JAMIEBUF12 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, mead107 said: Giants make more senseĀ Giants make sense if the bills want darnold.browns will probably take barkley at one.If Bills want Darnold they trade up to #2.If they want Josh Rosen they trade to #3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreboding Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said: Ā Colts make more sense. Luck is still young, Eli is on his last legs.Ā Ā I agree. People keep saying Giants, seems they might take this chance to set themselves up for the next 10 years as well. Colts need players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, BuffAlone said: I absolutely agree! Darnold at 12 wouldn't be horrible, but these are the prizes this year imo Ā Darnold at 12 would be fine - I said Darnold would be awful at 3.Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macaroni Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 IMHO it would be dumb to trade to the #3 pick before the Browns make their #1 pick ... if we are sitting at #3 the Browns know we may take the QB that they have targeted and would be forced to pick their QB at #1. Ā As it sits now ... the Browns can safely take a running back or edge rusher at #1 and wait until #4 for their QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Domdab99 said: Ā Darnold at 12 would be fine - I said Darnold would be awful at 3.Ā Ā Iām not sure I agree. Ā A QB is either worth it or he isnāt when you are talking picks that high. Ā Ā 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBean Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 If we trade to #3, they will be thrilled with either Rosen, Darnold, or Mayfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIZ Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, macaroni said: IMHO it would be dumb to trade to the #3 pick before the Browns make their #1 pick ... if we are sitting at #3 the Browns know we may take the QB that they have targeted and would be forced to pick their QB at #1. Ā As it sits now ... the Browns can safely take a running back or edge rusher at #1 and wait until #4 for their QB. Ā Not dumb if they have 3 QBs rated close to the same, and want to guarantee they get 1 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickelCity Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 It would be interesting for sure. I feel good about Rosen and Mayfield, and I've fluctuated on Darnold. Interestingly, my assessment of Darnold has increased over the past week or so (rewatched some of his games). If they take any of the three, I've got to give it to them. Heck of an offseason and it's early March.Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, McBean said: If we trade to #3, they will be thrilled with either Rosen, Darnold, or Mayfield. Ā This Is The Plan. Ā Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Buffalo Barbarian said: Ā This Is The Plan. Ā Ā I'm good with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 26 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said: Ā Perfect guarantees one of the top 3 and more likely Mayfield, who I want anyway. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā I hope it's Baker, but I'm suspecting Rosen or Darnold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, macaroni said: IMHO it would be dumb to trade to the #3 pick before the Browns make their #1 pick ... if we are sitting at #3 the Browns know we may take the QB that they have targeted and would be forced to pick their QB at #1. Ā As it sits now ... the Browns can safely take a running back or edge rusher at #1 and wait until #4 for their QB. Except the Browns donāt for a second think that the Bills (or another team) doesnāt trade in front of them at 4 to get their guy. The only way that the Browns take Barkley is if they have 3 QBs rated closely and are comfortable taking the guy that is 3rd on their list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 It's entirely possible Cleveland has told them the guy they want, or at least they know within two guys and the Giants have told them they are set on Barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, NewEraBills said: I hope it's Baker, but I'm suspecting Rosen or Darnold. Ā I refuse to believe it's not Mayfield Ā Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffAlone Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Domdab99 said: Ā Darnold at 12 would be fine - I said Darnold would be awful at 3.Ā Ok...i didnt mean to quote you. This is MY opinion.sorry Edited March 12, 2018 by BuffAlone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 We will be trading 12, 22, a second and a third most likely.Ā That's pretty close to the Philly Deal from a couple of years ago.Ā This will leave us with 1 pick in each of the first three rounds at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadLandsMeanie Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 17 minutes ago, Canadian Bills Fan said: I don't think ok i know how to process all this positive news. Not used to this I am finding that there is such a thing as a bit too much excitement in the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFunPolice Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Chuck Wagon said: It's entirely possible Cleveland has told them the guy they want, or at least they know within two guys and the Giants have told them they are set on Barkley. Ā I think so too... Maybe the Browns sweetened the Tyrod deal a little in order to get an assurance from the Bills that if they were able to trade into the top 3 they wouldn't take _________ QB. That helps the Browns and in return they give the Bills a little extra for Tyrod 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 NFL DraftĀ Ā #1 pick - Sam Darnold (Cleveland) #2 pick - - Saquon Barkley (New York Giants) #3 pick - Josh Rosen (Buffalo Bills) Ā 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallskiWallski83 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 18 minutes ago, Magox said: Number 3 from the Colts makes sense if their guy is Baker Mayfield, not Josh Rosen. Ā If there is something to this rumor, then I think the target is Mayfield. Ā Which would make this guy really happy! #metoo 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan2313 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, TallskiWallski83 said: I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want Ā Agreed. Unless they have 3 guys they would be good with.Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFunPolice Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 The Giants might want to think about the plus side of taking a QB at #2 and letting him sit a few years behind Eli, like the Favre-Rogers handoff. Ā Green Bay has largely wasted Rogers career with a poor overall roster but they went from one HOF QB to another. That just doesn't happen often. Even going from a SB winning QB to a very good QB without any break doesn't happen often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Mayfield or Rosen and we are golden. The two Franchise QB's in this draft.Ā 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, TallskiWallski83 said: I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want It also could be Gettleman told him he was taking Barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIZ Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobChalmers Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 11 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said: Ā Iām not sure I agree. Ā A QB is either worth it or he isnāt when you are talking picks that high. Ā Ā Ā And who knows for sure which of these top 3-4 guys is better than the rest - or if any of them is for that matter??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, TallskiWallski83 said: I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want Ā I don't think GM's approach and grade that way.Ā They probably like all three guys.Ā It's like dating man.Ā You date three women at the same time and you could see yourself with either of them.Ā Just let things work themselves out but make sure you get 1 of them. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Ballin Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) If I was Beane, I wouldn't do all of this work and trade most of my picks for any QB in this draft. I'm only doing it if Colts are serious about trading Andrew Luck. They been talking, which does not surprise me. I'll be talking Andrew Luck scenarios all day long with Colts' brass. Lucks' shoulder should not be a concern. Look at Peyton Manning when Colts released him. Peyton's shoulder and neck issues didn't matter. Ā We have enough picks to send to Colts. Colts didn't want Cordy Glenn all along. No one saw this coming. Edited March 12, 2018 by Buffalo Ballin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Buffalo Ballin said: If I was Beane, I wouldn't do all of this work and trade most of my picks for any QB in this draft. I'm only doing it if Colts are serious about trading Andrew Luck. They been talking, which does not surprise me. I'll be talking Andrew Luck scenarios all day long with Colts' brass. Shoulder questions? No thanks. He may come back like Pennington.Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 21 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: You go to three if you have similar grades on the top 3.Ā Ā You also use 3 talk as a chip to aid in negotiations for 2Ā Ā The game is on.Ā We Bills fans are use to ourĀ GM's playing Chutes and Ladders. I'm liking having a "Bobby Fischer" playing chess. Let's see what happens now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBaumer Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 There is no way in hell Barkley is not going 1 or 2 so no matter what, if the Bills get to 3, they should be able to get Darnold or Rosen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Ballin Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, H2o said: Shoulder questions? No thanks. He may come back like Pennington.Ā Ā Chad Pennington sucks. Andrew Luck is once in a decade QB. He's in our sights. Again, the shoulder issues don't matter. Ask Peyton Manning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art in PNS Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 32 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said: Ā Bills give Colts: Ā Hughes #12 #22 higher 2nd rounder Ā Colts give Bills: Ā #3 Why in the name of XCSD!!!@@##$$Ā does everyone want t trade the only legitimate pass rusher we have ???? Just say no to trading HUGHES . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Buffalo Ballin said: Ā Chad Pennington sucks. Andrew Luck is once in a decade QB. He's in our sights. Again, the shoulder issues don't matter. Ask Peyton Manning. It was Manning's neck. Ā It's Luck's shoulder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Ballin Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, oldmanfan said: It was Manning's neck. Ā It's Luck's shoulder. Which is even worse than a shoulder. Sounds like Luck is available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Buffalo Ballin said: Ā Chad Pennington sucks. Andrew Luck is once in a decade QB. He's in our sights. Again, the shoulder issues don't matter. Ask Peyton Manning. Pennington had a significantly stronger arm prior to his shoulder surgery and he didn't suck. Very accurate in his time and was trending up prior to his multiple surgeries. I may not be with the rest, but I'm not overly impressed by Luck, especially when you take into account the turnovers. I'll pass.Ā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo44 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, Buffalo Ballin said: If I was Beane, I wouldn't do all of this work and trade most of my picks for any QB in this draft. I'm only doing it if Colts are serious about trading Andrew Luck. They been talking, which does not surprise me. I'll be talking Andrew Luck scenarios all day long with Colts' brass. Lucks' shoulder should not be a concern. Look at Peyton Manning when Colts released him. Peyton's shoulder and neck issues didn't matter. Ā We have enough picks to send to Colts. Colts didn't want Cordy Glenn all along. No one saw this coming. The indications certainly point to the likelihood that the bills are trying to maneuver up to one of the top picksThe indications certainly point to the likelihood that the bills are trying to maneuver up to Ā get one of the top three quarterbacks coming out from college.Ā Ā Ā However the Luck scenarioĀ is certainly plausible.Ā Ā Ā There is one other scenario here. The bills might be angling to get one of the top tier free agentĀ quarterbacksĀ such as Cousins, Foles or maybe even BreesAnd use their draft picks to shore up their Ā linebackers, defensive line and OL. They could get a stud linebacker or D lineman with number 12! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26TrapDraw Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Gamache518 said: According to Buffalo report Bills reportedly have been talking to Colts in acquiring their 1st round draft pick (3). Both sides have been talking all day. I'm Thinking 3 because Beane has talked to both the Browns and the Giants and The Browns are taking Darnold or Allen followed by the Giants taking Barkley is why 3 will be high enough for Rosen. IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boca BIlls Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 20 minutes ago, TallskiWallski83 said: I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want Lol Cleveland is not moving from #1... The Browns should just disband and move to London if that happened. Also Beane is BFF's with the Giants GM so he is like "Hey Bro who you taking" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts