IgotBILLStopay Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Both will likely need at least a first rounder to pry away from respective teams. Roughly the same age. Luck is the more heralded but shoulder is suspect. Foles has been a little inconsistent, but is healthy and a SB winner. Luck is under contract for 3 more years at about 80 mill, Foles only for one year, but for a pittance. PS: Neither is not an option:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicharito Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Anyone who says foles needs to be committed! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Foles. Luck is damaged goods. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Is this a real question? I'd give pick 12, 22, ,56 and next years first round pick for Luck. They wouldn't be able to fax the paperwork to the league office fast enough. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teef Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 oh my...luck. this question shouldn't exist. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Holmes Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Ive always liked Foles but always wanted Luck a million times more. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wsam4031 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Just now, Boatdrinks said: Is this a real question? I'd give pick 12, 22, ,56 and next years first round pick for Luck. They wouldn't be able to fax the paperwork to the league office fast enough. I second this. Luck is a top 5 qb in the league if healthy. I don't think the bills would ever trade for him without doing their homework to make sure hes healthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blokestradamus Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 As the old adage goes; it's better to be lucky than Foles. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Have to love overreacting to everything that just happened! Luck was the next great qb and Foles was barely in the NFL. NOw, they are getting compared??? dear lord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Is this a real question? I'd give pick 12, 22, ,56 and next years first round pick for Luck. They wouldn't be able to fax the paperwork to the league office fast enough. even though we still don't know if his shoulder is healed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Rodgers! Make the call Beane! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jobot Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, thebug said: Foles. Luck is damaged goods. So was Drew Brees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Just now, nucci said: even though we still don't know if his shoulder is healed? This is a hypothetical. A trade wouldn't go through without a physical being passed, so it's implied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Just now, Jobot said: So was Drew Brees So were hundreds of others not worth mentioning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOboy Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 If he passes a physical, without a doubt Luck. The contracts not even a consideration, if you deal for Foles he's not playing out that last year of his deal. He's demanding a number much closer to what Luck is getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Joe Montana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Foles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPP Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 7 minutes ago, thebug said: Foles. Luck is damaged goods. Not if he passes his physical which he definately will....Luck is not 40 yrs old he will be fine... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 what if Luck's arm is permanently damaged and he throws like Peyton in his final season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jobot Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 1 minute ago, thebug said: So were hundreds of others not worth mentioning. Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny3410 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Foles 1 year rental worse case scenario. Luck we have not an idea about his shoulder. I am passing on both. my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xwnyer Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 If I knew 100% sure that Luck is fully healed and his old self I take Luck but I fear he is damaged goods and will never throw well again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Luck. Not happening, but Luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEpsYtown Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Peterm...just kidding...obviously Luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Luck and it's not even close. To me, the injury risk is still worth taking a look for, even if he's at 80% for the rest of his career. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 The lore of Kim Jung QB is greater than any QB that has ever played the game and can turn Super Bowl MVPs into piles of dust soon to be strewn about in the wind. The reality of Kim Jung QB is Jim Plunkett with a giant contract. The reputation of Nick Foles varies between lucky, underrated, middling, competitive and commonplace. The reality of Nick Foles is, remarkably, still a bit unknown. Fine in the right system but overwhelmed if anything goes awry? Simply a good QB miscast by Jeff Fisher? My order of preference would be: 1. The lore of Kim Jung QB 2. Trust Beane to decipher the reality of the two and decide 3. The reputation of Nick Foles. Choices 1 and 3 are not reality based so for me it is choice 2 which is to trust Beane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpmenow Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 27 minutes ago, thebug said: Foles. Luck is damaged goods. Commit him, now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 20 minutes ago, jr1 said: what if Luck's arm is permanently damaged and he throws like Peyton in his final season Well at least it might cut down on his playoff turnover ratio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I’d rather not have a QB by trading for one. Draft a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Boo Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 Neither! Who would trade for Luck and that ridiculous contract? Have you seen his stats against NE for his career? It's pathetic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 The most I'm giving up for Foles is a 3rd rd pick, you are going to have to pay him based on his playoff/Super Bowl performance. If we get Luck for the 22 pick I'm taking Luck easily over Foles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: Neither! Who would trade for Luck and that ridiculous contract? Have you seen his stats against NE for his career? It's pathetic! According to sportrac.com, Luck has about 4 years $80m left on his contract with almost none of it guaranteed. Makes a ton of sense that Reich would want his guy in Foles. I'd trade both 1sts for Luck. Both 1sts aren't even guaranteed to get you in the top 5 of this draft. Edited March 14, 2018 by BuffaloRebound 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USABuffaloFan Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 52 minutes ago, IgotBILLStopay said: Both will likely need at least a first rounder to pry away from respective teams. Roughly the same age. Luck is the more heralded but shoulder is suspect. Foles has been a little inconsistent, but is healthy and a SB winner. Luck is under contract for 3 more years at about 80 mill, Foles only for one year, but for a pittance. PS: Neither is not an option:) Luck has 4 years around 84 mil left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Formation Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I'd trade a 1st and 2nd for Luck, but nothing more than that, too risky, but you also have to take into consideration that trading up to 2-3 is also very risky so the risks are about even. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USABuffaloFan Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 41 minutes ago, jr1 said: what if Luck's arm is permanently damaged and he throws like Peyton in his final season Luck could have played last year and owner is pissed he didn't cause he just signed him a extension. Luck will be healthy, they have not offered him to trade which would mean they are going QB at 3. My guess is if you pay the price he could be had but it would be costly. Moving to 12 would be appealing to Indy with the 3rd and 12 pick. If they like a QB this would offer a fresh start. I think there is a better chance this happens giving up 12, next years 1st, a 2nd and 3rd rounder than paying the same price to get 3rd pick from Indy. Buffalo needs a QB that can play now with McCoy maybe having 2 great years left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALLEN1QB Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 I don't want either one of them just relax everybody I guarantee you the Buffalo braintrust already have a plan in place or a trade in place we will get our quarterback don't lose sleep over it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snamsnoops Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) Why would want or need either? We have Peterman........................................................................... If this team could somehow acquire Luck that would be awesome. (i don't think Indy will trade him) I wouldn't mind Big D1<k Nick for a reasonable trade, maybe a 2nd and a 4th,. Edited March 14, 2018 by snamsnoops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmart128 Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 58 minutes ago, Chicharito said: Anyone who says foles needs to be committed! Why.... Foles is so much cheaper. I'd rather us have Foles at the cheaper price and trade up in the draft and get a QB top 5 QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USABuffaloFan Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 40 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Luck and it's not even close. To me, the injury risk is still worth taking a look for, even if he's at 80% for the rest of his career. 80% of Luck is still better than 3/4 of the QB's starting today. He is smart and can control a possession type attack with McCoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts