Jump to content

Backup QB... The most under-the-radar, enticing offseason storyline.


whatdrought

Recommended Posts

This is mostly from the brain of a guy who is turning his attention to the offseason and is already inundated with trying to figure out which 5th round pick is going to put us over the top as SB contenders (It's South Carolina CB Israel Makuamu, BTW)... that being said, I can't get the idea of our position battle at backup QB off my brain. 

 

First off, I don't expect we'll add any serious competition to this group. It's a well stocked room with guys who they like, and outside of a camp arm, I just don't see it. 

 

That being said, we have three in house options that are each unique and present a really interesting framework for the competition... 

 

1. Matt Barkley.  Obviously he's the favorite to win the job, as it's his job now. I think they like his vet experience and they enjoy that he brings age and maturity to the room. Furthermore, I think he has become a part of the leadership nucleus that gives him an edge over the other guys. These tweets more less started my brain thinking through these situations: 

 

 

 

(this is a response to Matt responding to Thad's tweet)

 

As you can see, Brit seems to be a leaders among the WAG's. While I'm sure this isn't the kind of thing that keeps a guy his job if he's clearly inferior, with the way this admin values organizational culture and structure, I would imagine they are aware of what Matt and Brit mean to the team as a whole and that is a positive in his favor.

 

On the field Barkley has been up and down. The Dolphins game showed he can still make plays, but it's not quite enough to eliminate some of the questions we've seen (Patriots game last year, Chargers this year) when he's gone in to fill in. The Dolphins game was good, but the whole team whipped them - hard not to wonder how much value that really has as far as assessment goes. 

 

2. Jake Fromm. Fromm has an advantage because he's got draft capital invested in him. A 5th round pick isn't the end of the world, and if he never plays for us/isn't successful it won't be seen as some huge error made by the team. That being said, teams are generally (and our team specifically) slow to be rid of guys they drafted. As far as Fromm goes, we don't know anything about him. As far as I know we haven't even seen any real practice reps from him. I think his time as the sequestered QB was both a benefit and a negative for him - benefit as it gave him a chance to see the game plans and prepare like a starter would (as opposed to running the scout team or something along those lines), but a negative because he probably just didn't get all that many reps throughout the season. Fromm is a question mark and I'm excited to see what he looks like if we get real practice/preseason this year. Athletically speaking, he's seemingly quite limited. I was always uncertain about picking him as I don't love the idea of having a backup QB who is so different than your starter - it seems like that's a sure way to cause the offense to have to change were you to go to the backup. The same issue is present with Barkley, so clearly the staff disagrees with me on that. 

 

3. Davis Webb. Webb is the darkhorse in this. We know very little about him. We know that he was a relatively high draft pick (something like 65th pick?) but that two teams gave up on him (granted, those two teams each had young first round QB's at the time). We know that there were reports that he was essentially running the unofficial mini-camp practices this offseason and was a huge factor in helping new guys grasp the offense (I didn't find the sourcing on this, so if anyone has it, feel free to add it). We know that the team rewarded him for his hard work on the PS by calling him up for the last game of the year. And we know that physically he is as close to Josh of the three (see below article). Webb is an interesting part of this discussion because he has never thrown an NFL pass. Presumably he played in pre-season, but I don't know how that went at all? This article I found made me super interested in Webb, both as a backup QB option, and as a potential future coach some day. He seems to have a real sharp football head. Also, reading the article, all of the knocks that are given about Webb pre-draft (footwork causing accuracy issues, having all the arm but sometimes lacking touch, etc) sounded very familiar to me...

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/how-davis-webb-has-become-the-most-intriguing-qb-prospect-in-the-nfl-draft/

 

 

All that to say, I am really intrigued by this situation. Each of these guys has a valid argument for their added value, but I think we'll see something akin to an open competition for QB #2 this year. 

 

Two thoughts in close: 

 

1- I personally don't care all that much about the backup QB in the context of who could replace Josh. I don't believe any of these guys could do so at any level that doesn't completely change who we are as a team. Last years team could have seen a backup QB playing well have some success. The team we saw in 2020 was completely dependent on Josh. If he isn't an MVP caliber player, we aren't half of what we were. That being said, I hope we get back to being a team that can help josh/be able to survive if we needed to with a backup- but that's just not the NFL we live in. For every Nick Foles cinderella story there's 30 examples of teams seasons ending cause their QB gets hurt and the backup isn't up to snuff. If they were good starters, they wouldn't be backups. As the great Tom Moore (longtime Colts OC) used to say when asked why backups didn't get more reps in practice: "If 18 goes down, we're f***** and we don't practice f*****." I think our goals in finding backup QB's should be: - Can they get us out of a game/play well enough to give us a shot in one or two games if absolutely necessary. - Can they help the team/Josh prepare and win football games. - Is there a potential to get a truly good QB who might have trade value. I think each of the three above gives us some combination of these three things which makes this conversation interesting. 

 

2- This thread is clearly just a fun thought exercise and is not meant to present a conclusion. I honestly have no idea who will be the best option/who will win the backup QB job. Feel free to give your thoughts. I personally like heading into an offseason where we have the luxury of talking about our backup QB because so many important parts of our team are set in stone. 

 

 

Edited by whatdrought
  • Like (+1) 7
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • whatdrought changed the title to Backup QB... The most under-the-radar, enticing offseason storyline.

I’m good with Barkley. He has played well in about half of the situations he has been called upon. I guess that’s what you expect from a backup. I will throw in an unlikely but not impossible outside thought here. If Tyrod Taylor ever got free again, I’d be interested in seeing him back. IMO he is the perfect backup. I also feel some debt towards him as the QB that finally broke the drought. Obviously he had history with McDermott. Tyrod can run very well. He could run the same offense as Josh Incase of emergency. And should it (god forbid) be an extended period within a season...you can win with him. I know it’s unlikely but it’s an option I would explore. Should the situation present itself.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

This is mostly from the brain of a guy who is turning his attention to the offseason and is already inundated with trying to figure out which 5th round pick is going to put us over the top as SB contenders (It's South Carolina CB Israel Makuamu, BTW)... that being said, I can't get the idea of our position battle at backup QB off my brain. 

 

First off, I don't expect we'll add any serious competition to this group. It's a well stocked room with guys who they like, and outside of a camp arm, I just don't see it. 

 

That being said, we have three in house options that are each unique and present a really interesting framework for the competition... 

 

1. Matt Barkley.  Obviously he's the favorite to win the job, as it's his job now. I think they like his vet experience and they enjoy that he brings age and maturity to the room. Furthermore, I think he has become a part of the leadership nucleus that gives him an edge over the other guys. These tweets more less started my brain thinking through these situations: 

 

 

 

(this is a response to Matt responding to Thad's tweet)

 

As you can see, Brit seems to be a leaders among the WAG's. While I'm sure this isn't the kind of thing that keeps a guy his job if he's clearly inferior, with the way this admin values organizational culture and structure, I would imagine they are aware of what Matt and Brit mean to the team as a whole and that is a positive in his favor.

 

On the field Barkley has been up and down. The Dolphins game showed he can still make plays, but it's not quite enough to eliminate some of the questions we've seen (Patriots game last year, Chargers this year) when he's gone in to fill in. The Dolphins game was good, but the whole team whipped them - hard not to wonder how much value that really has as far as assessment goes. 

 

2. Jake Fromm. Fromm has an advantage because he's got draft capital invested in him. A 5th round pick isn't the end of the world, and if he never plays for us/isn't successful it won't be seen as some huge error made by the team. That being said, teams are generally (and our team specifically) slow to be rid of guys they drafted. As far as Fromm goes, we don't know anything about him. As far as I know we haven't even seen any real practice reps from him. I think his time as the sequestered QB was both a benefit and a negative for him - benefit as it gave him a chance to see the game plans and prepare like a starter would (as opposed to running the scout team or something along those lines), but a negative because he probably just didn't get all that many reps throughout the season. Fromm is a question mark and I'm excited to see what he looks like if we get real practice/preseason this year. Athletically speaking, he's seemingly quite limited. I was always uncertain about picking him as I don't love the idea of having a backup QB who is so different than your starter - it seems like that's a sure way to cause the offense to have to change were you to go to the backup. The same issue is present with Barkley, so clearly the staff disagrees with me on that. 

 

3. Davis Webb. Webb is the darkhorse in this. We know very little about him. We know that he was a relatively high draft pick (something like 65th pick?) but that two teams gave up on him (granted, those two teams each had young first round QB's at the time). We know that there were reports that he was essentially running the unofficial mini-camp practices this offseason and was a huge factor in helping new guys grasp the offense (I didn't find the sourcing on this, so if anyone has it, feel free to add it). We know that the team rewarded him for his hard work on the PS by calling him up for the last game of the year. And we know that physically he is as close to Josh of the three (see below article). Webb is an interesting part of this discussion because he has never thrown an NFL pass. Presumably he played in pre-season, but I don't know how that went at all? This article I found made me super interested in Webb, both as a backup QB option, and as a potential future coach some day. He seems to have a real sharp football head. Also, reading the article, all of the knocks that are given about Webb pre-draft (footwork causing accuracy issues, having all the arm but sometimes lacking touch, etc) sounded very familiar to me...

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/how-davis-webb-has-become-the-most-intriguing-qb-prospect-in-the-nfl-draft/

 

 

All that to say, I am really intrigued by this situation. Each of these guys has a valid argument for their added value, but I think we'll see something akin to an open competition for QB #2 this year. 

 

Two thoughts in close: 

 

1- I personally don't care all that much about the backup QB in the context of who could replace Josh. I don't believe any of these guys could do so at any level that doesn't completely change who we are as a team. Last years team could have seen a backup QB playing well have some success. The team we saw in 2020 was completely dependent on Josh. If he isn't an MVP caliber player, we aren't half of what we were. That being said, I hope we get back to being a team that can help josh/be able to survive if we needed to with a backup- but that's just not the NFL we live in. For every Nick Foles cinderella story there's 30 examples of teams seasons ending cause their QB gets hurt and the backup isn't up to snuff. If they were good starters, they wouldn't be backups. As the great Tom Moore (longtime Colts OC) used to say when asked why backups didn't get more reps in practice: "If 18 goes down, we're f***** and we don't practice f*****." I think our goals in finding backup QB's should be: - Can they get us out of a game/play well enough to give us a shot in one or two games if absolutely necessary. - Can they help the team/Josh prepare and win football games. - Is there a potential to get a truly good QB who might have trade value. I think each of the three above gives us some combination of these three things which makes this conversation interesting. 

 

2- This thread is clearly just a fun thought exercise and is not meant to present a conclusion. I honestly have no idea who will be the best option/who will win the backup QB job. Feel free to give your thoughts. I personally like heading into an offseason where we have the luxury of talking about our backup QB because so many important parts of our team are set in stone. 

 

 


pretty fascinating thread. Had No idea about Beane’s Comments re Barkley’s wife.

 

there were probably multiple reasons why the Bills did so well with covid this year, and I am sure family buy-in was one of them. Can’t underestimate the influence of building and extending the team culture to players’ family members. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who watched Davis Webb a little at Cal, he is definitely the most talented of the three. I also think that the really stupid tweets from Fromm last year that came out after the draft *might* (emphasis on might) have soured the team a little. Maybe not. I guess I’d bet on Webb — who Daboll REALLY talked up late in the season — as #2 and Barkley as a 3. They can PS Fromm, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting post.

 

Please to note that Matt Barkley is an UDFA.  After the 2018 season, he signed a 2 year, $4M contract. 

 

So in terms of him being the favorite because "it's his job now", not so fast....he has to decide what kind of money he thinks he wants and whether he has interest from anyone besides the Bills, then the Bills have to consider how much they are willing to give him.  I don't know the answer to either of those questions, but he doesn't quite seem like a "sho-in" to me.  I could see him being a cap casualty, so to speak, especially if he gets another offer.

 

I feel that Jake Fromm "took one for the team" in a big way this season, and as a reward he deserves a fair chance to win or lose the backup job.

 

When we hear about Davis Webb, we always hear about how great he was organizing and running the off season workouts, calling the receivers in the off-season and making sure they were all up in the playbook (he can do that because he's a player, not a coach), playing multiple roles on the Scout team (Scout team Safety!!!).   We don't hear about how he's slinging it as a QB.

 

McDermott did make a point of emphasis that Webb is a "developmental QB" in the league.  Accuracy seemed to be the knock on him, but we've seen that can be improved. 

 

Webb was drafted 87th overall in 2017.  Each time he lost his roster spot (Giants after 2017,  Jets after 2018), it was accompanied by a HC/OC change.  Those guys usually want to bring in their own developmental talent.  In 2018, the Giants drafted Kyle Lauletta and kicked Webb to the curb.  In 2019, Gase brought in David Fales, who I believe played under Gase in Chicago and in Miami.  So it probably had less to do with Webb's objective talent and potential vs. these guys, and more to do with the new regime wanting "their guy" in there.

 

I had kind of thought Webb would be in line to be a coaching assistant, but it's an advantage for the Bills to keep him as a player if we're going to have another covid-curtailed off-season. 

 

 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dave mcbride said:

As someone who watched Davis Webb a little at Cal, he is definitely the most talented of the three. I also think that the really stupid tweets from Fromm last year that came out after the draft *might* (emphasis on might) have soured the team a little. Maybe not. I guess I’d bet on Webb — who Daboll REALLY talked up late in the season — as #2 and Barkley as a 3. They can PS Fromm, right?

 

They could PS Fromm.  But considering they didn't this past season, it seems they like what they've seen of him so it's highly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

Interesting post.

 

Please to note that Matt Barkley is an UDFA.  After the 2018 season, he signed a 2 year, $4M contract. 

 

So in terms of him being the favorite because "it's his job now", not so fast....he has to decide what kind of money he thinks he wants and whether he has interest from anyone besides the Bills, then the Bills have to consider how much they are willing to give him.  I don't know the answer to either of those questions, but he doesn't quite seem like a "sho-in" to me.  I could see him being a cap casualty, so to speak, especially if he gets another offer.

 

I feel that Jake Fromm "took one for the team" in a big way this season, and as a reward he deserves a fair chance to win or lose the backup job.

 

When we hear about Davis Webb, we always hear about how great he was organizing and running the off season workouts, calling the receivers in the off-season and making sure they were all up in the playbook (he can do that because he's a player, not a coach), playing multiple roles on the Scout team (Scout team Safety!!!).   We don't hear about how he's slinging it as a QB.

 

McDermott did make a point of emphasis that Webb is a "developmental QB" in the league.  Accuracy seemed to be the knock on him, but we've seen that can be improved. 

 

Webb was drafted 87th overall in 2017.  Each time he lost his roster spot (Giants after 2017,  Jets after 2018), it was accompanied by a HC/OC change.  Those guys usually want to bring in their own developmental talent.  In 2018, the Giants drafted Kyle Lauletta and kicked Webb to the curb.  In 2019, Gase brought in David Fales, who I believe played under Gase in Chicago and in Miami.  So it probably had less to do with Webb's objective talent and potential vs. these guys, and more to do with the new regime wanting "their guy" in there.

 

I had kind of thought Webb would be in line to be a coaching assistant, but it's an advantage for the Bills to keep him as a player if we're going to have another covid-curtailed off-season. 

 

 

 

 


 

Forgot that Barkley is UFA. That is definitely a wrinkle. I guess that’ll be our first indication of what they think of the young kids. 
 

As for Webb, I too have wondered if they’re grooming him for a coaching role... maybe a Dorsey replacement if he gets keyed for an OC gig in the next couple years? Not sure how it works for players to go directly from a roster to a coaching staff, but the talk around him definitely makes you wonder. His pedigree (based on that article I posted) screams coach. 
 

13 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Watch the Pats on this front. Just saying.


Completing his AFC East circuit. 
 

 

Also, color me stupid, but I’d be lying if I said there wasn’t .01% of me intrigued by Cam as a backup QB / RZ weapon. 😂

Edited by whatdrought
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These sorts of discussions are incomplete without a list of the available alternatives. To my way of thinking the Bills are pretty much right where they need to be at QB...and it really wouldn’t hurt if they could get Barkley some more game time snaps during the regular season in a mop up roll. It’d keep him sharp and more ready should Allen go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Ryan Fitzpatrick is a legit NFL QB now and will probably get offered more $$ than we are prepared to pay by a team with a less entrenched starter and playoff hopes.

Oh no question!  But we can’t underestimate his love for Buffalo and want to win.  This late in his career, who knows...  Maybe he takes what we gave Matt last year.  Doubtful, but hope spring eternal!!!  

19 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Watch the Pats on this front. Just saying.

The more likely scenario, I agree.  Would be an upgrade over Cam, which I never thought I’d say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

I’m good with Barkley. He has played well in about half of the situations he has been called upon. I guess that’s what you expect from a backup. I will throw in an unlikely but not impossible outside thought here. If Tyrod Taylor ever got free again, I’d be interested in seeing him back. IMO he is the perfect backup. I also feel some debt towards him as the QB that finally broke the drought. Obviously he had history with McDermott. Tyrod can run very well. He could run the same offense as Josh Incase of emergency. And should it (god forbid) be an extended period within a season...you can win with him. I know it’s unlikely but it’s an option I would explore. Should the situation present itself.

If there's one qb I never wanna see in a bills uniform again it's Tyrod. He's ok, but the memories of screaming at my TV to throw the ball are to fresh. I'd take Fitz back over Tyrod. Problem with Fitz is he always starts no matter where he lands 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills are overly reliant on Allen and his skill set, partly because the run game is so poor.  How many times, when it was 3rd or 4th and 1 did you want Allen to hand the ball off to an RB?  Personally, 0 times for me.

 

Given Allen's willingness to stand in the pocket and wait for plays to develop, he's more likely to take hits, and more likely to get injured.  I think most would agree that if Allen is out for an extended period of time, we're done, but it would be nice to have a backup QB who can win a game or two if called upon.   Look at Matt Moore last year in KC.  The guy had been out of football, Mahomes gets hurt in the middle of a game, Moore comes in, Chiefs go on to win that game, and split their next two with Moore starting.  Granted, KC's offensive system and offensive personnel are considerably better than those of the Bills, but still...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my perfect world a QB like Webb is the ideal back up for Buffalo, the provision is that Webb is Barkley, but with a better arm, which I suspect he already is, and that would make him the better candidate, Fromm who is...??? Is the obvious third choice, jmo.

 

Go Bills!!!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say this every year.  There is no team, nor fan base, in the NFL as hung up on the backup QB position as the Buffalo Bills and their fans.

 

I've never understood it, I still don't understand it and I never will.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whatdrought said:

As the great Tom Moore (longtime Colts OC) used to say when asked why backups didn't get more reps in practice: "If 18 goes down, we're f***** and we don't practice f*****." I

 

LMAO

 

That just about sums it up perfectly.

 

Keep Barkley to hold Joshes jock and his wife to bake cookies ;)

 

5-25m with 20 guaranteed should get it done ;) 

 

 

1 hour ago, Frat-Train said:

(Ryan Fitzpatrick has entered the chat...)

 

I hope not....the Fitz jinx is real ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gugny said:

I say this every year.  There is no team, nor fan base, in the NFL as hung up on the backup QB position as the Buffalo Bills and their fans.

 

I've never understood it, I still don't understand it and I never will.

 

I will explain it in baseball terms....the BU QB is that fireball throwing bull pen pitcher that everyone (but baseball people) think can be a 6 inning starter ;) 

 

just kidding Gug ;) 

 

When Fitz was here no one cared about the BU QB because he(the BU) was already starting ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Frat-Train said:

Oh no question!  But we can’t underestimate his love for Buffalo and want to win.  This late in his career, who knows...  Maybe he takes what we gave Matt last year.  Doubtful, but hope spring eternal!!!  

 

I love me some Fitzy.  I cherish some of the comments directed at me One Spawn Time, all for failing to agree that he was the worst QB in the league. 

 

Every freakin' place he goes, the starter gets hurt.  I can not wish that upon Josh.  No to Fitz.

 

48 minutes ago, Frat-Train said:

The more likely scenario, I agree.  Would be an upgrade over Cam, which I never thought I’d say.

 

IK, R? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

As someone who watched Davis Webb a little at Cal, he is definitely the most talented of the three. I also think that the really stupid tweets from Fromm last year that came out after the draft *might* (emphasis on might) have soured the team a little. Maybe not. I guess I’d bet on Webb — who Daboll REALLY talked up late in the season — as #2 and Barkley as a 3. They can PS Fromm, right?

 

I don't see Barkley taking a salary cut - some other team in need of a backup who's thrown passes in the NFL will pay it

I might see Beane re-signing Barkley, but only if he thinks he's #2.

 

Keep in mind Daboll talked Webb up as "Best Teammate Ever", not as "Developmental QB"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

I don't see Barkley taking a salary cut - some other team in need of a backup who's thrown passes in the NFL will pay it

I might see Beane re-signing Barkley, but only if he thinks he's #2.

 

Keep in mind Daboll talked Webb up as "Best Teammate Ever", not as "Developmental QB"

 

No way.  He's the worst backup in the league.  I read it right here..

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the cap not going up, I would try to keep the QB room intact

 

You have Barkley who has played and from quotes is big for team culture/chemistry and then you have 2 development guys in Webb and fromm who if Barkley isn't getting it done if called to action you have 2 guys that you can throw in there

 

My questions are is this team good enough to win a super bowl without a qb of Josh allen's talent and is the drop in talent from say fitz to Barkley worth 4 to 6 million conservatively? I think no on both accounts

 

Also think 7 playoff teams de values the back up QB position a bit as well

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just give me a backup QB that can win 4 out of 5 games if the unthinkable happens

 

because this team right now is so centered around Josh Allen that I shudder to think if we actually had to run the ball to protect a QB that is not close to Josh Allens talent

 

The OC is back....but they HAVE to get this worked out.....if we want to win a super bowl we need to be able to run the ball when we want to....it is unfathom to me that teams are scheming to take away our passing attack and we cant get 1st downs on the ground

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Just give me a backup QB that can win 4 out of 5 games if the unthinkable happens

 

 

 

Who is that player because I dont see him on the team now... although to be fair I dont see him on many other teams either...

 

Back to the topic.. Matt Barkley ( and his wife) seem like good peeps but I'm about ready to see who else might be available to step into the role...

 

I'm hoping Fromm might be the guy, although his development is no doubt been put behind schedule given the past year's disruptions...

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Doc said:

Develop Fromm.  Webb can be in the mix.  And keep Barkley on speed dial.

 

Agree.  Don't resign Barkley (very slim chance anyone else will).

See how Fromm and Webb start the offseason and if you have to call Barkley back.

 

Then again with the cap situation maybe Barkley will sign for vet minimum with 150k guaranteed.

If he does bring him to camp.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Georgie said:

Jake Fromm was in a unique situation. Kept on the 53 in case of a Covid emergency. If they had put him on the PS he could have been grabbed by another team. He wasnt on the 53  because of talent ; it was to keep him around

 

If he had no talent, why would anyone grab him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Just give me a backup QB that can win 4 out of 5 games if the unthinkable happens

 

because this team right now is so centered around Josh Allen that I shudder to think if we actually had to run the ball to protect a QB that is not close to Josh Allens talent

 

The OC is back....but they HAVE to get this worked out.....if we want to win a super bowl we need to be able to run the ball when we want to....it is unfathom to me that teams are scheming to take away our passing attack and we cant get 1st downs on the ground

 

The backup QB

Win 4 out of 5 games

 

Dude, that's a winning % of 80%

 

In a 16 game season, that's a guy who helps you win 12-13 games

 

Most of the league's starters don't do that

 

 

 

1 hour ago, RobbRiddick said:

 

4m to practice and watch film. I know it must be tough not getting to play but the life of a backup QB isn't a bad one really.

 

He did get to come into the game and immediately get nailed by Nick Bosa

Welcome to Arizona Matt Barkley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

Just give me a backup QB that can win 4 out of 5 games if the unthinkable happens

Starting QB:

 

This can also be referred to as a backup QB that wins 4 out of 5 games. 

Edited by JGMcD2
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Doc said:

No way.  He's the worst backup in the league.  I read it right here..

 

That is why he will be signed.  Just like in politics sometimes the 2nd is there more to give confidence to #1.  Starting QB is one with an inferiority complex and is afraid he is going to be pulled so team has a #2 no one wants to replace him. What is great about that for team if #1 goes out with season ending injury no one expects much for season so team will not be accused as tanking.  

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

If he had no talent, why would anyone grab him?

 

 

Potential.  

e

t

e

r

m

a

n

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I feel the need for a thread of Football Daffy-nitions

 

This can go first:

 

Starting QB: backup QB who wins 4 out of 5 games

 

I’m honored to be the (bad) man to have created the number 1 definition in that thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...