Jump to content

Gettleman - idiot or genius?


eball

Recommended Posts

I don't think the Giants have the ability to tank bad enough to get a top-3 pick. Having Barkley plus 2 first round picks pretty much guarantees them 4-5 wins. They'll probably grab a QB & WR in the 1st & be on the upswing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You never know what constraints and directives a GM is working under.  If the Giants aren’t blowing up that team and going all out for QB of the future and total rebuild, then someone there is stupid.  Could be the owner, could be the GM.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

You never know what constraints and directives a GM is working under.  If the Giants aren’t blowing up that team and going all out for QB of the future and total rebuild, then someone there is stupid.  Could be the owner, could be the GM.  

 

Very true. Especially considering that McAdoo and Reese were both fired for trying to move on from Eli before the owner was ready. Gettleman may have been hired and told to do what he can to build around Eli. Not sure how trading OBJ works into that, but it would explain picking a RB #2 overall instead of any of the QB prospects.

 

Hmmm, a meddling owner sandbagging his GM and forcing them to pick a RB over a QB.... where have I heard this story before?...

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, 947 said:

I don't think the Giants have the ability to tank bad enough to get a top-3 pick. Having Barkley plus 2 first round picks pretty much guarantees them 4-5 wins. They'll probably grab a QB & WR in the 1st & be on the upswing.

 

 

The new QB won't start.  The new WR won't be like OBJ.  This team has 3 wins written all  over them.

 

If the Giants have anyone in the building with clue, they won't bother drafting a QB from this year's class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eball said:

I'm leaning towards idiot, but I guess his new "plan" is to tank this season and go after the QB next year.  But wow.  Think where the Giants might be if they had drafted a QB last year as many felt was the prudent move?  And how do you think Eli feels at this point?  "Thanks for the two Super Bowl wins, man -- now get out there and get your ass kicked while we tank for Tua!"

 

Giants in full rebuild mode now.

 

On the plus side, the Bills play the Miami Tankers twice and the Giant Tankers once this year!

 

The trade is hard to understand.  OBJ isn’t  a quitter like Brown.

 

Is it possible we’re seeing the first ever two year tank so they can draft Lawrence?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devil's advocate time....   

 

 

This is a rebuild, even if it isn't stated.   The OBJ trade wasn't great, but given he shopped the offer, I'm guessing it was at market value.  He's rebuilt the OL and will likely grab his QB to with some decent pieces in Shephard and Engram.  On defense, he has work to do, but has 4 picks in the top 1000, avoided a really bad contract in Collins and added Peppers in his place.  

 

 

Yeah....best I have.....idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mattynh said:

 

Giants were awesome with the all pro last year!

true. Giants can't get much worse. Now they can't get much better either.

 

Now the Steelers.. have a lot to lose. We'll see how valuable all-pro skill position players are. I think Bell's absence directly caused them to miss the playoffs.. handicapped them to the point where they were fighting for a spot with or without Brown. We'll see how JuJu does with double teams, and how James Connor holds up health wise. Somehow he's more injury prone than a 5 year running back averaging 400 carries a season. He's a great RB in his own right though. Albeit the position has very little depth

 

Giants will remain a team that sucks balls. Steelers will become one lol.

Edited by BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P said:

true. Giants can't get much worse. Now they can't get much better either.

 

Now the Steelers.. have a lot to lose. We'll see how valuable all-pro skill position players are. I think Bell's absence directly caused them to miss the playoffs.. handicapped them to the point where they were fighting for a spot with or without Brown. We'll see how JuJu does with double teams, and how James Connor holds up health wise. Somehow he's more injury prone than a 5 year running back averaging 400 carries a season.

 

Giants will remain a team that sucks balls. Steelers will become one lol.

 

We aleady know....they are not that valuable when it comes to winning and losing games, especially lombardi's.  There is lots of data out there.  The QB  is really the only position that affects wins and losses in a meaningful way when it comes to one player.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone is saying the Browns are the next big thing but i don't see it, name the last big name WR to win a SB... Jerry Rice? Also is freddie kitchens in his first year going to be able to manage all these divas? Hunt was just in a tape kicking a woman, both Landry and OBJ are head cases and from what I read OBJ is already asking for a pay increase like the one AB got from the Raiders. I'd love for the Browns to be relevant but I just watched my other favorite team :)  the Pittsburgh Steelers who had all these divas just blow it up and I'm telling you I feel even better now that these guys are off the roster, now you have a hungry James Conner, a team player and pro bowler in Schuster and a guy who will become a house hold name in James Washington. Say what you want about Gettelman but the guy put together a roster good enough to compete in the SB that is more than we can say about any GM from 1997 on from our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mattynh said:

 

We aleady know....they are not that valuable when it comes to winning and losing games, especially lombardi's.  There is lots of data out there.  The QB  is really the only position that affects wins and losses in a meaningful way when it comes to one player.

yes the QB is the most important one player. I don't see how you're drawing the conclusion that we already know and there's lots of data out there that skill position players don't make a difference. QB's have their best years when they have their best skill position players: Brady w Moss, Brees w Kamara & Michael Thomas, Brady w Edelman & Sony Michel, Foles w Alshon.

 

I mean we just spent the whole season complaining JA doesn't have the skill position players he needs. Which is it? Quarterbacks like throwing to guys that can get open and make catches. It's football, a team sport. Losing all-pros at any non-QB position still makes you worse.

 

Are you saying the Steelers are going to be better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, QCity said:

He's a massive idiot. Why would you pay him a $20M signing bonus just to ship him out of town months later?

 

Cleveland is basically getting OBJ for 5yrs $75M with only $19M GTD. That's insane. It's $15M AAV.

The problem is that OBJ is already unhappy with his contract.  The 5 year deal for $75 million will need to be adjusted for things can get ugly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

I vote for Idiot....

 

 
Why not use original round tender and save money???

 

Coleman was a 1st rounder.

 

Dov Kleiman Retweeted Adam Caplan

Original round tender, lowest level, for WR Corey Coleman. He was originally a first. Big difference in salary.

Dov Kleiman added,

Adam CaplanVerified account @caplannfl
Folks: He was a first-round pick so they are tendering him at the same level. https://twitter.com/caplannfl/status/1105933403705303041 
0 replies1 retweet3 likes
Reply
 
 
Retweet
 1
 
 
Like
 3
 
Direct message
Edited by Albany,n.y.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

I vote for Idiot....

 

 
Why not use original round tender and save money???

 

 

The comments are hysterical (for once I am grateful it is not us). I love how it does not even mention OBJ

Edited by Reed83HOF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BarkleyForGOATBackupPT5P said:

yes the QB is the most important one player. I don't see how you're drawing the conclusion that we already know and there's lots of data out there that skill position players don't make a difference. QB's have their best years when they have their best skill position players: Brady w Moss, Brees w Kamara & Michael Thomas, Brady w Edelman & Sony Michel, Foles w Alshon.

 

I mean we just spent the whole season complaining JA doesn't have the skill position players he needs. Which is it? Quarterbacks like throwing to guys that can get open and make catches. It's football, a team sport. Losing all-pros at any non-QB position still makes you worse.

 

Are you saying the Steelers are going to be better?

 

I think they could be, yes.   I don't expect a noticeable drop off.   What good is an all pro who does not show up for practice and meetings for week 17 cause he is butthurt about someone else being voted team MVP?  More talent is better, I agree but there is also something to be said for guys who are selfish losers that can bring the team down because they are not committed.   

 

I absolutely think the Steelers will win 9 or more games next year, matching last years output.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

Coleman was a 1st rounder.

Yep he was, they could STILL tender him at 1st round tender level meaning gave him 4.407M qualifying offer.

 

 

 

Now that said they did give him the original round tender according to SPOTRAC

Edited by MAJBobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Yep he was, they could STILL tender him at 1st round tender level meaning gave him 4.407M qualifying offer.

 

 

 

Now that said they did give him the original round tender according to SPOTRAC

It’s the same for him because his original round was 1st round 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Yep he was, they could STILL tender him at 1st round tender level meaning gave him 4.407M qualifying offer

Nope, $2.025 million:  https://www.newsday.com/sports/football/giants/corey-coleman-rfa-tender-1.28188464

 

Corey Coleman spent time with four different teams in 2018, but he may have found a steady home for this year. The Giants used an original-round tender on the wide receiver as a restricted free agent, a source confirmed. That lines him up for a non-guaranteed salary of $2.025 million in the 2019 season.

It’s a pretty good value for the Giants, considering Coleman’s pedigree. He’s still free to negotiate with other teams as an RFA, but the Giants will have the option to match any contract offer he receives. That move is highly unlikely, given that they would receive a pick from the original round in which Coleman was selected if he signs elsewhere. In this case, that would be a first-rounder because Coleman initially was selected there by the Browns. This virtually ensures that no other team will try to sign him away and that he will be with the Giants.

The price tag for a first-round tender is $4.407 million, so the Giants essentially get the same protection on Coleman for half the cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's trying to build what Beane has built in Buffalo. All bussiness , everybody is 1/11 and instill that culture . OBJ has been a locker room problem for the Giants . I feel his hands were tied but I don't understand the extension if  they were planning this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems somewhat reminiscent of what happened here in Buffalo in the recent past. Clear the big contract, non process guys off the roster, collect picks, clean up cap space, and rebuild fresh

 

Look at the players that we got rid of and the past few years... Watkins, Dareus, Darby, etc.  It screwed up our cap for a year or two, but look at us now

 

They couldn't afford Collins, they got an extra 1st and 3rd plus a safety on his rookie deal with the obj deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, eball said:

I'm leaning towards idiot, but I guess his new "plan" is to tank this season and go after the QB next year.  But wow.  Think where the Giants might be if they had drafted a QB last year as many felt was the prudent move?  And how do you think Eli feels at this point?  "Thanks for the two Super Bowl wins, man -- now get out there and get your ass kicked while we tank for Tua!"

 

Giants in full rebuild mode now.

 

On the plus side, the Bills play the Miami Tankers twice and the Giant Tankers once this year!

I think he is a clueless moron!  What that GM is doing really makes no sense to me.

 

 They keep Manning....dunno why... and who is he going to throw to that can bail them out as ODB can?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

I see problems in Cleveland. OBJ might very well start a war with Mayfield. 

 

Based on what? Seems to be Mayfield is exactly the type of QB Beckham would love to play with, attitude-wise. I also don’t think Beckham is going to complain about lack of targets since they’ll most likely be going to his long-time best friend. But if you have additional info, please share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They tried to retool the roster instead of rebuild it and it backfired spectacularly.  They also hired a previously failure of an NFL head coach.  They could've gotten at least this much compensation (maybe close to what the Raiders got for Mack) before extending OBJ last year as he's a generational talent who was only 25 at the time.  They wouldn't be eating 16 million in dead cap space right now.  Drafting a running back that high in the draft when you need a young quarterback was also a mistake even though Barkley is a beast.  They also could've gotten at least something for Landon Collins by franchise tagging him.  Add to that the Nate Solder signing that hasn't worked out thus far.  I'm leaning towards he's not a good GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

I think he is a clueless moron!  What that GM is doing really makes no sense to me.

 

 They keep Manning....dunno why... and who is he going to throw to that can bail them out as ODB can?

 

 

 

The Manning stance, IMO, is being dictated by ownership. Mara seems to love being grouped in with the Rooneys as old guard, “classy” owners who respect tradition, act as stewards of the game, etc., blah blah blah. At least that is how media usually groups and describes them. Mara may view that bailing on the long-time franchise QB who hails from one of the league’s royal families and delivered 2 championships as uncouth.

 

of course that attitude is backward AF in today’s NFL and has done them much more harm than good. Bellicheck figured this out a long time ago. He has zero loyalty to players and gives exactly zero **** about how that’s perceived. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...