Jump to content

NFL Draft Rumors


HappyDays

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

we talking arm length or weight here?

Probably a combination of both

 

he doesn't have bad length but it's about average and he's a little slight for a center 

 

So he doesn't really have position versatility.. he would need more mass or length for a guard 

 

The lack of flexibility will push him down the board a little bit probably 

 

He still grades out as a good starting center.. but he's had some problems moving some zero and one techs in college.. some bigger plugs will give him some fits 

 

All of that I can see sliding him to the second round where a lot of good interior lineman go 

 

If he was 310 no doubt he's top 30

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Jameson Williams AND Breece Hall

 

BIG BALLER BEANE


No defense fears Devin Singletary.

They will fear Breece Hall.

He is a Dynamic RB who can be a weapon in the passing game.

 

that element to this offense puts every defense in a lose lose scenario on how to defend us….

 


 

Why would they fear him?  Most teams would prefer we run as they fear Josh Allen.

 

If he becomes top 5 in the league - he is basically matching what Singletary does.  
 

Overall our rushing is hurt because he will not average what Josh gets and those are the carries Hall would get.

 

The only way it changes how defenses approach us is if we take a significant number of plays out of Josh’s hands and become a more run focused team.  Otherwise Hall is just CEH in KC - no one cares if he runs the ball - you stayed deep because Hill and Kelce are what will beat you.

 

 

Edited by Rochesterfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, newcam2012 said:

Generally speaking, I don't disagree.  However, the Bills are in a great position to make a super bowl run. Thus, they are in a win it all mode. All those picks in the lower rounds aren't likely to contribute to the win it all theme. Maybe, I'm wrong thinking that? I'd much rather have them trade up in rounds 1 to 3.  Personally, I'd love to see Sauce or Stingly in a Bills uniform. Unfortunately, I think the price is just too much. 

That's fair. 

No, you're not wrong.  :)

 

The chances a player will be successful in the NFL go up, the closer you get to day 1.  I'm sure there have been some analyses of this.  Personally I'm thinking that the Bills might try to trade up in round TWO, and/or THREE this year, but not ONE, unless a player they have graded as a top 15 slips to 20 or so, and is a "must have, at the expense of giving up a valuable 3rd rounder for example.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing to remember with all draft rumours is that nobody knows. Even GMs with their myriad of contacts don't know who each of their 31 counterparts will take. A lot of it is speaking to 4 or 5 teams and having a decent feel for them and then putting 2 and 2 together. Sometimes on draft day those rumours turn out to be accurate. It was about this time in 2018 that it really started to become apparent that Baker Mayfield was going to go #1 for example. But equally other years the 2 and 2 ends up equalling 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

That’s exactly my point… CEH was a complete waste of a first round pick… you’d think the Bills would see that from the team that’s bounced them twice from the playoffs the last two years. 

I think if they do take an offensive player in the first, McD will be yanking Beanes chain for Hall or an offensive linemen if one of the good ones drops…. Def not for a WR. JMO.

It’s so freaking lazy to just reference CEH anytime a first round runner comes up. He’s just not very good. It was a miss. It that pick was a solid hit their offense would be that much more dynamic. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

It’s so freaking lazy to just reference CEH anytime a first round runner comes up. He’s just not very good. It was a miss. It that pick was a solid hit their offense would be that much more dynamic. 

 

Thank ***** they didn't draft JT. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Thank ***** they didn't draft JT. 

I was gonna reference him but I can’t remember how realistic of an option he was for the first round at the time. I think he went in the 40’s…. But ya. That’s sorta my point. Again, referencing CEH is just lazy. I can mention a miss for any position. That’s not hard. They had a ready made roster and wanted a cherry on top of the offense. IMO the philosophically the logic was sound. They just missed on the player. 
 

Now a team like Pitt with holes all over their roster taking one in the 20’s last year?… that was foolish IMO. 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

I was gonna reference him but I can’t remember how realistic of an option he was for the first round at the time. I think he went in the 40’s…. But ya. That’s sorta my point. Again, referencing CEH is just lazy. I can mention a miss for any position. That’s not hard. They had a ready made roster and wanted a cherry on top of the offense. IMO the philosophically the logic was sound. They just missed on the player. 
 

Now a team like Pitt with holes all over their roster taking one in the 20’s last year?… that was foolish IMO. 

 

So I still disagree on the philosophy, but I take the point totally that just pointing at individual players who bust doesn't prove or disprove the point at all. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So I still disagree on the philosophy, but I take the point totally that just pointing at individual players who bust doesn't prove or disprove the point at all. 

Fair enough. I see absolutely no issue with taking a player that can add explosive elements to your offense, regardless of position, once a roster has been filled out like this one has. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone think the Giants and Daboll take a QB with one of their first rounders?  I mean, there’s no way they pick up Jones’s fifth year option next week, right? Or do they try to move back and pick up another 2023 first rounder? Personally, I think it’s unlikely, but not impossible, that they take one this year…

Edited by mannc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mannc said:

Does anyone think the Giants and Daboll take a QB with one of their first rounders?  I mean, there’s no way they pick up Jones’s fifth year option next week, right? Or do they try to move back and pick up another 2023 first rounder? Personally, I think it’s unlikely, but not impossible, that they take one this year…

 

I am surprised they haven't looked into getting Mayfield. He may not have lived up to his #1 pick status but he is better then Jones. We all saw how Daboll helped Allen. Whose to say he can't help Baker.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

Fair enough. I see absolutely no issue with taking a player that can add explosive elements to your offense, regardless of position, once a roster has been filled out like this one has. 

 

But the way contracts and the cap work means your roster is never "filled out" for long. So I'd rather take a premium position guy that I might not "start" in 2022 but that will be down the line rather than take the "luxury pick" at running back.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, newcam2012 said:

Generally speaking, I don't disagree.  However, the Bills are in a great position to make a super bowl run. Thus, they are in a win it all mode. All those picks in the lower rounds aren't likely to contribute to the win it all theme. Maybe, I'm wrong thinking that? I'd much rather have them trade up in rounds 1 to 3.  Personally, I'd love to see Sauce or Stingly in a Bills uniform. Unfortunately, I think the price is just too much. 

That's fair. 

Where would this team be without Matt Milano and Taron Johnson on defense? What about Siran Neal or Bass on ST? All of them were 2nd day picks. It's nice to think that all that matters are your top guys but a team is more than that. It's why you sign Trubisky last year and trade for Keenum this season. It's why Tawain Jones keeps getting brought back. It's going to be more important when Poyer, Edmunds and Gabe Davis and McKenzie and maybe Knox are off it. Going all in when you have a QB about to hit his prime will middle you out when your franchise player could be at his best not wise if ask me. While I'm all for taking a CB in Round 1 since helps the starting 22 and overall depth is much wiser than risking picks for a one year wonder injured WR. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More from Charlie Campbell:

 

https://walterfootball.com/nflhotpress/article/2022-NFL-Draft-Week-Rumors-Tuesday

 

Quote

One of the wild cards high in the first round of the 2022 NFL Draft is Oregon defensive end Kayvon Thibodeaux. Entering the 2022 NFL Draft process, Thibodeaux was a favorite to go No. 1 overall, but he fell from that standing due to a variety of reasons. Those include his 2021 tape being not dominant as in the past and that he took a lot of plays off. Thibodeaux also developed a reputation of being focused on "his brand" and not loving football. Here is the quote from an AFC director of college scouting:

 

"Thibs is a bit overhyped - good but not a deluxe athlete. Kayvon doesn't love ball, isn't a team guy and everything is transactional with him, like a business deal. Big smoker & teammates roll their eyes at him. Got a lot of crap that comes with him, and he's not a freak."

 

Other team sources said that Thibodeaux did poorly in the interviews and he bombed some pre-draft visits. That being said, teams like his speed off the edge and natural quarterback-hunting skills. With that conundrum, Thibodeaux could as high as No. 3 overall to the Texans or he could slide to late in the top 10 or to the early teens. If he does slide, the character issues and the reputation for not loving football will be why.

 

Quote

While Thibodeaux's poor reputation has gotten publicity leading up the 2022 NFL Draft, another edge rusher who is receiving poor marks for character has flown under the radar, Florida State defensive end Jermaine Johnson. Multiple team sources say Johnson's character issues are significant, with one director of player personnel labelling Johnson as worse than Thibodeaux. Teams received negative feedback from Georgia, and the character issues played a part in Johnson transferring from the Bulldogs for his senior year. Johnson did well in the pre-draft workouts and at the Senior Bowl, so he is probably safe as a top-20 selection. But if he slides, the makeup question will be what is dragging him down.

 

Quote

Notre Dame safety Kyle Hamilton slid during the draft process thanks to some slow 40 times and workouts that were not impressive. For the Fighting Irish, Hamilton looked big, athletic and fast, so it was somewhat surprising that he did not work out better. A reason for that might be that Hamilton did not attack the draft workout training like most prospects do. Here are the comments from a source with team that could select a safety in the first or second round of the 2022 NFL Draft.

 

"He's just not the worker and leader that most of the Notre Dame guys are," said a NFC director of player personnel. "He's a little selfish also."

 

Hamilton is young as a true junior, so perhaps as he matures, he will become a more focused professional.

 

Quote

Some NFL sources told WalterFootball.com there is chatter that the Packers are interested in trading up for a wide receiver. With four selections in the top-59 picks, Green Bay has plenty of ammo to do it. Obviously, the Packers are in dire need of a potential No. 1 wide receiver after trading Davante Adams to the Raiders. This is second-hand information from team sources and not coming from Green Bay, so it has to be taken with some skepticism given the timing. Still, it would not be surprising if the Packers were aggressive about landing Aaron Rodgers a new weapon.

 

Quote

Another second-hand rumor going around with team sources is that both the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens covet Georgia nose tackle Jordan Davis. The Ravens hold the 14th pick, and the Eagles are one behind them at No. 15, so if Philadelphia wants to ensure it can land Davis, the organization may have to a short trade up like it did last year for DeVonta Smith.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

The top 3 possibilities that drafting Breece Hall in round 1 open up:

 

1. Taking the ball out of Josh Allen's hands more.

2. Keeping the RB's as a group from getting into a rhythm by dividing carries even further.

3. Potentially lowering the production per play from the alternative of handing it off to the very productive Devin Singletary.

 

I understand that Hall tested well but he didn't have a better college career rushing the football than Devin Singletary and neither were exceptional pass catchers.

 

Singletary's NFL career 4.7 yards per carry is not going to be easy to substantially upgrade from.    For reference,  the revered Johnathon Taylor has a career 5.3 ypc.........just a half yard per carry more.........and that's a high end result.     The odds are actually much greater that Hall will produce less ypc than Singletary..........because most highly drafted RB's do.  

This is exactly where I’m at too, especially point #1. Everytime we turn around and hand it off, the defense is ecstatic because it’s no longer in Josh’s hands. I’m not saying we can’t be more dynamic back there, but why kind of team do we want to be? You want to pound the rock or throw it around? I’m the latter. That said, teams are going to be playing light boxes all year against us to force us to run more so we need guys that can take the short passes and take them to the house or can keep the defense honest if we hand it off. Teams don’t fear singletary but would they fear Hall? No clue. I think our O line was such a mess last year that even Hall wouldn’t have been successful. Is Hall a dynamic pass catcher out of the backfield? If so then maybe that’s something we really need and would help to offset the defenses josh is definitely going to be seeing this year. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BeavercreekBillsFan said:

This is exactly where I’m at too, especially point #1. Everytime we turn around and hand it off, the defense is ecstatic because it’s no longer in Josh’s hands. I’m not saying we can’t be more dynamic back there, but why kind of team do we want to be? You want to pound the rock or throw it around? I’m the latter. That said, teams are going to be playing light boxes all year against us to force us to run more so we need guys that can take the short passes and take them to the house or can keep the defense honest if we hand it off. Teams don’t fear singletary but would they fear Hall? No clue. I think our O line was such a mess last year that even Hall wouldn’t have been successful. Is Hall a dynamic pass catcher out of the backfield? If so then maybe that’s something we really need and would help to offset the defenses josh is definitely going to be seeing this year. 

im not on board with rb in 1st, but the argument of taking the ball outta joshs hands is crazy... hall is a guy that can run routes and screens. you can run the ball the same amount as last year and have it be effective. 3rd n short would be nice to not have our half billion $ qb taking a beating for 3 yards. you can be a balanced team and still pass 75/25. also josh would certainly benefit from a guy that keeps teams outta 2 high safety, instead of having to go against the current with it.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Logic said:

"Sounds like a smokescreen to me" is often draft-season-speak for "I don't like the rumor I'm hearing".

Yes, sometimes this stuff IS a smokescreen. Sometimes it's not. Very often, the more arduously one dislikes a given rumor, the more vehemently they will insist it's a smokescreen.

I wonder, for instance: If the rumor was that the Bills planned to stay put and take the best corner available, or, say, that they really like Andrew Booth...would people insist THAT'S a smokescreen, too? (Cue insistent "yes!" defenses here).

Draft season is too long. By the Monday of draft week, the arguments and counter arguments have all been made. The hay is in the barn. All that's left is kookiness.

Let it be Thursday night already...

It’s definitely draft fatigue hitting. But most bills fans seem to want this RB and a lot don’t want a corner so not sure. Draft week is just heavy smokescreen time so anything getting to the media is getting there in calculated fashion. 
 

Who has espn+ and can tell me what Matt Miller predicted for Bills?

 

 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

But the way contracts and the cap work means your roster is never "filled out" for long. So I'd rather take a premium position guy that I might not "start" in 2022 but that will be down the line rather than take the "luxury pick" at running back.

Ehhhh. Havnt we been thinking about “down the line” for a couple decades now? I’ll take the immediate upgrade. It’s not like this is something that’s gonna bankrupt the franchise. 
 

this is probably the wrong thread for all this though. So I’ll be moving on. Good talk, as always. 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Jokeman said:

Where would this team be without Matt Milano and Taron Johnson on defense? What about Siran Neal or Bass on ST? All of them were 2nd day picks. It's nice to think that all that matters are your top guys but a team is more than that. It's why you sign Trubisky last year and trade for Keenum this season. It's why Tawain Jones keeps getting brought back. It's going to be more important when Poyer, Edmunds and Gabe Davis and McKenzie and maybe Knox are off it. Going all in when you have a QB about to hit his prime will middle you out when your franchise player could be at his best not wise if ask me. While I'm all for taking a CB in Round 1 since helps the starting 22 and overall depth is much wiser than risking picks for a one year wonder injured WR. 

Nice analysis. Agree on the the corner vs an injuried WR. Depth and development should always be considered. I get that and agree. However, the idea of getting one or two studs to take you over the top is equally appealing. Look at the Miller pick up and Diggs signing. I suppose when you are an elite team like the Bills; you have to weigh the two and make quality decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BeavercreekBillsFan said:

This is exactly where I’m at too, especially point #1. Everytime we turn around and hand it off, the defense is ecstatic because it’s no longer in Josh’s hands. I’m not saying we can’t be more dynamic back there, but why kind of team do we want to be? You want to pound the rock or throw it around? I’m the latter. That said, teams are going to be playing light boxes all year against us to force us to run more so we need guys that can take the short passes and take them to the house or can keep the defense honest if we hand it off. Teams don’t fear singletary but would they fear Hall? No clue. I think our O line was such a mess last year that even Hall wouldn’t have been successful. Is Hall a dynamic pass catcher out of the backfield? If so then maybe that’s something we really need and would help to offset the defenses josh is definitely going to be seeing this year. 

 

Not necessarily in love with Breece Hall at 25, but Singletary catches the ball, then turns up field, then gets what he can.   Breece Hall is fluid in his pass catching, meaning that unlike Singletary (who is ok in the pass game), he catches and goes in one motion, and then looks to make a big play with his speed and cut back ability.  

 

Not sure if that makes any sense, but what I see with Breece Hall is a guy who can take those Allen checkdowns against 2 deep safety looks and do damage... whereas Singletary just gets what's there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jermaine Johnson thing from Charlie Campbell maybe is true but a guy at Georgia who isn’t getting PT even though he’s likely a top 10 pick this cycle would be a source of frustration. 
 

I’m as big of a backer of Johnson as any but I find that to be untrue. Everyone at FSU said he was a model teammate, never complained despite the team being 5-7 and came back for Norvell twice to recruit including transfer DE Jared Verse and their spring game. Verse even stated that having that 1 on 1 conversation was a big reason he decided to transfer to Florida State

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

It’s definitely draft fatigue hitting. But most bills fans seem to want this RB and a lot don’t want a corner so not sure. Draft week is just heavy smokescreen time so anything getting to the media is getting there in calculated fashion. 
 

Who has espn+ and can tell me what Matt Miller predicted for Bills?

 

 

I’m a sucker who pays for it…

 

Mcduffie

Tolbert

James Cook

Zachary Carter

Cade Mays

Cole Kelley

Terrel Bernard

Jordan Stout.

 

I really hate that mock. I like Stout in the 7th the most out of all his picks..

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Motor26 said:

I’m a sucker who pays for it…

 

Mcduffie

Tolbert

James Cook

Zachary Carter

Cade Mays

Cole Kelley

Terrel Bernard

Jordan Stout.

 

I really hate that mock. I like Stout in the 7th the most out of all his picks..

 

I like McDuffie (position of need, dont know enough about all the corners to know which one I would prefer), Cook (added speed/pass catching weapon) and Mays picks

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PaattMaann said:

 

I like McDuffie (position of need, dont know enough about all the corners to know which one I would prefer), Cook (added speed/pass catching weapon) and Mays picks


I like Cook, but 89 seems a bit early for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeavercreekBillsFan said:

This is exactly where I’m at too, especially point #1. Everytime we turn around and hand it off, the defense is ecstatic because it’s no longer in Josh’s hands. I’m not saying we can’t be more dynamic back there, but why kind of team do we want to be? You want to pound the rock or throw it around? I’m the latter. That said, teams are going to be playing light boxes all year against us to force us to run more so we need guys that can take the short passes and take them to the house or can keep the defense honest if we hand it off. Teams don’t fear singletary but would they fear Hall? No clue. I think our O line was such a mess last year that even Hall wouldn’t have been successful. Is Hall a dynamic pass catcher out of the backfield? If so then maybe that’s something we really need and would help to offset the defenses josh is definitely going to be seeing this year. 

 

 

Devin Singletary is a career 4.7 ypc RB who actually put up better numbers in college than Hall.     

 

For comparison........Leonard Fournette.......long lusted after by RB-centric Bills fans........ is just a career 4.0 ypc RB.........and pretty consistently high 3's and low 4's whether playing with Blake Bortles or Tom Brady.

 

Bills fans simply have a bad case of thinking the grass is always greener because the RB has a higher draft stock or runs a better 40 at a bigger size...........which has been proven wrong time and time again.

 

In the unlikely event that the Bills got top of the league production from Hall..........like Nick Chubb or Johnathon Taylor.....5.3 ypc on 15 carries per game(255 carry pace)..........that's a measly 9 more yards total per game versus an average Singletary day.    

 

The Bills should definitely add a RB on day 3 because Singletary is a free agent after the season and because it is a very deep pool or RB's............but they don't need to draft one in the first round and park the productive Singletary on the bench or have them split 20 carries per game.

 

McDermott may disagree.........maybe the objective is to pound the rock for 12 games and then go back into panic mode in December and start running Josh Allen 10 times per game.    Either way I don't think you need a first round RB.   History has proven that over and over.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeavercreekBillsFan said:

This is exactly where I’m at too, especially point #1. Everytime we turn around and hand it off, the defense is ecstatic because it’s no longer in Josh’s hands. I’m not saying we can’t be more dynamic back there, but why kind of team do we want to be? You want to pound the rock or throw it around? I’m the latter. That said, teams are going to be playing light boxes all year against us to force us to run more so we need guys that can take the short passes and take them to the house or can keep the defense honest if we hand it off. Teams don’t fear singletary but would they fear Hall? No clue. I think our O line was such a mess last year that even Hall wouldn’t have been successful. Is Hall a dynamic pass catcher out of the backfield? If so then maybe that’s something we really need and would help to offset the defenses josh is definitely going to be seeing this year. 

This has been kind of my feeling too. Why would we draft a bell cow type rb high, to give him 20+ carries a game when we have an elite franchise passer at qb. We arent going to be a turn around and hand the ball off type offense with josh allen. 

The rb would have to be special. Dont see that with hall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeavercreekBillsFan said:

This is exactly where I’m at too, especially point #1. Everytime we turn around and hand it off, the defense is ecstatic because it’s no longer in Josh’s hands. I’m not saying we can’t be more dynamic back there, but why kind of team do we want to be? You want to pound the rock or throw it around? I’m the latter. That said, teams are going to be playing light boxes all year against us to force us to run more so we need guys that can take the short passes and take them to the house or can keep the defense honest if we hand it off. Teams don’t fear singletary but would they fear Hall? No clue. I think our O line was such a mess last year that even Hall wouldn’t have been successful. Is Hall a dynamic pass catcher out of the backfield? If so then maybe that’s something we really need and would help to offset the defenses josh is definitely going to be seeing this year. 

You do realize Hall is a good weapon in the receiving game too right?  It’s obvious they want a RB that can catch as was evidenced by their attempt to get McKissic. Hall is the best pass catching RB in the draft. 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, newcam2012 said:

Nice analysis. Agree on the the corner vs an injuried WR. Depth and development should always be considered. I get that and agree. However, the idea of getting one or two studs to take you over the top is equally appealing. Look at the Miller pick up and Diggs signing. I suppose when you are an elite team like the Bills; you have to weigh the two and make quality decisions. 

I think some here under value Marquez Stevenson as a WR. He showed some good play last preseason toss in feel the WR depth in this draft is big similar to the year we got Gabe Davis in the 3rd. I don't see a stud WR putting us over the top this year. That's why am not advocating trading up for one. 

Edited by The Jokeman
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Bills select Hall, it’s because they believe he’s capable of catching a 5 yard pass and turning it into a 60 yard TD. They don’t currently have that player on the roster and Beane referenced needing that sort of talent. You can draft it at WR and add it to that group, but personally I’d rather have it at RB. He doesn’t have to carry it 25+ times a game.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Devin Singletary is a career 4.7 ypc RB who actually put up better numbers in college than Hall.     

 

For comparison........Leonard Fournette.......long lusted after by RB-centric Bills fans........ is just a career 4.0 ypc RB.........and pretty consistently high 3's and low 4's whether playing with Blake Bortles or Tom Brady.

 

Bills fans simply have a bad case of thinking the grass is always greener because the RB has a higher draft stock or runs a better 40 at a bigger size...........which has been proven wrong time and time again.

 

In the unlikely event that the Bills got top of the league production from Hall..........like Nick Chubb or Johnathon Taylor.....5.3 ypc on 15 carries per game(255 carry pace)..........that's a measly 9 more yards total per game versus an average Singletary day.    

 

The Bills should definitely add a RB on day 3 because Singletary is a free agent after the season and because it is a very deep pool or RB's............but they don't need to draft one in the first round and park the productive Singletary on the bench or have them split 20 carries per game.

 

McDermott may disagree.........maybe the objective is to pound the rock for 12 games and then go back into panic mode in December and start running Josh Allen 10 times per game.    Either way I don't think you need a first round RB.   History has proven that over and over.

To be fair Devin's level of competition as FIU probably worse than Hall's has been at ISU. That said I'm not big on taking a RB in Round 1. I think a complimentary RB to Motor can be found later than sooner. The guy I like to fit Round 4/5 area we could take to me is Ty Chandler. As he has the timed/breakaway speed and can also line up as a WR and return kicks and what this team could use as a RB3 behind Singletary/Johnson.

 

Edited by The Jokeman
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

Where would this team be without Matt Milano and Taron Johnson on defense? What about Siran Neal or Bass on ST? All of them were 2nd day picks. It's nice to think that all that matters are your top guys but a team is more than that. It's why you sign Trubisky last year and trade for Keenum this season. It's why Tawain Jones keeps getting brought back. It's going to be more important when Poyer, Edmunds and Gabe Davis and McKenzie and maybe Knox are off it. Going all in when you have a QB about to hit his prime will middle you out when your franchise player could be at his best not wise if ask me. While I'm all for taking a CB in Round 1 since helps the starting 22 and overall depth is much wiser than risking picks for a one year wonder injured WR. 

A good GM earns his keep on days 2 and 3.  Not to say that you can keep missing on No. 1 picks...like every Jet GM for the past 20 years, but you build your team after day 1.

 

As much as people say there is a limit of Round 1 grades this year, that may be true.  But it doesn't mean the day 2 and 3 players are all mediocre. 

 

Quite to the contrary, IMO.  There is a really good pool of outstanding athletes who have produced, but usually at a lower level of competition.

 

Troy Anderson - N Dakota St.

Christian Watson - N. Dakota St.

Pierre Strong - S. Dakota St.

Zyon McCollum - Sam Houston St.

Danny Gray- SMU

Tycen Anderson - Toledo

 

to name a few. Put their physical numbers against most of the first round guys and they equal or exceed them.

 

Some are better athletes than given credit, like Chenal of Wisconsin.  His RAS is outstanding...he just needs proper training on pass pro.  Thorton of Baylor ran a sub 4.3 40 and is 6'3"...and can go up and get the ball...he just needs to put on 15-20 pounds.  He's a bean pole, but a stronger bean pole than he looks. 

 

Honestly, this a draft pool that would make John Butler salivate. And the beauty is, with the way the current roster is, you can afford to take a chance on one or more of these guys.  You don't have to take only "pretty good players", who will never be more than pretty good.   

 

Just my opinion, but I expect a good, solid, contributing starter in round 1, but have the feeling the true stud comes in a later round.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, HappyDays said:

I swear we had this thread last year, to track all of the general rumors leading up to the draft.

 

Here's a few this week from Charlie Campbell who has been on point with the info he's put out before:

 

https://walterfootball.com/nflhotpress/article/2022-NFL-Draft-Week-Rumors-Monday

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The note about Daxton Hill is the most intriguing to me. I thought he would be a strong candidate to be our pick at 25. But if he has concerns about his mental makeup he won't have a 1st round grade from Beane.

I can't believe people still believe Walter Football has any first hand knowledge of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said:

I can't believe people still believe Walter Football has any first hand knowledge of anything.

 

I won't speak for Walter himself, but Charlie Campbell has legitimate sources. As a result every year he is one of the most accurate mock drafters out there.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...