Jump to content
YoloinOhio

The London Chargers? In the AFC East? It could happen

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, arcane said:

Kick the Pats out.

Man. Imagine being in one of those divisions where 10 and 11 wins can get you the win every time, and no team is any more scary than the Texans. We've missed out on so many good moments, fun rides, just because of the freaking division we're in. Particularly since ~2014. It's not ***** fair.

 

The whole NFL has missed out.

 

The patriots are the worst thing to ever happen to the NFL. They ruined it for everyone. The league is forever tainted because of them.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hell NO, to moving them with us. If they move it really doesnt matter what division they are in, there is going to be some serious jetlag.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dma0034 said:

NFL should do a major division realignment. 

 

Yep all regional

 

Rust belt division

 

Bills 

Steelers

Browns

Lions

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, dma0034 said:

NFL should do a major division realignment. 

 

I’ve never supported a major realignmanet as has been postulated several times, but I’m coming around to the idea.  Having divisions all closest to each other could encourage more away game attendance like this year where the Bills are traveling well given not just the wins, but the geographic proximity of many opponents.

 

Im not saying do it, but considering wouldn’t be a bad idea.  

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:

 

I’ve never supported a major realignmanet as has been postulated several times, but I’m coming around to the idea.  Having divisions all closest to each other could encourage more away game attendance like this year where the Bills are traveling well given not just the wins, but the geographic proximity of many opponents.

 

Im not saying do it, but considering wouldn’t be a bad idea.  

 

Four divisions, each with 8 teams.

 

The Pacific Division

Seahawks, Raiders, 49ers, Rams, Cardinals, Broncos, Chiefs,  Bengals (not a great fit)

 

The Gulf Bay Division

Cowboys, Texans, Dolphins, Jaguars, Buccaneers, Saints, Falcons, Titans (not a great fit)

 

The Great Lakes Division

Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions, Bills, Steelers, Browns, Colts (not a great fit)

 

The Atlantic Division

Patriots, Jets, Giants, Ravens, Redskins, Eagles, London, Panthers

 

Scheduling:

All scheduling based on the previous years standings: you play half of your division twice (top four finishers play a home and away vs each other, bottom four finishers play a home and away vs each other) for 6 games; you play the other half of your division 1 time (bottom finisher plays top 4 teams once) for 4 games; interdivisionally, all first and second place finishers play one another, all 3rd and 4th place finishers play one another, all 5th and 6th place finishers play one another, all 7th and 8th place finishers play one another--for an additional 6 games.

 

Playoffs:
No separation of conferences, as there are no conferences. 12 teams make the playoffs. Each division winner gets a bye. 8 wild card teams are seeded based on record, then re-seeded for the second round. Reseeding again for the 3rd round of the playoffs, and the Super Bowl should then theoretically feature the two best teams.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Move both L.A teams to London;  neither team has any fan base.   Raiders will be the same once they move.  just a tourist destination for opposing team fans. 

 

The NFL is going to mess this up chasing the $$. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chargers in LA looks like a bad fit so far.  It looked liked Jacksonville would have been going to London.

 

I still prefer Chargers going back to San Diego , use the relocation fee to build new stadium there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great...🙄  Everytime your team plays an away game at London, all your players will be coming home wearing dopey hats...those ridiculous bearskins, bowlers, top hats.

*
😁 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simplest solution would to move us to AFC North, Texans to AFC West, and the Ravens to AFC South.

East:  Pats, Fins, Jets, Chargers

West: Chiefs, Texans, Raiders, Broncos

South: Colts, Titans, Ravens, Jaguars

North:  Bills, Steelers, Browns, Bengals

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Warcodered said:

It would suck to be the division stuck with the London team.

 

Move the Bills to the AFC North.

34 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

Great...🙄  Everytime your team plays an away game at London, all your players will be coming home wearing dopey hats...those ridiculous bearskins, bowlers, top hats.

*
😁

 

And monocles.

35 minutes ago, ALF said:

Chargers in LA looks like a bad fit so far.  It looked liked Jacksonville would have been going to London.

 

I still prefer Chargers going back to San Diego , use the relocation fee to build new stadium there.

 

Anyone ask Shad Khan what he thinks of this brilliant idea?

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

4 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Can't Portland, Salt Lake City, Columbus or Omaha get a team?  Putting two franchises in LA is one of the dumbest ideas in the long list of dumb ideas.

 

Agreed.  LA couldn't support 2 teams the first time around, so I'm not sure why the NFL suits thought it would work again except that stadium boosters/developers sold owners a bill of goods.  I don't think that the cities you mentioned are viable options because they aren't big enough metros, population wise, to support an NFL franchise in this era.  I think that San Diego and St Louis are both viable, and probably Oakland as well.  Those cities didn't lose their franchises because the fans didn't support their teams but because the owners couldn't strong arm the local governments into building them new stadiums.

Edited by SoTier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, wppete said:

Hope not. I Like the rivalries in the AFC East now. 

What rivalries?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not one that generally supports moving teams around. It guts a fan base and a community. With that being said, the Chargers aren’t really a LA team. They have no support, no roots, and no stadium. They will always be the Rams tenant and little brother. Moving them to London would check a lot of boxes and no one would care in LA. 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

If there is so much interest in football in London, why don't they have their own league?

 

As I recall, the London Monarchs were one of the first teams in the WAFL to fold.

 

The WAFL? The West Australia Football League?

 

I think you mean WLAF, and later NFL Europe. The Monarchs lasted all 8 seasons and was probably the most successful franchise along with the Frankfurt Galaxy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

I am all for a team in London. The Chargers and Jags both make sense.

 

They do - for slightly different reasons. The Chargers currently have no roots and there is no funding to take them back to San Diego so they are basically homeless with no existing stadium tie that they can't get out of. The Jags because Jacksonville has always felt like a bit of a meh NFL city and they have already done a lot of work in building the brand and fanbase over here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JohnnyGold said:

 

Four divisions, each with 8 teams.

 

The Pacific Division

Seahawks, Raiders, 49ers, Rams, Cardinals, Broncos, Chiefs,  Bengals (not a great fit)

 

The Gulf Bay Division

Cowboys, Texans, Dolphins, Jaguars, Buccaneers, Saints, Falcons, Titans (not a great fit)

 

The Great Lakes Division

Vikings, Packers, Bears, Lions, Bills, Steelers, Browns, Colts (not a great fit)

 

The Atlantic Division

Patriots, Jets, Giants, Ravens, Redskins, Eagles, London, Panthers

 

Scheduling:

All scheduling based on the previous years standings: you play half of your division twice (top four finishers play a home and away vs each other, bottom four finishers play a home and away vs each other) for 6 games; you play the other half of your division 1 time (bottom finisher plays top 4 teams once) for 4 games; interdivisionally, all first and second place finishers play one another, all 3rd and 4th place finishers play one another, all 5th and 6th place finishers play one another, all 7th and 8th place finishers play one another--for an additional 6 games.

 

Playoffs:
No separation of conferences, as there are no conferences. 12 teams make the playoffs. Each division winner gets a bye. 8 wild card teams are seeded based on record, then re-seeded for the second round. Reseeding again for the 3rd round of the playoffs, and the Super Bowl should then theoretically feature the two best teams.

 

 

Your dreaming, they are never getting rid of the conferences.  Plus the way you have it schedule, too much of a schedule imbalance, top 4 teams play each other twice & bottom 4 play each other twice, I mean come on that is not fair.  Penalizing a team like that because they are good.  I will chalk this one up as another boneheaded idea.  😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Should the Chargers pursue the move, the NFL could help build the team’s bridge to London by transferring the $650 million relocation fee it still must pay for the L.A. move to a London relocation. The Chargers also could switch divisions with the Houston Texans — the Chargers to the AFC South and the Texans to the AFC West — or perhaps the league could move the Chargers to the AFC East, Miami Dolphins to the AFC South and Texans to the AFC West.

 

Well, Miami IS in the South.   Maybe they can toss the Patriots out too.  LOL 

 

North - Keep the same ?          * Baltimore is more east than north / central. 

East - Buff, Jets, Putz*** and  Chargers?  

South - Miami, Jax, Tenny and Houston

Mid West / Mountain - Colts, Denver, KC and Raiders 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, May Day 10 said:

Dolphins "rivalry" is dead

 

It's been a corpse for decades. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Simplest solution would to move us to AFC North, Texans to AFC West, and the Ravens to AFC South.

East:  Pats, Fins, Jets, Chargers

West: Chiefs, Texans, Raiders, Broncos

South: Colts, Titans, Ravens, Jaguars

North:  Bills, Steelers, Browns, Bengals

This ^^^ except switch Fins and Ravens.

  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if means the nfl finally realigns the division(s) and we end up in a division with Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Detroit. This is what makes sense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...