Jump to content

NFL Network Analyst Willie McGinest arrested for Assault with a Deadly Weapon in LA


Big Turk

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, ArtVandalay said:

You realize the other person could have committed an actual crime prior to this, right? Done something really awful.

 

Just saying, wait for the facts, and yes you would need a pretty good reason for this. I won't list them out but you can use your imagination.  

 

I just don't understand the rush to cancel his job and remove him from society. Wait for the facts. 

 

Welcome to the new America guilty until proven innocent ! We've been watching this for the better part of 3 plus years everyday in the media !

 

He should be maybe taken off the job until a investigation into why this happened is done & there can be a determination to exactly why it happened then proceed if any discipline needs doing .

 

But by the looks of it it could have been handled a bit more civilized but there could have been some extenuating circumstances but 4 on 1 COME ON MAN . 

Edited by T master
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, T master said:

 

Welcome to the new America guilty until proven innocent ! We've been watching this for the better part of 3 plus years everyday in the media !

 

He should be maybe taken off the job until a investigation into why this happened is done & there can be a determination to exactly why it happened then proceed if any discipline needs doing .

 

But by the looks of it it could have been handled a bit more civilized but there could have been some extenuating circumstances but 4 on 1 COME ON MAN . 

well, he's on camera being guilty of assault, so the whole innocent part is out the window.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, T master said:

 

Welcome to the new America guilty until proven innocent ! We've been watching this for the better part of 3 plus years everyday in the media !

 

He should be maybe taken off the job until a investigation into why this happened is done & there can be a determination to exactly why it happened then proceed if any discipline needs doing .

 

But by the looks of it it could have been handled a bit more civilized but there could have been some extenuating circumstances but 4 on 1 COME ON MAN . 

What is he supposed to be proven innocent of exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, T master said:

 

Welcome to the new America guilty until proven innocent ! We've been watching this for the better part of 3 plus years everyday in the media !

 

He should be maybe taken off the job until a investigation into why this happened is done & there can be a determination to exactly why it happened then proceed if any discipline needs doing .

 

But by the looks of it it could have been handled a bit more civilized but there could have been some extenuating circumstances but 4 on 1 COME ON MAN . 

1) Vigilante justice is not legal in the US, whether morally justified or not
2) He has been suspended by the NFL network while they review the matter

 

There's also this:
https://www.tmz.com/2016/09/30/willie-mcginest-sued-you-knocked-me-out-cold-called-me-a-B word-ass-n/
 

 

 

Edited by DasNootz
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, T master said:

 

Welcome to the new America guilty until proven innocent ! We've been watching this for the better part of 3 plus years everyday in the media !

 

He should be maybe taken off the job until a investigation into why this happened is done & there can be a determination to exactly why it happened then proceed if any discipline needs doing .

 

But by the looks of it it could have been handled a bit more civilized but there could have been some extenuating circumstances but 4 on 1 COME ON MAN . 

I respectfully disagree that the "why" this happened is pertinent here. Here's an example. Gosh golly gee I'm low of funds for Christmas. I think I'll rob a bank. Im justified right?  I was layed off from my job and Im broke.

 

Or even trickier is  "That SOB harmed my daughter so now Im going to kick his behind to assuage my anger at the injustice of what she endured."

 

Guess what folks. Im not a police force member but my guess is that charges would be brought in each of those cases regardless of why they did  it.  The "why" will be brought up in his defense as a mitigating circumstance and may carry weight as far as reducing punishment if he is found guilty. What happened in the venue isnt i question. It is on Tape.

 

Lets say he did have a reason that people can empathize with aka defensing his daughters honor. My mother used to tell me "2 wrongs don't make a right" Now instead of one injured party (the daughter) there are now 3.....daughter, victim and assaulter (McGinest) And now the daughter conceivably has to deal with the fact her dad will be sued and charged legally and maybe even losing his job on account of something someone allegedly did to Her.  She shouldnt have to carry that weight burden

 

i had to beg my dad to Not beat down the person who assaulted me. I am so glad he didnt. I would rightly or wrongly felt somewhat responsible.

 

Let the legal system do their thing and then the civil courts.  I call what he did Bogus full stop.

 

And on tape so ambiguity  isn't there. I imagine McGinest will have his day in court unless it settles out of court first. 

Edited by muppy
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, muppy said:

I respectfully disagree that the "why" this happened is pertinent here. Here's an example. Gosh golly gee I'm low of funds for Christmas. I think I'll rob a bank. Im justified right?  I was layed off from my job and Im broke.

 

Or even trickier is  "That SOB harmed my daughter so now Im going to kick his behind to assuage my anger at the injustice of what she endured."

 

Guess what folks. Im not a police force member but my guess is that charges would be brought in each of those cases regardless of why they did  it.  The "why" will be brought up in his defense as a mitigating circumstance and may carry weight as far as reducing punishment if he is found guilty. What happened in the venue isnt i question. It is on Tape.

 

Lets say he did have a reason that people can empathize with aka defensing his daughters honor. My mother used to tell me "2 wrongs don't make a right" Now instead of one injured party (the daughter) there are now 3.....daughter, victim and assaulter (McGinest) And now the daughter conceivably has to deal with the fact her dad will be sued and charged legally and maybe even losing his job on account of something someone allegedly did to Her.  She shouldnt have to carry that weight burden

 

i had to beg my dad to Not beat down the person who assaulted me. I am so glad he didnt. I would rightly or wrongly felt somewhat responsible.

 

Let the legal system do their thing and then the civil courts.  I call what he did Bogus full stop.

 

And on tape so ambiguity  isn't there. I imagine McGinest will have his day in court unless it settles out of court first. 

Willie is facing criminal charges.  He can plead guilty or go to trial.  No settling out of court on criminal charges.  He'll probably get sued and in that situation he can settle out of court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's genuinely pathetic to see a guy in his '50s act that way.  I mean, it would be pathetic for anyone, at any age - but he's 51, has a family, and a very high profile job.

 

Sad to see people acting like that, in any circumstances.  Everyone can take a lesson from this:  count to 10, think about what you're doing.  Try to treat everyone in your life and that you encounter better.  We all have choices, every day.  Choose the better options.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

The guy sitting chatting in the booth was committing a crime?  Must have missed that in the video.  Did the cops arrest him too?

 

No one here is "removing him from society".  The criminal justice system is for that.

No where did i say he was actively committing a crime while eating and you know this,  not sure why you want to play games like that. 

 

And yes, many posters have already jumped to remove him from TV and throw him in jail, take a read. 

9 hours ago, teef said:

as i mentioned before, i doubt this happened for noble reasons.  i can't be certain, but i'm certain.  

That's fine, i don't blame people for having their gut feelings on this, but all means do so...  I just think it's silly for people to be so outraged they want him immediately jailed and lose his job and they don't even know anything other than a video clip lol.

9 hours ago, Gugny said:

 

Adults shouldn't be starting fistfights.  McGinest is a 51-year-old man, for Christ's sakes.  Grow the f*ck up.

 

No one is going to remove anyone from society ... calm down.  And why on earth would you use the word "cancel," in this context?

Read through the thread at the amount of people that want him kicked off NFL Network and thrown in prison... without knowing anything about this other than the video clip. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, T master said:

 

So it's okay in your book that 4 people just walk up & start pummeling someone in a public place around a bunch of innocent people ? Wow remind me to not be any where that you are !! 

 

Why don't you enlighten us all on the facts surrounding the reasons why Willy & 3 others just start beating this guy ? As Bill Burr say there had to be a reason that led up to the ass whooping it doesn't just happen .

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2L4UUL8TiY

 

It wouldn't surprise me if alcohol was involved in some way as they say "Instant A Hole just add alcohol" but even then anything short of calling Willy's mom or a family member something very nasty or a personal threat that action is unwarranted !! 

I don't know what the facts are, no one does.  The point is wait for the fact before judging.

 

This guy would need to have done something awful for this to be acceptable. 

 

Some people deserve beatings like this yes, rapists, sexual absuers, child abusers, domestic abusers, etc. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

T

9 hours ago, teef said:

well, he's on camera being guilty of assault, so the whole innocent part is out the window.

 

   We also don't know the extent of the injuries the victim sustained.  That he was able to speak and stand after is amazing.  

 

 

   Myself I loved the fictional premise of Dexter but I always understood I would not condone such vigilante justice to be accepted.  So spare us some fictional possible reasons where this could be justified.  I can come up with all types of fictional stories to justify or to vilify him based on the visual we have.  Not sure if the original video they have has any sound that may offer some of what may have been said during this ambush.

 

 

    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArtVandalay said:

Read through the thread at the amount of people that want him kicked off NFL Network and thrown in prison... without knowing anything about this other than the video clip. 

 

So you think Two Bills Drive community members have the power to remove a man from society?

 

Jesus Christ ... I guess these TBD dues I pay ARE worth it!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, muppy said:

my understanding is he can be tried both ways... legally first, the prosecution and defense conceivably  make a deal and it settles before trial.   then civilly and the same premise applies  I could be wrong.

 

@BringBackFergy

Commonly known as a plea bargain  (not a settlement)and  it’s very possible that could be the end result here. Long way from that at this point though. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

No where did i say he was actively committing a crime while eating and you know this,  not sure why you want to play games like that. 

 

And yes, many posters have already jumped to remove him from TV and throw him in jail, take a read. 

That's fine, i don't blame people for having their gut feelings on this, but all means do so...  I just think it's silly for people to be so outraged they want him immediately jailed and lose his job and they don't even know anything other than a video clip lol.

Read through the thread at the amount of people that want him kicked off NFL Network and thrown in prison... without knowing anything about this other than the video clip. 

Are we really surprised ? Many wanted Jerry Sullivan fired - for the crime of verbally stereotyping the behaviors of a certain subset of fans. The video clip speaks for itself- though we lack details and context. I’m sure many of those same folks would support a guy who just literally pulverized another human being and argue that he doesn’t deserve to lose his job, is misunderstood etc etc. What a &@€!#% up world we live in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, muppy said:

I respectfully disagree that the "why" this happened is pertinent here. Here's an example. Gosh golly gee I'm low of funds for Christmas. I think I'll rob a bank. Im justified right?  I was layed off from my job and Im broke.

 

Or even trickier is  "That SOB harmed my daughter so now Im going to kick his behind to assuage my anger at the injustice of what she endured."

 

Guess what folks. Im not a police force member but my guess is that charges would be brought in each of those cases regardless of why they did  it.  The "why" will be brought up in his defense as a mitigating circumstance and may carry weight as far as reducing punishment if he is found guilty. What happened in the venue isnt i question. It is on Tape.

 

Lets say he did have a reason that people can empathize with aka defensing his daughters honor. My mother used to tell me "2 wrongs don't make a right" Now instead of one injured party (the daughter) there are now 3.....daughter, victim and assaulter (McGinest) And now the daughter conceivably has to deal with the fact her dad will be sued and charged legally and maybe even losing his job on account of something someone allegedly did to Her.  She shouldnt have to carry that weight 

 

   Don't forget now the victims family and friends have the rights to form their own posse to mete out justice for the harm they endured at the hands of Willie and each of his crew.  This now has to rinse and repeat and before you know it everyone is running amok attacking anything that looks at them funny or offends them.  

 

9 hours ago, muppy said:

i had to beg my dad to Not beat down the person who assaulted me. I am so glad he didnt. I would rightly or wrongly felt somewhat responsible.

 

    And that would have just made the injury you already suffered at your assailants hands that much more painful.  You very rightly removed the power that criminal thought he won over you.  

 

9 hours ago, muppy said:

 

Let the legal system do their thing and then the civil courts.  I call what he did Bogus full stop.

 

    I certainly hope that I your case that the law enforcement and justice system apprehended and punished your assailant properly.  

 

9 hours ago, muppy said:

And on tape so ambiguity  isn't there. I imagine McGinest will have his

day in court unless it settles out of court first. 

 

     Thing is as it's very possible this has some sort of gang affiliation, not saying there is, but Willie's age puts him right smack dab in the era where there was alot of gang activity in CA.   I don't recall specific areas but I'd imagine Long Beach isn't far from LA where many gangs were based.  Google gangs in long Beach where Willie is from.  There are 55 known gang affiliations there 1 in every 100 people are involved in a gang there.  That explains the other people in video looking on as if this is a common sight to see.  The police making a statement of this incident maybe related to another incident could just be a previous gang related act of violence which prompted this retaliation. Just because the man has 3 daughters doesn't mean he's suddenly this stand up citizen who must have been triggered into such a brutal act.  And if this is gang related there may be further related retaliation.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

This guy would need to have done something awful for this to be acceptable. 

No, there is nothing that he could have done that would make it acceptable. Understandable perhaps but not acceptable ... unless you have no respect for the rule of law and think vigilantism is okay

6 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

Some people deserve beatings like this yes, rapists, sexual absuers, child abusers, domestic abusers, etc. 

Oh, you do 🙄 I'd be intrigued to know what you would include in your "etc." Where is the line ... and who draws it?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Gunvald's Husse said:

No, there is nothing that he could have done that would make it acceptable. Understandable perhaps but not acceptable ... unless you have no respect for the rule of law and think vigilantism is okay

Oh, you do 🙄 I'd be intrigued to know what you would include in your "etc." Where is the line ... and who draws it?


 

People who refer to Wednesday as “hump day.”

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AuntieEm said:

 

   Don't forget now the victims family and friends have the rights to form their own posse to mete out justice for the harm they endured at the hands of Willie and each of his crew.  This now has to rinse and repeat and before you know it everyone is running amok attacking anything that looks at them funny or offends them.  

 

 

    And that would have just made the injury you already suffered at your assailants hands that much more painful.  You very rightly removed the power that criminal thought he won over you.  

 

 

    I certainly hope that I your case that the law enforcement and justice system apprehended and punished your assailant properly.  

 

 

     Thing is as it's very possible this has some sort of gang affiliation, not saying there is, but Willie's age puts him right smack dab in the era where there was alot of gang activity in CA.   I don't recall specific areas but I'd imagine Long Beach isn't far from LA where many gangs were based.  Google gangs in long Beach where Willie is from.  There are 55 known gang affiliations there 1 in every 100 people are involved in a gang there.  That explains the other people in video looking on as if this is a common sight to see.  The police making a statement of this incident maybe related to another incident could just be a previous gang related act of violence which prompted this retaliation. Just because the man has 3 daughters doesn't mean he's suddenly this stand up citizen who must have been triggered into such a brutal act.  And if this is gang related there may be further related retaliation.  

 

good morning 🙂 thank you for your thoughts. 

 

I dont know how what provoked this incident to occur. What I do know is TMZ and national media will be all over it. Film at 11.

 

PS my perp was caught he was charged with 2 felonies, pled down to guilty for 1 felony 5 years probation. Case closed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

No where did i say he was actively committing a crime while eating and you know this,  not sure why you want to play games like that. 

 

And yes, many posters have already jumped to remove him from TV and throw him in jail, take a read. 

That's fine, i don't blame people for having their gut feelings on this, but all means do so...  I just think it's silly for people to be so outraged they want him immediately jailed and lose his job and they don't even know anything other than a video clip lol.

Read through the thread at the amount of people that want him kicked off NFL Network and thrown in prison... without knowing anything about this other than the video clip. 

I’d rather let it play out and find out what the circumstances were but there’s one thing that is undeniable five guys beat down one guy it’s on camera does Willie McGinest really need for other guys in order to give some common dude a beating add some gang mentality ***** right there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

No where did i say he was actively committing a crime while eating and you know this,  not sure why you want to play games like that. 

 

And yes, many posters have already jumped to remove him from TV and throw him in jail, take a read. 

That's fine, i don't blame people for having their gut feelings on this, but all means do so...  I just think it's silly for people to be so outraged they want him immediately jailed and lose his job and they don't even know anything other than a video clip lol.

Read through the thread at the amount of people that want him kicked off NFL Network and thrown in prison... without knowing anything about this other than the video clip. 

 

McGinnest committed a crime on video.  He casually walked up and beat a guy.  It won't matter what happened before that as far as the law is concerned.  He can't claim self defense so...what will he tell the judge?  What don't we know that would lead the judge to say "oh, that makes sense. you may go free"?

 

You must be thinking of some defense that would free him.  Why don't you just tell us what it is---and spare us your "rapists, sexual absuers, child abusers, domestic abusers" stuff.  Ol' Willie isn't some Street Avenger hunting down bad men.  Even if your bizarro scenario was true--it's not a legal defense, obviously.

 

So tell us what he tell "the judge" that gets him off and back into "society"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

 

That's fine, i don't blame people for having their gut feelings on this, but all means do so...  I just think it's silly for people to be so outraged they want him immediately jailed and lose his job and they don't even know anything other than a video clip lol.

 

i'm not outraged, nor am i looking for any punishment.  just pointing out that it was stupid of him.  when you have that much to lose, you better be smarter.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

I don't know what the facts are, no one does.  The point is wait for the fact before judging.


This is the internet not the courtroom. People can have whatever opinion suits them based on the video.  I think you significantly edited this post but video is very damning it’s not just someone’s interpretation of what might have happened.  You can see it with your own eyes.  
 

can’t wait to find out what led to it.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, maddenboy said:

exactly the opposite

 

this is real life.  I think a lot of you are way overreacting.  Have you never seen a beat down?  This happens all the time

 

Occasionally it will involve a former athlete. 

 

It didnt look like they were trying to kill him.  Just punish him for whatever-or-other.

 

He will be punished.  Sure.  But these things happen all the time in the real world.

I think you’d be laughed out of a juror deliberation room with that argument 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think so.

 

A battery occurred.  By each of several defendants.  ADW too, from the looks of it, because a champagne bottle is definitely a deadly weapon as it was wielded/used here.  Possibly also a criminal conspiracy.

 

Self-defense doesnt seem applicable.

 

I'm not talking about court.  I'm speaking directly to the hysteria in the thread over a simple beatdown-jump.  Just because Mcguinest is a used-to-be, semi-famous athlete in a team sport, on a team we hate.  'Im saying yesterday probably 30-50 people got jumped.  This one is no worse than any other. .

 

 

Edited by maddenboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ArtVandalay said:

No where did i say he was actively committing a crime while eating and you know this,  not sure why you want to play games like that. 

 

And yes, many posters have already jumped to remove him from TV and throw him in jail, take a read. 

That's fine, i don't blame people for having their gut feelings on this, but all means do so...  I just think it's silly for people to be so outraged they want him immediately jailed and lose his job and they don't even know anything other than a video clip lol.

Read through the thread at the amount of people that want him kicked off NFL Network and thrown in prison... without knowing anything about this other than the video clip. 

 

In what world does walking up to someone and starting a 6 on 1 fight then proceeding to smash the man in the face with a giant wine/champagne bottle not constitute some form of assault?

 

Regardless of anything that happened before this, there was no imminent threat to his person so there is no self defense claim, he could have simply walked away and left the area instead of starting that.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AuntieEm said:

 

  Not sure if the original video they have has any sound that may offer some of what may have been said during this ambush.

 

 

    

I didn't find any sound from the video but I am not bad at lip reading. Heres what I can decipher from the video-

 

As McGinest leans over the table of the victim he seems to say - Excuse me good sir, do you by any chance have any Grey Poupon at this table?

 

Victim seems to say - What? You mean mustard?

 

Willy - Must...? Why you! Take that and that..... Hmmmph 

 

Victim  - ooof....uhhh...oww

 

Entourage - Get 'em........ Uhhh....... hmmmph...... show you

 

Willy - My pants...... my pants

 

After altercation

Victim seems to yell - Hah, the jokes on you, I did , in fact, have Grey Poupon all along !!!!

 

Or words to that effect.

Edited by wnyguy
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2022 at 8:09 PM, f0neguy said:

Has he lost his broadcast job yet?

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/12/19/nfl-network-suspends-willie-mcginest-pending-investigation-of-criminal-charges/

[ Don't try to copy title, filled with crap unrelated]

Quote

“We are aware of the incident and the video, which is disturbing. Willie McGinest will not appear on NFL Network while we review the matter,” a spokesman for NFL Network told PFT via email.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I’d rather let it play out and find out what the circumstances were but there’s one thing that is undeniable five guys beat down one guy it’s on camera does Willie McGinest really need for other guys in order to give some common dude a beating add some gang mentality ***** right there

 

There is no circumstance that allows a person to assault someone 6 on 1 when there is no immediate threat of bodily harm to you from that person.  If they felt unsafe for whatever reason(which is BS because what dude who is 6'5" 250 is going to feel unsafe with 5 other dudes the same size or bigger with them), they had the option to leave. Instead they assaulted him, including smacking him in the face repeatedly with a wine/champagne bottle.

 

What "circumstances" make that OK?

1 hour ago, wnyguy said:

I didn't find any sound from the video but I am not bad at lip reading. Heres what I can decipher from the video-

 

As McGinest leans over the table of the victim he seems to say - Excuse me good sir, do you by any chance have any Grey Poupon at this table?

 

Victim seems to say - What? You mean mustard?

 

Willy - Must...? Why you! Take that and that..... Hmmmph 

 

Victim  - ooof....uhhh...oww

 

Entourage - Get 'em........ Uhhh....... hmmmph...... show you

 

Willy - My pants...... my pants

 

After altercation

Victim seems to yell - Hah, the jokes on you, I did , in fact, have Grey Poupon all along !!!!

 

Or words to that effect.

 

LMAO!!!

 

What you didn't see before this is that Willie asked the gentleman for some Polaner All-Fruit and the guy shouted to his friend across the table "Would you please pass the jelly!"...Willie got so offended he had to be held back, a member of his entourage fainted...the Grey Poupon incident was simply the straw that broke the camel's back...can't be dining with Heathen's like that in a swanky club in LA...

 

 

Edited by Big Turk
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gugny said:

 

image.png.2d78f4b7adc5ab50f4306efd8dd6a4ee.png

 

never caught him

3 hours ago, maddenboy said:

I dont think so.

 

A battery occurred.  By each of several defendants.  ADW too, from the looks of it, because a champagne bottle is definitely a deadly weapon as it was wielded/used here.  Possibly also a criminal conspiracy.

 

Self-defense doesnt seem applicable.

 

I'm not talking about court.  I'm speaking directly to the hysteria in the thread over a simple beatdown-jump.  Just because Mcguinest is a used-to-be, semi-famous athlete in a team sport, on a team we hate.  'Im saying yesterday probably 30-50 people got jumped.  This one is no worse than any other. .

 

 

 

Plus indecent exposure...

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

Anyone who's anyone knows that you wait until they leave the restaurant before jumping them.

 

That's the true gangsta move...

 

Fake gangstas come and fake gangstas go...

Real gangstas chill cause real gangstas know...

that too much heat will get you beef on the street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2022 at 3:26 PM, WideNine said:

This on top of that epic embarrassment of a game against the Raiders... Pat fans will be jumping off bridges.


Can't get enough of Chandler Jones just shoving Mac to the turf by his face as he runs over him for the game-clinching TD.

 

 

 

Capture3.JPG

And If you watch Mac tries to trip him too. I hate Mac Jones he’s such a scumbag.

Edited by BeefCurtns
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said:


This is the internet not the courtroom. People can have whatever opinion suits them based on the video.  I think you significantly edited this post but video is very damning it’s not just someone’s interpretation of what might have happened.  You can see it with your own eyes.  
 

can’t wait to find out what led to it.  

Not sure what you are referring to, didn't edit the post you quoted, it would say if i did.

 

Blows my mind that waiting for factual information is such a ground breaking take.

 

I mean do you people go through life making snap judgements with no facts? 

13 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

McGinnest committed a crime on video.  He casually walked up and beat a guy.  It won't matter what happened before that as far as the law is concerned.  He can't claim self defense so...what will he tell the judge?  What don't we know that would lead the judge to say "oh, that makes sense. you may go free"?

 

You must be thinking of some defense that would free him.  Why don't you just tell us what it is---and spare us your "rapists, sexual absuers, child abusers, domestic abusers" stuff.  Ol' Willie isn't some Street Avenger hunting down bad men.  Even if your bizarro scenario was true--it's not a legal defense, obviously.

 

So tell us what he tell "the judge" that gets him off and back into "society"?

Not talking legality, talking morality. You don't know any information but you have all the answers, I'm merely reserving judgements for the facts.

 

Oh yes, I'll spare you the example of abuse because as we all know children or women are never raped or abused this day and age, you're right. My bad.  Would never happen. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ArtVandalay said:

Not sure what you are referring to, didn't edit the post you quoted, it would say if i did.

 

Blows my mind that waiting for factual information is such a ground breaking take.

 

I mean do you people go through life making snap judgements with no facts? 

Not talking legality, talking morality. You don't know any information but you have all the answers, I'm merely reserving judgements for the facts.

 

Oh yes, I'll spare you the example of abuse because as we all know children or women are never raped or abused this day and age, you're right. My bad.  Would never happen. 

 

Can you point the child rapers in that video?

 

 

So now you are reduced to (clinging to, really), the absurdity that McGinest was wandering around Vegas lounges looking for the bad guy and administering street/"moral" justice to them on behalf of the raped and abused?  

 

And that to challenge your (ahem) logic.... is tantamount to asserting  that women and children "are never raped or abused in this day and age"?

 

keep this gold river flowing, man---this is good stuff!

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...