Jump to content

Marrone went for 2 up 31-12 with 25 sec to go vs Jets


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

Why would you want to take out Bortles? Usually he is the only reason the opponent is still in the game, if your getting beaten by a Blake Bortles offence, you should be more worried and angry at your defence....

 

very true, Re: Bortles. But at that point in time I would have sent somebody flying over the line just the same. I might just be deranged, though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillsRdue said:

So what. Maybe he wanted to work on the 2pt conversions. Maybe he was running up the score. That's fine. There are tie-breakers based on point difference that can come back to haunt a team. You never know how a season will play out. Take what you can get every week. It's the opponents job to stop you.

every time I hear of this being done.

 

I can't help but think of the time Marinos Dolphins went for a meaningless two point conversion back in the day when the conversion just was implemented.

 

Of course they ran it and the Dolphins RB had his knee bent backwards and I believe had a complete dislocation with ligament damage. Out for year and he was never the same again. Sad as hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Soda Popinski said:

I want to have reasons to hate on Marrone, but this really isn't one of them.   You're up, you are going to win the game, might as well get in some 2 point conversion work in a live situation.   

 

Ehh, I don't hate it. 

Isnt it statistically more likely that an extra point will be good over completing a 2 point conversion? So technically by going for it with a lower chance of scoring, you are being nicer to the opponent and giving them a better chance of not running g up the score.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, apuszczalowski said:

Isnt it statistically more likely that an extra point will be good over completing a 2 point conversion? So technically by going for it with a lower chance of scoring, you are being nicer to the opponent and giving them a better chance of not running g up the score.....

I don't know about all the optics of it, people want to say it was piling on, maybe it was, Marrone is kind of a DB.    But in this instance, knowing that down the road he may need to get a 2pt conversion to win a game, I say get some reps in live action while you can.   But I"m looking at it from that standpoint only.   Not the emotional lenses most people are probably correctly looking through.   

 

Maybe it's a big eff you to the owner of the Jets, in which case it's still pretty iffy.    You are winning the game.  what does 2 extra points do?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, apuszczalowski said:

Isnt it statistically more likely that an extra point will be good over completing a 2 point conversion? So technically by going for it with a lower chance of scoring, you are being nicer to the opponent and giving them a better chance of not running g up the score.....

all the so called experts surmise, and have stats to back it up, that going for two in the long run scores more points.

 

problem is situationally if you do that you can lose a game you should not lose because of going for two when one is the right call, situationally.

IE: making a two point conversion in a blowout is meaningless. Missing a two pt conversion in a close game can by far far wrong, situationally of course. Ask Browns why they went for two when 1 pt would have given them a 3 pt lead vs Oak. That mistake forced them to go for 2 again and lucky they made it.

 

Piitsburgh tried going for a lot of 2's doing that last year and quickly decided it was pretty stupid in NFL. They used their own numbers showing they make them at a higher league avg and were set to do it all the time as they thought Big Ben and Pitt's wr's/te's gave them even better odds.  What they failed to take into account is if you have a large sample size and they do it more and more. They likely fail back to the mean. Which was exactly as it appeared to be trending before they stopped it.

 

So I give them credit for being bold and then more credit to stop being stupid when it showed it was flawed thinking.

Edited by cba fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, apuszczalowski said:

Isnt it statistically more likely that an extra point will be good over completing a 2 point conversion? So technically by going for it with a lower chance of scoring, you are being nicer to the opponent and giving them a better chance of not running g up the score.....

you fail to take into account you get double points when scoring 2 pt conversion so you statistically could be worse converting 2pt vs kicking and still score more points.

https://www.boydsbets.com/nfl-two-point-conversion-success-rate/

Edited by cba fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marrone was smart to get out of Buffalo. Great move.He knew he would have a Nathan Peterman in his future if he stayed.

4 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said:

We couldn’t even score 2 points yesterday so your point is don’t score as much as you can mmmkay. 

90 minutes of football and counting..--whats the record?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

The guys a good coach. His teams never get blown out. Our defenses were better with him and he’s an offensive guy. He probably just didn’t want to be told to play EJ anymore. I don’t know why people are mad at him. Be mad at the idiot that gave him the opt out.

I agree.  I always like Marrone and think he is a good coach even though that is not the popular opinion.  However, he was blown out in like 4 games his two years here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

The guys a good coach. His teams never get blown out. Our defenses were better with him and he’s an offensive guy. He probably just didn’t want to be told to play EJ anymore. I don’t know why people are mad at him. Be mad at the idiot that gave him the opt out.

Why can't we be mad at everyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Soda Popinski said:

I don't know about all the optics of it, people want to say it was piling on, maybe it was, Marrone is kind of a DB.    But in this instance, knowing that down the road he may need to get a 2pt conversion to win a game, I say get some reps in live action while you can.   But I"m looking at it from that standpoint only.   Not the emotional lenses most people are probably correctly looking through.   

 

Maybe it's a big eff you to the owner of the Jets, in which case it's still pretty iffy.    You are winning the game.  what does 2 extra points do?    

My thoughts as well. What difference does 1 point make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, coloradobillsfan said:

If I understand the new-ish rule correctly, the Jets could have intercepted or returned that 2 point try the other way and suddenly it's a 1 score game

No.  It was 31-12 before the 2 pt try.

 

If NY int's and returns it or returns a fumble they only get 2 pts. 31-14

and if they would be allowed to score a TD on a PAT return and then went for 2 it would be 31-22. 

Edited by cba fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pretty much understand baseball "don't show up the opponent" protocol when you're winning big. You don't steal bases, you don't bunt for a hit, etc. The football unwritten rules are kind of a mystery though. Why is it considered o.k. to send in the kicker to kick the extra point when you're up by 21 with one minute to play? After all, you could just send out the offense again and take a knee on an ostensible try for a 2 point conversion. That's what teams do when they score a game winning touchdown as time runs out on the game clock. Why isn't kicking the extra point considered piling on, whereas going for 2 is? Nobody bats an eye when a team leading by 23 points kicks a field goal on 4th and 1 with less than a minute of game time left. Why not just take a knee on 4th down and turn it over on downs? In other words, I have no problem with what Marrone did. It's not like KC having Dontari Poe throw a TD pass when you're winning by 3 touchdowns late ... that's one where it's easy to spot the line (trick plays done for the highlight reel only) and the fact that Andy Reid crossed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

The guys a good coach. His teams never get blown out. Our defenses were better with him and he’s an offensive guy. He probably just didn’t want to be told to play EJ anymore. I don’t know why people are mad at him. Be mad at the idiot that gave him the opt out.

 

Marrone is a baffoon. Our offense was putrid and our offensive line (both are his "expertise") was crap, even though with the same personell they had been good previously and again after he left.

 

Marrone has nothing to do with our defense being good, and he has nothing to do with the Jags defense being good.

 

I was all too happy he opted out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

The guys a good coach. His teams never get blown out. Our defenses were better with him and he’s an offensive guy. He probably just didn’t want to be told to play EJ anymore. I don’t know why people are mad at him. Be mad at the idiot that gave him the opt out.

 

I agree. But I understand people not liking him because despite being a good coach he is an arse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MJS said:

 

Marrone is a baffoon. Our offense was putrid and our offensive line (both are his "expertise") was crap, even though with the same personell they had been good previously and again after he left.

 

Marrone has nothing to do with our defense being good, and he has nothing to do with the Jags defense being good.

 

I was all too happy he opted out.

Our offense with Orton was twice as good as what it is now. That was the best passing game we have had since Bledsoe. We just had no RB. If you gave Orton Shady and didn’t start EJ the first 4 weeks, that’s the team that ends the drought.

Edited by Brianmoorman4jesus
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

Our offense with Orton was twice as good as what it is now. That was the best passing game we have had since Bledsoe. We just had no RB. If you gave Orton Shady and didn’t start EJ the first 4 weeks, that’s the team that ends the drought.

 

For like 2 or 3 games, yes, but then Orton started sucking horribly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

That’s just not true. It’s over there is no sense going back through something that is trivial at this point. He was the best QB we had durring the  drought 

 

Go look at his game logs after the bye week. Steep drop off. He started playing scared, and I attribute that DIRECTLY to Doug Marrone wanting him to play conservatively.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...