Jump to content

Charles Clay - back in 2019?


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

What is it with the O'Leary fascination?

 

I think he got himself cut with that preseason reception where he turned upfield and started sprinting like he was stuck in the mud. Just a very meh player with zero speed.

Star power?  After all, he is Jack Nicholson's nephew!  ?  So what if he runs like Fred Flintstone?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BillsRdue said:

Clay hasn't done sh^t since he signed that contract. Waste of cap space and time to find a real TE.

Was my least favorite Whaley contract at the time. Although I could see why he put a premium on TEs.. but never overpay that much for any reason

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

Star power?  After all, he is Jack Nicholson's nephew!  ?  So what if he runs like Fred Flintstone?!

Did you mean Nicklaus or is he also related to Jack Nicholson? Talk about star power.

 

I feel like I've heard the announcers mention he was related to Nicklaus a few(thousand) times. For that reason alone, I don't miss him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably nothing in a trade.

 

I would just keep him. He's been a major disappointment, but he's still better than anyone else we have. Not the time to be cutting weapons for next to nothing in terms of cap savings.

 

The Bills should really address the position in a serious way this offseason, but I'd rather keep him around than cut him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, NoSaint said:

 

Cap hit of 9m and dead money of just 4.5 so there’s a solid cap savings to cutting him.

 

1 hour ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

There's no financial difference between trading Clay and releasing him. Also, pre-6/1 and post-6/1 makes no difference either.

 

So right you guys.  What I would hope for is after the Bills take the 4.5 Dead Cap hit any team would only pay 4.5 for the season.

Maybe a trade could be made to a team that thinks he was under utilized on a bad offensive team.

I'm hoping Beane can get a 2020 5th for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clay has a cap hit of 4.5 million if cut. So the question is, is Charles Clay worth 4.5 million? I think considering that Clay is still a decent player and the high cost to replace him even with an average player is far above 4.5 million its likely the team will keep Clay and draft a tight end behind him to groom to take over the position in 2020. Personally I could go either way on Clay, I think at 4.5 million he is serviceable but if they decide to move on I won't be too upset.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

 

So right you guys.  What I would hope for is after the Bills take the 4.5 Dead Cap hit any team would only pay 4.5 for the season.

Maybe a trade could be made to a team that thinks he was under utilized on a bad offensive team.

I'm hoping Beane can get a 2020 5th for him.

 

...he may better plan to BUY a "5th" at his favorite liquor store....think he's a definite release.........

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

He's gone. Eat whatever is left on his contract.  He's as fragile as Sammy. Move on and develop Croom plus draft a guy. 

 

Maybe, but he’s probably tradable at least if someone is looking for that sort of player. 

1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Was?

 

 I didn’t mean it in the Bill Clinton context. Could still be the case 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BillsRdue said:

Clay hasn't done sh^t since he signed that contract. Waste of cap space and time to find a real TE.

What a completely, lazy worthless post.  He was our leading receiver.  I guess Woods sucked too.  Or maybe the Bills have had crappy qbs who couldn’t get the ball to our receivers.

 

clay is a good and versatile TE who was handcuffed by crappy throwing qbs and injuries.  He is gone and will probably sign with a good Team and be a really solid TE #2.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

Did you mean Nicklaus or is he also related to Jack Nicholson? Talk about star power.

I knew he was Nicklaus' grandson, but noticed a contributor had thrown Nicholson into the mix, whether accidentally or intentionally.  I picked it up and continue to run with it since I don't know when 'enough' is 'too much'.

57 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...he may better plan to BUY a "5th" at his favorite liquor store....think he's a definite release.........

Make sure it's one of those fancy 'Jim Beam' collector decanters...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

We overpaid and are paying the price. Send him packing. 

That's kind of like taking a pitcher out after he's given up 5 runs through 2 innings.

 

At this point, I'd prefer they ride it out. I think he's a little underrated around these parts because we gave up too much to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

I knew he was Nicklaus' grandson, but noticed a contributor had thrown Nicholson into the mix, whether accidentally or intentionally.  I picked it up and continue to run with it since I don't know when 'enough' is 'too much'.

Make sure it's one of those fancy 'Jim Beam' collector decanters...

 

 

....we already OVERPAID once, right?....got snookered by the Fins....tried to dry up their cap space figuring they would match.....and we lost..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

I like Chuck Clay but his injuries are always an issue. Seemed like he would usually play on Sundays whether he practiced a lot or not but looks like he might miss another game. He’s a Whaley guy... think he’s gone?

I think they can improve the position. and should. 
Clay has value , but he did not live up to the Whaley contract by any stretch of the imagination. I cannot fault Clay specifically. i like him. he gets open and can move the chains.
He has value

 But it might disappoint him what that # now is.
I would keep him. if he accepted a reasonable new contract and his legs(knees) are up for another season or two. ( i think they may not be though )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

That's kind of like taking a pitcher out after he's given up 5 runs through 2 innings.

 

At this point, I'd prefer they ride it out. I think he's a little underrated around these parts because we gave up too much to get him.

there is a definite bias always running as an undercurrent here. Folks act like it is their money and the financial advisor screwed them ha ha.
Bad contract in different era, Whaley desperate to get weapons for EJM was the cause for some poor decision making

 But Clay has been a decent target when on the field. and obviously been playing in pain for a couple seasons.

 Need to develop some youth to overtake his role sooner than later though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

Clay has a cap hit of 4.5 million if cut. So the question is, is Charles Clay worth 4.5 million? I think considering that Clay is still a decent player and the high cost to replace him even with an average player is far above 4.5 million its likely the team will keep Clay and draft a tight end behind him to groom to take over the position in 2020. Personally I could go either way on Clay, I think at 4.5 million he is serviceable but if they decide to move on I won't be too upset.

 

Without doubt he is not worth $9m. Therefore I would pay him the $4.5m I am on the hook for anyway (which has actually already been paid in cash terms) and keep the other $4.5m in my pocket.

 

Charles Clay is no longer NFL starter level and he won't be signed as a starter anywhere else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 9:53 PM, MrEpsYtown said:

His contract was so front loaded that he isn't making much next year. And I believe the dead cap and cap hit are the same. So it makes sense to just keep him. I like Maxx Williams and Jack Doyle in free agency. Tyler Krof and Jesse James are interesting as well. 

TE clearly a place where all that cap space will be spent, among others.   Looking forward to the FA period.  Gonna be some talent coming in.  Get your popcorn and..... Trust the Process. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 8:40 PM, YoloinOhio said:

I like Chuck Clay but his injuries are always an issue. Seemed like he would usually play on Sundays whether he practiced a lot or not but looks like he might miss another game. He’s a Whaley guy... think he’s gone?

 

 

He’s never played at a high level.  I would think he could be replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

There's no financial difference between trading Clay and releasing him. Also, pre-6/1 and post-6/1 makes no difference either.

 

When I pay for a product, I want it to work!

 

Clay has been broken for years.  Is it too hard to ask for 3-5 catches per game and a few blocks for the 16 games?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is so quick to throw Clay out with the trash.

People, we don't have a QB or offensive line playing well at the moment. You can not start to pin those issues on a receiver until those issues are resolved. 

 When Allen has time, and the run/pass game starts to scare defenses, everything changes...

Edited by George C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, George C said:

Everyone is so quick to throw Clay out with the trash.

People, we don't have a QB or offensive line playing well at the moment. You can not start to pin those issues on a receiver until those issues are resolved. 

 When Allen has time, and the run/pass game starts to scare defenses, everything changes...

 

Clay is the bag that holds the trash!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 9:40 PM, YoloinOhio said:

I like Chuck Clay but his injuries are always an issue. Seemed like he would usually play on Sundays whether he practiced a lot or not but looks like he might miss another game. He’s a Whaley guy... think he’s gone?

The biggest false messiah since Bledsoe.  Let him go and don't look back.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's so ineffective. We need a bigger, more durable TE. Clay is too small and injured too much.plus, he doesn't really make contested catches much, which is the whole reason to throw to a TE.

 

So he is essentially a big, slow, WR who gets hurt a lot.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BuffaloBill said:

 

 

He’s never played at a high level.  I would think he could be replaced.

Yup, Clay sucks.  Not Tyrod, Allen, Anderson, Barkley, Peterman.  It’s Clay who sucks.

21 minutes ago, MJS said:

He's so ineffective. We need a bigger, more durable TE. Clay is too small and injured too much.plus, he doesn't really make contested catches much, which is the whole reason to throw to a TE.

 

So he is essentially a big, slow, WR who gets hurt a lot.

Because our qbs suck.  Wild prediction.  Clay would be good if he didn’t play with the worst qbs in the nfl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Yup, Clay sucks.  Not Tyrod, Allen, Anderson, Barkley, Peterman.  It’s Clay who sucks.

Because our qbs suck.  Wild prediction.  Clay would be good if he didn’t play with the worst qbs in the nfl.

 

 

Chicken and the egg situation.  If you want to defend Clay go right ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 6:40 PM, YoloinOhio said:

I like Chuck Clay but his injuries are always an issue. Seemed like he would usually play on Sundays whether he practiced a lot or not but looks like he might miss another game. He’s a Whaley guy... think he’s gone?

 

I think Croom can do a similar job to what Clay does personally.  Clay has never been a guy who I feel keeps his head in the whole game and whiffs on some plays he should make.  

 

I wont campaign for him to be gone, and I think he probably stays, but I have liked what I have seen from Croom in some of his limited work.  But if Clay isn’t here then I would expect we draft or sign another.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I think Croom can do a similar job to what Clay does personally.  Clay has never been a guy who I feel keeps his head in the whole game and whiffs on some plays he should make.  

 

I wont campaign for him to be gone, and I think he probably stays, but I have liked what I have seen from Croom in some of his limited work.  But if Clay isn’t here then I would expect we draft or sign another.   

for a part of a game , i was wondering who the hell 80 was and why was he lining up outside? 
 He is still learning it seems.
but he is another heavier wide receiver playing TE.
bring back O'Leary ! and line him up tight !!

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I think Croom can do a similar job to what Clay does personally.  Clay has never been a guy who I feel keeps his head in the whole game and whiffs on some plays he should make.  

 

I wont campaign for him to be gone, and I think he probably stays, but I have liked what I have seen from Croom in some of his limited work.  But if Clay isn’t here then I would expect we draft or sign another.   

and who is behind Croom ? Logan Thomas ?
improve the position with depth, then you can sort the wheat from the chaff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2018 at 9:40 PM, YoloinOhio said:

I like Chuck Clay but his injuries are always an issue. Seemed like he would usually play on Sundays whether he practiced a lot or not but looks like he might miss another game. He’s a Whaley guy... think he’s gone?

 

he's gone, has done little here . We need a real TE , still pissed we passed on Gronk.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...