Jump to content

Sound a horn when play clock expires


Utah John

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Simon said:

The repeated pearl clutching over 1 meaningless second of game time never ceases to amaze me.

Do we really give a ***** about this?

 

 

Agree........the play clock exists only to make teams keep a pace to the game........1 second isn't a big competitive advantage.

 

For that matter.........whether or not the distance was reached for a first down when you know a team got 9.9 yards at least..........basically, IMO,  NEITHER side did their job well enough for it to be obvious........so color me less than outraged when that decision seems arbitrary(like at the end of the WC game vs Dolphins).

 

And when a sideline play is marginal and goes against the offense...........well, maybe try to make your plays in the other 53 plus feet of field.

 

If the NFL ever cares about getting these things right they can gps and chip all of it and replace the human element on many of these controversial calls.

 

If anything the NFL went the other way this season wrt officiating with their new liberal rules allowing manhandling receivers downfield........until they don't, of course.

 

Nothing bonds fans to their teams or favorite wrassler' like the perception that the refs are cheating them.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

For that matter.........whether or not the distance was reached for a first down when you know a team got 9.9 yards at least..........basically, IMO,  NEITHER side did their job well enough for it to be obvious........so color me less than outraged when that decision seems arbitrary

 

I didn't think I was going to like it when they stared foregoing measurements, making quick judgment calls and giving the O the benefit of the doubt with first down calls, but it's been one of the few things they've successfully done to keep the game moving and the momentum building.

I hope the OCD fans don't start squawking about this also when they feel wronged while looking at their angled sideline views.

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Breakout Squad said:

Interesting idea. It’s obnoxious to me that there isn’t more consistency. I’d like to see a change like that. 


I think they can just have a buzzer go to the officials when it hits zero. It vibrates while the official is looking at the snap. If it hasn’t snapped the penalty. Simple and easy. Allows the official to focus more on the snap of the ball rather than having to look two places.

 

also technology exists as buzzing down to an official occurs for booth initiated replays.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL woould say that sound travels slower than light so they need to give an extra second after the clock expires for the sound to hit the ref's ear drums

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Simon said:

The repeated pearl clutching over 1 meaningless second of game time never ceases to amaze me.

Do we really give a ***** about this?

No Simon we don't but if we're going to continue this ridiculous thread why not set the football to explode right at zero. Now that's what I call a dead ball. 

 

 

Edited by LABILLBACKER
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LABILLBACKER said:

No Simon we don't but if we're going to continue this ridiculous thread why not set the football to explode right at zero. Now that's what I call a dead ball. 

 

 

Love the Acme quality idea but I'd be concerned about Belichik figuring a way to make it blow up in Morse's face with 3 seconds left.

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lights are a good idea, the other thing they should do, like the NBA and NCAA basketball, is show the tenths of the second in the last 5 seconds of the play clock. I think now when the play clock goes to zero there are actually .9 seconds left. The combo (lights and tenths) would alleviate all these debates. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Simon said:

The repeated pearl clutching over 1 meaningless second of game time never ceases to amaze me.

Do we really give a ***** about this?

Absolutely. Or at least we should.  How many big plays have happend in key moments when it clearly should have been a 5 yard penalty in the opposite direction?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In one of the games this weekend (can't remember which one), there was a no call on delay of game (clock showed zero) but they called encroachment. The defensive player jumped once the clock hit zero, timing his rush to the play clock. I couldn't believe that they ignored the delay of game in that instance. 

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Utah John said:

The NFL has this strange procedure for calling delay of game penalties when the play clock expires.  Sometimes it seems a QB will have a full extra second, but not always. 

 

With all the high-resolution technology available for almost everything else, why use this subjective approach?  When the play clock expires, sound a horn (like in basketball) and have lights on the sidelines go on, so no one can mistake when the snap is late. This seems like a very easy, and fair, way to go.  

Super easy fix, not a huge fan of the horn and lights, but just put a “pack” of some kind on the official who monitors the clock. 
 

The pack vibrates as soon as the clock hits zero. 
 

He doesn’t have to take his eyes off the ball. 
 

the pack vibrates and ball isn’t snapped he throws the flag. 
 

Simple 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

No Simon we don't but if we're going to continue this ridiculous thread why not set the football to explode right at zero. Now that's what I call a dead ball. 

 

 

I don't think this is ridiculous.  It's a valid concern.  If the Dolphins convert a 4th and 8 to get into field goal range to win the game against us with 15 seconds left, but snapped the ball 1 second after the play clock ran out, you would be pretty pissed they were not set back 5 yards instead.  No exploding balls.  In the year 2023, we should be able to notify the ref in some way where he doesnt have to take his eye off the ball.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Utah John said:

The NFL has this strange procedure for calling delay of game penalties when the play clock expires.  Sometimes it seems a QB will have a full extra second, but not always. 

 

With all the high-resolution technology available for almost everything else, why use this subjective approach?  When the play clock expires, sound a horn (like in basketball) and have lights on the sidelines go on, so no one can mistake when the snap is late. This seems like a very easy, and fair, way to go.  

 

I'm much more interested in why there are never "forward motion" penalties against WRs at the snap when they go in motion since when you watch games 80% of the time time the player is angling toward the line of scrimmage at the snap of the ball. Those are penalties but they are never called.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Utah John said:

The NFL has this strange procedure for calling delay of game penalties when the play clock expires.  Sometimes it seems a QB will have a full extra second, but not always. 

 

With all the high-resolution technology available for almost everything else, why use this subjective approach?  When the play clock expires, sound a horn (like in basketball) and have lights on the sidelines go on, so no one can mistake when the snap is late. This seems like a very easy, and fair, way to go.  

 

I want royalties! This was my idea that I posted weeks ago! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, davetra said:

I don't think this is ridiculous.  It's a valid concern.  If the Dolphins convert a 4th and 8 to get into field goal range to win the game against us with 15 seconds left, but snapped the ball 1 second after the play clock ran out, you would be pretty pissed they were not set back 5 yards instead.  No exploding balls.  In the year 2023, we should be able to notify the ref in some way where he doesnt have to take his eye off the ball.  

Exactly. See: Texans 3rd and 18 conversion in the playoffs a few years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Utah John said:

The NFL has this strange procedure for calling delay of game penalties when the play clock expires.  Sometimes it seems a QB will have a full extra second, but not always. 

 

With all the high-resolution technology available for almost everything else, why use this subjective approach?  When the play clock expires, sound a horn (like in basketball) and have lights on the sidelines go on, so no one can mistake when the snap is late. This seems like a very easy, and fair, way to go.  

 

Don't forget sensors on wires for cameras and such.  Ball hit one but no visible evidence it happening other than change in trajectory of ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Simon said:

The repeated pearl clutching over 1 meaningless second of game time never ceases to amaze me.

Do we really give a ***** about this?

If the nose of the ball is a centimeter short of the line to gain , shouldn’t the offense be given a first down anyway?🤷‍♂️

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i can't believe this hasn't been mentioned, but the reason why this is a problem is it gives the O an advantage and stops the D from timing the snap when the clock is nearly out.

 

if it was a hard penalty at 0 seconds, then the O has to be more honestly about when they snap, getting lined up and set sooner, and less room to audible, and it gives the D a real shot at timing the clock as well as the snap count.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NoSaint said:


and if the fraction of the second was meaningful and unevenly enforced I’d be right there with you. 


Just gotta look at the Dolphins game.

 

Multiple times while MIA was on offense, the play clock went to zero and was there for 2-3 seconds after.
 

More than a fraction of a second and unevenly enforced in favor of MIA. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davetra said:

f the Dolphins convert a 4th and 8 to get into field goal range to win the game against us with 15 seconds left, but snapped the ball 1 second after the play clock ran out, you would be pretty pissed they were not set back 5 yards instead.

 

No, I'd be pretty pissed that we gave up a 4th/8 to lose a game and wouldn't care less that it happened one second later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davetra said:

I don't think this is ridiculous.  It's a valid concern.  If the Dolphins convert a 4th and 8 to get into field goal range to win the game against us with 15 seconds left, but snapped the ball 1 second after the play clock ran out, you would be pretty pissed they were not set back 5 yards instead.  No exploding balls.  In the year 2023, we should be able to notify the ref in some way where he doesnt have to take his eye off the ball.  

This is not brain surgery. Technologically you could simply have a special vibrating pager type device in the chief refs pocket set to go off at the exact instant the clock hits zero. He doesn't have to visually align the snap with the clock. They can easily do this they're just lazy and want to keep it subjective to move the game along.  Perera and Blandino have said this before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, I am the egg man said:

…..just not a train horn.

 

For some reason I’ve developed an aversion to them.

 

A train horn was the first thing I thought of when I read the thread title.

 

Personally, I've developed an aversion to the guy yelling "Thiiiiiiirrrrrd doooooooooowwwwwn!"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Simon said:

 

No, I'd be pretty pissed that we gave up a 4th/8 to lose a game and wouldn't care less that it happened one second later.

So, you wouldn't care if they missed a false start on that same play?  Sometimes it's only a twitch. Or an illegal formation? Sometimes it's only Inches off the line.

Why should 1 second be any different?  I'd be mad they gave up a 4th and 8 too.  But every team is supposed to get a specific time to get the play off.  if they don't its a penalty.  The 4th and 8 should have never happened.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, davetra said:

So, you wouldn't care if they missed a false start on that same play?  Sometimes it's only a twitch. Or an illegal formation? Sometimes it's only Inches off the line.

Why should 1 second be any different?  I'd be mad they gave up a 4th and 8 too.  But every team is supposed to get a specific time to get the play off.  if they don't its a penalty.  The 4th and 8 should have never happened.  

 

You can gain competitive advantages from false starts or illegal formations, but the 41st second on the play clock is completely irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...