old rivalries thing anyways with the division realignment. 

 

The Bills should be in a division with Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and 

 

AFC East

Patriots, Jets, Chargers, Giants

 

AFC North 

Bills, Steelers, Browns, Bengals

 

AFCSouth

Dolphins, Jaguars, Buccaneers, Falcons

 

AFC West

Broncos, Chiefs, Raiders, Texans

 

NFC East

Eagles, Redskins, Ravens, Panthers

 

NFC North

Packers, Bears, Lions, Vikings

 

NFC South

Titans, Saints, Colts, Cowboys

 

NFC West

Cardinals, Rams, 49ers, Seahawks

 

 

The Colts are really the only team misaligned but they have no spot in the NFC or AFC North

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

2 teams in LA is just not going to work. Their stadium was like 99 percent packers fans yesterday. They have no fan base! I don’t want London in the afc east though 

The NFL cares about one thing- large TV markets equating to increased revenue. I can’t stand the idea of a team going to London or Mexico. The logistics alone are brutal then a million other factors that have to be considered. Is is really sad imo.

49 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

Buffalo belongs in the east not the Rust belt North / Central / Mid West .  

Geographically speaking we are in closer proximity for the AFC North- directly above Pittsburgh and due northeast of Cleveland. Baltimore belongs in the East and Miami belongs in the south- geographically of course ?‍♂️

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dan Darragh said:

Move them to the AFC East then move the Bills to the AFC North with natural rivals Pittsburgh and Cleveland. Cincinnati can move to the west where they'd play against KC.

I’d leave Cincinnati in the North. Move Miami to the South, Baltimore to the East, and Texans to the west. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Kicking the Pats out for the Texans right now as Brady hits the end and Watson enters his prime strikes me as bad for the Bills. 

 

 

The Bills would never play in the Texans' division. I'm just imagining what it'd have been like to play in the AFC South the last half decade versus the division with Brady in it. Imagining a division where the biggest threat was the Houston team of the last few years - including a team that Peterman and the 90 mil dead cap Bills almost beat. 

 

I'm dreaming of a Great Lakes region type division - Buffalo, Pittsburgh/Cincy, Cleveland, Detroit


We'd have 10 home playoff games in the next 10 seasons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a long time NFL fan from the south border, I will be so angry if London gets a team before Mexico. We have far more fans and I guarantee know for sure all games would be sold out if they alocate a team anywhere in Mexico. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

What happens if a player’s passport is revoked? Or what if they don’t have one? 

Or if they have had a felony charge? What it a lot of players do not want to live abroad? Maybe Phillip Rivers doesn’t dig fish n chips ?‍♂️

Edited by billsfan_34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, arcane said:

Kick the Pats out.

Man. Imagine being in one of those divisions where 10 and 11 wins can get you the win every time, and no team is any more scary than the Texans. We've missed out on so many good moments, fun rides, just because of the freaking division we're in. Particularly since ~2014. It's not ***** fair.


Have to look ahead, not backward. Bellichek is getting up there in age, Brady is about to retire. They’re going into the gutter. The AFCE is where you want to be with Miami, NE, and NYJ.

 

Keep the Pats before you get the Eagles with Wentz, NYG with Jones, the Browns with a real head coach, etc.

 

It’ll be fun to knock around the Brady-less Pats for a decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, I am the egg man said:

After reading about the new Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, which was built with the NFL in mind, looks like its a not if, but when will the NFL have a team in London.

The really interesting story of that stadium is that it was built on the site of the old stadium. It was actually built in two halves around the existing one so they played in the old one the entire season while the first half was being built. Then they knocked the old one down, built the second half, and linked the two halves together. Amazing....but costly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

If there is so much interest in football in London, why don't they have their own league?

 

As I recall, the London Monarchs were one of the first teams in the WAFL to fold.

I don't know how to tell you this, but London is one city.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’m all for it. We had a blast in London when the Bills played there! 

That's nice BUT Wembley is a like an English LA Coliseum.  Built for Olympic events not NFL games.  Too many bad seats to sell.  How many "locals" go to game(s), or care about the NFL?   For those who do travel from the USA be prepared for the London departure tax buried on your plane ticket.  Last time I checked it was in the $160 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...