Jump to content

Huh, this is weird (Jags game personnel sets)


Hapless Bills Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

No reason to disbelieve this, but it's weird

 

 

Given the struggles in run blocking and pass protection, one might think a little (2,1) with Gilliam as a HB or (1,2) with an extra OL blocking would not be amiss

 

It's almost as though at times Daboll doesn't even have those plays in the gameplan for the week.

or even two HB's and let them both chip for the tackles on the way out to the flats.  Give the WR's time to work down the field and the middle and back the coverage even further off so if you do outlet to a back he has 3 or 4 yards before they close on him.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just shows me Josh and the offense feels most comfortable with that personnel.  They haven't had nearly any success this year with different personnel except in the red zone.  They ran 38 out of 40 plays in 11 personnel in the 2nd half against the Fins where they scored 23 points and abandoned the 4 WR set.  They scored 31 points against the Titans with over 90% of their plays in 11 personnel.  I guess Daboll just thought it would work eventually.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Just shows me Josh and the offense feels most comfortable with that personnel.  They haven't had nearly any success this year with different personnel except in the red zone.  They ran 38 out of 40 plays in 11 personnel in the 2nd half against the Fins where they scored 23 points and abandoned the 4 WR set.  They scored 31 points against the Titans with over 90% of their plays in 11 personnel.  I guess Daboll just thought it would work eventually.

This is exactly right as for why to run 11. 
What is concerning is the lack of points scored from it in the Jax game. Not sure bringing in an extra TE will do much at this point unless you can run multiple plays from it. This oline needs the benefit of the d not knowing what’s coming. It seems if the D can anticipate a run by the Bills, it gets stoped for little to no gain. This oline isn’t physical enough to maul and they appear to be struggling with assignments in zone. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

No reason to disbelieve this, but it's weird

 

 

Given the struggles in run blocking and pass protection, one might think a little (2,1) with Gilliam as a HB or (1,2) with an extra OL blocking would not be amiss

 

It's almost as though at times Daboll doesn't even have those plays in the gameplan for the week.

 

I don't really find it that weird. The Bills ran 11 personnel something like 75% of the time last year. It's their bread and butter personnel wise and what they should be doing. I guess it's weird that it was every single play but it's their strength on offense. They did run 11 with an extra OL instead of TE on a couple occasions.. which didn't work, so there's that.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dabolls entire offense has been weird this year.  One of my favorite things about his offense in the past was the ability to give different looks out of the same play setup.  The jet sweep to Mckenzie had multiple variations.

 

Now it seems like they have one look on passing downs and one on running downs.   Its been very bland.   

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills have tried to be stubborn with the running game this year, even when it's not been working. I think the reason they didn't in this game was actually complete disrespect for the Jags.

 

It was as though they were thinking, this is the JAGS for Christ's sake, eventually we'll hit them for the 1 big play we need in order to win, because they sure as ***** arn't getting a TD on us.

 

I don't think we'll see them do that again, so in that respect the loss probably did them some good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting: I think it shows the utter lack of preparation for that game. Which also factored into the lack of late game adjustments. It’s like when you thought a test was going to be easy so you blew off studying the night before and ended up sitting there staring at the exam wondering ‘when did we learn this’? Pathetic performance by a professional football team vying for a championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said:

Dabolls entire offense has been weird this year.  One of my favorite things about his offense in the past was the ability to give different looks out of the same play setup.  The jet sweep to Mckenzie had multiple variations.

 

Now it seems like they have one look on passing downs and one on running downs.   Its been very bland.   

Are they saving the good stuff for the stretch run and playoffs??  Maybe they felt this game was winnable just showing basic packages.  If so, we outsmarted ourselves.  Go Bills!!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

No reason to disbelieve this, but it's weird

 

 

Given the struggles in run blocking and pass protection, one might think a little (2,1) with Gilliam as a HB or (1,2) with an extra OL blocking would not be amiss

 

It's almost as though at times Daboll doesn't even have those plays in the gameplan for the week.

Didn't we have a QB named Thad Brown once?  (Or something like that?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think part of issue is who is injured- we only at most 5 good lineman and one decent blocking tight end- making it difficult to get people on the field to help move the ball. I am little surprised they did not bring in Gilliam to help out in the backfield but maybe he is less of a blocker than I realize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said before... Daboll does not know how to mix things up.  He doesn't mix up personnel.  He doesn't mix up the pass/run downs very well.  He just doesn't.  There are hardly any motions or misdirection this year either.  I don't care that McKenzie is the punt returner.  It was a staple last season.  If he can go in there and catch passes and try to block then he can fake and run jet sweeps.  The Bills are making it too easy on a defense.

 

Its almost as if they took an explosive offense of last year and dumbed it down.

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

I don't really find it that weird. The Bills ran 11 personnel something like 75% of the time last year. It's their bread and butter personnel wise and what they should be doing. I guess it's weird that it was every single play but it's their strength on offense. They did run 11 with an extra OL instead of TE on a couple occasions.. which didn't work, so there's that.

Cant argue that point. And although I think it's important to strike a balance between the pass and run game it shouldn't be forced into the game plan when your passing scheme is so freaking good.  It should be sprinkled in until it reaches a level of respect from opposing defenses which we clearly do not have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

As I have said before... Daboll does not know how to mix things up.  He doesn't mix up personnel. 

 

Except that the reason this is notable to me is that normally, the Bills do "mix things up" with personnel much more than this.

You can find data at

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/nfl-stats/personnel-groupings/offense/offensive-personnel-grouping-frequency-2021/

On average, we run 66% (1,1), 8% (1,2), 7% (2,1), 12% (1,0) and 1-2% of 4 other formations.

(doesn't seem to have week 9 stats up there yet)

12 hours ago, Wayne Cubed said:

 

I don't really find it that weird. The Bills ran 11 personnel something like 75% of the time last year. It's their bread and butter personnel wise and what they should be doing. I guess it's weird that it was every single play but it's their strength on offense. They did run 11 with an extra OL instead of TE on a couple occasions.. which didn't work, so there's that.

 

Well, it's weird to me because if we were struggling to run the ball or if Sweeney was struggling with blocking, how about trying a fullback (2,0)?

And we usually do (as you point out) change things up at least 25% of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Except that the reason this is notable to me is that normally, the Bills do "mix things up" with personnel much more than this.

You can find data at

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/nfl-stats/personnel-groupings/offense/offensive-personnel-grouping-frequency-2021/

On average, we run 66% (1,1), 8% (1,2), 7% (2,1), 12% (1,0) and 1-2% of 4 other formations.

(doesn't seem to have week 9 stats up there yet)

 

Well, it's weird to me because if we were struggling to run the ball or if Sweeney was struggling with blocking, how about trying a fullback (2,0)?

And we usually do (as you point out) change things up at least 25% of the time

 

On the season the Bills ran 320 (not including week 9 as you said- its not updated) plays in 1-1 and 160 plays in the all other formations combined.  Also if you dig into it, some of those other formations are completely lopsided in play selection.  For instance in 2-1 personnel they ran the ball 82% of the time. I stand by what I said and Daboll does not mix it up.  Our offense is too easy to defend based on tendencies, formations, and poor o line play.  Some of that is on Daboll.  

 

Also look at it by week.  Week two 11 personnel 70%.  Week three 77%. Week six 84%.  Week eight 74%.  Any other given week its primarily 2 personnel groupings with 11 personnel being at least 50%.  That is not mixing up personnel.  It is way too easy on a defense to identify what the Bills are going to do.  Even if they are wrong by the couple surprises a game they either are fine because of bad o line play or big deal it was one first down.

 

Thank you for this link.  I actually looked for one and couldn't find it.

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

On the season the Bills ran 320 (not including week 9 as you said- its not updated) plays in 1-1 and 160 plays in the all other formations combined.  Also if you dig into it, some of those other formations are completely lopsided in play selection.  For instance in 2-1 personnel they ran the ball 82% of the time. I stand by what I said and Daboll does not mix it up.  Our offense is too easy to defend based on tendencies, formations, and poor o line play.  Some of that is on Daboll.  

 

Also look at it by week.  Week two 11 personnel 70%.  Week three 77%. Week six 84%.  Week eight 74%.  Any other given week its primarily 2 personnel groupings with 11 personnel being at least 50%.  That is not mixing up personnel.  It is way too easy on a defense to identify what the Bills are going to do.  Even if they are wrong by the couple surprises a game they either are fine because of bad o line play or big deal it was one first down.

 

Thank you for this link.  I actually looked for one and couldn't find it.

 

So now that you have the site, can you pick a team you feel does “mix it up” leading to more offensive success, and tell us how their personnel use differs W2W?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

So now that you have the site, can you pick a team you feel does “mix it up” leading to more offensive success, and tell us how their personnel use differs W2W?

 

Not tonight but there arent too many teams that cant also run the football and have swiss cheese for an o line.  Different teams can get away with different things.  They dont have the combined problem of a team that cant run the football, or pass block, or primarily likes to go downfield.  Im not sure what Daboll can do but I am sure there is something he can do to help.  Like maybe some shorter passing schemes or something or maybe actually run the football more often and change up the blocking scheme to help those guys out.  There are times in game where he runs the same down.  There are times its obvious he is going to run in the red zone.  There are times where he runs and it works so he does it every down until its stopped. Then goes back to passing every down <--- that is when I think he does not mix it up well primarily.

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scott7975 said:

Not tonight but there arent too many teams that cant also run the football and have swiss cheese for an o line.  Different teams can get away with different things.  They dont have the combined problem of a team that cant run the football, or pass block, or primarily likes to go downfield.

 

How would “mixing it up” more than we do (normally this year, about 33% of the time) help these things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

How would “mixing it up” more than we do (normally this year, about 33% of the time) help these things?

 

I assume you realize I am not talking about mixing up just the personnel groupings?  If that is the case you shouldnt really have to ask me this question.  Tendencies would be the answer.

 

The defense knows we are going to pass the ball.

The defense pretty much knows based on package, down, distance, etc when we are going to run the football

The defense knows they can get home with 4 a lot

The defense knows our o line sucks against stunts

 

When the defense is wrong which most of the time it isnt than its not a huge deal because most of the time they arent and the few times they are doesnt burn them bad enough.  Change habits.  Might help the o line out.

Edited by Scott7975
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

How would “mixing it up” more than we do (normally this year, about 33% of the time) help these things?

 

I mean I guess I feel like you are asking me these questions like you think Im off my rocker.  Which is ok.  Im no football super expert but I am a computer programming logics expert.  This stuff feels logical to me.  If I am wrong then I am wrong.  But I feel like Daboll could do better and he doesn't do a good job at keeping a defense guessing.  Nor does he do a good job helping Allen and the o line out.  

 

Seems to me that if you could shorten the passing routes and call a quick strike game that would help the o line, help Allen, and help open our deep ball up.  Might even help the run game out.  If we are one dimensional then there needs to be more dimensions to that one dimension.  If they cant fix the run game then the pass game needs to change.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

Well, it's weird to me because if we were struggling to run the ball or if Sweeney was struggling with blocking, how about trying a fullback (2,0)?

And we usually do (as you point out) change things up at least 25% of the time

 

Yea I get that. They've attempted to run 20 personnel, I-formation kind of plays and it just hasn't worked either. When players aren't executing it's really difficult to say a change of formation/personnel is going to do anything. Plus in the previous week, they went to more 11 personnel in the second half against that Cover 2 and beat it.

 

They even went with 6 OL in 11 personnel, taking Sweeney off, and the play was still blown up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...