Jump to content

Is Tremaine Edmunds the answer at MLB?


KOKO NFL

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, KOKO NFL said:

I've heard all the talk that our second year MLB is a physical freak with size and speed. My eyes, however, tell me he's not tough or instinctive enough to be a good MLB, let alone a great one. IMO Beane and McDermott need to take a serious look at this position in the off season and upgrade. Perhaps Edmonds is better suited for OLB? Fans can speculate but only the coaching staff can make an educated guess. So... is Tremaine Edmunds the answer at MLB?

No, because Luke Kuechly is... Edmunds and Milano at OLB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like most MLBs Edmunds needs our DTs to absorb blockers to allow him to get to the runner.  

 

He he is going to get stronger and better with age and experience.  We lost, they ran on us, we ran into an angry team that is better than us.   Now is not the time to quit and assign blame.  Now is the time to learn and get better.  

Edited by Bob in STL
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I think Edmunds could be a generational talent as a Sam, but think he’s a square peg in a round hole at the Mike.

So true....he's a fish out of water in the middle. Constantly getting lost in the wash. And no this isn't the first time this has happened. Maybe because of his age he'll get better but my gut says he'd be so much better in the SAM.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw him on at least 3 running plays today running unblocked towards the los without any regard for where the ball carrier was going.  In all 3 cases, he wasn’t anywhere near where the play was going, and just ended up in a mess of OL and DL.  
 

 

I’d be shocked if come training camp next season, he is not moved to OLB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure about Tremaine, but he is still young and growing into his body.  I kind of would like to see him slip over to OLB in Lorax place next year and bring in Bobby Wagner in FA. That would be my big spend and make this D killer elite.  With Horrible Harry back and everyone in the system another year, I think we'd finally challenge NE.  We just need Josh to develop and spend the rest keeping the Oline in place and getting a stud RB and WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

I saw him on at least 3 running plays today running unblocked towards the los without any regard for where the ball carrier was going.  In all 3 cases, he wasn’t anywhere near where the play was going, and just ended up in a mess of OL and DL.  
 

 

I’d be shocked if come training camp next season, he is not moved to OLB. 

Yep.  Needs to read plays better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Eagles offense run plays designed with lots of distraction.  I can see a second year man getting confused out there.  I wouldn't judge Edmunds based just on the eagles game.  That said, there's no question that he needs to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like if Edmunds isn't reading the plays better/is more consistent by years' end, some consideration should be given to moving him to the SAM. The guy is still a physical freak and has a lot of talent. He's good enough to be on the field, for sure. But is he a MIKE? I'm not sure yet. He has gotten better, but he needs to take another step. I'm willing to give him 2 full seasons to figure it out, especially considering how young he was when he came into the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Old Coot said:

The Eagles offense run plays designed with lots of distraction.  I can see a second year man getting confused out there.  I wouldn't judge Edmunds based just on the eagles game.  That said, there's no question that he needs to improve.

He's started 23 NFL games now, played in another 8 preseason NFL games and been part of 2 NFL training camps and he still looks lost. It really needs to be addressed that maybe he isn't the answer at MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Luke Kuechly was DROY in his first season, and then DPOY, 1st team All-Pro in year two. 

Why are you naming one player like that is the norm?

1 minute ago, ScottLaw said:

Of god. Will the “he’s only insert age here” excuse ever end? What’s the cut off?

There is actually no reason to do that?   He is improved over last year.....has been solid in most games this year.....I would say he is a player that actually makes this great defense work.

 

He isnt London Fletcher....London would have also gotten torched in pass defense the way we use him.....he isnt a "stick your nose in a beehive" linebacker....he is an incredible athlete that is still figuring out run support at times.....he is also making a lot of plays.

 

I dont see a reason to even defend him our team lost today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

He’s too often lost and easily taken out of plays. He was getting mauled in the run game. Absolutely destroyed.... They don’t have a choice at this point but if the inconsistencies continue they should be actively pursuing a MLB in the offseason. 

Your not listening....

 

THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT AT MLB.......a extremely long athletic can cover animal that does things other ILBs cannot do....its a passing league and in most games teams dont pass on us.   They are not going to change him out when the defense is for the most part playing dominantly.

 

If you want to complain that we are not scoring enough points to win games right now Im with you.....but the problem of this team is not Edmunds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Why are you naming one player like that is the norm?

There is actually no reason to do that?   He is improved over last year.....has been solid in most games this year.....I would say he is a player that actually makes this great defense work.

 

He isnt London Fletcher....London would have also gotten torched in pass defense the way we use him.....he isnt a "stick your nose in a beehive" linebacker....he is an incredible athlete that is still figuring out run support at times.....he is also making a lot of plays.

 

I dont see a reason to even defend him our team lost today

That is the player that Edmunds is supposed to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KOKO NFL said:

I've heard all the talk that our second year MLB is a physical freak with size and speed. My eyes, however, tell me he's not tough or instinctive enough to be a good MLB, let alone a great one. IMO Beane and McDermott need to take a serious look at this position in the off season and upgrade. Perhaps Edmonds is better suited for OLB? Fans can speculate but only the coaching staff can make an educated guess. So... is Tremaine Edmunds the answer at MLB?

i agree...i dont see the instinct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, John from Riverside said:

Says who?

Well McD was running the defense in Carolina when Kuechly was drafted, who was an incredible athlete prior to be drafted, who was also drafted in the first round, who also played MLB in the same defense that we play, and also had the same run and pass coverage responsibilities. 

 

The phrase “he’s our Kuechly” has been written here no less than 100 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Why are you naming one player like that is the norm?

There is actually no reason to do that?   He is improved over last year.....has been solid in most games this year.....I would say he is a player that actually makes this great defense work.

 

He isnt London Fletcher....London would have also gotten torched in pass defense the way we use him.....he isnt a "stick your nose in a beehive" linebacker....he is an incredible athlete that is still figuring out run support at times.....he is also making a lot of plays.

 

I dont see a reason to even defend him our team lost today

London Fletcher got a million tackles per game...unfortunately after a big gain by the runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tcali said:

London Fletcher got a million tackles per game...unfortunately after a big gain by the runner

Yeah I was still a big fan of London Fletcher.....I know he got dragged often.

 

But I think if Edmunds played like Fletch in run support they would be happier......London Fletcher was not a freak athlete like Edmunds...he was just a instinctual football player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen and Edmunds are just good enough to hold us back for a few years because they were 1st rounders that we spent a lot of capital on. This regime will sink with them rather than let them go. Their situation is similar to Tannehill's when he was a fish. He played just well enough to stick around, but kept the team from being a serious threat. It's starting to look like Oliver could fit the same mold. Beane just can't get those 1st round picks right and that spells disaster for a GM. You've got to get those high picks right.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

Yes right,  most 20 year olds just jump right in and make the Pro Bowl at MLB.  

 

Sarcasm. I get it, but LB's seldom take time to develop. Just ask Leonard and Vander Esche. Let's just hope that proverbial light comes on, but it definitely should have by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo, there are two things that are hallmarks of NFL middle libebackers:

 

1.  Instincts

2.  Edginess 

 

When I watch Edmunds, I do not see an instinctual linebacker that plays with an edge.  I'm not sure how you grow into either of those things, but otherwise the talent is undeniable.  

Edited by Capco
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes

 

 

 

Just needs to work on run defense in practice.

 

 

2 hours ago, GreggTX said:

 

Sarcasm. I get it, but LB's seldom take time to develop. Just ask Leonard and Vander Esche. Let's just hope that proverbial light comes on, but it definitely should have by now.

 

Vander Esch was my boy, really wanted him. Edmunds will be fine and has played well for us and even great in some games, he's still young and will continue to improve.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GreggTX said:

Allen and Edmunds are just good enough to hold us back for a few years because they were 1st rounders that we spent a lot of capital on. This regime will sink with them rather than let them go. Their situation is similar to Tannehill's when he was a fish. He played just well enough to stick around, but kept the team from being a serious threat. It's starting to look like Oliver could fit the same mold. Beane just can't get those 1st round picks right and that spells disaster for a GM. You've got to get those high picks right.

Right... but literally 2 days ago we were praising all of these people for the opposite of everything you just said in this post.

 

 

Im just saying the truth is somewhere in between.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I think Edmunds could be a generational talent as a Sam, but think he’s a square peg in a round hole at the Mike.

 

Careful...I suggested this idea before the season and was told by a mod that I knew nothing in comparison to the coaching staff and should shut my mouth about it.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To quote the infamous Aaron Rodgers ... R-E-L-A-X ... rated 12th among 70 linebacker .. I'll take it.

 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-pff-rankings-top-25-second-year-nfl-players-week-7-2019

8. LB Tremaine Edmunds, Buffalo Bills

At the time that Edmunds was drafted, he was just 19 years old. That youth and inexperience showed early in his career, as he stumbled out of the gate with a 47.0 overall grade across his first eight career games. As the season progressed, though, his athleticism and playmaking ability in the middle of the Buffalo defense began to make it apparent that improvement was on the way. Edmunds did, in fact, improve his grade to 70.5 over the second half of the season, and he has carried over that improved play into 2019. His overall grade of 71.1 this season ranks 12th among 70 linebackers with 175 or more defensive snaps, anchoring one of the better defenses in the league.

 

and for those Vander Esch Lovers

Lastly, Vander Esch has recorded a run-defense grade of 44.4 this season while allowing 243 receiving yards as the primary coverage defender.

Edited by WideRightRevenge
added fact
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...